-
1.
Family History of Diabetes and the Effectiveness of Lifestyle Intervention on Insulin Secretion and Insulin Resistance in Chinese Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome.
Zhu, H, Chen, X, Zhang, B, Yang, W, Xing, X
Journal of diabetes research. 2021;:8822702
Abstract
AIMS: The current study aims to explore if a family history of diabetes can influence the efficiency of lifestyle intervention on insulin secretion and study the insulin resistance in Chinese men and women with metabolic syndrome in a cohort with a 2-year follow-up. METHODS 151 individuals (90 individuals did not have a family history of diabetes (DMFH (-)) and 61 with a family history of diabetes (DMFH (+)) with metabolic syndrome participated in the lifestyle intervention program at baseline and finished with 1-year follow-up. 124 individuals have two-year follow-up data. A family history of diabetes was ascertained by self-report. Lifestyle interventions were individual sessions on lifestyle changes. RESULTS During the 1-year follow-up, Ln Insulinogenic index (Δbaseline-1year = 0.29 ± 0.65, P = 0.001) and 30-min glucose (Δbaseline-1year = -0.41 ± 1.71, P = 0.024) changed significantly in the DMFH(-) group; in the DMFH(+) group, Ln ISIm (Δbaseline-1year = -0.22 ± 0.60, P = 0.022) and 30-min glucose (Δbaseline-1year = 0.53 ± 1.89, P = 0.032) changed significantly, and there was no significant change of other parameters. The change of 30 min glucose during a 1-year intervention has shown a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.002). During the 2 years intervention, Ln Insulinogenic index changed significantly in the DMFH(-) group (Δbaseline-1year = 0.33 ± 0.66, P < 0.001 and Δbaseline-2year = 0.43 ± 1.17, P = 0.034). Fasting insulin (Δbaseline-2year = 2.95 ± 8.69, P = 0.034), 2 h insulin (Δbaseline-2year = 23.75 ± 44.89, P = 0.002), Ln HOMA-B (Δbaseline-2year = 0.43 ± 1.02, P = 0.009), Ln HOMA-IR (Δbaseline-2year = 0.53 ± 1.04, P = 0.002), Ln ISIm (Δbaseline-2year = 0.52 ± 0.95, P = 0.004), and Ln Insulinogenic index (Δbaseline-2year = 0.66 ± 1.18, P = 0.047) changed significantly after 2 years of intervention, compared to the baseline in the DMFH(+) group. The change of Ln ISIm (P = 0.023), fasting (P = 0.030), and 2 h insulin (P = 0.007) during the 2-year intervention has shown a significant difference between the two groups. Family history of diabetes was related with a 0.500 unit increase in 2-year ISIm (P = 0.020) modified by lifestyle intervention adjusted for age, baseline BMI, sex, and baseline waist circumference and a 0.476 unit increase in 2-year ISIm (P = 0.027) with extra adjustment for weight change. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a family history of diabetes benefit more from lifestyle intervention in regard to insulin resistance than those without a family history of diabetes adjusting for age, baseline BMI, sex, baseline waist circumference, and weight change.
-
2.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Palmer, SC, Tendal, B, Mustafa, RA, Vandvik, PO, Li, S, Hao, Q, Tunnicliffe, D, Ruospo, M, Natale, P, Saglimbene, V, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2021;:m4573
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying cardiovascular and renal risk. DESIGN Network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 11 August 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Randomised controlled trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with placebo, standard care, or other glucose lowering treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes with follow up of 24 weeks or longer. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was carried out and GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) used to assess evidence certainty. Results included estimated absolute effects of treatment per 1000 patients treated for five years for patients at very low risk (no cardiovascular risk factors), low risk (three or more cardiovascular risk factors), moderate risk (cardiovascular disease), high risk (chronic kidney disease), and very high risk (cardiovascular disease and kidney disease). A guideline panel provided oversight of the systematic review. RESULTS 764 trials including 421 346 patients proved eligible. All results refer to the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing diabetes treatment. Both classes of drugs lowered all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and kidney failure (high certainty evidence). Notable differences were found between the two agents: SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced admission to hospital for heart failure more than GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced non-fatal stroke more than SGLT-2 inhibitors (which appeared to have no effect). SGLT-2 inhibitors caused genital infection (high certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists might cause severe gastrointestinal events (low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists might lower body weight. Little or no evidence was found for the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists on limb amputation, blindness, eye disease, neuropathic pain, or health related quality of life. The absolute benefits of these drugs vary substantially across patients from low to very high risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes (eg, SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in 3 to 40 fewer deaths in 1000 patients over five years; see interactive decision support tool (https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!/) for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with some differences in benefits and harms. Absolute benefits are determined by individual risk profiles of patients, with clear implications for clinical practice, as reflected in the BMJ Rapid Recommendations directly informed by this systematic review. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019153180.
