-
1.
Yogurt, cultured fermented milk, and health: a systematic review.
Savaiano, DA, Hutkins, RW
Nutrition reviews. 2021;79(5):599-614
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Many fermented foods are associated with health benefits, including fermented dairy products. Whereby diary itself is part of many nutritional guidelines, the guidances rarely distinguish between dairy and fermented dairy. This qualitative, systematic review sought to capture how consumption of fermented milk products influences health. The review included 108 studies, with over 70% reporting beneficial health outcomes. A small number of studies reported insignificant or neutral results and four unfavourable ones. The aspects of health that were considered included lactose digestion and tolerance, gut health and disease, diarrhoea and constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, cardiovascular health and disease, hypertension, blood lipids, cancer risk, colorectal/breast/prostate cancer, weight and body composition, diabetes risk and metabolic syndrome and bone health. The authors concluded that eating fermented dairy products aided lactose digestion and showed a consistent link with reduced risk of breast and colorectal cancer, type 2 diabetes, and improved weight maintenance, cardiovascular, bone, and gastrointestinal health. As dairy appears to increase the risk for prostate cancer, fermented dairy seems to be no different here to unfermented dairy at increasing the risk. Some potential mechanisms are proposed in the discussion section, how fermented dairy may elicit its health benefits. Given the predominant health benefits of fermented dairy, the authors encouraged to include fermented dairy into national nutrition guidelines and stress distinction between dairy and fermented dairy products. This review captures current evidence of the widespread health benefits of fermented dairy consumption worthwhile considering in clinical practice. In the absence of more clear findings in relation to prostate cancer and prevention, a cautious approach to dairy and fermented dairy consumption may be warranted.
Abstract
Consumption of yogurt and other fermented products is associated with improved health outcomes. Although dairy consumption is included in most dietary guidelines, there have been few specific recommendations for yogurt and cultured dairy products. A qualitative systematic review was conducted to determine the effect of consumption of fermented milk products on gastrointestinal and cardiovascular health, cancer risk, weight management, diabetes and metabolic health, and bone density using PRISMA guidelines. English language papers in PubMed were searched, with no date restrictions. In total, 1057 abstracts were screened, of which 602 were excluded owing to lack of appropriate controls, potential biases, and experimental design issues. The remaining 455 papers were independently reviewed by both authors and 108 studies were included in the final review. The authors met regularly to concur, through consensus, on relevance, methods, findings, quality, and conclusions. The included studies were published between 1979 and 2017. From the 108 included studies, 76 reported a favorable outcome of fermented milks on health and 67 of these were considered to be positive or neutral quality according to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Quality Criteria Checklist. Of the 32 remaining studies, the study outcomes were either not significant (28) or unfavorable (4), and most studies (18) were of neutral quality. A causal relationship exists between lactose digestion and tolerance and yogurt consumption, and consistent associations exist between fermented milk consumption and reduced risk of breast and colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes, improved weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular, bone, and gastrointestinal health. Further, an association exists between prostate cancer occurrence and dairy product consumption in general, with no difference between fermented and unfermented products. This article argues that yogurt and other fermented milk products provide favorable health outcomes beyond the milk from which these products are made and that consumption of these products should be encouraged as part of national dietary guidelines. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017068953.
-
2.
Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Simons, N, Veeraiah, P, Simons, PIHG, Schaper, NC, Kooi, ME, Schrauwen-Hinderling, VB, Feskens, EJM, van der Ploeg, EMCL, Van den Eynde, MDG, Schalkwijk, CG, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2021;113(2):391-400
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The use of fructose in the food industry may have contributed to the increase in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the general population. Consequently, obesity and associated comorbidities like type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, NAFLD, and cardiovascular disease have increased. Although glucose and fructose are both sugars, they are metabolised differently by the body. The overfeeding of fructose may contribute to steatosis or accumulation of fat in the liver than glucose. The aim of this randomised, double-blind trial was to measure intrahepatic lipid content in 44 overweight subjects with high fatty liver index following fructose restriction for six weeks. In this study, fructose restriction resulted in a small but significant reduction in intrahepatic lipid content with a small effect size of 0.7% point. Fructose restriction did not seem to affect glucose tolerance, serum lipid concentration or HOMA-IR, variables related to intrahepatic lipid content. As a supplement, fructose may have a different metabolic profile than when taken as a food component. The study found no effect on glucose tolerance or serum lipid levels. The results of this study may help healthcare professionals to comprehend the role of fructose in steatosis and NAFLD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an ongoing debate on whether fructose plays a role in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fructose restriction on intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content in a double-blind randomized controlled trial using an isocaloric comparator. METHODS Between March 2017 and October 2019, 44 adult overweight individuals with a fatty liver index ≥ 60 consumed a 6-wk fructose-restricted diet (<7.5 g/meal and <10 g/d) and were randomly assigned to supplementation with sachets of glucose (= intervention group) or fructose (= control group) 3 times daily. Participants and assessors were blinded to the allocation. IHL content, assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, was the primary outcome and glucose tolerance and serum lipids were the secondary outcomes. All measurements were conducted in Maastricht University Medical Center. RESULTS Thirty-seven participants completed the study protocol. After 6 wk of fructose restriction, dietary fructose intake and urinary fructose excretion were significantly lower in the intervention group (difference: -57.0 g/d; 95% CI: -77.9, -39.5 g/d; and -38.8 μmol/d; 95% CI: -91.2, -10.7 μmol/d, respectively). Although IHL content decreased in both the intervention and control groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), the change in IHL content was more pronounced in the intervention group (difference: -0.7% point, 95% CI: -2.0, -0.03% point). The changes in glucose tolerance and serum lipids were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS Six weeks of fructose restriction per se led to a small, but statistically significant, decrease in IHL content in comparison with an isocaloric control group.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03067428.
-
3.
SARS-CoV-2 and immune-microbiome interactions: Lessons from respiratory viral infections.
Cyprian, F, Sohail, MU, Abdelhafez, I, Salman, S, Attique, Z, Kamareddine, L, Al-Asmakh, M
International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021;105:540-550
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped RNA beta-coronavirus. This virus caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between microbiota, immunity, and COVID-19, with particular focus on how microbiome-associated immune crosstalk can shape outcome of COVID-19. The study included 118 articles which investigated or reviewed COVID-19 or coronavirus and the microbiome of the gut or respiratory tract. Findings indicate that: - an over-activated immune system leads to massive pulmonary damage in COVID-19 patients. - the effect of aging and comorbidities, and the use of antibiotics have an effect on the diversity of the microbiota. - the milieu of gut flora can exert influence on pulmonary immune responses. - a unique cross-talk exists between the pulmonary and gut microbial compartments. Authors conclude by highlighting the need of further studies that delineate the role of the microbiota and their products in the immune dysregulation observed in SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Abstract
By the beginning of 2020, infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had rapidly evolved into an emergent worldwide pandemic, an outbreak whose unprecedented consequences highlighted many existing flaws within public healthcare systems across the world. While coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is bestowed with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, involving the vital organs, the respiratory system transpires as the main route of entry for SARS-CoV-2, with the lungs being its primary target. Of those infected, up to 20% require hospitalization on account of severity, while the majority of patients are either asymptomatic or exhibit mild symptoms. Exacerbation in the disease severity and complications of COVID-19 infection have been associated with multiple comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders, cancer, and chronic lung disease. Interestingly, a recent body of evidence indicated the pulmonary and gut microbiomes as potential modulators for altering the course of COVID-19, potentially via the microbiome-immune system axis. While the relative concordance between microbes and immunity has yet to be fully elucidated with regards to COVID-19, we present an overview of our current understanding of COVID-19-microbiome-immune cross talk and discuss the potential contributions of microbiome-related immunity to SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and COVID-19 disease progression.
-
4.
Intake and adequacy of the vegan diet. A systematic review of the evidence.
Bakaloudi, DR, Halloran, A, Rippin, HL, Oikonomidou, AC, Dardavesis, TI, Williams, J, Wickramasinghe, K, Breda, J, Chourdakis, M
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2021;40(5):3503-3521
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This systematic review investigated vegan diets in the European populations and their adequacy of macro-and micronutrient intake, compared to the recommendations of the World Health Organization. Included were 48 studies and their outcomes regarding protein, carbohydrates, fats and micronutrients summarized. The overall results and their impact on health are discussed in the later sections of the paper. Adequate intake amongst vegans was seen with carbohydrates, fats, Vitamin A, B1, В6, C, E, iron, phosphorus, magnesium, copper and folate. Sodium exceeded recommended intake, whilst protein, Vitamin B2, B3, B12, D, iodine, zinc, calcium, potassium, selenium was of low consumption in a vegan diet. The bioavailability of some nutrients was also acknowledged. In summary, following a vegan diet appears to have positive and negative aspects. A vegan diet profile can contribute to disease prevention with lower incidence rates of obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Yet veganism appears to increase the risk for mental health conditions, bone fractures, immune system impairments, anaemias and deficiencies from low nutrient intake. This review yields a comprehensive overview of the positive and negative health consequences of a vegan diet. It may be a useful reference for those looking to support vegans or individuals considering adopting a vegan diet pattern.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Vegan diets in European populations tend to be lower in protein intake, particularly amino acids lysine, methionine and tryptophan.
