-
1.
Effects of genistein on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hemati, N, Asis, M, Moradi, S, Mollica, A, Stefanucci, A, Nikfar, S, Mohammadi, E, Farzaei, MH, Abdollahi, M
Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.). 2020;:108764
Abstract
Genistein (4',5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) is a phytoestrogen with potential health benefits in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, the evidence regarding its effects on hypertension has not been conclusive. Therefore, we examined the impact of oral genistein supplementation on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane library databases (until August 2019) were searched to identify potential RCTs with information on genistein supplementation and hypertension. Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) was pooled using a random-effects model. Pooling four RCTs (four treatment arms) together did not show any significant reduction of SBP (WMD: -5.32 mmHg, 95% CI: -14.59 to 3.96) and DBP (WMD: -2.06 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.41 to 2.28) compared to that of the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis by intervention duration suggested that more than 6 months genistein supplementation in metabolic syndrome patients can significantly decrease SBP (WMD: -13.73 mmHg, 95% CI: -18.10 to -9.37) and DBP (WMD: -5.18 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.62 to -3.74). Generally, present study indicated that genistein supplementation had no effect on hypertension, but it seems that longer intervention duration of more than 6 months especially among metabolic syndrome patients may lead to the effectiveness of genistein.
-
2.
Effect of telmisartan on histological activity and fibrosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A 1-year randomized control trial.
Alam, S, Kabir, J, Mustafa, G, Gupta, U, Hasan, SK, Alam, AK
Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. 2016;(1):69-76
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: Telmisartan can attenuate two hit pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). This study aimed to observe the effect of Telmisartan on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) and fibrosis score in NASH patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 50 NASH patients were randomized; 35 of group 1 were treated with Telmisartan 40/80 mg once daily with life style modification (TL) and 15 of group 2 underwent only life style modification (L) for 1 year. At the end, 20 of TL group and 10 of L group were analyzed. Those who showed NAS improvement ≥ 2 or NAS improvement ≥ 1 with fibrosis improvement ≥ 1 were considered as responders. RESULTS Baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), insulin resistance index, components of metabolic syndrome, age, and sex were similar in both groups. At the end of study, NAS improvement in TL and L groups was 2.15 ± 1.66 and 1.10 ± 0.57 (P = 0.017) and fibrosis improvement was 0.65 ± 0.93 and -0.30 ± 0.48 (P = 0.001), respectively. NAS improved by ≥ 2 in 13 (65%) and 2 (20%) patients and fibrosis score improved by ≥ 1 in 8 (40%) patients and none of the patients in TL group and L group, respectively. Telmisartan and life style modification could improve steatosis, ballooning, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis. Life style modification could improve ballooning only, but fibrosis deteriorated. TL group showed improvement in NAS and fibrosis score [P value: 0.035; odds ratio (OR) =92.07, confidence interval (CI) =1.39-6106] to the level of response by regression analysis. Weight reduction and improvement of metabolic syndrome did not influence the response. There were similar minor adverse events in both groups. CONCLUSION Telmisartan improved NAS and fibrosis score in NASH with insignificant adverse events.
-
3.
Utilization of antihypertensive drugs in obesity-related hypertension: a retrospective observational study in a cohort of patients from Southern Italy.
