0
selected
-
1.
Efficacy of diet restriction with or without probiotic for treatment of patients with IBS-D: Phase I-II clinical trial.
Zhao, XS, Shi, LJ, Ning, BL, Zhao, ZM, Li, XX, Zhu, MH, Zhang, YB, Fu, J
Immunity, inflammation and disease. 2023;11(5):e857
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional intestinal disorder that can significantly affect quality of life. IBS patients suffer from intermittent abdominal pain/ discomfort, altered bowel habits, and abdominal bloating/distension. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of dietary restriction and probiotic use on IBS‐D patients. This study was a 2 × 2 factorial design, single‐centre, randomised trial. Phase 1 was a 12‐week dietary intervention, with 214 participants randomised to an IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet) or a control diet (cold/spicy/fried restricted). In Phase 2, 167 participants were randomised into either an IgG res diet + placebo or an IgG res diet + probiotic for 12 weeks. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS‐D‐SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. Results showed that both diets reduced IBS‐D symptom severity scores and decreased immunoglobulin (IgG) antibody titer, although the IgG res diet had a greater impact. IBS symptom scores decreased with the addition of a Bifidobacterium probiotic along with dietary exclusion, however, IgG titers did not change with the probiotic compared to placebo. Authors concluded that diet restriction with appropriate and effective probiotics, provides greater symptom reductions for patients with IBS-D.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
For individuals with IBDS-D:
- Establish IgG intolerances to foods and ensure an elimination diet remains nutritionally balanced
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional intestinal disorder, affecting 5-20% of the population and diet is likely a major factor in its development as well as in its management. The aim of this study was to compare 3 dietary interventions and the use of a probiotic supplement in patients with IBS-diarrhoea dominant (IBS-D).
Methods
The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first was a 12-week 2 × 2 factorial design, randomised dietary intervention and included 224 patients (214 completed) with IBS-D. The diets were an Eastern/Chinese restriction diet, avoiding cold/raw, spicy and fried foods (CSF), the second avoided common allergens as determined by an IgG test (IgG diet, 14 foods tested), the third a combination of the two, whilst the control group continued their usual (Eastern/Chinese) diet.
The second phase was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the CSF + IgG diet plus placebo with the CSF + IgG diet plus a 2 billion Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplement; this part included 202 patients of whom 169 completed the study.
The primary outcomes under observation were a reduction in IBS-D symptom severity Score (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG antibody titre (TigG).
Results
Phase 1: The IBS-D-SSS improved in all four groups from baseline (p<0.001), with the intervention groups improving significantly more than the control group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the IgG and the IgG + CSF groups, although the authors considered there to be a synergistic effect. Statistically significant (p<0.001) reductions in TIgG were seen in all interventions, but not the control group.
Part 2: Significant (p<0.001) improvements in IBS-D-SSS were seen with both placebo and Bifidobacterium, although this was greater in the probiotic group (p<0.001). Improvements in TIgG were seen in both groups (p<0.001), with no difference between groups.
Conclusion
The authors concluded that the best intervention for patients with IBD-D is an IgG food elimination diet together with a Bifidobacterium probiotic supplement.
Clinical practice applications:
- Consider an elimination diet based on IgG testing for clients with IBS-D
- Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement. The dose used in this study was 4x 0.5 billion capsules of Bifidobacterium adolescentis
- Eliminating cold/raw, spicy and fried food could be an alternative to IgG elimination if the latter is not suitable for the client.
