-
1.
Relationship between Ketones, Ghrelin, and, Appetite on Isocaloric Diets with Varying Carbohydrate Quality and Amount: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in People with Obesity (CARBFUNC).
Sommersten, CH, Gjerde, ES, Laupsa-Borge, J, Andersen, AI, Lawrence-Archer, L, McCann, A, Hansson, P, Raza, GS, Herzig, KH, Lied, GA, et al
The Journal of nutrition. 2023;153(2):459-469
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diet induced fat loss can result in an increase in appetite, contributing to weight loss regression and reduced diet adherence after successful weight loss. Certain diets such as those very high in fat and low in carbohydrates, which switches the body’s main fuel source to fat instead of sugar, have been shown to suppress feelings of hunger after weight loss. When this occurs it is known as ketosis and these diets may suppress a hormone, which is responsible for feelings of hunger, known as ghrelin. Diets which focus on the quality of the carbohydrate being consumed have also been shown to affect appetite. This randomised control trial of 193 individuals aimed to determine the effect of ketosis and the quality of carbohydrates on ghrelin and feelings of hunger. The results showed that ketosis during a low carbohydrate high fat diet was insufficient to decrease levels of the hunger hormone ghrelin and increased feelings of hunger. Carbohydrate quality also failed to decrease feelings of hunger or the hunger hormone ghrelin. It was concluded that regardless of the diet, fat loss resulted in feelings of hunger, which could not be supressed by a high-quality carbohydrate diet or a low carbohydrate high fat diet. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that weight loss may be hindered by an increase in appetite. If this occurs, strategies to limit the hunger hormone ghrelin may be successful in maintaining weight loss.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF) diets may suppress the increase in appetite otherwise seen after diet-induced fat loss. However, studies of diets without severe energy restriction are lacking, and the effects of carbohydrate quality relative to quantity have not been directly compared. OBJECTIVES To evaluated short- (3 mo) and long-term (12 mo) changes in fasting plasma concentrations of total ghrelin, β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB), and subjective feelings of appetite on 3 isocaloric eating patterns within a moderate caloric range (2000-2500 kcal/d) and with varying carbohydrate quality or quantity. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled trial of 193 adults with obesity, comparing eating patterns based on "acellular" carbohydrate sources (e.g., flour-based whole-grain products; comparator arm), "cellular" carbohydrate sources (minimally processed foods with intact cellular structures), or LCHF principles. Outcomes were compared by an intention-to-treat analysis using constrained linear mixed modeling. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03401970. RESULTS Of the 193 adults, 118 (61%) and 57 (30%) completed 3 and 12 mo of follow-up. Throughout the intervention, intakes of protein and energy were similar with all 3 eating patterns, with comparable reductions in body weight (5%-7%) and visceral fat volume (12%-17%) after 12 mo. After 3 mo, ghrelin increased significantly with the acellular (mean: 46 pg/mL; 95% CI: 11, 81) and cellular (mean: 54 pg/mL; 95% CI: 21, 88) diets but not with the LCHF diet (mean: 11 pg/mL; 95% CI: -16, 38). Although βHB increased significantly more with the LCHF diet than with the acellular diet after 3 m (mean: 0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.24), this did not correspond to a significant group difference in ghrelin (unless the 2 high-carbohydrate groups were combined [mean: -39.6 pg/mL; 95% CI: -76, -3.3]). No significant between-group differences were seen in feelings of hunger. CONCLUSIONS Modestly energy-restricted isocaloric diets differing in carbohydrate cellularity and amount showed no significant differences in fasting total ghrelin or subjective hunger feelings. An increase in ketones with the LCHF diet to 0.3-0.4 mmol/L was insufficient to substantially curb increases in fasting ghrelin during fat loss.
-
2.
Gut bless you: The microbiota-gut-brain axis in irritable bowel syndrome.
Hillestad, EMR, van der Meeren, A, Nagaraja, BH, Bjørsvik, BR, Haleem, N, Benitez-Paez, A, Sanz, Y, Hausken, T, Lied, GA, Lundervold, A, et al
World journal of gastroenterology. 2022;(4):412-431
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common clinical label for medically unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms, recently described as a disturbance of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Despite decades of research, the pathophysiology of this highly heterogeneous disorder remains elusive. However, a dramatic change in the understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms surfaced when the importance of gut microbiota protruded the scientific picture. Are we getting any closer to understanding IBS' etiology, or are we drowning in unspecific, conflicting data because we possess limited tools to unravel the cluster of secrets our gut microbiota is concealing? In this comprehensive review we are discussing some of the major important features of IBS and their interaction with gut microbiota, clinical microbiota-altering treatment such as the low FODMAP diet and fecal microbiota transplantation, neuroimaging and methods in microbiota analyses, and current and future challenges with big data analysis in IBS.