-
3.
Clinical analysis of risk factors for severe COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes.
Zhang, Q, Wei, Y, Chen, M, Wan, Q, Chen, X
Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2020;(10):107666
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIMS: To describe characteristics of COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes and to analyze risk factors for severity. METHODS Demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory findings, treatments and outcomes of COVID-19 patients with diabetes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Seventy-fourCOVID-19 patients with diabetes were included. Twenty-seven patients (36.5%) were severe and 10 patients (13.5%) died. Higher levels of blood glucose, serum amyloid A (SAA), C reactive protein and interleukin 6 were associated with severe patients compared to non-severe ones (P<0.05). Levels of albumin, cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, small and dense low density lipoprotein and CD4+T lymphocyte counts in severe patients were lower than those in non-severe patients (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified decreased CD4+T lymphocyte counts (odds ratio [OR]=0.988, 95%Confidence interval [95%CI] 0.979-0.997) and increased SAA levels (OR=1.029, 95%CI 1.002-1.058) as risk factors for severity of COVID-19 with diabetes (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Type 2 diabetic patients were more susceptible to COVID-19 than overall population, which might be associated with hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. Aggressive treatment should be suggested, especially when these patients had low CD4+T lymphocyte counts and high SAA levels.
-
4.
Effects of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Monotherapy on Weight Changes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
Wang, H, Yang, J, Chen, X, Qiu, F, Li, J
Clinical therapeutics. 2019;(2):322-334.e11
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor monotherapy on the weight of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to compare different SGLT2 inhibitors with other oral glucose-lowering medications. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov Web site were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. Patients with T2DM in the included studies were administered SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy for at least 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in weight from baseline; the secondary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a weight reduction ≥5%. A pairwise meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and a network meta-analysis with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo random effects models were performed. FINDINGS A total of 29 randomized controlled trials (11,999 patients) with a low risk of bias were identified. The results showed that the mean weight loss ranged from -2.26 kg (95% credible interval [CrI], -2.71 to -1.76) with canagliflozin 300 mg to -0.79 kg (95% CrI, -1.54 to -0.05) with ipragliflozin 25 mg compared with metformin. Compared with linagliptin and sitagliptin, the mean weight loss ranged from -3.17 kg (95% CrI, -3.67 to -2.57) with canagliflozin 300 mg to -0.93 kg (95% CrI, -1.92 to 0.05) with ipragliflozin 25 mg. Canagliflozin 300 mg reduced weight to a greater extent than the other SGLT2 inhibitors, with a probability of 99.44%. SGLT2 inhibitors also improved the proportions of patients achieving ≥5% weight loss. The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on weight reduction was associated with dosage. IMPLICATIONS Available evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy exerts more beneficial effects on weight reduction than both metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors. The weight reduction effect of 300 mg canagliflozin is greater than that of most other SGLT2 inhibitors. More types of SGLT2 inhibitors in a head-to-head trial, as well as a comparison between SGLT2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, will be involved in our further research. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42018089761.
-
5.
Effects of wine on blood pressure, glucose parameters, and lipid profile in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized interventional trials (PRISMA Compliant).
Ye, J, Chen, X, Bao, L
Medicine. 2019;(23):e15771
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies identified conflicting results about the effects of wine intake on glucose parameters and the risk of cardiovascular diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present study further investigated the association between wine digestion and these outcomes in T2DM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases (up to November 2018) was performed for randomized interventional trials which evaluated the effect of wine on blood pressure (BP), glucose parameters and lipid profiles in T2DM people. We used a variety of tests: fixed and random effects models, Q Cochrane test and I index, Egger and Begg tests, forest plots, and sensitivity analysis in our study. RESULTS A total of 9 randomized interventional studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, significant association between wine intake with diastolic BP (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.10; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.01 to 0.20, P = .03 I = 13%) and total cholesterol (TC) (WMD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.02-0.31, P = .03, I = 6%), whereas no noticeable differences in glucose parameters, systolic BP, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) were identified between wine and controls groups (fasting glucose [FG],WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.58 to 0.58; fasting insulin [FI], -0.22, -2.09 to 1.65; HbAc1%, -0.16, -0.40 to 0.07; systolic blood pressure, 0.12, -0.05 to 0.28; LDLC, -0.02, -0.25 to 0.21; TG, -0.34, -1.31 to 0.64; HDLC, 0.22, -0.08 to 0.53]. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis revealed that moderate wine consumption among T2DM patients could reduce the level of diastolic blood pressure and TC, but not glucose parameters and other cardiovascular risk factors.
