1.
Dysglycemia among youth with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control in the Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change trial.
Kahkoska, AR, Crandell, J, Driscoll, KA, Kichler, JC, Seid, M, Mayer-Davis, EJ, Maahs, DM
Pediatric diabetes. 2019;(2):180-188
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence and correlates of non-severe hypoglycemia among adolescents with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control, an understudied topic in this group. METHODS Seven days of blinded continuous glucose monitor data were analyzed in 233 adolescents at baseline of the Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change trial (13-16 years, type 1 diabetes duration >1 year, and hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 8-13% [64-119 mmol]). Incidence of clinical hypoglycemia (54-69 mg/dL) and clinically serious hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was defined as number of episodes ≥15 minutes. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine the correlates of long duration of hypoglycemia, categorized by median split among those who experienced hypoglycemia. RESULTS The sample was 76.1% non-Hispanic white, 49.8% female, age = 14.9 ± 1.1 years, diabetes duration = 6.4 ± 3.7 years, and HbA1c = 9.6 ± 1.2% (81 ± 13 mmol/mol). Over 7 days, 79.4% of youth experienced ≥1 hypoglycemic episodes of <70 mg/dL, and 55.4% of youth experienced ≥1 hypoglycemic episodes of <54 mg/dL. Among all adolescents, the median duration of clinical hypoglycemia and clinically serious hypoglycemia was 21.9 (range 0-250.2) and 4.3 (range 0-209.7) minutes/day, respectively. Long duration of clinical hypoglycemia (range 1.8-17.4% time overall) and clinically serious hypoglycemia (range 1.2-14.6% time overall) was associated with older age and decreasing HbA1c. Long duration of clinically serious hypoglycemia also was associated with insulin pump use. CONCLUSIONS Almost 80% of adolescents with elevated HbA1c had an episode of clinical hypoglycemia, and >50% had clinically serious hypoglycemia in a week. Increased education alongside access to emerging diabetes technologies may help to prevent hypoglycemia while improving glycemic control.
2.
Assessment of a Precision Medicine Analysis of a Behavioral Counseling Strategy to Improve Adherence to Diabetes Self-management Among Youth: A Post Hoc Analysis of the FLEX Trial.
Kahkoska, AR, Lawson, MT, Crandell, J, Driscoll, KA, Kichler, JC, Seid, M, Maahs, DM, Kosorok, MR, Mayer-Davis, EJ
JAMA network open. 2019;(5):e195137
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The Flexible Lifestyles Empowering Change (FLEX) trial, an 18-month randomized clinical trial testing an adaptive behavioral intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes, showed no overall treatment effect for its primary outcome, change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) percentage of total hemoglobin, but demonstrated benefit for quality of life (QoL) as a prespecified secondary outcome. OBJECTIVE To apply a novel statistical method for post hoc analysis that derives an individualized treatment rule (ITR) to identify FLEX participants who may benefit from intervention based on changes in HbA1c percentage (primary outcome), QoL, and body mass index z score (BMIz) (secondary outcomes) during 18 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multisite clinical trial enrolled 258 adolescents aged 13 to 16 years with type 1 diabetes for 1 or more years, who had literacy in English, HbA1c percentage of total hemoglobin from 8.0% to 13.0%, a participating caregiver, and no other serious medical conditions. From January 5, 2014, to April 4, 2016, 258 adolescents were recruited. The post hoc analysis excluded adolescents missing outcome measures at 18 months (2 participants [0.8%]) or continuous glucose monitoring data at baseline (40 participants [15.5%]). Data were analyzed from April to December 2018. INTERVENTIONS The FLEX intervention included a behavioral counseling strategy that integrated motivational interviewing and problem-solving skills training to increase adherence to diabetes self-management. The control condition entailed usual diabetes care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Subgroups of FLEX participants were derived from an ITR estimating which participants would benefit from intervention, which would benefit from control conditions, and which would be indifferent. Multiple imputation by chained equations and reinforcement learning trees were used to estimate the ITR. Subgroups based on ITR pertaining to changes during 18 months in 3 univariate outcomes (ie, HbA1c percentage, QoL, and BMIz) and a composite outcome were compared by baseline demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics. RESULTS Data from 216 adolescents in the FLEX trial were reanalyzed (166 [76.9%] non-Hispanic white; 108 teenaged girls [50.0%]; mean [SD] age, 14.9 [1.1] years; mean [SD] diabetes duration, 6.3 [3.7] years). For the univariate outcomes, a large proportion of FLEX participants had equivalent predicted outcomes under intervention vs usual care settings, regardless of randomization, and were assigned to the muted group (HbA1c: 105 