-
3.
The Effect of Anaerobically Cultivated Human Intestinal Microbiota Compared to Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Gut Microbiota Profile and Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome, a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.
Mazzawi, T, Hausken, T, Refsnes, PF, Hatlebakk, JG, Lied, GA
Microorganisms. 2022;(9)
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from healthy donors has been shown to improve the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and changes the profile of the gut microbiota for the recipients. Alternatively, anaerobically cultivated human intestinal microbiota (ACHIM) can be used to manipulate the gut microbiota. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ACHIM suspension with donor-FMT and placebo (patient's own feces) to treat IBS. Out of the 62 originally included eligible patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS and their respective donors, only 43 patients completed the study by answering the questionnaires and delivering fecal samples before transplantation and after 1, 4, 12 and 24 weeks. The patients were randomized into three subgroups for receiving ACHIM suspension (n = 17), donor-FMT (n = 11), or placebo (n = 15), and were followed up for 24 weeks. Fecal samples were analyzed by sequencing 16S rRNA gene using the GA-map Dysbiosis Test (Genetic Analysis AS, Oslo, Norway). IBS symptom questionnaires improved in all three subgroups. Bacterial strain signals in IBS patients were more significant for Actinobacteria spp. and Bifidobacteria spp. after receiving donor-FMT compared to placebo and for Alistipes onderdonkii before and after treatment in the subgroups of ACHIM and donor-FMT vs. placebo. These signals change after treatment with ACHIM suspension and donor FMT towards those measured for healthy controls, but not after placebo. IBS symptom questionnaires improved in all three forms of transplantation. Some bacterial strain signals were significantly different between ACHIM and donor-FMT vs. placebo. However, the placebo subgroup failed to change the gut microbiota towards signals measured for healthy controls. The safety and efficacy of ACHIM and donor-FMT seems similar in the current study, but further larger studies are needed.
-
4.
Effects of Plant-Based Diets on Weight Status: A Systematic Review.
Tran, E, Dale, HF, Jensen, C, Lied, GA
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy. 2020;13:3433-3448
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Being overweight or obese is a huge risk factor for many detrimental conditions. It is estimated that around one-third of the world’s population will be overweight or obese by 2025. Hence there is a need to look at dietary strategies in the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity. Plant-based diets have always existed, however interest in the topic has increased recently and more research is being done on the health-related effects of different plant-based diets. There are many reasons why someone might convert to a plant-based diet, possible health benefits such as weight management are among the most common. The purpose of this review was to evaluate intervention studies assessing the effects of different plant-based diets on body mass index and weight. The results suggest that plant-based diets may improve weight status in some patient groups. It should be noted that only one study out of the 19 included in the review had normal weight, clinically healthy participants. The study populations for the rest were overweight, obese or had type 2 diabetes. Future research should aim to include a representative study population and apply study diets without dietary restrictions.
Abstract
There is an increasing number of people who convert to a plant-based diet. The desire for health benefits, including weight management, is often a contributing factor behind this dietary choice. The purpose of this review was to evaluate intervention studies assessing the effects of different plant-based diets on body mass index and weight. A literature search was conducted in PubMed until December 2019. Twenty-two publications from 19 studies were included. The majority of them were randomized controlled trials comparing a low-fat vegan diet to an omnivore diet in participants with overweight, type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or cardiovascular disease. All studies reported weight reductions, of which seven revealed significant differences, and four revealed non-significant differences between the intervention and the control groups. The results suggest that plant-based diets may improve weight status in some patient groups. Due to restrictions in fat intake in many studies, followed by reduced energy intake, the effects of the different interventions differ depending on the specific plant-based diets investigated. Future research should aim to include a representative study population and apply study diets without dietary restrictions.
-
5.
Comparison of gut microbiota profile in celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.