- Other micronutrients that tend to lower in vegan diets are Vitamin B12, zinc, calcium and selenium.
- Healthcare practitioners should be aware of these potential deficiencies when working with vegan clients.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Vegan diets have become increasingly popular in the last ten years. This systematic review of 48 studies investigated the adequacy of vegan diets in European populations. It compared their macro- and micronutrient intakes compared to World Health Organization recommendations. It found that vegan diets tend to be lower in protein and in essential amino acids (lysine, methionine and tryptophan). They can also be lower in micronutrients especially vitamin B12, zinc, calcium and selenium. However, the lower intakes are not always associated with health impairments.
Clinical practice applications:
Practitioners should be aware of the potential deficiencies in a vegan diet.
Considerations for future research:
More research is needed to determine whether lower nutrient intakes in vegans correlated with poor health outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vegan diets, where animal- and all their by-products are excluded from the diet, have gained popularity, especially in the last decade. However, the evaluation of this type of diet has not been well addressed in the scientific literature. This study aimed to investigate the adequacy of vegan diets in European populations and of their macro- and micronutrient intakes compared to World Health Organization recommendations. METHODS A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, IBSS, Cochrane library and Google Scholar was conducted and 48 studies (12 cohorts and 36 cross-sectional) were included. RESULTS Regarding macronutrients, vegan diets are lower in protein intake compared with all other diet types. Veganism is also associated with low intake of vitamins B2, Niacin (B3), B12, D, iodine, zinc, calcium, potassium, selenium. Vitamin B12 intake among vegans is significantly lower (0.24-0.49 μg, recommendations are 2.4 μg) and calcium intake in the majority of vegans was below recommendations (750 mg/d). No significant differences in fat intake were observed. Vegan diets are not related to deficiencies in vitamins A, B1, Β6, C, E, iron, phosphorus, magnesium, copper and folate and have a low glycemic load. CONCLUSIONS Following a vegan diet may result in deficiencies in micronutrients (vitamin B12, zinc, calcium and selenium) which should not be disregarded. However, low micro- and macronutrient intakes are not always associated with health impairments. Individuals who consume a vegan diet should be aware of the risk of potential dietary deficiencies.
-
5.
Recent Advances in Psoriasis Research; the Clue to Mysterious Relation to Gut Microbiome.
Komine, M
International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease where the skin forms bumpy red patches covered with white scales. There is no cure, but medications have focused on supressing the immune response. There is a link between the gut microbiome and psoriasis but it is poorly understood. This review includes the current understanding of how psoriasis develops and discusses the recent findings to support further research in this area. The composition of the gut microbiome affects inflammation in the whole body. This inflammation is associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and other inflammatory disorders. Recent studies have linked cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome to an imbalance in the gut microbiome. Psoriasis is often found alongside these conditions with similar abnormalities in gut bacteria. An imbalance in gut microbiome could cause certain people to develop psoriasis. The role of the gut microbiome needs to be further clarified but mounting evidence for this gut/skin link means that other therapeutic options may be available for treatment in the future.
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease, characterized by activated plasmacytoid dendritic cells, myeloid dendritic cells, Th17 cells, and hyperproliferating keratinocytes. Recent studies revealed skin-resident cells have pivotal roles in developing psoriatic skin lesions. The balance in effector T cells and regulatory T cells is disturbed, leading Foxp3-positive regulatory T cells to produce proinflammatory IL-17. Not only acquired but also innate immunity is important in psoriasis pathogenesis, especially in triggering the disease. Group 3 innate lymphoid cell are considered one of IL-17-producing cells in psoriasis. Short chain fatty acids produced by gut microbiota stabilize expression of Foxp3 in regulatory T cells, thereby stabilizing their function. The composition of gut microbiota influences the systemic inflammatory status, and associations been shown with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, psychomotor diseases, and other systemic inflammatory disorders. Psoriasis has been shown to frequently comorbid with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, psychomotor disease and obesity, and recent report suggested the similar abnormality in gut microbiota as the above comorbid diseases. However, the precise mechanism and relation between psoriasis pathogenesis and gut microbiota needs further investigation. This review introduces the recent advances in psoriasis research and tries to provide clues to solve the mysterious relation of psoriasis and gut microbiota.
