-
1.
Effectiveness of using long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker in Japanese obese patients with metabolic syndrome on morning hypertension monitoring by using telemedicine system (FUJIYAMA study).
Kinoshita, S, Ryuzaki, M, Sone, M, Nishida, E, Nakamoto, H, ,
Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993). 2014;(7):508-16
Abstract
AIM: Recently, obesity patients have been diagnosed as metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate which angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs), telmisartan or candesartan, is superior for the control of home blood pressure (BP) in the morning when the outpatient clinic BP was well controlled in the patients with metabolic syndrome. METHODS The patients with metabolic syndrome were enrolled. Home BP was monitored by using a telemedicine system. After a 2- to 4-week control period to establish baseline home BP values, these patients were randomly divided into telmisartan (20-80 mg) and candesartan (4-12 mg) groups. These end points were evaluated by using the telemedicine system during steady-state active therapy. A total of 356 patients attending 60 outpatient Japanese centers were recruited. RESULTS On a day of active therapy, telmisartan significantly lowered both systolic and diastolic home BP in the morning to a greater extent compared to candesartan. At the end of the study, reductions in systolic and diastolic home BP in the morning, in telmisartan group were significantly larger compared to the changes in the candesartan group (systolic; Tel: 12.0 ± 8.9 versus Can: 8.1 ± 17.1 mmHg, p = 0.0292, diastolic; Tel: 7.4 ± 6.1 versus Can: 3.7 ± 6.8 mmHg, p = 0.0053). Additionally in the telmisartan treated group, LDL-cholesterol showed significant reduction (p = 0.037), but candesartan did not. CONCLUSION The present study by using the telemedicine system clearly demonstrated that telmisartan has a strong effect on reducing morning home BP, and a good effect on lipid metabolism in patients with metabolic syndrome.
-
2.
Effect of tablets with a combination of telmisartan and amlodipine on patients with hypertension: the Cotalo study.
Ohishi, M, Kawai, T, Hayashi, N, Kitano, S, Katsuya, T, Nagano, M, Hirotani, A, Yamamoto, K, Kamide, K, Rakugi, H
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2013;(7):620-6
Abstract
Fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with telmisartan 40 mg+amlodipine 5 mg (T40/A5) is expected to achieve tight blood pressure (BP) control because of the strong efficacy and long half-life of each drug. The aims of this study were to evaluate the 24-h antihypertensive efficacy of T40/A5 FDC therapy and to explore differences that may arise owing to different administration times in Japanese patients whose hypertension was not controlled by 5 mg of amlodipine per day. In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients who had been taking amlodipine 5 mg per day and did not achieve their optimal BP target were enrolled (mean age: 67.8±10.2 years). The subjects were then randomly assigned to a T40/A5 morning or evening administration group (22 patients per group). At baseline and 8 weeks after randomization, we evaluated clinical BP and various laboratory values and performed ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Clinical and mean BP evaluated with ABPM at 8 weeks (24 h, daytime, nighttime and early morning) were significantly decreased compared with BP at baseline. There were no significant differences in the diurnal BP profile change from baseline to 8 weeks between subjects in the morning and evening administration groups. There were also no significant differences in the diurnal BP profile change from baseline to 8 weeks between subjects with or without metabolic syndrome. We conclude that T40/A5 FDC therapy significantly decreased the 24-h mean and clinical BP, independent of administration time, in patients whose hypertension was not controlled by 5 mg of amlodipine.
-
3.
Angiotensin II receptor blockers improve endothelial dysfunction associated with sympathetic hyperactivity in metabolic syndrome.