Transeth, EL, Dale, HF, Lied, GA
The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. 2020;31(11):735-745
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dysbiosis refers to a disturbance in the quantity and composition of the gut microbiota, and this shift in the microbiota profile is associated with a variety of GI disorders including celiac disease (CD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). There is no current clinical distinction between IBS and NCGS although it is hypothesised the characteristics of gut microbiota of these clinical presentations may overlap. The aim of this review is to analyse the gut microbiota profile in these three diagnoses. Thirteen trials were included in this review and show the bacterial composition of the gut microbiota of patients with CD and IBS shared many similarities when compared to healthy controls, including an overall reduction in microbial abundance. There were fewer similarities between IBS and NCGS, in part due to the lack of existing literature. Based on these findings, the authors suggest the bacterial profiles of patients CD and IBS share certain disease-specific trends. While the current data is limited, the authors hope these suggested trends influence further research to examine the overlap between NCGS and IBS and distinguish differential diagnostic and treatment plans.
Abstract
Gut microbiota is vital for human health. Shifts in the microbial diversity can affect bacterial function, and dysbiosis is associated with a variety of gastrointestinal disorders, including celiac disease (CD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The distinction between IBS and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is unclear, and it is conceivable that the gut microbiota profile of these patients may overlap. To our knowledge, no existing literature has evaluated the microbial characteristics in CD, IBS, and NCGS. Hence, this systematic review aims to compare the gut microbiota profile in these three diagnoses. A literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline) until April 2019. Studies investigating bacterial diversity in the gut of patients with CD, IBS, and NCGS were eligible. Inclusion criteria were observational studies and randomized controlled trials reporting bacterial profile at baseline. Ninety-one articles were identified, of which 13 trials were eligible for inclusion. Overall, the bacterial composition of the gut microbiota of patients with CD and those with IBS shared the many similarities. The microbial richness was correspondingly reduced in these patient-groups compared with healthy controls, but this was not reported for NCGS. Our findings suggest that the bacterial profiles of patients with IBS and CD share certain disease-specific trends. Fewer similarities were observed between the bacterial profiles of patients with IBS and NCGS. Notably, the data are limited; thus, no solid conclusions can be made on the basis of these findings alone. The suggested trends can be a valuable basis for further research.
-
6.
Effects of Plant-Based Diets on Outcomes Related to Glucose Metabolism: A Systematic Review.
Johannesen, CO, Dale, HF, Jensen, C, Lied, GA
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy. 2020;13:2811-2822
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Research indicates that a reduction in the intake of animal products and an increase in plant-based foods have several positive health outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a plant-based diet on outcomes related to glucose metabolism. This study is a systemic review of nine randomised controlled trials which focused on subjects with overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease. Overall, the results of this study were inconsistent overall. Findings show that: - five of the nine studies (56%) showed that the plant-based intervention significantly improved markers of glycaemic control from baseline to end point. - four studies (44%) showed a significant improvement in markers of glycaemic control in the intervention group that differed from the control intervention. Additionally, they also did not reveal any significant improvements of a plant-based intervention on outcomes related to glucose metabolism. Authors outline that no clear conclusion regarding effects of different plant-based diets can be drawn based on the current findings.
Abstract
According to the rising prevalence of obesity and metabolic disorders leading to impaired glucose metabolism, effective strategies to prevent and/or delay the onset of disease are of great need. A plant-based diet has been suggested as an effective lifestyle change that may reduce the degree of obesity and improve outcomes related to glucose metabolism. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of a plant-based diet on outcomes related to glucose metabolism. A literature search was conducted in the database PubMed until January 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of a plant-based dietary intervention on outcomes related to glucose metabolism in human subjects compared to an omnivorous diet were eligible for inclusion. Of 65 publications identified, nine trials on subjects with overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease were included. Five studies reported that the plant-based intervention significantly improved markers of glycemic control from baseline to end point, of which four revealed a significant improvement in the intervention group compared to the control intervention. The remaining four studies did not observe a significant effect of a plant-based intervention on outcomes related to glucose metabolism. Our findings suggest that a shift to a plant-based diet may lead to favorable effects on glycemic control in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or obesity. The data were however somewhat conflicting, and the included trials reported results based on different intervention diets and study populations. Overall, no clear conclusions regarding effects of different plant-based diets can be drawn based on the current findings alone.
-
7.
