-
1.
Efficacy of diet restriction with or without probiotic for treatment of patients with IBS-D: Phase I-II clinical trial.
Zhao, XS, Shi, LJ, Ning, BL, Zhao, ZM, Li, XX, Zhu, MH, Zhang, YB, Fu, J
Immunity, inflammation and disease. 2023;11(5):e857
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional intestinal disorder that can significantly affect quality of life. IBS patients suffer from intermittent abdominal pain/ discomfort, altered bowel habits, and abdominal bloating/distension. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of dietary restriction and probiotic use on IBS‐D patients. This study was a 2 × 2 factorial design, single‐centre, randomised trial. Phase 1 was a 12‐week dietary intervention, with 214 participants randomised to an IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet) or a control diet (cold/spicy/fried restricted). In Phase 2, 167 participants were randomised into either an IgG res diet + placebo or an IgG res diet + probiotic for 12 weeks. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS‐D‐SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. Results showed that both diets reduced IBS‐D symptom severity scores and decreased immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody titer, although the IgG res diet had a greater impact. IBS symptom scores decreased with the addition of a Bifidobacterium probiotic along with dietary exclusion, however, IgG titers did not change with the probiotic compared to placebo. Authors concluded that diet restriction with appropriate and effective probiotics, provides greater symptom reductions for patients with IBS-D.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
For individuals with IBDS-D:
- Establish IgG intolerances to foods and ensure an elimination diet remains nutritionally balanced
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional intestinal disorder, affecting 5-20% of the population and diet is likely a major factor in its development as well as in its management. The aim of this study was to compare 3 dietary interventions and the use of a probiotic supplement in patients with IBS-diarrhoea dominant (IBS-D).
Methods
The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first was a 12-week 2 × 2 factorial design, randomised dietary intervention and included 224 patients (214 completed) with IBS-D. The diets were an Eastern/Chinese restriction diet, avoiding cold/raw, spicy and fried foods (CSF), the second avoided common allergens as determined by an IgG test (IgG diet, 14 foods tested), the third a combination of the two, whilst the control group continued their usual (Eastern/Chinese) diet.
The second phase was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the CSF + IgG diet plus placebo with the CSF + IgG diet plus a 2 billion Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplement; this part included 202 patients of whom 169 completed the study.
The primary outcomes under observation were a reduction in IBS-D symptom severity Score (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG antibody titre (TigG).
Results
Phase 1: The IBS-D-SSS improved in all four groups from baseline (p<0.001), with the intervention groups improving significantly more than the control group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the IgG and the IgG + CSF groups, although the authors considered there to be a synergistic effect. Statistically significant (p<0.001) reductions in TIgG were seen in all interventions, but not the control group.
Part 2: Significant (p<0.001) improvements in IBS-D-SSS were seen with both placebo and Bifidobacterium, although this was greater in the probiotic group (p<0.001). Improvements in TIgG were seen in both groups (p<0.001), with no difference between groups.
Conclusion
The authors concluded that the best intervention for patients with IBD-D is an IgG food elimination diet together with a Bifidobacterium probiotic supplement.
Clinical practice applications:
- Consider an elimination diet based on IgG testing for clients with IBS-D
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement. The dose used in this study was 4x 0.5 billion capsules of Bifidobacterium adolescentis
- Eliminating cold/raw, spicy and fried food could be an alternative to IgG elimination if the latter is not suitable for the client.