Considerations for future research:
- 45% and 35% of screened patients, respectively in the 2 phases of the study, were IgG negative. Screening for more potential food intolerances may extend the suitability of the approach to more patients
- Only a single strain probiotic was tested. Further research could evaluate other or combinations of Bifidobacteria strains in combination with an IgG elimination diet
- The mechanism(s) by which probiotics may affect symptoms of IBS-D are unknown. Adding stool microbiome analyses may shed further light on the effect of the intervention on the composition and function of the microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Diet is a major contributor to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and is also a powerful tool for treatment of IBS. This study compared two diets and explored the effectiveness of the diets when combined with a probiotic for treatment of IBS-D patients. METHODS Phase I, patients were randomized into groups; control, cold/spicy/fried restricted diet (CSF res diet), IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet), and a combination both diets (CSF + IgG res diet). Phase II, patients were randomized into IgG res diet + placebo and IgG res diet + probiotic. Both interventions were 12 weeks in duration. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS Totals of 214 and 167 patients completed the two parts of the study, respectively. After intervention, IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade were significantly improved compared to baseline, with results similar to the control group. In general, there were decreases in IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade that were significantly different among the groups. There were exceptions; no differences were observed for IBS-D-SSS between the IgG res diet and CSF + IgG res diet, or TIgG grade between the CSF res diet, IgG res diet, and CSF + IgG res diet. However, the CSF res diet and IgG res diet had a synergistic effect that decreased IBS-D-SSS and TIgG titer, with a greater contribution by the IgG res diet. Therefore, we evaluated the IgG res diet with either placebo or probiotic and found that IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade decreased from baseline. There was a significant decrease in IBS-D-SSS with the probiotic but TIgG grade was not significantly different between the IgG diet + placebo and IgG diet + probiotic diet. CONCLUSIONS Both the CSF res diet and IgG res diet improved IBS symptoms and demonstrated synergy, although the IgG res diet had a greater contribution. Further, when intolerant foods cannot be eliminated from a diet, avoiding uncooked, cold, spicy, fried, and alcoholic foods is a superior choice. The IgG res diet combined with Bifidobacteria was the best dietary choice and may function though a non-IgG pathway.
-
2.
Food Exclusion Based on IgG Antibodies Alleviates Symptoms in Ulcerative Colitis: A Prospective Study.
Jian, L, Anqi, H, Gang, L, Litian, W, Yanyan, X, Mengdi, W, Tong, L
Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2018;24(9):1918-1925
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic debilitating inflammatory bowel disease that may need lifetime management. Dietary management of UC by eliminating food antigens that may be causing a delayed immune response is one of the approaches used widely to manage the disease. Food intolerance, mediated by immunoglobulin G antibodies in response to food antigens that are otherwise harmless, could be one cause of UC. Low levels of digestive enzymes may result in poor digestion of glucose, amino acids, and glycerol, followed by an immune reaction that leads to food sensitivities. Ninety-seven UC patients were enrolled in this open-label, stratified, prospective, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of an elimination diet versus a sham diet (a normal healthy diet). Following an IgG-specific exclusion diet for six months resulted in the alleviation of UC symptoms and an improvement in health-related quality of life. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of the exclusion diet since the intervention group did not show a significant reduction in IgG antibody levels. These results can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the potential role of exclusion diets in the management of UC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) rely predominantly on medication for disease control. Diet interventions can reduce pharmaceutical expenditures and prolong remission. We designed a prospective study to evaluate whether an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-guided exclusion diet would improve symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in patients with UC. METHODS The 6-month diet intervention included 97 patients with UC, who were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 49) and a control (n = 48) group. Individual diet plans were created for the intervention group according to IgG titers; the control group ate a healthy diet as normal. Observational indices included disease activity, extraintestinal manifestations, nutritional status, and QoL. Relationships between food-specific IgG antibodies and these indices were also analyzed. RESULTS At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups. Food-specific IgG antibodies were detected in 70.10% of participants. After intervention, the Mayo score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (2.41 ± 0.89 vs 3.52 ± 1.15, P < 0.05). The number of patients with extraintestinal manifestations decreased from 7 to 2 in the intervention group and from 6 to 5 in the control group. As for nutritive indices, the intervention group had higher mean body mass index and albumin than the control group (23.88 ± 3.31 vs 21.50 ± 6.24 kg/m2, respectively, P < 0.05; 48.05 ± 6.39 vs 45.72 ± 5.48 g/L, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas prealbumin and transferrin were not significantly different between the groups. QoL improved after food exclusion (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS An IgG-guided exclusion diet ameliorated UC symptoms and improved QoL. Interactions between IgG-based food intolerance and UC warrant further study.
-
3.
Randomised controlled trial of food elimination diet based on IgG antibodies for the prevention of migraine like headaches.
