1.
Cardioprotective effects of single oral dose of nicorandil before selective percutaneous coronary intervention.
Yang, J, Zhang, J, Cui, W, Liu, F, Xie, R, Yang, X, Gu, G, Zheng, H, Lu, J, Yang, X, et al
Anatolian journal of cardiology. 2015;(2):125-31
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nicorandil, an opener of ATP-sensitive K+ channels, was used to treat angina in patients with coronary artery disease. In this study, we aim to investigate the cardioprotective effects of single oral dose of nicorandil in patients undergoing selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS One hundred and thirty-eight patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI from July 2011 to October 2012 were randomly divided into control group (group 1, n = 47), 10 mg oral nicorandil group (group 2, n = 45), and 20 mg oral nicorandil group (group 3, n = 46) about 2 hours before procedure, respectively. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels were determined at 20 ~ 24 hours after PCI. RESULTS There was a significant difference in the rate of any cTnI elevation among the three groups (group 1: 36.17%, group 2: 20.00%, group 3: 15.22%, p = 0.0176). With respect to the frequency of cTnI elevation ≥ 3 and 5 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), there also had statistical difference among the three groups (17.02% in group 1, 8.89% in group 2, and 4.35% in group 3, respectively for cTnI elevation ≥ 3 × ULN, p = 0.0428; 12.77% in group 1, 6.67% in group 2, and 2.17% in group 3, respectively, for cTnI elevation ≥ 5 × ULN, p = 0.0487). Logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF (OR = 0.915, 95% CI = 0.853-0.981) and the use of nicorandil (OR = 0.516, 95% CI = 0.267-0.996) before PCI were independent protective factors of myocardial injury. CONCLUSION Single oral dose of nicorandil (10 mg, 20 mg) 2 hours before the PCI procedure could decrease the incidence of peri-procedure myocardial injury and PCI-related myocardial infarction.
2.
Hydralazine and nitrates alone or combined for the management of chronic heart failure: A systematic review.
Farag, M, Mabote, T, Shoaib, A, Zhang, J, Nabhan, AF, Clark, AL, Cleland, JG
International journal of cardiology. 2015;:61-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hydralazine (H) and nitrates (Ns), when combined, reduced morbidity and mortality in some trials of chronic heart failure (CHF). It is unclear whether either agent used alone provides similar benefits. We aimed to evaluate the effects of H and/or N in patients with CHF. METHODS A systematic review of randomised trials assessing the effects of H and N in CHF. For meta-analysis, only the endpoints of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were considered. RESULTS In seven trials evaluating H&N in 2626 patients, combination therapy reduced all-cause mortality (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.95; p=0.02), and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.99; p=0.04) compared to placebo. However, when compared to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), combination therapy was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.03-1.76; p=0.03), and cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.04-1.81; p=0.03). For N alone, ten trials including 375 patients reported all-cause mortality and showed a trend to harm (13 deaths in those assigned to nitrates and 7 to placebo; OR 2.13; 95% CI 0.88-5.13; p=0.09). For H alone, three trials showed no difference in all-cause mortality compared to placebo (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.37-2.47; p=0.93), and two trials suggested inferiority to ACEI (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.03-5.04; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Compared to placebo, H&N reduces mortality in patients with CHF. Whether race or background therapy influences benefit is uncertain, but on direct comparison H&N appears inferior to ACEI. There is little evidence to support the use of either drug alone in CHF.