Considerations for future research:
- 45% and 35% of screened patients, respectively in the 2 phases of the study, were IgG negative. Screening for more potential food intolerances may extend the suitability of the approach to more patients
- Only a single strain probiotic was tested. Further research could evaluate other or combinations of Bifidobacteria strains in combination with an IgG elimination diet
- The mechanism(s) by which probiotics may affect symptoms of IBS-D are unknown. Adding stool microbiome analyses may shed further light on the effect of the intervention on the composition and function of the microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Diet is a major contributor to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and is also a powerful tool for treatment of IBS. This study compared two diets and explored the effectiveness of the diets when combined with a probiotic for treatment of IBS-D patients. METHODS Phase I, patients were randomized into groups; control, cold/spicy/fried restricted diet (CSF res diet), IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet), and a combination both diets (CSF + IgG res diet). Phase II, patients were randomized into IgG res diet + placebo and IgG res diet + probiotic. Both interventions were 12 weeks in duration. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS Totals of 214 and 167 patients completed the two parts of the study, respectively. After intervention, IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade were significantly improved compared to baseline, with results similar to the control group. In general, there were decreases in IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade that were significantly different among the groups. There were exceptions; no differences were observed for IBS-D-SSS between the IgG res diet and CSF + IgG res diet, or TIgG grade between the CSF res diet, IgG res diet, and CSF + IgG res diet. However, the CSF res diet and IgG res diet had a synergistic effect that decreased IBS-D-SSS and TIgG titer, with a greater contribution by the IgG res diet. Therefore, we evaluated the IgG res diet with either placebo or probiotic and found that IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade decreased from baseline. There was a significant decrease in IBS-D-SSS with the probiotic but TIgG grade was not significantly different between the IgG diet + placebo and IgG diet + probiotic diet. CONCLUSIONS Both the CSF res diet and IgG res diet improved IBS symptoms and demonstrated synergy, although the IgG res diet had a greater contribution. Further, when intolerant foods cannot be eliminated from a diet, avoiding uncooked, cold, spicy, fried, and alcoholic foods is a superior choice. The IgG res diet combined with Bifidobacteria was the best dietary choice and may function though a non-IgG pathway.
Sponsored Journal Article
2.
The Clinical Use of IgG Food Sensitivity Testing with Migraine Headache Patients: a Literature Review
Current Pain and Headache Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of pain and headache.
2022
Abstract
Purpose of Review: This literature review describes the relationship between IgG food sensitivities and their relation to migraine headaches. Recent Findings: IgG food sensitivities have been linked to various symptoms and disorders. While food sensitivities and intolerances are recognized within the clinical medicine community, diagnosing these sensitivities and intolerances can be challenging because symptoms are usually delayed hours to days and may not occur after every exposure to the allergen. Some reports indicate that foods such as chocolate, cheese, cow’s milk, eggs, and red wine may be triggers for migraine headaches. Summary: The pathophysiology of migraine headaches is not well understood. Some evidence supports the use of IgG food sensitivity testing to determine food sensitivities and intolerances. IgG food sensitivity testing may prove to be a beneficial tool for healthcare practitioners, especially for patients experiencing migraine headache symptoms. Utilizing IgG food sensitivity testing to create customisable dietary recommendations for patients may allow healthcare providers to treat migraine headaches without the use of medications.
-
3.
The Clinical Use of IgG Food Sensitivity Testing with Migraine Headache Patients: a Literature Review.
Geiselman, JF
Current pain and headache reports. 2019;23(11):79
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This literature review describes the relationship between IgG food sensitivities and their relation to migraine headaches. RECENT FINDINGS IgG food sensitivities have been linked to various symptoms and disorders. While food sensitivities and intolerances are recognized within the clinical medicine community, diagnosing these sensitivities and intolerances can be challenging because symptoms are usually delayed hours to days and may not occur after every exposure to the allergen. Some reports indicate that foods such as chocolate, cheese, cow's milk, eggs, and red wine may be triggers for migraine headaches. The pathophysiology of migraine headaches is not well understood. Some evidence supports the use of IgG food sensitivity testing to determine food sensitivities and intolerances. IgG food sensitivity testing may prove to be a beneficial tool for healthcare practitioners, especially for patients experiencing migraine headache symptoms. Utilizing IgG food sensitivity testing to create customizable dietary recommendations for patients may allow healthcare providers to treat migraine headaches without the use of medications.
-
4.
