1.
Recommendations and management of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.
Torlone, E, Sculli, MA, Bonomo, M, Di Benedetto, A, Di Cianni, G, Festa, C, Formoso, G, Lapolla, A, Mannino, D, Napoli, A, et al
Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2020;:108345
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Many specialists use the remote management of people with chronic disease as diabetes, but structured management protocols have not been developed yet. The COVID-19 pandemic has given a big boost to the use of telemedicine, as it allows to maintain the physical distance, essential to the containment of contagion having regular health contact. Encouraging results related to the use of telemedicine in women with hyperglycaemia in pregnancy, have been recently published. It is well known that hyperglycaemia alters the immune response to infections, that inflammation, in turn, worsens glycaemic control and that any form of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HIP) has effects not only on the mother but also on development of the foetus. Therefore, the Italian Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group, together with a group of experts, developed these recommendations in order to guide physicians in the management of HIP, providing specific diagnostic, therapeutic and assistance pathways (PDTAs) for the COVID-19 emergency. Three detailed PDTAs were developed, for type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes.
2.
Heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures in nutrition guidelines for cancer patients.
Zhao, XH, Yang, T, Ma, XD, Qi, YX, Lin, YY, Chen, XZ, Duan, YQ, Sun, DL
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2020;(6):1692-1704
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to systematically assess the nutrition care procedures in nutrition guidelines for cancer patients and identify gaps limiting evidence-based practise. METHODS A systematic search of databases and websites was conducted to identify nutrition guidelines for cancer patients. The quality of the eligible guidelines was evaluated by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) was used to assess the scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for nutrition care procedures in the guidelines (2017-2019), and evidence supporting these recommendations was extracted and analysed. RESULTS Seventeen nutrition guidelines for cancer patients were identified. Only European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and Australian guidelines have a total quality score of more than 60%, which is worthy of clinical recommendation. Twelve guidelines (2017-2019) were included to further analyse the heterogeneity and causes of nutrition care procedures, and we found that the content and tools of nutrition screening and assessment, the application of immune nutrients, and the selection of nutritional support pathways were heterogeneous. The main reasons for the heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures were insufficient attention to nutrition risk screening, differences in recommendations for nutrition assessment, immune nutrients and nutritional support, unreasonable citation of screening and assessment evidence, preference of developers, and lack of evidence of high-quality research on energy and nitrogen demand. In addition, the fairness and propensity of the guidelines for the selection of evidence for different cancer patients are also potential reasons for the heterogeneity of nutritional care procedures. CONCLUSIONS The quality of the nutrition guidelines for cancer patients was highly variable. The nutrition care procedures were heterogeneous among the different guidelines in the last 3 years. Specific improvement of the factors leading to the heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures will be a reasonable and effective way for developers to upgrade the nutrition care procedures in the guidelines for cancer patients.
3.
Modern preoperative fasting guidelines: a summary of the present recommendations and remaining questions.
Søreide, E, Ljungqvist, O
Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology. 2006;(3):483-91
Abstract
This chapter is complementary to the others in this volume focusing on preoperative fasting routines. In it we discuss some of the issues in need of more research to define best practice. One of these is the role of fasting in emergency patients. Modern preoperative fasting recommendations almost exclusively deal with elective patients. In emergency patients preoperative fasting cannot secure gastric emptying to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Hence, surgery should be timed according to the urgency of the situation, and the patient should always be treated as if the stomach was full. More data are needed to better define what is going on in the gastrointestinal tract during the perioperative period in these patients. In certain patient groups--such as patients with diabetes, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and/or obesity--the data are insufficient to give complete guidance to best practice. Preoperative fasting guidelines also affect fluid balance and perioperative fluid management, a topic of debate in recent years. In addition, carbohydrate-enriched fluids for oral use in the preoperative phase have been shown to have a positive effect on postoperative metabolism. Recent studies also suggest that the immune system would be less affected by surgery with such preparations. Last but not least, new scientific evidence alone is not enough to change daily practice. Active implementation of new evidence is also needed. To improve perioperative care, anaesthesiologists, surgeons and the nursing staff must work together.