Gut microbiota and therapeutic approaches for dysbiosis in irritable bowel syndrome: recent developments and future perspectives.
Dale, HF, Lied, GA
Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2020;(SI-2):1632-1641
Abstract
Increased knowledge regarding the implications of gut microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) suggests that a disturbed intestinal microenvironment (dysbiosis) might promote the development and maintenance of IBS symptoms and affects several pathways in the pathology of this multifactorial disease. Accordingly, manipulation of the gut microbiota in order to improve IBS symptoms has evolved as a novel treatment strategy in the last decade. Several different approaches have been investigated in order to improve the gut microbiota composition. Dietary modifications including supplementation with fibers, prebiotics, and probiotics are shown to improve symptoms and composition of gut microbiota in IBS; however, the exact probiotic mixture beneficial for each individual remains to be identified. The use of antibiotics still needs confirmation, although promising results have been reported with use of rifaximin. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has recently gained a lot of attention, and several placebo-controlled trials investigating FMT obtain promising results regarding symptom reduction and gut microbiota manipulation in IBS. However, more data regarding long-term effects are needed before FMT can be integrated as a customized treatment for IBS in the clinical routine.
-
8.
Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review.
Dale, HF, Rasmussen, SH, Asiller, ÖÖ, Lied, GA
Nutrients. 2019;(9)
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a frequent functional gastrointestinal disorder, and alterations in the gut microbiota composition contributes to symptom generation. The exact mechanisms of probiotics in the human body are not fully understood, but probiotic supplements are thought to improve IBS symptoms through manipulation of the gut microbiota. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the latest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of probiotic supplementation on symptoms in IBS patients. A literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed) until March 2019. RCTs published within the last five years evaluating effects of probiotic supplements on IBS symptoms were eligible. The search identified in total 35 studies, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Seven studies (63.6%) reported that supplementation with probiotics in IBS patients significantly improved symptoms compared to placebo, whereas the remaining four studies (36.4%) did not report any significant improvement in symptoms after probiotic supplementation. Of note, three studies evaluated the effect of a mono-strain supplement, whereas the remaining eight trials used a multi-strain probiotic. Overall, the beneficial effects were more distinct in the trials using multi-strain supplements with an intervention of 8 weeks or more, suggesting that multi-strain probiotics supplemented over a period of time have the potential to improve IBS symptoms.
-
9.
Clinical response to fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is associated with normalization of fecal microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acid levels.
Mazzawi, T, Hausken, T, Hov, JR, Valeur, J, Sangnes, DA, El-Salhy, M, Gilja, OH, Hatlebakk, JG, Lied, GA
Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 2019;(6):690-699
Abstract
Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may be associated with disturbances in gut microbiota composition and functions. We recently performed a study of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) and found that IBS symptoms improved and the gut microbiota profile changed following FMT. We now aimed to explore the effects of FMT on the gut microenvironment in further detail by using 16S rRNA sequencing for more extended microbiota profiling and analyzing bacterial fermentation products (SCFAs: short chain fatty acids). Materials and methods: The study included 13 patients (four females and nine males) with IBS-D according to Rome III criteria and 13 healthy donors. Freshly donated feces were administered into duodenum via gastroscopy. The patients completed symptom and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires and delivered feces before and 1, 3, 12 and 20/28 weeks after FMT. Microbiota analysis was performed by sequencing 16S rRNA gene with Illumina Miseq technology. Fecal concentrations of SCFAs were analyzed by vacuum distillation followed by gas chromatography. Results: Several gut microbiota taxa and SCFAs were significantly different in the patients at baseline compared to their donors. These differences normalized by the third week following FMT in parallel with significant improvement in symptoms and QoL. Responders had different gut microbiota profile and SCFAs than nonresponders. Significant correlations were found between the gut microenvironment and IBS symptoms. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: FMT restores alterations of the gut microenvironment in IBS-D patients during the first 3 weeks and improves their symptoms for up to 28 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03333291.
-
10.
Erratum: Effect of a cod protein hydrolysate on postprandial glucose metabolism in healthy subjects: a double-blind cross-over trial - CORRIGENDUM.
Dale, HF, Jensen, C, Hausken, T, Lied, E, Hatlebakk, JG, Brønstad, I, Hoff, DAL, Lied, GA
Journal of nutritional science. 2019;:e1
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1017/jns.2018.23.].