1.
Outcomes of tacrolimus therapy in adults with refractory membranous nephrotic syndrome: a prospective, multicenter clinical trial.
Chen, W, Liu, Q, Liao, Y, Yang, Z, Chen, J, Fu, J, Zhang, J, Kong, Y, Fu, P, Lou, T, et al
The American journal of the medical sciences. 2013;(2):81-7
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment of adult refractory idiopathic membranous nephropathy with steroid and other immunosuppressant-resistant nephrotic syndrome can be a significant challenge. The authors investigated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) as a promising regimen. METHODS A prospective, multicenter trial was conducted in 9 nephrology centers from 2006 to 2008. Fourteen patients were enrolled. In conjunction with prednisone, TAC was started at 0.05 mg/kg/d, titrated to achieve a trough blood level of 5 to 10 ng/mL for the first 6 months, then reduced to 4 to 6 ng/mL for the subsequent 6 months. The primary endpoints included complete or partial remission. Secondary endpoints included relapse, change of clinical parameters and adverse events. RESULTS After 12 months, complete remission was achieved in 35.7% of patients and partial remission in 42.9%, yielding a response rate of 78.6%. Proteinuria, serum albumin, cholesterol, triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein were improved significantly (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.01, P = 0.004, respectively). Proteinuria and serum albumin were significantly improved (42.0% ± 13.2%, P = 0.02; 15.2% ± 4.5%, P = 0.01, respectively) even after the first month of treatment. One patient relapsed during the subsequent 6 months of follow-up. Adverse events included 2 cases of infection and 1 case each of hyperglycemia, hand tremor, sudden death (nondrug related) and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS TAC plus prednisone may be an alternative therapeutic option for steroid and general immunosuppressant-resistant membranous nephrotic syndrome patients, with a favorable safety profile. However, given the limitation of a small number of patients in this trial, further study with a larger number and longer follow-up is needed.
2.
Observation of efficacy and safety of converting the calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy.
Chen, J, Li, L, Wen, J, Tang, Z, Ji, S, Sha, G, Cheng, Z, Sun, Q, Cheng, D, Liu, Z
Transplantation proceedings. 2008;(5):1411-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of converting from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus among renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). METHODS In 16 patients with CAN, substituted sirolimus for CsA or FK506 and observed the incidence of acute rejection and changes in serum creatinine, triglycerides, cholesterol, blood uric acid, and peripheral blood leukocyte/platelet counts within 12 months. All recipients underwent an allograft biopsy before conversion. The targeted sirolimus level was 4-8 ug/L. RESULTS After conversion to sirolimus, the creatinine level of 7 cases decreased and the efficacy rate was (43.8%). No acute rejection occurred during the follow-up. The cases with hypercholesteremia increased from 3 to 7 after conversion; hypertriglyceridemia increased from 3 to 5; leukopenia occurred in 2; subnormal platelet counts increased from 2 to 3; and hyperuricemia increased from 6 to 7. Meanwhile, the average level of peripheral blood leukocytes obviously decreased in the first month, the average peripheral blood cholesterol increased over 12 months, but the average content of peripheral blood platelets, triglyceride and blood uric acid failed to display as statistic difference. Eight patients showed C4d deposition in peritubular capillary in graft tissue before conversion, 7 cases of whom showed no improvement in renal function. In 6 cases there was no C4d deposition in peritubular capillary in graft tissue. Only 2 of 6 cases showed no improvement in renal function. There were 6 patients whose creatinine level was <2.48 mg/dL before conversion, and renal function in 5 of them improved in a year after conversion. In contrast, among 10 patients whose blood creatinine level was >2.48 mg/dL, only 2 cases improved. CONCLUSION It is safe for patients with CAN to use substitute sirolimus for CNI; the incidence of acute rejection did not increase. In this study, 43.8% of patients showed improved renal function. The main adverse reactions after conversion to sirolimus were hypercholesteremia and decreased peripheral blood leukocytes. The serum creatinine level and the deposition of C4d in peritubular capillary were important factors influencing therapeutic efficacy.