Mitchell, N, Hewitt, CE, Jayakody, S, Islam, M, Adamson, J, Watt, I, Torgerson, DJ
Nutrition journal. 2011;10:85
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The exact causes of migraine are unknown, but it is thought that it may be a culmination of several different factors, such as stress, altered sleep patterns, weather and hypersensitivity to foods. Testing for food intolerances is a challenging process and several methods can be employed to test. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using a type of testing known as the enzyme linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA), which tests the body’s delayed immune reaction to foods, and whether eliminating foods based on results from this test would help migraine sufferers. The results showed that 4 weeks of eliminating foods based on the ELISA test decreased migraines, however this was not sustained to 12 weeks of food elimination. It was concluded that in the short-term, eliminating foods based on results from the ELISA decreased headache frequency, but this could not be sustained long-term. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that diet elimination based on measuring the body’s delayed immune response may have limited effects on migraines.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research suggests that food intolerance may be a precipitating factor for migraine like headaches. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of the ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay) Test and subsequent dietary elimination advice for the prevention of migraine like headaches. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Community based volunteers in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Volunteers who met the inclusion criteria for migraine like headaches and had one or more food intolerance were included in the study. Participants received either a true diet (n = 84) or a sham diet (n = 83) sheet. Participants were advised to remove the intolerant foods from their diet for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of headache days over a 12 week period (item A MIDAS questionnaire). Other measures includes the total MIDAS score and total HIT-6 score. RESULTS The results indicated a small decrease in the number of migraine like headaches over 12 weeks, although this difference was not statistically significant (IRR 1.15 95% CI 0.94 to 1.41, p = 0.18). At the 4 week assessment, use of the ELISA test with subsequent diet elimination advice significantly reduced the number of migraine like headaches (IRR 1.23 95%CI 1.01 to 1.50, p = 0.04). The disability and impact on daily life of migraines were not significantly different between the true and sham diet groups. CONCLUSIONS Use of the ELISA test with subsequent diet elimination advice did not reduce the disability or impact on daily life of migraine like headaches or the number of migraine like headaches at 12 weeks but it did significantly reduce the number of migraine like headaches at 4 weeks.
-
4.
Clinical relevance of IgG antibodies against food antigens in Crohn's disease: a double-blind cross-over diet intervention study.
Bentz, S, Hausmann, M, Piberger, H, Kellermeier, S, Paul, S, Held, L, Falk, W, Obermeier, F, Fried, M, Schölmerich, J, et al
Digestion. 2010;81(4):252-64
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Environmental factors are thought to play a part in the development of or exacerbation of symptoms in Crohn's disease (CD), and patients often implicate food as a contributing factor. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) food reactions can be rare in IBD and immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing can be controversial, this study set out to compare IgG antibody reactions in 79 CD patients and 20 healthy individuals. The pilot study measured IgG levels against 271 foods in the blood. It then went on to measure stool frequency, abdominal pain and general well-being following a 6 week specific elimination diet (based on foods identified by the IgG testing) or a 6 week sham diet. 23 participants were included in the follow on 12 week, cross-over double blinded study. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in stool was also measured to evaluate disease activity. The pilot study showed a significantly higher IgG reaction in the CD patients. In the follow-up study there was a decrease in stool frequency, abdominal pain and general well-being during the specific diet compared to the sham diet. EDN was found to decrease in both the specific and sham diet. It was concluded that IgG antibodies may contribute to CD but the mechanism is still not clear.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental factors are thought to play an important role in the development of Crohn's disease (CD). Immune responses against auto-antigens or food antigens may be a reason for the perpetuation of inflammation. METHODS In a pilot study, 79 CD patients and 20 healthy controls were examined for food immunoglobulin G (IgG). Thereafter, the clinical relevance of these food IgG antibodies was assessed in a double-blind cross-over study with 40 patients. Based on the IgG antibodies, a nutritional intervention was planned. The interferon (IFN)gamma secretion of T cells was measured. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin was quantified in stool. RESULTS The pilot study resulted in a significant difference of IgG antibodies in serum between CD patients and healthy controls. In 84 and 83% of the patients, respectively, IgG antibodies against processed cheese and yeast were detected. The daily stool frequency significantly decreased by 11% during a specific diet compared with a sham diet. Abdominal pain reduced and general well-being improved. IFNgamma secretion of T cells increased. No difference for eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in stool was detected. CONCLUSION A nutritional intervention based on circulating IgG antibodies against food antigens showed effects with respect to stool frequency. The mechanisms by which IgG antibodies might contribute to disease activity remain to be elucidated.