Kishi, T, Hirooka, Y, Konno, S, Sunagawa, K
Journal of hypertension. 2012;(8):1646-55
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are preferred for the treatment of hypertension with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Underlying endothelial dysfunction and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation are critically involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension in MetS. We investigated whether treatment with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) improves endothelial and autonomic function in patients with MetS. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial. Sixty patients with MetS were randomized into three treatment groups: telmisartan, candesartan, or diet therapy (control; n = 20 each), and treated for 6 months. To evaluate the endothelial function of forearm resistance arteries, blood flow and vascular resistance were measured using a strain-gauge plethysmograph during intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine (ACh) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP). At 6 months, both telmisartan and candesartan comparably decreased blood pressure. Furthermore, ARB treatment ameliorated impaired forearm vasodilation in response to ACh. Telmisartan had a greater effect than candesartan on ACh-induced forearm vasodilation. In contrast, forearm vasodilation in response to SNP was comparable between the telmisartan and candesartan-treated groups. ARB treatment increased high-molecular-weight (HMW) adiponectin levels and baroreflex sensitivity, but telmisartan had a stronger effect than candesartan. In addition, only telmisartan treatment significantly decreased plasma norepinephrine concentrations, blood pressure variability, and heart rate variability based on spectral analysis. CONCLUSION These findings indicate that ARBs improve impaired endothelial and baroreflex function, and increase HMW adiponectin levels in patients with MetS. Telmisartan exhibited more beneficial effects than candesartan, and only telmisartan reduced sympathetic hyperactivity, despite similar depressor effects.
-
4.
Role of angiotensin II in plasma PAI-1 changes induced by imidapril or candesartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.
Fogari, R, Zoppi, A, Mugellini, A, Maffioli, P, Lazzari, P, Derosa, G
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2011;(12):1321-6
Abstract
To evaluate the relationship between plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and angiotensin II (Ang II) changes during treatment with imidapril and candesartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. A total of 84 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome were randomized to imidapril 10 mg or candesartan 16 mg for 16 weeks. At weeks 4 and 8, there was a dose titration to imidapril 20 mg and candesartan 32 mg in nonresponders (systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg). We evaluated, at baseline and after 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, clinic blood pressure, Ang II and PAI-1 antigen. Both imidapril and candesartan induced a similar SBP/DBP reduction (-19.4/16.8 and -19.5/16.3 mm Hg, respectively, P<0.001 vs. baseline). Both drugs decreased PAI-1 antigen after 4 weeks of treatment, but only the PAI-1 lowering effect of imidapril was sustained throughout the 16 weeks (-9.3 ng ml(-1), P<0.01 vs. baseline), whereas candesartan increased PAI-1 (+6.5 ng ml(-1), P<0.05 vs. baseline and P<0.01 vs. imidapril). Imidapril significantly decreased Ang II levels (-14.6 pg ml(-1) at week 16, P<0.05 vs. baseline), whereas candesartan increased them (+24.2 pg ml(-1), P<0.01 vs. baseline and vs. imidapril). In both groups there was a positive correlation between Ang II and PAI-1 changes (r=0.61, P<0.001 at week 16 for imidapril, and r=0.37, P<0.005 at week 16 for candesartan). Imidapril reduced plasma PAI-1 and Ang II levels, whereas candesartan increased them. This suggests that the different effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ang II blockers on Ang II production has a role in their different influence on fibrinolysis.
-
5.
Baseline characteristics of the Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial population: comparison with other diabetes prevention trials.