-
6.
Short- and potential long-term adverse health outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review.
Leung, TYM, Chan, AYL, Chan, EW, Chan, VKY, Chui, CSL, Cowling, BJ, Gao, L, Ge, MQ, Hung, IFN, Ip, MSM, et al
Emerging microbes & infections. 2020;9(1):2190-2199
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) has infected millions of people worldwide and there is evidence that it affects many systems in the human body. This rapid review summarises the current evidence on short-term negative health outcomes of Covid-19. It also assesses the risk of potential long-term negative effects by looking at data from the other coronaviruses; Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The burden for caring for Covid-19 survivors is likely to be huge and so policy makers need suitable data to put the appropriate care strategies in place. The review is divided into sections as per body system affected: Immune, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal, neurological, dermatological, mental health, pregnancy and prenatal exposure. The evidence (short-term and long-term) is then reviewed by experts in those fields. Further large-scale studies are needed to monitor the adverse effects and to measure the long-term health consequences.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in millions of patients infected worldwide and indirectly affecting even more individuals through disruption of daily living. Long-term adverse outcomes have been reported with similar diseases from other coronaviruses, namely Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Emerging evidence suggests that COVID-19 adversely affects different systems in the human body. This review summarizes the current evidence on the short-term adverse health outcomes and assesses the risk of potential long-term adverse outcomes of COVID-19. Major adverse outcomes were found to affect different body systems: immune system (including but not limited to Guillain-Barré syndrome and paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome), respiratory system (lung fibrosis and pulmonary thromboembolism), cardiovascular system (cardiomyopathy and coagulopathy), neurological system (sensory dysfunction and stroke), as well as cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations, impaired hepatic and renal function. Mental health in patients with COVID-19 was also found to be adversely affected. The burden of caring for COVID-19 survivors is likely to be huge. Therefore, it is important for policy makers to develop comprehensive strategies in providing resources and capacity in the healthcare system. Future epidemiological studies are needed to further investigate the long-term impact on COVID-19 survivors.
-
7.
Two apples a day lower serum cholesterol and improve cardiometabolic biomarkers in mildly hypercholesterolemic adults: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.
Koutsos, A, Riccadonna, S, Ulaszewska, MM, Franceschi, P, Trošt, K, Galvin, A, Braune, T, Fava, F, Perenzoni, D, Mattivi, F, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2020;111(2):307-318
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Apples contain naturally occurring substances, called polyphenols, which in combination with fibre may be beneficial in preventing heart disease in a number of different ways. However, high quality research on this is lacking. This randomised control crossover trial of 40 individuals with slightly elevated cholesterol, aimed to assess the effects of consuming two apples a day for 20 weeks, on indicators for heart disease and in particular cholesterol levels. The results showed that consuming two apples per day resulted in decreased cholesterol and improved indicators for heart disease. It was concluded that the consumption of 2 apples per day decreased heart disease risk, attributed to the polyphenols and fibre they contain. Health professionals could use this study to recommend 2 apples per day in patients with slightly raised cholesterol in order to decrease their risk of heart disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apples are rich in bioactive polyphenols and fiber. Evidence suggests that consumption of apples or their bioactive components is associated with beneficial effects on lipid metabolism and other markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these data and explore the mechanisms. OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine the effects of apple consumption on circulating lipids, vascular function, and other CVD risk markers. METHODS The trial was a randomized, controlled, crossover, intervention study. Healthy mildly hypercholesterolemic volunteers (23 women, 17 men), with a mean ± SD BMI 25.3 ± 3.7 kg/m2 and age 51 ± 11 y, consumed 2 apples/d [Renetta Canada, rich in proanthocyanidins (PAs)] or a sugar- and energy-matched apple control beverage (CB) for 8 wk each, separated by a 4-wk washout period. Fasted blood was collected before and after each treatment. Serum lipids, glucose, insulin, bile acids, and endothelial and inflammation biomarkers were measured, in addition to microvascular reactivity, using laser Doppler imaging with iontophoresis, and arterial stiffness, using pulse wave analysis. RESULTS Whole apple (WA) consumption decreased serum total (WA: 5.89 mmol/L; CB: 6.11 mmol/L; P = 0.006) and LDL cholesterol (WA: 3.72 mmol/L; CB: 3.86 mmol/L; P = 0.031), triacylglycerol (WA: 1.17 mmol/L; CB: 1.30 mmol/L; P = 0.021), and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (WA: 153.9 ng/mL; CB: 159.4 ng/mL; P = 0.028), and increased serum uric acid (WA: 341.4 μmol/L; CB: 330 μmol/L; P = 0.020) compared with the CB. The response to endothelium-dependent microvascular vasodilation was greater after the apples [WA: 853 perfusion units (PU), CB: 760 PU; P = 0.037] than after the CB. Apples had no effect on blood pressure or other CVD markers. CONCLUSIONS These data support beneficial hypocholesterolemic and vascular effects of the daily consumption of PA-rich apples by mildly hypercholesterolemic individuals.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01988389.