Cataldi, M, di Geronimo, O, Trio, R, Scotti, A, Memoli, A, Capone, D, Guida, B
BMC pharmacology & toxicology. 2016;:9
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the pathophysiological mechanisms of arterial hypertension are different in obese and lean patients, hypertension guidelines do not include specific recommendations for obesity-related hypertension and, therefore, there is a considerable uncertainty on which antihypertensive drugs should be used in this condition. Moreover, studies performed in general population suggested that some antihypertensive drugs may increase body weight, glycemia and LDL-cholesterol but it is unclear how this impact on drug choice in clinical practice in the treatment of obese hypertensive patients. Therefore, in order to identify current preferences of practitioners for obesity-related hypertension, in the present work we evaluated antihypertensive drug therapy in a cohort of 129 pharmacologically treated obese hypertensive patients (46 males and 83 females, aged 51.95 ± 10.1 years) that came to our observation for a nutritional consultation. METHODS Study design was retrospective observational. Differences in the prevalence of use of the different antihypertensive drug classes among groups were evaluated with χ(2) square analysis. Threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS 41.1 % of the study sample was treated with one, 36.4 % with two and the remaining 22.5 % with three or more antihypertensive drugs. In patients under single drug therapy, β-blockers, ACEIs and ARBs accounted each for about 25 % of prescriptions. The prevalence of use of β-blockers was about sixfold higher in females than males. Diuretics were virtually never used in monotherapy regimens but were used in more than 60 % of patients on dual antihypertensive therapy and in all patients assuming three or more drugs. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of use of any of the aforementioned drugs among patients with obesity of type I, II and III or between patients with or without metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that no first choice protocol seems to be adopted in clinical practice for the treatment of obesity-related hypertension. Importantly, physicians do not seem to differentiate drug use according to the severity of obesity or to the presence of metabolic syndrome or to avoid drugs known to detrimentally affect body weight and metabolic profile in general population.
-
4.
Effect of Lactotripeptides (Isoleucine-Proline-Proline/Valine-Proline-Proline) on Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness Changes in Subjects with Suboptimal Blood Pressure Control and Metabolic Syndrome: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial.
Cicero, AF, Colletti, A, Rosticci, M, Cagnati, M, Urso, R, Giovannini, M, Borghi, C, D'Addato, S
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders. 2016;(3):161-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lactotripeptides (LTPs) have a mild antihypertensive effect in hypertensive subjects. The main aim of our clinical trial was to test if LTPs could have some influence on blood pressure (BP) and related hemodynamic parameters in a sample of outpatients affected by metabolic syndrome. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted in a group of 40 nonsmoking volunteers with metabolic syndrome. The treatment periods were 4 weeks long and were separated by a 4-week washout period. The dietary supplementation was made by daily administration of LTPs from casein, 10.2 mg/day, and compared with placebo. RESULTS During the LTP treatment, patients experienced a significant mean decrease in systolic BP (SBP; -3.4 ± 4.4 mmHg, P = 0.041), diastolic BP (DBP; -3.1 ± 3.2 mmHg, P = 0.049), and pulse wave velocity (PWV; -0.7 ± 0.3 m/sec, P = 0.001). After LTP treatment, delta SBP, DBP, and PP were all significantly improved (P < 0.01 for all) compared with placebo. PWV also improved significantly after LTP treatment with respect to the end of the treatment with placebo (-0.8 ± 0.4 vs. -0.1 ± 0.3 m/sec, P = 0.009). The square root of the ratio of peak:baseline pulse volume during hyperemia (√V2/V1) improved after LTP treatment only (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, P = 0.04). Through the evaluation of the hemodynamic parameters that were measured by the 24-hr ambulatory monitoring, we observed that SBP, MBP, and the percentage of time with SBP over the normal were significantly reduced only after the LTP treatment (P < 0.05). These parameters were also significantly improved when compared with the ones measured after the placebo treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION In our trial, during LTP treatment, patients affected by metabolic syndrome experienced a mild but significant improvement in office and 24-hr BP, PWV, and endothelial function compared with placebo treatment.
-
5.
Anti-hypertensive drug treatment of patients with and the metabolic syndrome and obesity: a review of evidence, meta-analysis, post hoc and guidelines publications.
