1.
Neurological Manifestations of Neuropathy and Ataxia in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review.
Mearns, ES, Taylor, A, Thomas Craig, KJ, Puglielli, S, Leffler, DA, Sanders, DS, Lebwohl, B, Hadjivassiliou, M
Nutrients. 2019;11(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy in which dietary gluten triggers an inflammatory reaction of the small intestine in genetically predisposed individuals. The clinical presentation of the disease varies broadly and may include both intestinal symptoms and extra-intestinal manifestations, including iron-deficiency anaemia, osteoporosis, dermatitis herpetiformis, and neurological disorders, such as peripheral neuropathies and ataxia (a condition that affects co-ordination, balance and speech). Many patients who present with neurological manifestations of CD have no gastrointestinal symptoms, commonly leading to a delay in diagnosis. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the prevalence of peripheral neuropathies and gluten ataxia. Nine studies on gluten ataxia and 13 on gluten neuropathy were included in this review. The prevalence of both, neuropathy and ataxia, in the general population is very low, but this risk is increased in patients with CD. Estimates of the prevalence of neuropathy in CD patients ranged from 0% to 39%, with an increased risk in older and female patients. Prevalence of gluten ataxia varied from 0% to 6%. Symptoms of gluten neuropathy improve when patients with CD follow a gluten free diet (GFD), whilst the benefits of a GFD for ataxia vary between studies, possibly due to differences in study design. The authors note that this review primarily concentrated on patients with CD (i.e. those with evidence of enteropathy). However, neurological manifestations may exist in the presence of anti-gliadin antibodies alone (gluten sensitivity without evidence of enteropathy), and such patients benefit equally from a GFD. The authors conclude that patients with CD have an increased risk of gluten ataxia and gluten neuropathy, and that clinicians should check for gluten sensitivity in patients with ataxia and neuropathy of unknown origin.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated gastrointestinal disorder driven by innate and adaptive immune responses to gluten. Patients with CD are at an increased risk of several neurological manifestations, frequently peripheral neuropathy and gluten ataxia. A systematic literature review of the most commonly reported neurological manifestations (neuropathy and ataxia) associated with CD was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings were systematically searched from January 2007 through September 2018. Included studies evaluated patients with CD with at least one neurological manifestation of interest and reported prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or clinical outcomes. Sixteen studies were included describing the risk of gluten neuropathy and/or gluten ataxia in patients with CD. Gluten neuropathy was a neurological manifestation in CD (up to 39%) in 13 studies. Nine studies reported a lower risk and/or prevalence of gluten ataxia with a range of 0%⁻6%. Adherence to a gluten-free diet appeared to improve symptoms of both neuropathy and ataxia. The prevalence of gluten neuropathy and gluten ataxia in patients with CD varied in reported studies, but the increased risk supports the need for physicians to consider CD in patients with ataxia and neurological manifestations of unknown etiology.
2.
Vitamin K antagonist use: evidence of the difficulty of achieving and maintaining target INR range and subsequent consequences.
Schein, JR, White, CM, Nelson, WW, Kluger, J, Mearns, ES, Coleman, CI
Thrombosis journal. 2016;:14
Abstract
Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are effective oral anticoagulants that are titrated to a narrow therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range. We reviewed published literature assessing the impact of INR stability - getting into and staying in target INR range - on outcomes including thrombotic events, major bleeding, and treatment costs, as well as key factors that impact INR stability. A time in therapeutic range (TTR) of ≥65 % is commonly accepted as the definition of INR stability. In the real-world setting, this is seldom achieved with standard-of-care management, thus increasing the patients' risks of thrombotic or major bleeding events. There are many factors associated with poor INR control. Being treated in community settings, newly initiated on a VKA, younger in age, or nonadherent to therapy, as well as having polymorphisms of CYP2C9 or VKORC1, or multiple physical or mental co-morbid disease states have been associated with lower TTR. Clinical prediction tools are available, though they can only explain <10 % of the variance behind poor INR control. Clinicians caring for patients who require anticoagulation are encouraged to intensify diligence in INR management when using VKAs and to consider appropriate use of newer anticoagulants as a therapeutic option.