-
8.
Mediterranean diet intervention in overweight and obese subjects lowers plasma cholesterol and causes changes in the gut microbiome and metabolome independently of energy intake.
Meslier, V, Laiola, M, Roager, HM, De Filippis, F, Roume, H, Quinquis, B, Giacco, R, Mennella, I, Ferracane, R, Pons, N, et al
Gut. 2020;69(7):1258-1268
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Evidence suggests that the Mediterranean diet (MD) may help prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, this could be influenced by an individual’s gut microbiome, highlighting a need for personalised nutrition practices. This randomised crossover control trial aimed to evaluate an 8-week personalised MD intervention in 82 overweight and obese subjects, who were at high risk of cardiovascular disease. The results showed that a personalised MD lowered cholesterol, regardless of the amount of energy consumed and the amount of exercise performed and relied upon adherence to the MD. Gut microbiome composition was altered by a MD and although markers for diabetes were not improved overall, there was an improvement in prediabetes in individuals with higher levels of Bacteroides species and lower levels of Prevotella species. It was concluded that a MD may reduce cholesterol and alter the gut microbiome to benefit cardiovascular health. Health professionals could use this study to switch patients to a MD whilst maintaining their energy intake to reduce cardiovascular risk. In order to see maximum benefit, it would be recommended to take a personalised approach and analyse an individual’s gut microbiome in order to tailor recommendations.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore the effects of an isocaloric Mediterranean diet (MD) intervention on metabolic health, gut microbiome and systemic metabolome in subjects with lifestyle risk factors for metabolic disease. DESIGN Eighty-two healthy overweight and obese subjects with a habitually low intake of fruit and vegetables and a sedentary lifestyle participated in a parallel 8-week randomised controlled trial. Forty-three participants consumed an MD tailored to their habitual energy intakes (MedD), and 39 maintained their regular diets (ConD). Dietary adherence, metabolic parameters, gut microbiome and systemic metabolome were monitored over the study period. RESULTS Increased MD adherence in the MedD group successfully reprogrammed subjects' intake of fibre and animal proteins. Compliance was confirmed by lowered levels of carnitine in plasma and urine. Significant reductions in plasma cholesterol (primary outcome) and faecal bile acids occurred in the MedD compared with the ConD group. Shotgun metagenomics showed gut microbiome changes that reflected individual MD adherence and increase in gene richness in participants who reduced systemic inflammation over the intervention. The MD intervention led to increased levels of the fibre-degrading Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and of genes for microbial carbohydrate degradation linked to butyrate metabolism. The dietary changes in the MedD group led to increased urinary urolithins, faecal bile acid degradation and insulin sensitivity that co-varied with specific microbial taxa. CONCLUSION Switching subjects to an MD while maintaining their energy intake reduced their blood cholesterol and caused multiple changes in their microbiome and metabolome that are relevant in future strategies for the improvement of metabolic health.
-
9.
The Weight Optimization Revamping Lifestyle using the Dietary Guidelines (WORLD) Study: Sustained Weight Loss Over 12 Months.