-
6.
Ipragliflozin as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: An evidence-based pharmacoeconomics evaluation.
Wang, H, Yao, G, Chen, X, Ouyang, J, Yang, J
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2019;:107867
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of ipragliflozin as an add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and four Chinese databases, as well as the ClinicalTrials.gov website were searched from their inception through Jan 2019. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3. RESULTS A total of 11 randomized controlled trials with 1766 patients were included. Ipragliflozin administered (50 mg) once daily as an add-on therapy to other glucose-lowering medications (metformin, pioglitazone, sulfonylurea, α-glucosidase inhibitor, sitagliptin, insulin) was associated with reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of -0.74% (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.00 to -0.48), fasting plasma glucose (WMD -25.03 mg/dL; 95% CI -32.89 to -17.16), weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, and triglycerides levels. Neither the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.16) nor drug-related TEAEs (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.54) was significantly increased. However, it was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia when added to insulin (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.61). Compared with the pioglitazone group and the sitagliptin + metformin group, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of ipragliflozin add-on therapy group was $4976.89, $2089.76 per percentage of qualified HbA1c, respectively. CONCLUSION Ipragliflozin as an add-on therapy is well tolerated and effective. Ipragliflozin as an add-on therapy do not appear cost-effective compared with metformin alone, but may be competitive against pioglitazone group and the sitagliptin + metformin group.
-
7.
Effects of acetyl-L-carnitine and methylcobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
Li, S, Chen, X, Li, Q, Du, J, Liu, Z, Peng, Y, Xu, M, Li, Q, Lei, M, Wang, C, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2016;(5):777-85
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION To assess the efficacy and safety of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) on diabetic peripheral neuropathy compared with methylcobalamin (MC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-controlled, non-inferior phase II clinical trial. Diabetic patients with abnormal nerve conduction test results were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral ALC 500 mg t.i.d. or MC 0.5 mg t.i.d. for 24 weeks. The neuropathy symptom score, neuropathy disability score and neurophysiological parameters were measured during follow up. RESULTS A total of 232 patients were randomized (ALC n = 117, MC n = 115), 88% of which completed the trial. At week 24, patients from both groups had significant reductions in both neuropathy symptom score and neuropathy disability score with no significant difference between two groups (neuropathy symptom score reduction: ALC vs MC 2.35 ± 2.23, P < 0.0001 vs 2.11 ± 2.48, P < 0.0001, intergroup P = 0.38; neuropathy disability score reduction ALC vs MC 1.66 ± 1.90, P < 0.0001 vs 1.35 ± 1.65, P < 0.0001, intergroup P = 0.23). Neurophysiological parameters were also improved in both groups. No significant difference was found between groups in the development of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS ALC is as effective as MC in improving clinical symptoms and neurophysiological parameters for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy over a 24-week period with good tolerance.
-
8.
Effect of Linagliptin on Glycemic Control in Chinese Patients with Newly-Diagnosed, Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Wu, W, Li, Y, Chen, X, Lin, D, Xiang, S, Shen, F, Gu, X
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2015;:2678-84
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linagliptin (a novel dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor) on glucose metabolism and β-cell function in Chinese patients with newly-diagnosed, drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIAL AND METHODS Newly-diagnosed and drug-naïve T2DM patients were enrolled. After 4-week lifestyle modulation and 2-week placebo run-in, 57 patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with linagliptin (n=34) or placebo (n=23). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 24 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (2h-PPG), fasting insulin, proinsulin-to-insulin ratio, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) were also evaluated. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Compared with placebo, linagliptin therapy resulted in a significant decrease in HbA1C (-1.2±0.7% vs. -0.4±0.4%, P<0.001), FBG (-0.98±1.17 vs. -0.32±0.51 mmol/L, P=0.011, and 2h-PPG (-2.02±0.94 vs. -0.97±0.63 mmol/L, P<0.001). Significant differences were observed for the proinsulin/insulin ratio (P<0.001) and HOMA-β index (P=0.001). Rates of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups (30.3% vs. 27.3%). All adverse events were mild. One patient discontinued participation due to pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Linagliptin treatment resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful improvement of glycemic control in drug-naïve Chinese patients with T2DM, as well as improved parameters of b-cell function. Linagliptin had an excellent safety profile.
