0
selected
-
1.
Intermittent fasting for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Allaf, M, Elghazaly, H, Mohamed, OG, Fareen, MFK, Zaman, S, Salmasi, AM, Tsilidis, K, Dehghan, A
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021;(1):CD013496
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Lifestyle changes are at the forefront of preventing the disease. This includes advice such as increasing physical activity and having a healthy balanced diet to reduce risk factors. Intermittent fasting (IF) is a popular dietary plan involving restricting caloric intake to certain days in the week such as alternate day fasting and periodic fasting, and restricting intake to a number of hours in a given day, otherwise known as time-restricted feeding. IF is being researched for its benefits and many randomised controlled trials have looked at its benefits in preventing CVD. OBJECTIVES To determine the role of IF in preventing and reducing the risk of CVD in people with or without prior documented CVD. SEARCH METHODS We conducted our search on 12 December 2019; we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase. We also searched three trials registers and searched the reference lists of included papers. Systematic reviews were also viewed for additional studies. There was no language restriction applied. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing IF to ad libitum feeding (eating at any time with no specific caloric restriction) or continuous energy restriction (CER). Participants had to be over the age of 18 and included those with and without cardiometabolic risk factors. Intermittent fasting was categorised into alternate-day fasting, modified alternate-day fasting, periodic fasting and time-restricted feeding. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Five review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extraction. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Secondary outcomes include the absolute change in body weight, and glucose. Furthermore, side effects such as headaches and changes to the quality of life were also noted. For continuous data, pooled mean differences (MD) (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) were calculated. We contacted trial authors to obtain missing data. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS Our search yielded 39,165 records after the removal of duplicates. From this, 26 studies met our criteria, and 18 were included in the pooled analysis. The 18 studies included 1125 participants and observed outcomes ranging from four weeks to six months. No studies included data on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure at any point during follow-up. Of quantitatively analysed data, seven studies compared IF with ab libitum feeding, eight studies compared IF with CER, and three studies compared IF with both ad libitum feeding and CER. Outcomes were reported at short term (≤ 3 months) and medium term (> 3 months to 12 months) follow-up. Body weight was reduced with IF compared to ad libitum feeding in the short term (MD -2.88 kg, 95% CI -3.96 to -1.80; 224 participants; 7 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of IF when compared to CER in the short term (MD -0.88 kg, 95% CI -1.76 to 0.00; 719 participants; 10 studies; very low-certainty evidence) and there may be no effect in the medium term (MD -0.56 kg, 95% CI -1.68 to 0.56; 279 participants; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of IF on glucose when compared to ad libitum feeding in the short term (MD -0.03 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.19; 95 participants; 3 studies; very-low-certainty of evidence) and when compared to CER in the short term: MD -0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.12; 582 participants; 9 studies; very low-certainty; medium term: MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.11; 279 participants; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). The changes in body weight and glucose were not deemed to be clinically significant. Four studies reported data on side effects, with some participants complaining of mild headaches. One study reported on the quality of life using the RAND SF-36 score. There was a modest increase in the physical component summary score. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Intermittent fasting was seen to be superior to ad libitum feeding in reducing weight. However, this was not clinically significant. There was no significant clinical difference between IF and CER in improving cardiometabolic risk factors to reduce the risk of CVD. Further research is needed to understand the safety and risk-benefit analysis of IF in specific patient groups (e.g. patients with diabetes or eating disorders) as well as the effect on longer-term outcomes such as all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction.
-
2.
From Fad to Fact: Evaluating the Impact of Emerging Diets on the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.
D'Souza, MS, Dong, TA, Ragazzo, G, Dhindsa, DS, Mehta, A, Sandesara, PB, Freeman, AM, Taub, P, Sperling, LS
The American journal of medicine. 2020;(10):1126-1134
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease remains one of the most prevalent and preventable chronic conditions worldwide. Diet modification is the foundation of cardiovascular disease prevention. Several dietary approaches have emerged to promote better cardiovascular health. The rapid dissemination of anecdotal and observational data through the internet and social media has caused confusion amongst providers and patients. The aim of this comprehensive review is to present objective insights into 2 of today's most popular fad diets: ketogenic diet and intermittent fasting. We will evaluate the performance of these diets based on their impact on cardiovascular risk factors.
-
3.
Intermittent Fasting: A Heart Healthy Dietary Pattern?