Psota, TL, Tindall, AM, Lohse, B, Miller, PE, Petersen, KS, Kris-Etherton, PM
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020;28(7):1235-1244
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Effective long-term weight loss strategies to reduce the risk of death and diseases associated with being obese or overweight are required, as restrictive programmes are difficult to sustain, and weight loss may be heavily influenced by behavioural factors. This randomised control trial of 101 premenopausal women with obesity or overweight aimed to compare a lower-fat and moderate-fat diets, both with nutrition education for 12 months. The results showed that both treatment groups lost weight. Both groups consumed the same amount of fat but increased their diet quality. Diet quality and greater attendance at nutritional education sessions were associated with greater weight loss. Cholesterol was significantly lower in both groups, but blood pressure remained unchanged. Interestingly there were a large number of women who did not complete the trial. It was concluded that irrespective of the amount of fat consumed, nutrition education can help to achieve sustained weight loss, improve diet quality and decrease heart disease risk for at least 12 months. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that recommending fat-based targets for weight loss may be ineffective and the importance of emotional and behavioural support for individuals on a weight loss regime to improve their risk for heart disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare two energy-restricted, nutrient-dense diets at the upper or lower ends of the dietary fat recommendation range (lower fat [20% energy from fat] versus moderate fat [35%]) on weight loss using behavioral theory-based nutrition education. METHODS A total of 101 premenopausal women with overweight or obesity were randomized to an energy-restricted lower-fat or moderate-fat diet for 1 year. Interventions included 28 behavioral theory-based nutrition education sessions plus weekly exercise sessions. RESULTS Both treatment groups experienced weight loss (-5.0 kg for lower fat and -4.3 kg for moderate fat; P < 0.0001), but there was no difference in weight loss or fat intake between groups. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased (-3. 4 mg/dL and -3.8 mg/dL; P < 0.05), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased (1.9 mg/dL; P < 0.05) in both groups at 12 months. Diet quality, assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, increased significantly at 4 months versus baseline (70.8 [0.9] vs. 77.8 [1.0]) and was maintained through 12 months. Higher Healthy Eating Index scores were associated with greater weight loss at 4 months (r = -0.2; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the context of a well-resourced, free-living weight-loss intervention, total fat intake did not change; however, theory-based nutrition education underpinned by food-based recommendations resulted in caloric deficits, improvements in diet quality, and weight loss that was sustained for 1 year.
-
10.
A Snack Formulated with Ingredients to Slow Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption Reduces the Glycemic Response in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rebello, CJ, Johnson, WD, Pan, Y, Larrivee, S, Zhang, D, Nisbet, M, Johnson, J, Chu, Y, Greenway, FL
Journal of medicinal food. 2020;23(1):21-28
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The rate, extent, and location of carbohydrate digestion and absorption are factors that influence metabolic outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a savoury snack (Test-snack) on the glycaemic response [changes in blood glucose after consuming a carbohydrate-containing food] in humans. The study is randomized, controlled crossover trial which enrolled twenty subjects, aged between 18 and 60 years. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six unique orders for receiving the three interventions. Results show that the Test-snack formulated with ingredients and processes to slow carbohydrate digestion lowered the glycaemic response compared to the Control-snack. Furthermore, slowing of starch digestion influences subjective appetite ratings independent of the glycaemic response. Authors conclude that foods designed to slow starch digestion can help consumers meet their need to moderate the postprandial [after a meal] glycaemic response.
Abstract
This study compared the effect of a snack with ingredients to slow carbohydrate digestion (Test-snack) on postprandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations and subjective appetite ratings. We hypothesized that Test-snack would lower glucose and insulin responses and reduce appetite compared with a Control-snack. Overweight or obese subjects (n = 17) completed a randomized crossover study. Glucose, insulin, and appetite ratings were measured before consuming each snack or white bread (Bread) and over a period of 4 h. Subjects received Test-snack, Control-snack, or Bread in random order at least a week apart. The a priori primary outcome was the glucose response, and the secondary outcomes were appetite ratings and insulin responses. Mixed effects statistical models were used to perform analysis of variance in terms of the area under curve (AUC) and at specific time points. The 2-h AUC for glucose was significantly lower with Test-snack compared to Control-snack and Bread (AUC and 95% confidence intervals: Test = 2186.43 [1783.36-2589.51]; Control = 3293.75 [2893.97-3693.54]; Bread = 2800.28 [2405.79-3194.77] mg/dL · min). Four-hour AUC for glucose, and insulin, followed a similar pattern except that Test-snack did not differ from Bread. The glucose concentrations peaked at 45 min under all three conditions, but Test-snack elicited a lower response than Control-snack and Bread (P < .01). Test increased fullness and satisfaction and reduced hunger and prospective intake compared to Bread (P < .02), but was not significantly different from Control-snack. Ingredients that slow carbohydrate digestion in a snack reduce the postprandial glucose and insulin responses compared to a product without these ingredients.
keywords:"Cardiovascular Diseases" OR (Cardiovascular AND Diseases) OR "Cardiovascular Diseases" OR (cardiovascular AND disease) OR "cardiovascular disease"