Serological investigation of IgG and IgE antibodies against food antigens in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Wang, HY, Li, Y, Li, JJ, Jiao, CH, Zhao, XJ, Li, XT, Lu, MJ, Mao, XQ, Zhang, HJ
World journal of clinical cases. 2019;7(16):2189-2203
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are relapsing gut inflammatory diseases that are usually referred to as Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). It may be triggered by an imbalance in immune response in response to environmental factors such as diet. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the presence of IgG and IgE mediated antibodies to food antigens in IBD patients. There were one hundred and thirty-seven IBD patients participating in this study, including forty Ulcerative colitis patients and ninety-seven Crohn's disease patients against fifty healthy controls to test serum IgG antibodies to fourteen specific food antigens and serum IgE antibodies to fourteen specific food antigens. There were significantly higher IgG antibodies in response to food antigens in Crohn's disease patients than in Ulcerative colitis patients and healthy controls. Food antigens such as tomato, corn, egg, rice, and soybean exhibited varying levels of IgG antibody responses in Crohn's disease patients and ulcerative colitis patients. Smokers were more likely to develop IgG reactions. Further robust research is needed to examine more IgG-specific food antigens to help manage IBD with an elimination rotation diet. The results of this study can help healthcare professionals understand the importance of diagnosing food intolerances when treating IBD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food antigens have been shown to participate in the etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their clinical value in IBD is still unclear. AIM: To analyze the levels of specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and E (IgE) antibodies against food antigens in IBD patients and to determine their clinical value in the pathogenesis of IBD. METHODS We performed a retrospective study based on patients who visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between August 2016 and January 2018. A total of 137 IBD patients, including 40 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 97 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), and 50 healthy controls (HCs), were recruited. Serum food-specific IgG antibodies were detected by semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and serum food-specific IgE antibodies were measured by Western blot. The value of food-specific IgG antibodies was compared among different groups, and potent factors related to these antibodies were explored by binary logistic regression. RESULTS Food-specific IgG antibodies were detected in 57.5% of UC patients, in 90.72% of CD patients and in 42% of HCs. A significantly high prevalence and titer of food-specific IgG antibodies were observed in CD patients compared to UC patients and HCs. The number of IgG-positive foods was greater in CD and UC patients than in HCs (CD vs HCs, P = 0.000; UC vs HCs, P = 0.029). The top five food antigens that caused positive specific IgG antibodies in CD patients were tomato (80.68%), corn (69.32%), egg (63.64%), rice (61.36%), and soybean (46.59%). The foods that caused positive specific IgG antibodies in UC patients were egg (60.87%), corn (47.83%), tomato (47.83%), rice (26.09%), and soybean (21.74%). Significantly higher levels of total food-specific IgG were detected in IBD patients treated with anti-TNFα therapy compared to patients receiving steroids and immunosuppressants (anti-TNFα vs steroids, P = 0.000; anti-TNFα vs immunosuppressants, P = 0.000; anti-TNFα vs steroids + immunosuppressants, P = 0.003). A decrease in food-specific IgG levels was detected in IBD patients after receiving anti-TNFα therapy (P = 0.007). Patients who smoked and CD patients were prone to developing serum food-specific IgG antibodies [Smoke: OR (95%CI): 17.6 (1.91-162.26), P = 0.011; CD patients: OR (95%CI): 12.48 (3.45-45.09), P = 0.000]. There was no difference in the prevalence of food-specific IgE antibodies among CD patients (57.1%), UC patients (65.2%) and HCs (60%) (P = 0.831). CONCLUSION CD patients have a higher prevalence of food-specific IgG antibodies than UC patients and HCs. IBD patients are prone to rice, corn, tomato and soybean intolerance. Smoking may be a risk factor in the occurrence of food-specific IgG antibodies. Food-specific IgG antibodies may be a potential method in the diagnosis and management of food intolerance in IBD.
-
5.
Chronic Food Antigen-specific IgG-mediated Hypersensitivity Reaction as A Risk Factor for Adolescent Depressive Disorder.