participants [48.6%]; QoL: 63 participants [29.2%]; BMIz: 136 participants [63.0%]). Regarding the BMIz univariate outcome, mean baseline BMIz of participants assigned to the muted group was lower than that of those assigned to the intervention and control groups (muted vs intervention: mean difference, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.75; P = .002; muted vs control: mean difference, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.11; P < .001); this group also had a higher proportion of individuals with underweight or normal weight using weight status cutoffs (95 [69.9%] in muted group vs 24 [54.6%] in intervention group and 11 [30.6%] in control group; χ24 = 24.67; P < .001). The approach identified subgroups estimated to benefit based on HbA1c percentage (54 participants [25.0%]), QoL (89 participants [41.2%]), and BMIz (44 participants [20.4%]). Regarding the HbA1c percentage outcome, participants expected to benefit from the intervention did not have significantly higher baseline HbA1c percentages than those expected to benefit from usual care (9.4% vs 9.2%; difference, 0.2%; 95% CI, -0.16% to 0.56%; P = .44). However, participants in the muted group had higher mean HbA1c percentages at baseline than those assigned to the intervention or control groups (muted vs intervention: 9.9% vs 9.4%; difference, 0.5%; 95% CI, 0.13% to 0.89%; P = .02; muted vs control; 9.9% vs 9.2%; difference, 0.7%; 95% CI, 0.34% to 1.08%; P = .001). No significant differences were found between subgroups estimated to benefit in terms of the composite outcome from the FLEX intervention (91 participants [42.1%]) vs usual care (125 participants [57.9%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The precision medicine approach represents a conceptually and analytically novel approach to post hoc subgroup identification. More work is needed to understand markers of positive response to the FLEX intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01286350.
3.
The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change (FLEX) intervention for self-management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Trial design and baseline characteristics.
Kichler, JC, Seid, M, Crandell, J, Maahs, DM, Bishop, FK, Driscoll, KA, Standiford, D, Hunter, CM, Mayer-Davis, E
Contemporary clinical trials. 2018;:64-73
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The Flexible Lifestyle Empowering Change (FLEX) Intervention Study is a multi-site randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of an adaptive behavioral intervention to promote self-management for youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). This paper details FLEX design, demographic characteristics of the sample, and outcome variables at baseline. Participants were randomized to either an intervention or control arm after their baseline standardized measurement visit. Baseline data for the primary (glycemic levels) and secondary outcome variables (e.g., motivation and problem-solving, health-related quality of life, risk factors associated with T1D complications) as well as the potential mediator variables (e.g., self-management behavior, family conflict and responsibility) suggest that the study sample was representative of the general population of adolescents with T1D and their parents. The FLEX adaptive intervention is an innovative application of a tailored treatment intervention designed to be readily adopted in real-world practice to meet each adolescent's individualized T1D self-management goals.
4.
Flexible Lifestyles for Youth (FL3X) behavioural intervention for at-risk adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a randomized pilot and feasibility trial.
Mayer-Davis, EJ, Seid, M, Crandell, J, Dolan, L, Lagarde, WH, Letourneau, L, Maahs, DM, Marcovina, S, Nachreiner, J, Standiford, D, et al
Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2015;(6):829-33
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: To determine the potential effect sizes for the Flexible Lifestyle for Youth (FL3X) behavioural intervention to improve glycaemic control (HbA(1c)) and quality of life for at-risk adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS Participants [n = 61; age 12-16 years, HbA(1c) 64-119 mmol/mol (8-13%)] were randomized to FL3X (minimum three sessions) or usual care. Effect sizes (Cohen's d), comparing the mean difference between the groups, were calculated. RESULTS Study retention (95%), attendance at intervention sessions (87% attended all three sessions) and acceptability were high (100% of the adolescents and 91% of parents would recommend the programme to others). Overall, 41% of participants in the intervention group and 24% of participants in the control group were 'responders' [HbA(1c) decreased by > 6 mmol/mol (0.5%); d = 0.37]. HbA(1c) levels decreased (d = -0.18), diabetes-specific quality of life increased (d = 0.29), but generic quality of life decreased (d = -0.23) in the intervention compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS The FL3X programme merits further study for improving HbA(1c) and diabetes-specific quality of life in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. (Clinical trials registry no.: NCT01286350).