1.
CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores as predictors of recurrence for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients on vitamin K antagonists after radiofrequency catheter ablation.
Zhao, J, Zhou, D, Chen, M, Zhuo, C, Lin, Z, Zheng, L, Wang, Q
Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). 2020;(3):200-208
Abstract
AIMS: Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia in the general population, and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation has emerged as a cornerstone in the treatment of drug-resistant atrial fibrillation. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores as predictors of outcomes among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on vitamin K antagonists after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). METHODS The current prospective observational study enrolled 304 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent RFCA. Warfarin was maintained for at least 3 months after RFCA. The 1-year atrial fibrillation recurrence rate was documented. RESULTS Persistent atrial fibrillation (P = 0.003), heart failure (P < 0.001), an enlarged left atrium (P = 0.003), current smoking (P < 0.001), the CHA2DS2-VASc score (P = 0.001), and the SAMe-TT2R2 score (P < 0.001) were univariate associated with recurrent atrial fibrillation. Cutoff analysis showed that a CHA2DS2-VASc score at least 3 (areas under the curve = 0.612; 95% confidence interval 0.537-0.687) and a SAMe-TT2R2 score at least 5 (areas under the curve = 0.642, 95% confidence interval 0.575-0.708) had the highest predictive value for atrial fibrillation recurrence. Patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score at least 3 (P < 0.001) and a SAMe-TT2R2 score at least 5 (P = 0.001) had a higher probability of experiencing atrial fibrillation recurrence after RFCA compared with patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score less than 3 and a SAMe-TT2R2 score less than 5. CONCLUSION CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores were associated with 1-year recurrence of atrial fibrillation in patients on vitamin K antagonists after RFCA. For CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores, a cutoff value of at least 3 and at least 5 had the highest predictive value for atrial fibrillation recurrence, respectively.
2.
Sorafenib combined with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of medium-sized hepatocellular carcinoma.
Kan, X, Jing, Y, Wan, QY, Pan, JC, Han, M, Yang, Y, Zhu, M, Wang, Q, Liu, KH
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2015;(2):247-55
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is the proved therapy method for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on heat delivery, Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been found to achieve complete neoplasm necrosis. It is the most widely performed percutaneous therapy for HCC. However, Study associated combined Sorafenib with RFA therapy for patients with advanced HCC has never been reported. The aim of present study is to explore the efficacy and safety of sorafenib combined with RFA therapy for the patients with medium-sized HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 62 patients diagnosed as HCC were involved in this study. All patients were randomly assigned to sorafenib and RFA (n=30) or RFA-alone (n=32) treatment groups. Treatment outcomes, including recurrence rates, time to progression (TTP) and adverse reactions induced by sorafenib were observed and recorded to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination method. RESULTS During the overall follow-up period, the recurrence rate of the combination subgroup was 56.7% (17/30), and that of the RFA-alone subgroup was 87.5% (28/32) (p < 0.01). The median TTP was 17.0 months in the combination therapy vs. 6.1 months in the RFA-alone (p < 0.05). Hand-foot skin reactions were reported by 83.3% (25/30) of patients and 46.7% (14/30) reported diarrhea while the most adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in the combination subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Sorafenib combined with RFA significantly decreased recurrence rates and prolonged the survival time of medium-sized HCC patients. The combination therapy is safer and more effective than the control without unexpected side effects. Furthermore, the earlier application, the better results were.