Krum, H, McMurray, JJ, Horton, E, Gerlock, T, Holzhauer, B, Zuurman, L, Haffner, SM, Bethel, MA, Holman, RR, Califf, RM
Cardiovascular therapeutics. 2010;(2):124-32
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
The Nateglinide and Valsartan Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) trial is exploring two pharmacological strategies (nateglinide and valsartan, both alone and in combination) in the prevention of overt diabetes mellitus (DM) and the reduction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in subjects at high risk for these events. In this analysis, we provide baseline characteristics of the randomized NAVIGATOR study population and contrast them with those from other trials of DM prevention. Key eligibility criteria include impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), a history of CVD (in patients aged > or =50 years), and > or =1 cardiovascular risk factor (in patients aged > or =55 years). Baseline demographic characteristics, laboratory findings, cardiovascular risk factors, CVD history, and medication use are described and compared with other trials of DM prevention. The full analysis set of subjects (N = 9306) showed a clustering of risk factors consistent with the metabolic syndrome: high rates of hypertension (77.5%), dyslipidemia (44.7%), increased waist circumference (101.0 cm), and high body mass index (BMI) (47.5% with BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)). A minority of patients had a history of CVD (24.3%); of these, 11.7% had a history of myocardial infarction and most of the remainder had evidence of coronary artery disease. Subjects also had elevated blood pressure (BP) (predominantly systolic) (139.7/82.6 mm Hg), increased serum low-density lipoproteins cholesterol levels (3.27 mmol/L), and borderline elevation of triglyceride levels (1.97 mmol/L). Demographic data, BP, and lipid profiles in NAVIGATOR were similar to those of previous DM prevention trials, which were also based largely on meeting criteria for IGT. Medication use at baseline among NAVIGATOR subjects, which frequently included aspirin, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and lipid-lowering agents, reflects enhanced CVD risk. However, little prescribing of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers was observed, likely due to protocol exclusion criteria. In conclusion, the NAVIGATOR study comprises prediabetic subjects who typically have concurrent BP and metabolic disturbances and an enhanced risk of CVD, and are thus at higher risk for cardiovascular events than subjects in previous DM prevention trials.
-
6.
Management of patients with nephrotic syndrome.
de Seigneux, S, Martin, PY
Swiss medical weekly. 2009;(29-30):416-22
Abstract
Nephrotic syndrome is characterised by proteinuria >3.5 g/24h, oedema, hypoalbuminaemia and hyperlipidaemia. Several glomerular diseases, either primary or secondary, may lead to nephrotic syndrome. Investigations for nephrotic syndrome include immunological and infectious evaluations. Renal biopsy is often mandatory, except in diabetes. Depending on aetiology specific treatment, often with immunosuppressive agents, may be implemented. In any cases nonspecific treatment should be started with ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Urinary protein loss leads to several complications: water and sodium retention, hyperlipidaemia, increased risk of thromboembolism and infection, anaemia and alteration of mineral metabolism. Each of these complications must be identified.
-
7.
Angiotensin-receptor blockers as therapy for mild-to-moderate hypertension-associated non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Georgescu, EF, Ionescu, R, Niculescu, M, Mogoanta, L, Vancica, L
World journal of gastroenterology. 2009;(8):942-54
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate insulin resistance, cytolysis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) score (NAS) using the Kleiner and Brunt criteria in 54 patients with NASH and mild-to-moderate hypertension, treated with telmisartan vs valsartan for 20 mo. METHODS All patients met the NCEP-ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome. Histology confirmed steatohepatitis, defined as a NAS greater than five up to 3 wk prior inclusion, using the current criteria. Patients with viral hepatitis, chronic alcohol intake, drug abuse or other significant immune or metabolic hepatic pathology were excluded. Subjects were randomly assigned either to the valsartan (V) group (standard dose 80 mg o.d., n = 26), or to the telmisartan (T) group (standard dose 20 mg o.d., n = 28). Treatment had to be taken daily at the same hour with no concomitant medication or alcohol consumption allowed. Neither the patient nor the medical staff was aware of treatment group allocation. Paired liver biopsies obtained at inclusion (visit 1) and end of treatment (EOT) were assessed by a single blinded pathologist, not aware of patient or treatment group. Blood pressure, BMI, ALT, AST, HOMA-IR, plasma triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) were evaluated at inclusion and every 4 mo until EOT (visit 6). RESULTS At EOT we noticed a significant decrease in ALT levels vs inclusion in all patients and this decrease did not differ significantly in group T vs group V. HOMA-IR significantly decreased at EOT vs inclusion in all patients but in group T, the mean HOMA-IR decrease per month was higher than in group V. NAS significantly diminished at EOT in all patients with a higher decrease in group T vs group V. CONCLUSION Angiotensin receptor blockers seem to be efficient in hypertension-associated NASH. Telmisartan showed a higher efficacy regarding insulin resistance and histology, perhaps because of its specific PPAR-gamma ligand effect.
-
8.
Amlodipine/ARB fixed-dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension: focus on amlodipine/olmesartan combination.