Tao, R, Fu, Z, Xiao, L
Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics. 2019;17(2):183-189
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) among adolescents has been on the rise recently. A high level of systemic low-grade inflammation is found in the serum of MDD adults, which is believed to interfere with neurotransmitter metabolism, resulting in symptoms of depression. Furthermore, disruption of the blood-brain barrier may inhibit neurotransmitter metabolism. One hundred and eighty-four adolescents with moderate MDD were evaluated against the same number of healthy controls to determine their serum levels of markers of inflammation, homocysteine, food sensitivity, histamine, and histamine metabolism. The study found that histamine levels and food antigen-specific antibodies in MDD adolescent patients were significantly higher than those in the control group. Increasing histamine levels, food-specific IgG levels, and S100 calcium-binding protein B levels suggest blood-brain barrier leakage may contribute to adolescent depression. There is still much to be learned about the pathophysiology of MDD, and further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved. The results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the role of histamine and food sensitivities in the development of adolescent depression rather than low-grade inflammation.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most common nonfatal disease burden worldwide. Systemic chronic low-grade inflammation has been reported to be associated with MDD progression by affecting monoaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. However, whether various proinflammatory cytokines are abnormally elevated before the first episode of depression is still largely unclear. Here, we evaluated 184 adolescent patients who were experiencing their first episode of depressive disorder, and the same number of healthy individuals was included as controls. We tested the serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IgE, 14 different types of food antigen-specific IgG, histamine, homocysteine, S100 calcium-binding protein B, and diamine oxidase. We were not able to find any significant differences in the serum levels of hs-CRP or TNF-α between the two groups. However, the histamine level of the patients (12.35 μM) was significantly higher than that of the controls (9.73 μM, P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Moreover, significantly higher serum food antigen-specific IgG positive rates were also found in the patient group. Furthermore, over 80% of patients exhibited prolonged food intolerance with elevated levels of serum histamine, leading to hyperpermeability of the blood-brain barrier, which has previously been implicated in the pathogenesis of MDD. Hence, prolonged high levels of serum histamine could be a risk factor for depressive disorders, and antihistamine release might represent a novel therapeutic strategy for depression treatment.
-
6.
[Frequency of determining markers of casein's inhability and gluten in children with disorders of autistic spectrum].
Bavykina, IA, Popov, VI, Zvyagin, AA, Bavykin, DV
Voprosy pitaniia. 2019;(4):41-47
Abstract
The most optimal approach to the problem of managing children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is a complex one that involves a pediatric gastroenterologist, a nutritionist, a neurologist, a psychiatrist. Currently, there are studies that confirm the effectiveness of diet in the correction of neuropsychiatric status and gastroenterological disorders in ASD. Evidence supporting the therapeutic value of diets is limited and inconclusive. Diet therapy should be used only if food allergy or gluten or casein intolerance is diagnosed. Aim. To study the frequency of detection of markers of gluten and casein intolerance in children with ASD. Material and methods. The study involved 51 children (39 boys and 12 girls) aged 3 to 15 years with a diagnosis of ASD. Among the study participants, 20 children used gluten-free diet and casein-free diet for more than 6 months. The material for the study was venous blood taken from the elbow vein in the morning on an empty stomach. Determination of specific IgG-antibodies to casein and gliadin, IgA-antibodies to deamidized gliadin peptides was carried out by enzyme immunoassay. The level of total IgA to exclude selective deficiency was also determined. Results and discussion. Most children with ASD (79.5%) had increased levels of specific IgG antibodies to casein. The increase in IgG antigliadin antibodies was determined in 19.3% of children who do not follow a gluten-free diet, and antibodies to deamidized gliadin Ig peptides were not detected in any patient. Gluten intolerance in children with ASD is characterized by sensitivity to it and occurs in 40-50%. Conclusion. According to the literature and the results of own studies, some children with ASD have gluten and casein intolerance. Before the appointment of diet therapy for children with ASD, it is necessary to conduct a survey to clarify the nature of intolerance and the choice of optimal tactics of diet therapy.
-
7.
Food Exclusion Based on IgG Antibodies Alleviates Symptoms in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study.