-
5.
Diet restriction in migraine, based on IgG against foods: a clinical double-blind, randomised, cross-over trial.
Alpay, K, Ertas, M, Orhan, EK, Ustay, DK, Lieners, C, Baykan, B
Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2010;30(7):829-37
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Migraine is a chronic neurological condition characterised by a multifactorial aetiology, with genetic susceptibility playing a significant role in its development. Some researchers believe the development of migraine may also be related to IgG-mediated food intolerances and IgE-mediated food allergies. This randomised, controlled, double-blinded, cross-over clinical trial assessed the effect of an IgG antibody-based elimination diet against two hundred and sixty-six food antigens in thirty migraineurs. During the baseline, each participant was tested for IgG antibody levels in response to specific food antigens in order to receive a tailored elimination diet. The results of this study showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of headache days and the number of migraine attacks during the elimination diet phase, in comparison to the baseline in migraineurs. However, additional larger scale, robust studies are required in order to confirm the efficacy of the IgG-specific elimination diets in the treatment of migraine. In terms of migraine management, the results of this study can be of assistance to health care professionals who would like to understand the potential of diet restrictions based on IgG antibodies.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is well-known that specific foods trigger migraine attacks in some patients. We aimed to investigate the effect of diet restriction, based on IgG antibodies against food antigens on the course of migraine attacks in this randomised, double blind, cross-over, headache-diary based trial on 30 patients diagnosed with migraine without aura. METHODS Following a 6-week baseline, IgG antibodies against 266 food antigens were detected by ELISA. Then, the patients were randomised to a 6-week diet either excluding or including specific foods with raised IgG antibodies, individually. Following a 2-week diet-free interval after the first diet period, the same patients were given the opposite 6-week diet (provocation diet following elimination diet or vice versa). Patients and their physicians were blinded to IgG test results and the type of diet (provocation or elimination). Primary parameters were number of headache days and migraine attack count. Of 30 patients, 28 were female and 2 were male, aged 19-52 years (mean, 35 +/- 10 years). RESULTS The average count of reactions with abnormally high titre was 24 +/- 11 against 266 foods. Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant reduction in the number of headache days (from 10.5 +/- 4.4 to 7.5 +/- 3.7; P < 0.001) and number of migraine attacks (from 9.0 +/- 4.4 to 6.2 +/- 3.8; P < 0.001) in the elimination diet period. CONCLUSION This is the first randomised, cross-over study in migraineurs, showing that diet restriction based on IgG antibodies is an effective strategy in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks.
-
6.
Food elimination based on IgG antibodies in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.
Atkinson, W, Sheldon, TA, Shaath, N, Whorwell, PJ
Gut. 2004;53(10):1459-64
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often feel they have some form of dietary intolerance and frequently try exclusion diets. Tests attempting to predict food sensitivity in IBS have been disappointing but none has utilised IgG antibodies. AIMS To assess the therapeutic potential of dietary elimination based on the presence of IgG antibodies to food. PATIENTS A total of 150 outpatients with IBS were randomised to receive, for three months, either a diet excluding all foods to which they had raised IgG antibodies (enzyme linked immunosorbant assay test) or a sham diet excluding the same number of foods but not those to which they had antibodies. METHODS Primary outcome measures were change in IBS symptom severity and global rating scores. Non-colonic symptomatology, quality of life, and anxiety/depression were secondary outcomes. Intention to treat analysis was undertaken using a generalised linear model. RESULTS After 12 weeks, the true diet resulted in a 10% greater reduction in symptom score than the sham diet (mean difference 39 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 5-72); p = 0.024) with this value increasing to 26% in fully compliant patients (difference 98 (95% CI 52-144); p<0.001). Global rating also significantly improved in the true diet group as a whole (p = 0.048, NNT = 9) and even more in compliant patients (p = 0.006, NNT = 2.5). All other outcomes showed trends favouring the true diet. Relaxing the diet led to a 24% greater deterioration in symptoms in those on the true diet (difference 52 (95% CI 18-88); p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Food elimination based on IgG antibodies may be effective in reducing IBS symptoms and is worthy of further biomedical research.