-
9.
The efficacy of dapagliflozin combined with hypoglycemic drugs in treating type 2 diabetes: protocol for meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Sun, YN, Zhou, Y, Chen, X, Che, WS, Leung, SW
Systematic reviews. 2013;:103
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dapagliflozin is a first-in-class oral sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. It is often used in combination with conventional anti-diabetic drugs such as metformin, glimepiride, and insulin in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). It not only reduces glucose reabsorption in the kidney but also increases renal glucose excretion. Some studies found the actions of dapagliflozin independent of insulin and free from risk of weight gain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether dapagliflozin is synergistic with other anti-diabetic drugs without risk of weight gain. METHODS/DESIGN This meta-analysis will include the randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of dapagliflozin as an add-on drug in treating T2D for >8 weeks with the outcome measures glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight. Information of relevant RCTs will be retrieved from major databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar according to a pre-specified search strategy. Google and manual search will find other unpublished reports and supplementary data. Eligible RCTs will be selected according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data will be extracted and input into a pre-formatted spreadsheet. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the quality of the eligible RCTs. Meta-analysis based on the random-effects model will be conducted to compare the changes of HbA1c (%), FPG (mmol/L), and body weight (kg) between dapagliflozin arm and placebo arm. Publication bias will be evaluated with a funnel plot and the Egger's test. Heterogeneity will be assessed with the I2 statistics. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted on follow-up periods. The evidential quality of the findings will be assessed with the GRADE profiler. DISCUSSION The findings of this meta-analysis will be important to clinicians, patients, and health policy-makers regarding the use of dapagliflozin in T2D treatment. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: CRD42013005034.
-
10.
Restriction of advanced glycation end products improves insulin resistance in human type 2 diabetes: potential role of AGER1 and SIRT1.
Uribarri, J, Cai, W, Ramdas, M, Goodman, S, Pyzik, R, Chen, X, Zhu, L, Striker, GE, Vlassara, H
Diabetes care. 2011;(7):1610-6
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Increased oxidative stress (OS) and impaired anti-OS defenses are important in the development and persistence of insulin resistance (IR). Several anti-inflammatory and cell-protective mechanisms, including advanced glycation end product (AGE) receptor-1 (AGER1) and sirtuin (silent mating-type information regulation 2 homolog) 1 (SIRT1) are suppressed in diabetes. Because basal OS in type 2 diabetic patients is influenced by the consumption of AGEs, we examined whether AGE consumption also affects IR and whether AGER1 and SIRT1 are involved. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The study randomly assigned 36 subjects, 18 type 2 diabetic patients (age 61±4 years) and 18 healthy subjects (age 67±1.4 years), to a standard diet (>20 AGE equivalents [Eq]/day) or an isocaloric AGE-restricted diet (<10 AGE Eq/day) for 4 months. Circulating metabolic and inflammatory markers were assessed. Expression and activities of AGER1 and SIRT1 were examined in patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMNC) and in AGE-stimulated, AGER1-transduced (AGER1+), or AGER1-silenced human monocyte-like THP-1 cells. RESULTS Insulin and homeostasis model assessment, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α and nuclear factor-κB p65 acetylation, serum AGEs, and 8-isoprostanes decreased in AGE-restricted type 2 diabetic patients, whereas PMNC AGER1 and SIRT1 mRNA, and protein levels normalized and adiponectin markedly increased. AGEs suppressed AGER1, SIRT-1, and NAD+ levels in THP-1 cells. These effects were inhibited in AGER1+ but were enhanced in AGER1-silenced cells. CONCLUSIONS Food-derived pro-oxidant AGEs may contribute to IR in clinical type 2 diabetes and suppress protective mechanisms, AGER1 and SIRT1. AGE restriction may preserve native defenses and insulin sensitivity by maintaining lower basal OS.