Jian, L, Anqi, H, Gang, L, Litian, W, Yanyan, X, Mengdi, W, Tong, L
Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2018;24(9):1918-1925
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory bowel disease that may need lifetime management. Dietary management of UC by eliminating food antigens that may be causing a delayed immune response is one of the approaches used widely to manage the disease. Food intolerance, mediated by immunoglobulin G antibodies in response to food antigens that are otherwise harmless, could be one cause of UC. Low levels of digestive enzymes may result in poor digestion of glucose, amino acids, and glycerol, followed by an immune reaction that leads to food sensitivities. Ninety-seven UC patients were enrolled in this open-label, stratified, prospective, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of an elimination diet versus a sham diet (a normal healthy diet). Following an IgG-specific exclusion diet for six months resulted in the alleviation of UC symptoms and an improvement in health-related quality of life. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of the exclusion diet since the intervention group did not show a significant reduction in IgG antibody levels. These results can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the potential role of exclusion diets in the management of UC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) rely predominantly on medication for disease control. Diet interventions can reduce pharmaceutical expenditures and prolong remission. We designed a prospective study to evaluate whether an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-guided exclusion diet would improve symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients with UC. METHODS The 6-month diet intervention included 97 patients with UC, who were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 49) and a control (n = 48) group. Individual diet plans were created for the intervention group according to IgG titers; the control group ate a healthy diet as normal. Observational indices included disease activity, extraintestinal manifestations, nutritional status, and QoL. Relationships between food-specific IgG antibodies and these indices were also analyzed. RESULTS At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups. Food-specific IgG antibodies were detected in 70.10% of participants. After intervention, the Mayo score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (2.41 ± 0.89 vs 3.52 ± 1.15, P < 0.05). The number of patients with extraintestinal manifestations decreased from 7 to 2 in the intervention group and from 6 to 5 in the control group. As for nutritive indices, the intervention group had higher mean body mass index and albumin than the control group (23.88 ± 3.31 vs 21.50 ± 6.24 kg/m2, respectively, P < 0.05; 48.05 ± 6.39 vs 45.72 ± 5.48 g/L, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas prealbumin and transferrin were not significantly different between the groups. QoL improved after food exclusion (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS An IgG-guided exclusion diet ameliorated UC symptoms and improved QoL. Interactions between IgG-based food intolerance and UC warrant further study.
-
8.
Is perceived intolerance to milk and wheat associated with the corresponding IgG and IgA food antibodies? A cross sectional study in subjects with morbid obesity and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Kvehaugen, AS, Tveiten, D, Farup, PG
BMC gastroenterology. 2018;18(1):22
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dairy and gluten are the most common triggers of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the general population. Food intolerance is generally detected by IgG antibodies, but the test is controversial. In this cross-sectional study, 97 obese subjects (82.4% women) were included, of which 72.1% had gastrointestinal symptoms, 35.7% had IBS, 31.4% had symptoms of milk intolerance, 28.6% had symptoms of wheat intolerance, and 15.7% had symptoms of intolerance to both milk and wheat. The study examined the association between IgA and IgG antibodies corresponding to milk and wheat in subjects with and without gastrointestinal issues and with and without perceptions of food sensitivity. The results of this study found no association between s-IgG and s-IgA antibodies and perceived food intolerances to milk and wheat among morbidly obese subjects. Although IgA against gliadin correlated with increased levels of zonulin, a marker of intestinal permeability, tight-junctional gut permeability inversely correlated with wheat intolerance. Furthermore, the study results revealed a significant correlation between hypothyroidism and IgG against wheat and a marginal correlation between hypothyroidism and IgG against gluten. Further robust research is needed to confirm these findings. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the current developments and the controversy surrounding food intolerance testing.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serum IgG and IgA food antibodies have been used for dietary advice to subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms and perceived food intolerance, but the role of these antibodies in mediating intolerance is controversial. The present study investigated associations between perceived gastrointestinal intolerance to milk-or wheat and the corresponding s-IgG and s-IgA food antibodies in subjects with morbid obesity. METHODS Subjects with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related complications) were included. Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) was diagnosed based on the Rome III criteria. Severity of specific gastrointestinal symptoms were measured with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)-IBS. S-IgG against cow's milk, cheese, wheat and gluten, and s-IgA against casein and gliadin were measured. RESULTS Ninety-seven subjects (80 females) with mean age 45 (SD 8.4) years were included, 70 had gastrointestinal complaints, 25 had IBS, and 22 and 20 reported milk- and wheat- intolerance respectively. There were no significant differences in serum concentrations or proportions of subjects above defined cut-off values for the antibodies between subjects with and without gastrointestinal complaints. In the group with gastrointestinal complaints, no significant differences were found between subjects with and without perceived food intolerance. Except for a significant correlation between IgG against cheese and GSRS-diarrhea (Rho: -0.25, P = 0.04), no significant correlations were found between the antibodies and type or degree of gastrointestinal symptoms, including IBS. CONCLUSIONS The study showed no associations between perceived milk or wheat intolerance and the corresponding s-IgG and s-IgA food antibodies in subjects with morbid obesity.