3.
Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drug regimens added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis.
Mearns, ES, Sobieraj, DM, White, CM, Saulsberry, WJ, Kohn, CG, Doleh, Y, Zaccaro, E, Coleman, CI
PloS one. 2015;(4):e0125879
Abstract
INTRODUCTION When first line therapy with metformin is insufficient for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the optimal adjunctive therapy is unclear. We assessed the efficacy and safety of adjunctive antidiabetic agents in patients with inadequately controlled T2D on metformin alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, regulatory websites was performed. We included randomized controlled trials of 3-12 months duration, evaluating Food and Drug Administration or European Union approved agents (noninsulin and long acting, once daily basal insulins) in patients experiencing inadequate glycemic control with metformin monotherapy (≥ 1500 mg daily or maximally tolerated dose for ≥ 4 weeks). Random-effects network meta-analyses were used to compare the weighted mean difference for changes from baseline in HbA1c, body weight (BW) and systolic blood pressure (SBP), and the risk of developing hypoglycemia, urinary (UTI) and genital tract infection (GTI). RESULTS Sixty-two trials evaluating 25 agents were included. All agents significantly reduced HbA1c vs. placebo; albeit not to the same extent (range, 0.43% for miglitol to 1.29% for glibenclamide). Glargine, sulfonylureas (SUs) and nateglinide were associated with increased hypoglycemia risk vs. placebo (range, 4.00-11.67). Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs, miglitol and empagliflozin/linagliptin significantly reduced BW (range, 1.15-2.26 kg) whereas SUs, thiazolindinediones, glargine and alogliptin/pioglitazone caused weight gain (range, 1.19-2.44 kg). SGLT2 inhibitors, empagliflozin/linagliptin, liraglutide and sitagliptin decreased SBP (range, 1.88-5.43 mmHg). No therapy increased UTI risk vs. placebo; however, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of GTI (range, 2.16-8.03). CONCLUSIONS Adding different AHAs to metformin was associated with varying effects on HbA1c, BW, SBP, hypoglycemia, UTI and GTI which should impact clinician choice when selecting adjunctive therapy.
4.
Measures of vitamin K antagonist control reported in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism studies: a systematic review.
Mearns, ES, Hawthorne, J, Song, JS, Coleman, CI
BMJ open. 2014;(6):e005379
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To aid trialists, systematic reviewers and others, we evaluated the degree of standardisation of control measure reporting that has occurred in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) studies since 2000; and attempted to determine whether the prior recommendation of reporting ≥2 measures per study has been employed. DESIGN Systematic review. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched bibliographic databases (2000 to June 2013) to identify AF and VTE studies evaluating dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and reporting ≥1 control measure. The types of measures reported, proportion of studies reporting ≥2 measures and mean (±SD) number of measures per study were determined for all studies and compared between subgroups. DATA EXTRACTION Through the use of a standardised data extraction tool, we independently extracted all data, with disagreements resolved by a separate investigator. RESULTS 148 studies were included, 57% of which reported ≥2 control measures (mean/study=2.13±1.36). The proportion of time spent in the target international normalised ratio range (TTR) was most commonly reported (79%), and was frequently accompanied by time above/below range (52%). AF studies more frequently reported ≥2 control measures compared with VTE studies (63% vs 37%; p=0.004), and reported a greater number of measures per study (mean=2.36 vs 1.53; p<0.001). Observational studies were more likely to provide ≥2 measures compared with randomised trials (76% vs 33%; p<0.001) and report a greater number of measures (mean=2.58 vs 1.63; p<0.001). More recent studies (2004-2013) reported ≥2 measures more often than older (2000-2003) studies (59% vs 35%; p=0.05) and reported more measures per study (mean=2.23 vs 1.48; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS While TTR was often utilised, studies reported ≥2 measures of VKA control only about half of the time and lacked consistency in the types of measures reported. A trend towards studies reporting greater numbers of VKA control measures over time was observed over our review time horizon, particularly, with AF and observational studies.