Owen, JG, Reisin, E
Current hypertension reports. 2015;(6):558
Abstract
Epidemiological studies have shown an increasing prevalence of obesity and the metabolic syndrome worldwide. Lifestyle modifications that include dietary changes, weight reduction, and exercise are the cornerstones in the treatment of this pathology. However, adherence to this approach often meets with failure in clinical practice; therefore, drug therapy should not be delayed. The ideal pharmacological antihypertensive regimen should target the underlying mechanisms involved in this syndrome, including sympathetic activation, increased renal tubular sodium reabsorption, and overexpression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by the adipocyte. Few prospective trials have been conducted in the search of the ideal antihypertensive regimen in patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. We summarize previously published ad hoc studies, prospective studies, and guideline publications regarding the treatment of hypertension in patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. We conclude that the optimal antihypertensive drug therapy in these patients has not been defined. Though caution exists regarding the use of thiazide diuretics due to potential metabolic derangements, there is insufficient data to show worsened cardiovascular or renal outcomes in patients treated with these drugs. In regard to beta blockers, the risk of accelerating conversion to diabetes and worsening of inflammatory mediators described in patients treated with traditional beta blockers appears much less pronounced or absent when using the vasodilating beta blockers. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition with an ACE or an ARB and treatment with calcium channel blockers appears safe and well tolerated in obesity-related hypertension and in patients with metabolic syndrome. Future prospective pharmacological studies in this population are needed.
-
6.
[WNK-SPAK-SLC12A signal cascade is a new therapeutic target for hypertension].
Kikuchi, E, Mori, T, Uchida, S
Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2015;(9):1597-605
Abstract
WNK-oxidative stress-responsive 1 (OSR1) /STE20/SPS1-related proline-alanine-rich protein kinase(SPAK)-SLC12A transporters cascade regulates blood pressure through NaCl reabsorption in kidney and vasoconstriction. Furthermore, we recently reported that this cascade is positively regulated by insulin, which may contribute to hypertension in patients with hyperinsulinemia. Therefore, drugs that inhibit this signal cascade could become new antihypertensive drugs that have dual effects as a diuretic and vasodilator and be particularly beneficial for patients with hyperinsulinemia such as metabolic syndrome and obesity. In this review, we provide an overview about the current understanding about WNK-SPAK-SLC12A signal cascade and show some prospects for drug discovery that blocks this signal cascade.
-
7.
Effectiveness of using long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker in Japanese obese patients with metabolic syndrome on morning hypertension monitoring by using telemedicine system (FUJIYAMA study).
Kinoshita, S, Ryuzaki, M, Sone, M, Nishida, E, Nakamoto, H, ,
Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993). 2014;(7):508-16
Abstract
AIM: Recently, obesity patients have been diagnosed as metabolic syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate which angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs), telmisartan or candesartan, is superior for the control of home blood pressure (BP) in the morning when the outpatient clinic BP was well controlled in the patients with metabolic syndrome. METHODS The patients with metabolic syndrome were enrolled. Home BP was monitored by using a telemedicine system. After a 2- to 4-week control period to establish baseline home BP values, these patients were randomly divided into telmisartan (20-80 mg) and candesartan (4-12 mg) groups. These end points were evaluated by using the telemedicine system during steady-state active therapy. A total of 356 patients attending 60 outpatient Japanese centers were recruited. RESULTS On a day of active therapy, telmisartan significantly lowered both systolic and diastolic home BP in the morning to a greater extent compared to candesartan. At the end of the study, reductions in systolic and diastolic home BP in the morning, in telmisartan group were significantly larger compared to the changes in the candesartan group (systolic; Tel: 12.0 ± 8.9 versus Can: 8.1 ± 17.1 mmHg, p = 0.0292, diastolic; Tel: 7.4 ± 6.1 versus Can: 3.7 ± 6.8 mmHg, p = 0.0053). Additionally in the telmisartan treated group, LDL-cholesterol showed significant reduction (p = 0.037), but candesartan did not. CONCLUSION The present study by using the telemedicine system clearly demonstrated that telmisartan has a strong effect on reducing morning home BP, and a good effect on lipid metabolism in patients with metabolic syndrome.
-
8.