-
9.
Food intolerance in patients with manifest autoimmunity. Observational study.
Coucke, F
Autoimmunity reviews. 2018;17(11):1078-1080
Abstract
In the professional medical and scientific world, there is not many interest in the correlation of food intolerance and autoimmune diseases. However there is a lot of evidence that e.g. gluten or gliadine can induce autoimmmune diseases: example the interest in coeliac disease and autoimmunity. There is however a lot of informationavailable about leaky gut and autoimmunity. We performed an observational study in our data base;, where we selected 100 patients with manifest autoimmune disease with clear symptoms and autoimmune antibodies in the form of positive anf more tehn 160 titer. These patients were compared with 25 control patients without any autoimmunity. We could clearly find a difference in food intolerance profiles when we compared AI patients with people without any AI. Overall there is a much greater reaction to several food epitopes, which can be observed on the level of specific antibodies tot he food epitopes. These igG levels for specific food antibodies are significantly higher in the patient group then in the control group. We can also see that some food epitopes provocate a very pronounced reaction, while other show no increased level of igG. Among the most reactive food epitopes are caseine, cow milk, wheat, gliadine, white of egg and rice. A variable reaction can bes een on nuts e.g.; walnuts and almonds. Almost no antibody reaction is noticed on vegetables, fish and meat products, who seem tob e immunologially very neutral. We conclude that food intolerance test is very important tool in patients with AI disease, and should be performed in each patient to tailor an individual diet program, which if properly followed, could relieve symptoms and probably stop or slow the the progression of the autoimmune disease. Also interesting for global research in AI disease is the fact that food is probably an important trigger for autoimmunity in vulnerable patients. More research on great scale and multicenter around this topic is mandatory and urgent.
-
10.
Recognizing the Leaky Gut as a Trans-diagnostic Target for Neuroimmune Disorders Using Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Immunology Assays.
Simeonova, D, Ivanovska, M, Murdjeva, M, Carvalho, AF, Maes, M
Current topics in medicinal chemistry. 2018;(19):1641-1655
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased intestinal permeability with heightened translocation of Gramnegative bacteria, also known as "leaky gut", is associated with the pathophysiology of neuroimmune disorders, such as Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CSF) and (deficit) schizophrenia, as well as with general medical disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome. This review aims to summarize clinical biochemistry and molecular immunology tests that may aid in the recognition of leaky gut in clinical practice. METHODS We searched online libraries, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Scopus, with the key words "diagnosis" or "biomarkers" and "leaky gut", "bacterial translocation", and "intestinal permeability" and focused on papers describing tests that may aid in the clinical recognition of leaky gut. RESULTS To evaluate tight junction barrier integrity, serum IgG/IgA/IgM responses to occludin and zonulin and IgA responses to actomyosin should be evaluated. The presence of cytotoxic bacterial products in serum can be evaluated using IgA/IgM responses to sonicated samples of common Gram-negative gut commensal bacteria and assays of serum lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) and other bacterial toxins, including cytolethal distenting toxin, subunit B. Major factors associated with increased gut permeability, including gut dysbiosis and yeast overgrowth, use of NSAIDs and alcohol, food hypersensitivities (IgE-mediated), food intolerances (IgG-mediated), small bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), systemic inflammation, psychosocial stressors, some infections (e.g., HIV) and dietary patterns, should be assessed. Stool samples can be used to assay gut dysbiosis, gut inflammation and decreased mucosal defenses using assays of fecal growth of bacteria, yeast and fungi and stool assays of calprotectin, secretory IgA, β-defensin, α- antitrypsin, lysozyme and lactoferrin. Blood and breath tests should be used to exclude common causes of increased gut permeability, namely, food hypersensitivities and intolerances, SIBO, lactose intolerance and fructose malabsorption. DISCUSSION Here, we propose strategies to recognize "leaky gut" in a clinical setting using the most adequate clinical chemistry and molecular immunology assays.