Dong, TA, Sandesara, PB, Dhindsa, DS, Mehta, A, Arneson, LC, Dollar, AL, Taub, PR, Sperling, LS
The American journal of medicine. 2020;(8):901-907
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Dietary patterns, such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and the Mediterranean diet, have been shown to improve cardiac health. Intermittent fasting is another type of popular dietary pattern that is based on timed periods of fasting. Two different regimens are alternative day fasting and time-restricted eating. Although there are no large, randomized control trials examining the relationship between intermittent fasting and cardiovascular outcomes, current human studies that suggest this diet could reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease with improvement in weight control, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Intermittent fasting may exert its effects through multiple pathways, including reducing oxidative stress, optimization of circadian rhythms, and ketogenesis. This review evaluates current literature regarding the potential cardiovascular benefits of intermittent fasting and proposes directions for future research.
-
4.
Relationships between cardiometabolic disorders and obstructive sleep apnea: Implications for cardiovascular disease risk.
Zhao, X, Li, X, Xu, H, Qian, Y, Fang, F, Yi, H, Guan, J, Yin, SK
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2019;(2):280-290
Abstract
Previous studies have reported the effects of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiometabolic disorders on cardiovascular disease (CVD), but associations between cardiometabolic biomarkers and two cardinal features of OSA (chronic intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation) and their interactions on CVD in OSA populations remain unclear. A total of 1727 subjects were included in this observational study. Data on overnight polysomnography parameters, biochemical biomarkers, and anthropometric measurements were collected. Metabolic syndrome (MS), including blood pressure, waist circumference (WC), fasting glucose, triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), was diagnosed based on modified criteria of the Adult Treatment Panel III. WC, mean arterial pressure, TG and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were independently associated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) after adjustment for confounding factors (β = 0.578, P = 0.000; β = 0.157, P = 0.001; β = 1.003, P = 0.019; and β = 4.067, P = 0.0005, respectively). Furthermore, the interaction analysis revealed joint effects between hypertension, obesity, hyperglycemia, and LDL-C dyslipidemia and AHI on CVD. The relative excess risks of CVD due to the interactions with OSA were 2.06, 1.02, 0.48, and 1.42, respectively (all P < 0.05). In contrast, we found no independent effect of the microarousal index (MAI) on CVD. However, LDL-C level and some MS components (WC, TG) were associated with MAI. Our findings indicate that hypoxemia and cardiometabolic disorders in OSA may potentiate their unfavorable effects on CVD. Sleep fragmentation may indirectly predispose patients with OSA to an increased risk of CVD. Thus, cardiometabolic disorders and OSA synergistically influence cardiometabolic risk patterns.
-
5.
Impact of 5-week high-intensity interval training on indices of cardio metabolic health in men.
Lira, FS, Antunes, BM, Figueiredo, C, Campos, EZ, Panissa, VLG, St-Pierre, DH, Lavoie, JM, Magri-Tomaz, L
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2019;(2):1359-1364
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the acute and chronic effects of high-intensity intermittent training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on indices of cardio-metabolic health: (HDL-c, total cholesterol, triglycerides, heart ratio, and phase angle/PhA) in physically active men. METHODS Twenty active men were randomly allocated to HIIT (n = 10), or MICT (n = 10) for 5 weeks, three times per week. HIIT consisted of running 5 km with 1-min at 100% of maximal aerobic speed interspersed by 1-min passive recovery while subjects in MICT group ran continuously the same 5 km at 70% of maximal aerobic speed. Blood samples were collected at different moments during the first and last exercise session. Before and after 5 weeks of both exercise training protocols, heart ratio (during exercise session) and PhA were measured pre and post-exercise training. RESULTS Fasting HDL-c levels did not change after 5 weeks of HIIT or MICT. Perceptual variation of HDL pre and post training (fed state) tended to differ between HIIT and MICT (p = 0.09). All lipoproteins parameters (HDL-c, total cholesterol, triglycerides and non-HDL) were increased in post-acute exercise session compared to pre-exercise during the first and last training session, these being observed after both training protocols. PhA and heart rate measured at different times during the first and last training session were not affected in both training protocols. CONCLUSION These results indicate that HIIT and MICT modify the post-exercise lipoprotein profile acutely. On the other hand, only HIIT tended to increase HDL-c levels chronically.