Anti-hypertensive strategies in patients with MEtabolic parameters, DIabetes mellitus and/or NephropAthy (the M E D I N A study).
Spinar, J, Vitovec, J, Soucek, M
Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia. 2014;(3):412-21
Abstract
AIMS: The primary questions asked by the MEDINA (MEtabolic parameters, DIabetes mellitus and NephropAthy) study are: 1) Do angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) have any advantages over angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)? 2) Should the other drug for combination be a diuretic or a calcium-channel blocker (CCB)? 3) How are the risks reduced by the co administration of a statin? METHODS A total of 439 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome and/or diabetes mellitus were randomized to 2 groups: group 1--ramipril (ACE-I) or perindopril and group 2--losartan (ARB). Hydrochlorothiazide (diuretic) or amlodipine (CCB) were added to both groups. As a third step, a statin was added. RESULTS Blood pressure decreased 24.1/13.3 mmHg in the ACE inhibitor group and 25.9/13.5 in the losartan group. The difference was insignificant. Adding either hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipin was equally effective. There were no significant differences on metabolic parameters in the trial arms. Cholesterol level decreased by 0.95 mmol/L in the ACE-I group and 1.02 mmol/L in the ARB group (ns). CONCLUSION MEDINA has so far confirmed the equivalence of ACE-I and ARB in hypertension treatment. Adding either diuretic or CCB was equally effective. Our data support the current recommendations on adding a statin to reduce cardiovascular risk.
-
9.
[Magnesium orotate in treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnant women].
Gaĭsin, IR, Valeeva, RM, Maksimov, NI, Iskhakova, AS, Khodyrev, LA, Shilina, LV
Kardiologiia. 2013;(9):33-9
Abstract
We examined 150 pregnant women with essential hypertension (EHT), EHT and connective tissue dysplasia (CTD), and healthy. Presence of CTD aggravated clinical picture of EHT and was associated with pronounced cardialgic, neurological, asthenic, vertebrogenic, visceral, and other syndromes. The use of antihypertensive, metabolic (magnesium orotate) drugs, sedative and uroseptic phytotherapy, application of other nondrug measures in conditions of multidisciplinary dynamic support of the gestational period facilitated regress of clinical symptoms of EHT and EHT+CTD, favorable course of pregnancy and successful delivery.
-
10.
Effect of tablets with a combination of telmisartan and amlodipine on patients with hypertension: the Cotalo study.
Ohishi, M, Kawai, T, Hayashi, N, Kitano, S, Katsuya, T, Nagano, M, Hirotani, A, Yamamoto, K, Kamide, K, Rakugi, H
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2013;(7):620-6
Abstract
Fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with telmisartan 40 mg+amlodipine 5 mg (T40/A5) is expected to achieve tight blood pressure (BP) control because of the strong efficacy and long half-life of each drug. The aims of this study were to evaluate the 24-h antihypertensive efficacy of T40/A5 FDC therapy and to explore differences that may arise owing to different administration times in Japanese patients whose hypertension was not controlled by 5 mg of amlodipine per day. In this randomized clinical trial, 44 patients who had been taking amlodipine 5 mg per day and did not achieve their optimal BP target were enrolled (mean age: 67.8±10.2 years). The subjects were then randomly assigned to a T40/A5 morning or evening administration group (22 patients per group). At baseline and 8 weeks after randomization, we evaluated clinical BP and various laboratory values and performed ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Clinical and mean BP evaluated with ABPM at 8 weeks (24 h, daytime, nighttime and early morning) were significantly decreased compared with BP at baseline. There were no significant differences in the diurnal BP profile change from baseline to 8 weeks between subjects in the morning and evening administration groups. There were also no significant differences in the diurnal BP profile change from baseline to 8 weeks between subjects with or without metabolic syndrome. We conclude that T40/A5 FDC therapy significantly decreased the 24-h mean and clinical BP, independent of administration time, in patients whose hypertension was not controlled by 5 mg of amlodipine.