1.
Association Between VEGF-460C/T Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.
Cheng, B, Wu, A, Zhou, X
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2024;(3):214-222
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between VEGF-460C/T polymorphism and susceptibility to diabetic retinopathy (DR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by meta-analysis. A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases until September 2023 to identify studies examining the association between VEGF-460C/T polymorphism and susceptibility to DR. Data process was performed by Stata 15.0 software. Eight studies were included, involving 1463 patients with DR. In the overall analysis, the difference was statistically significant only in the homozygous model (CC vs. TT: OR=1.86, p=0.048). A subgroup analysis of 6 papers with genotype frequency satisfying HWE in the control group indicated significant differences among the allele (C vs. T: OR=1.34, p=0.037), recessive (CC vs. CT+TT: OR=1.96, p=0.022) and homozygous (CC vs. TT: OR=2.28, p=0.015) models. However, in the dominant and heterozygous models, the difference was not statistically significant. The sensitivity of the HWE-based subgroup analysis showed that the conclusions in other gene models except the heterozygote model were not robust. This meta-analysis indicated that VEGF-460C/T gene polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to DR in T2DM. Allele C and genotype CC at the VEGF-460C/T locus are associated with an increased risk of DR in T2DM. However, considering that the results are not robust, more trials involving more rigorous design are needed to verify the findings of this review in the future.
2.
Paradoxical Effects of Prolonged Insufficient Sleep on Lipid Profile: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Trials.
Barragán, R, Zuraikat, FM, Cheng, B, Scaccia, SE, Cochran, J, Aggarwal, B, Jelic, S, St-Onge, MP
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2023;(20):e032078
Abstract
Background Insufficient sleep is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk, but causality is unclear. We investigated the impact of prolonged mild sleep restriction (SR) on lipid and inflammatory profiles. Methods and Results Seventy-eight participants (56 women [12 postmenopausal]; age, 34.3±12.5 years; body mass index, 25.8±3.5 kg/m2) with habitual sleep duration 7 to 9 h/night (adequate sleep [AS]) underwent two 6-week conditions in a randomized crossover design: AS versus SR (AS-1.5 h/night). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and inflammatory markers (CRP [C-reactive protein], interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor-α) were assessed. Linear models tested effects of SR on outcomes in the full sample and by sex+menopausal status (premenopausal versus postmenopausal women+men). In the full sample, SR increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with AS (β=1.2±0.5 mg/dL; P=0.03). Sex+menopausal status influenced the effects of SR on change in total cholesterol (P-interaction=0.04), LDL-C (P-interaction=0.03), and interleukin 6 (P-interaction=0.07). Total cholesterol and LDL-C decreased in SR versus AS in premenopausal women (total cholesterol: β=-4.2±1.9 mg/dL; P=0.03; LDL-C: β=-6.3±2.0 mg/dL; P=0.002). Given paradoxical effects of SR on cholesterol concentrations, we explored associations between changes in inflammation and end point lipids under each condition. Increases in interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-α during SR tended to relate to lower LDL-C in premenopausal women (interleukin 6: β=-5.3±2.6 mg/dL; P=0.051; tumor necrosis factor-α: β=-32.8±14.2 mg/dL; P=0.027). Conclusions Among healthy adults, prolonged insufficient sleep does not increase atherogenic lipids. However, increased inflammation in SR tends to predict lower LDL-C in premenopausal women, resembling the "lipid paradox" in which low cholesterol associates with increased cardiovascular disease risk in proinflammatory conditions. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02835261, NCT02960776.
3.
Efficacy and safety of topical administration of tacrolimus in oral lichen planus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Su, Z, Hu, J, Cheng, B, Tao, X
Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology. 2022;(1):63-73
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptomatic oral lichen planus is a common chronic T-cell-mediated disorder characterized by pain and inflammation. The meta-analysis aimed to compare and evaluate the effects and safety of tacrolimus for treating patients with symptomatic oral lichen planus. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science published up to and including December 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing trials. There were no restrictions on language or date of publication. Using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, we assessed the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials and estimated the proportion of between-trial heterogeneity. RESULTS A total of 9 RCTs evaluating the effects of tacrolimus were included in this study. The results revealed no significant difference in clinical resolution and relapse between tacrolimus and corticosteroids. However, tacrolimus may be more likely to cause mild adverse effects. In particular, clinical resolution was not significantly different between tacrolimus and clobetasol propionate, and between tacrolimus and triamcinolone acetonide, while tacrolimus was more likely to cause adverse effects than triamcinolone acetonide and clobetasol propionate. Moreover, there was no significant difference in pain resolution between tacrolimus and clobetasol. Furthermore, adverse effects were not significantly different between tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 clinical trials supported the short-term application of tacrolimus as an effective regimen in OLP patients resistant to other topical and systemic therapies. Furthermore, the adverse effects of tacrolimus were minor and transient and did not affect tacrolimus' continued application.