Chrysant, SG
Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998). 2008;(6):443-53
Abstract
The incidence of hypertension continues to increase worldwide and, according to recent estimates, its incidence is approximately 30% of the U.S. population. However, the control of blood pressure (BP) to recommended levels of < 140/90 mmHg for uncomplicated hypertension, recommended in the 7th Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC-7) on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, remains low at 36.8%. Because the level of BP is directly related to cardiovascular and stroke morbidity and mortality, aggressive treatment and control of hypertension are strongly indicated. Since monotherapy alone is not effective for the control of stage 2 hypertension, fixed-dose combination therapy with two complementary drugs has been recommended by the JNC-7 guidelines as initial therapy for subjects with diastolic BP > or = 100 mmHg and systolic BP > or = 160 mmHg. There are several fixed-dose combination preparations already available, each with its individual indications. The recently FDA-approved fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine with either olmesartan or valsartan are very effective in treating hypertension and are safe and well tolerated. In addition to reducing BP, these new fixed-dose combinations have also demonstrated significant reductions in the inciendence of edema associated with amlodipine monotherapy, which makes them more acceptable to patients. In addition, due to the metabolic neutrality of both component drugs, these preparations are preferable for the treatment of hypertensive patients with diabetes or the metabolic syndrome, in addition to other cardiovascular risk factors.
-
9.
Treatment of hypertension in individuals with the cardiometabolic syndrome: role of an angiotensin II receptor blocker, telmisartan.
Francischetti, EA, Celoria, BM, Francischetti, A, Genelhu, VA
Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2008;(3):289-303
Abstract
Arterial hypertension is a global public health problem owing to its high prevalence and association with increased risk for cerebral, cardiac and renal events. Hypertension frequently clusters with other cardiometabolic risk factors, such as dysglycemia, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high triglyceride levels. These, along with other factors such as central obesity, increased inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis, are components of the metabolic syndrome. All guidelines recommend that the first-line therapy in metabolic syndrome should be based on lifestyle modification, consisting of diet and moderate exercise for at least 30 min/day. Concerning drug treatment of hypertension associated with other cardiometabolic risk factors, many results of head-to-head studies have demonstrated a reduction in new-onset Type 2 diabetes in hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, when compared with conventional antihypertensive therapy. The explanations of the different actions of both these drugs include several mechanisms related to pancreatic insulin release and insulin sensitivity improvement. Another mechanism by which the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system may improve insulin sensitivity is through the partial peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonism of telmisartan. For that reason, telmisartan has been considered by some experts to be an antihypertensive agent that is particularly useful in the treatment of hypertension associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. The impact of the promising metabolic action exhibited by telmisartan on the outcome of hypertensive patients aggregating other cardiometabolic risk factors waits for adequately randomized and powered clinical trials.
-
10.
Metabolic and antihypertensive effects of combined angiotensin receptor blocker and diuretic therapy in prediabetic hypertensive patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome.
Zappe, DH, Sowers, JR, Hsueh, WA, Haffner, SM, Deedwania, PC, Fonseca, VA, Keeling, L, Sica, DA
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2008;(12):894-903
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Hypertensive patients with the cardiometabolic syndrome (CMS) are at increased risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The authors examined effects of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combined and alone on insulin sensitivity (using homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]), and inflammatory/metabolic biomarkers in prediabetic hypertensive persons with CMS. Eligible patients entered 16-week therapy with valsartan 320 mg/d (n=189), HCTZ 25 mg/d (n=190), or valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg/d (n=187). At the end point, there were no statistically significant differences in HOMA-IR among the 3 groups. HCTZ significantly increased hemoglobin A(1c) and triglyceride concentrations and lowered serum potassium levels vs valsartan. HCTZ also increased plasma aldosterone and C-reactive protein levels. Blood pressure reduction and blood pressure control rates were highest with valsartan/HCTZ. There were no differences between combination valsartan/HCTZ or monotherapies on a measure of insulin sensitivity; however, the negative metabolic effects of HCTZ (increase in triglyceride and hemoglobin A(1c) values) were absent with valsartan/HCTZ, indicating an ameliorating effect of valsartan on these measures.