1.
The effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Li, G, Feng, H, Mao, XL, Deng, YJ, Wang, XB, Zhang, Q, Guo, Y, Xiao, SM
Journal of translational medicine. 2023;21(1):442
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), an endocrine and metabolic disease, is influenced by host physiology and environmental factors. Recent studies have shown that the gut microbiota plays a key role in the maintenance of host homeostasis and pathogenesis of T2DM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a probiotic intervention on glycaemic control in T2DM patients and to evaluate the variations in these effects due to participant characteristics and intervention characteristics. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty randomised-controlled studies including a total of 1,827 individuals. Results showed that probiotic supplementation had favourable effects on glycaemic control in T2DM patients. Bifdobacterium and food-type probiotics had greater glucose-lowering effects than other probiotic genera and types of vehicles used to deliver the probiotics. Authors concluded that the administration of probiotics may be a promising adjuvant therapy for glycaemic control in T2DM patients.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on the data from the randomised clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS PubMed, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception to October 2022, and RCTs about probiotics and T2DM were collected. The standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control related parameters, e.g. fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). RESULTS Thirty RCTs including 1,827 T2MD patients were identified. Compared with the placebo group, the probiotics supplementation group had a significant decrease in the parameters of glycaemic control, including FBG (SMD = - 0.331, 95% CI - 0.424 to - 0.238, Peffect < 0.001), insulin (SMD = - 0.185, 95% CI - 0.313 to - 0.056, Peffect = 0.005), HbA1c (SMD = - 0.421, 95% CI - 0.584 to - 0.258, Peffect < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (SMD = - 0.224, 95% CI - 0.342 to - 0.105, Peffect < 0.001). Further subgroup analyses showed that the effect was larger in the subgroups of Caucasians, high baseline body mass index (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2), Bifidobacterium and food-type probiotics (Psubgroup < 0.050). CONCLUSION This study supported that probiotics supplementation had favourable effects on glycaemic control in T2DM patients. It may be a promising adjuvant therapy for patients with T2DM.
2.
Effect of lifestyle intervention on HbA1c levels in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes across ethnicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Yang, J, Xia, Y, Sun, Y, Guo, Y, Shi, Z, Cristina do Vale Moreira, N, Zuo, H, Hussain, A
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2023;199:110662
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Weight loss can benefit overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with regards to cardiovascular risk factors, including glycaemic control. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 randomised controlled trials, including 7850 patients, aimed to evaluate racial/ethnic differences in response to lifestyle interventions for weight loss on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c, a measure of glycaemic control) in overweight or obese patients with T2DM. Lifestyle interventions were associated with statistically significant reductions in HbA1c in White and Asian, but not in Black/African or Hispanic populations, although the latter were based on only 2 and 3 small trials, respectively, and may have therefore lacked statistical power. Reductions in HbA1c were seen in studies which led to a weight loss of more than 5% as well as those less than 5%, with greater reductions being seen in the former group. The authors conclude that ethnic differences should be taken into account when considering lifestyle interventions for diabetes management.
Abstract
AIMS: Weight reduction is fundamental for the management and remission of diabetes. We aimed to assess ethnic differences in the effects of lifestyle weight-loss interventions on HbA1c levels in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science online databases up to 31 Dec 2022. Randomized controlled trials using lifestyle weight-loss interventions in overweight or obese adults with T2DM were selected. We performed subgroup analyses to explore the heterogeneity across different ethnicities (Asians, White/Caucasians, Black/Africans and Hispanics). A random effects model was applied to calculate weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Thirty studies including 7580 subjects from different ethnicities were identified according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. HbA1c levels were significantly reduced by lifestyle weight-loss intervention. Notably, a significantly beneficial effect on HbA1c was observed in White/Caucasians (WMD = -0.59, 95% CI: -0.90, -0.28, P < 0.001) and Asians (WMD = -0.48, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.33, P < 0.001), but not in the Black/African or Hispanic group (both P > 0.05). The findings remained essentially unchanged in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS Lifestyle weight-loss interventions had distinct beneficial effects on HbA1c levels in different ethnic groups with T2DM, especially in Caucasians and Asians.
3.
A Low-Carbohydrate Diet Realizes Medication Withdrawal: A Possible Opportunity for Effective Glycemic Control.
Han, Y, Cheng, B, Guo, Y, Wang, Q, Yang, N, Lin, P
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2021;12:779636
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Many studies have shown that diet restrictions can help glycemic control and reduce metabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to look at the efficacy of two diets, the LCD and the low-fat diet (LFD), on glycemic control and clinical treatment. The study was a prospective, open-label, double-arm, randomized controlled trial conducted from March 2019 to December 2020 in China. 134 T2DM participants took part and they were randomly assigned to the LCD group or the low -fat diet (LFD) group. The following were measured at the beginning and end of each intervention: weight, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial 2-h blood glucose (PPG), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), antiglycemic medications, and medications for other diseases and emerging diseases. The effect of decreasing blood glucose control with the LCD is superior to that of the LFD for Chinese patients with T2DM. It also led to a lower medication effects score (MES). It can reduce body weight, BMI, and lipid-lowering agents. Strict diet control and monitoring are the keys to managing diabetes. Further larger scale studies are needed to obtain more evidence.
Abstract
Objective: Multiple studies have confirmed that diet restrictions can effectively realize glycemic control and reduce metabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In 2018, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) stated that individuals can select a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) according to their needs and preferences. Owing to the influence of Chinese traditional eating habits, only a small portion of patients in China have achieved their blood glucose goals. As a result, the Chinese government will incur huge expenditures. Method: This study recruited 134 T2DM participants and randomly assigned them to the LCD group (n = 67) or the low-fat diet (LFD) group (n = 67). All of the patients had a fixed amount of exercise and were guided by clinicians. After a period of dietary washout, all of the patients received corresponding dietary education according to group. The follow-up time was 6 months. The indicators for anthropometry, glycemic control, and medication application parameters were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: There were 121 participants who finally entered the study. The proportions of calories from three major nutrients the participants consumed met the requirements of LCD and LFD. Compared with baseline, the pre-postdifferences of body weight, BMI, and several other indicators were significant except for dosages of insulin used in the LCD group and MES in the LFD group. After the intervention, body weight, body weight index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial 2-h blood glucose (PPG), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in the LCD group decreased significantly (p < 0.05) compared with the LFD group. The number of patients using lipid-lowering agents was significant higher in the LCD group and lower in the LFD group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups for antihypertensive, hormone-replacement, and other agents. Conclusions: The LCD diet can decrease body weight, glycemic levels, MES, and lipid-lowering agents more than the LFD diet, thus decreasing cost burden in Chinese patients with T2DM. Strict diet control and monitoring are the keys to managing diabetes.