1.
Clinical and radiological results comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone cage for one to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A CONSORT-compliant article.
Yang, S, Yu, Y, Liu, X, Zhang, Z, Hou, T, Xu, J, Wu, W, Luo, F
Medicine. 2019;(45):e17935
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, many kinds of cages for cervical fusion have been developed to avoid the related complications caused by tricortical iliac crest graft. The existing literature has reported the excellent clinical efficacy and superior fusion rate. However, various types of cages have their own disadvantages. Which bone graft material is the best choice for cage with the fewest complications? At present, there is still no conclusion. METHODS By reviewing patients with 1 to 2-level cervical degenerative disease in our hospital with a novel cage made of allograft or polyetheretherketone (PEEK), we evaluated the efficacy and reliability of the new cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). From 2015 to 2016, a prospective review of 58 and 49 consecutive cases with spondylotic radiculopathy or myelopathy undergoing ACDF using allograft (group A) and PEEK (group B) cage were performed. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 40 months. Intraoperative index, clinical outcome and complications were recorded. Radiographs evaluated segmental and overall cervical lordosis, the height of the intervertebral space, interbody height ratio (IHR), cage positioning, and fusion state. RESULTS A total of 134 cages were implanted. Compared to preoperatively, the visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) were reduced postoperatively without any change during the subsequent follow-up in both groups. There was no migration or extrusion of the cages at the latest follow-up. There were 2 and 4 patients suffering dysphagia respectively. In both groups, the intervertebral height, IHR, segmental and overall cervical lordosis were significantly greater than pre-operation (Pā<ā.05) and were maintained at the last follow-up, but were not statistically significant (Pā>ā.05). The allograft group achieved a fusion rate of 100% (58/58) according to CT scans at 3 months post-operation, while PEEK group was 91.8% (45/49), which reached 95.9% (47/49) at 6 months and 100% at 12 months. In addition, the fusion state was maintained in all patients at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION Our data showed that the new allograft cage is superior to the PEEK cage in providing a high fusion rate and fewer complications after 1-level and 2-level ACDF procedures. It may represent an excellent alternative to other cages.
2.
[The finite element analysis of polyetheretherketone/hydroxyapatite/carbon fiber cage].
Liu, X, Zhu, H, Jing, Y, Sui, G, Zhang, Z
Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi. 2013;(4):873-8
Abstract
To compare the bio-mechanical characteristics of cages of two types, i. e., polyetheretherketone/ hydroxyapatite/carbon fiber (PEEK/HA/CF) and titanium combined with internal pedicle screw fixation in lumbar model, and to provide experimental evidences for clinical application, we constructed a three-dimensional finite element model of an intact L2-L4 segment by using computer tomography scans of a healthy male. The three-dimensional finite element models of an intact L2-L4 segment and single cage plus bilateral vertebral pedicle screw fixation were established. The angular motion of fused segment and stress distribution in the bone graft and cage and L3 inferior endplate under different loads were recorded. The result showed that the peak Von Mises stresses of the bone graft of PEEK/HA/CF group were at least 2.2 time as that of titanium group. The peak Von Mises stresses of L3 inferior endplate of the titanium group were at least 2. 3 times as that of PEEK/HA/CF group. These stresses were concentrated at places where the cage interfaced with the endplate. The angular variation of the titanium group showed similarity to PEEK/HA/CF group. The PEEK/HA/CF cage could provide stability similar to that of titanium cage in the presence of posterior instrumentation. It could increase the load transfer through the bone graft and promote the bone fusion. It could also reduce the stresses in endplates adjacent to the cage and reduce the subsidence of the cage.
3.
[Research progress in comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].
Su, K, Guo, Y, Zhang, Z, Jin, D
Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery. 2013;(11):1386-9
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the latest comparative research of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and traditional open approach. METHODS The domestic and foreign literature concerning the comparative research of minimally invasive TLIF and traditional open TLIF was reviewed, then intraoperative indicators, length of hospitalization, effectiveness, complication, fusion rate, and the effect on paraspinal muscles were analyzed respectively. RESULTS Minimally invasive TLIF has less blood loss and shorter length of hospitalization, but with longer operation and fluoroscopic time. Minimally invasive surgery has the same high fusion rate as open surgery, however, its effectiveness is not superior to open surgery, and complication rate is relatively higher. In the aspect of the effect on paraspinal muscles, in creatine kinase, multifidus cross-sectional area, and atrophy grading, minimally invasive surgery has no significant reduced damage on paraspinal muscles. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive TLIF is not significantly superior to open TLIF, and it does not reduce the paraspinal muscles injury. But prospective double-blind randomized control trials are still needed for further study.