1.
Does the High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in African Americans Contribute to Health Disparities?
Ames, BN, Grant, WB, Willett, WC
Nutrients. 2021;(2)
Abstract
African Americans have higher incidence of, and mortality from, many health-related problems than European Americans. They also have a 15 to 20-fold higher prevalence of severe vitamin D deficiency. Here we summarize evidence that: (i) this health disparity is partly due to insufficient vitamin D production, caused by melanin in the skin blocking the UVB solar radiation necessary for its synthesis; (ii) the vitamin D insufficiency is exacerbated at high latitudes because of the combination of dark skin color with lower UVB radiation levels; and (iii) the health of individuals with dark skin can be markedly improved by correcting deficiency and achieving an optimal vitamin D status, as could be obtained by supplementation and/or fortification. Moderate-to-strong evidence exists that high 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and/or vitamin D supplementation reduces risk for many adverse health outcomes including all-cause mortality rate, adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, cancer, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease and dementia, multiple sclerosis, acute respiratory tract infections, COVID-19, asthma exacerbations, rickets, and osteomalacia. We suggest that people with low vitamin D status, which would include most people with dark skin living at high latitudes, along with their health care provider, consider taking vitamin D3 supplements to raise serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels to 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) or possibly higher.
2.
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation, Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation, or a Strength-Training Exercise Program on Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults: The DO-HEALTH Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bischoff-Ferrari, HA, Vellas, B, Rizzoli, R, Kressig, RW, da Silva, JAP, Blauth, M, Felson, DT, McCloskey, EV, Watzl, B, Hofbauer, LC, et al
JAMA. 2020;(18):1855-1868
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The benefits of vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, and exercise in disease prevention remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To test whether vitamin D, omega-3s, and a strength-training exercise program, alone or in combination, improved 6 health outcomes among older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial among 2157 adults aged 70 years or older who had no major health events in the 5 years prior to enrollment and had sufficient mobility and good cognitive status. Patients were recruited between December 2012 and November 2014, and final follow-up was in November 2017. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to 3 years of intervention in 1 of the following 8 groups: 2000 IU/d of vitamin D3, 1 g/d of omega-3s, and a strength-training exercise program (n = 264); vitamin D3 and omega-3s (n = 265); vitamin D3 and exercise (n = 275); vitamin D3 alone (n = 272); omega-3s and exercise (n = 275); omega-3s alone (n = 269); exercise alone (n = 267); or placebo (n = 270). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The 6 primary outcomes were change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and incidence rates (IRs) of nonvertebral fractures and infections over 3 years. Based on multiple comparisons of 6 primary end points, 99% confidence intervals are presented and P < .01 was required for statistical significance. RESULTS Among 2157 randomized participants (mean age, 74.9 years; 61.7% women), 1900 (88%) completed the study. Median follow-up was 2.99 years. Overall, there were no statistically significant benefits of any intervention individually or in combination for the 6 end points at 3 years. For instance, the differences in mean change in systolic BP with vitamin D vs no vitamin D and with omega-3s vs no omega-3s were both -0.8 (99% CI, -2.1 to 0.5) mm Hg, with P < .13 and P < .11, respectively; the difference in mean change in diastolic BP with omega-3s vs no omega-3s was -0.5 (99% CI, -1.2 to 0.2) mm Hg; P = .06); and the difference in mean change in IR of infections with omega-3s vs no omega-3s was -0.13 (99% CI, -0.23 to -0.03), with an IR ratio of 0.89 (99% CI, 0.78-1.01; P = .02). No effects were found on the outcomes of SPPB, MoCA, and incidence of nonvertebral fractures). A total of 25 deaths were reported, with similar numbers in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults without major comorbidities aged 70 years or older, treatment with vitamin D3, omega-3s, or a strength-training exercise program did not result in statistically significant differences in improvement in systolic or diastolic blood pressure, nonvertebral fractures, physical performance, infection rates, or cognitive function. These findings do not support the effectiveness of these 3 interventions for these clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01745263.
3.
Effect of Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D on Mental Health in Older Adults: Secondary Analysis of a RCT.
Gugger, A, Marzel, A, Orav, EJ, Willett, WC, Dawson-Hughes, B, Theiler, R, Freystätter, G, Egli, A, Bischoff-Ferrari, HA
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;(6):1211-1217
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test the effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on mental health in pre-frail older adults. DESIGN Ancillary study of a 1-year double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted in Zurich, Switzerland. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 200 community-dwelling adults 70 years and older with a prior fall event in the last year. Participants were randomized to receive 24 000 IU vitamin D3 (considered standard of care), 60 000 IU vitamin D3 , or 24 000 IU vitamin D3 plus 300 μg calcifediol per month. MEASURES The primary end point was the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the SF-36. Secondary end points were the SF-36 Mental Health (MH) subscale and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). RESULTS Participants' mean age was 78 years (67% women), and 58% were vitamin D deficient (<20 ng/mL). Over time, primary and secondary end points did not differ significantly among the three treatment groups or in subgroups by vitamin D status at baseline. Given the lack of a true placebo group, we explored in a predefined observational analysis the change in mental health scales by achieved 25(OH)D levels at 12 months. After adjusting for confounders, participants achieving the highest 25(OH)D quartile (Q) at 12 months (44.7-98.9 ng/mL) had the greatest improvements in MCS (Q4 = 0.79 vs Q1 = -2.9; p = .03) and MH scales (Q4 = 2.54 vs Q1 = -3.07; p = .03); these associations were strongest among participants who were vitamin D deficient at baseline. No association was found for GDS (p = .89). CONCLUSIONS For mental health, our study suggests no benefit of higher monthly doses of vitamin D3 compared with the standard monthly dose of 24 000 IU. However, irrespective of vitamin D treatment dose, achieving higher 25(OH)D levels at 12-month follow-up was associated with a small, clinically uncertain but statistically significant improvement in mental health scores.