1.
The effect of nebivolol treatment on oxidative stress and antioxidant status in patients with cardiac syndrome-X.
Erdamar, H, Sen, N, Tavil, Y, Yazici, HU, Turfan, M, Poyraz, F, Topal, S, Okuyan, H, Cemri, M, Cengel, A
Coronary artery disease. 2009;(3):238-4
Abstract
BACKGROUND Free radical-mediated oxidative stress has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of several disorders. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effect of treatment with nebivolol on the metabolic state of oxidative stress, and antioxidant status markers in patients with cardiac syndrome-X (CSX), additionally, to compare with the effect of metoprolol treatment. METHODS Thirty patients, 17 female and 13 male, with CSX were enrolled in the study. Nebivolol (5 mg/day) or metoprolol (50 mg/day) was administrated for 12 weeks. Twelve hour fasting blood samples, taken at the initiation and on the third month of therapy, were analyzed for the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), nitrite+nitrate (NOx), and the activity of myeloperoxidase (MPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD). No patient presented additional risk factors for increased reactive oxygen species levels. RESULTS Compared with sixteen control participants, patients with CSX had significantly higher activity of MPO and levels of MDA, but significantly lower SOD activity and levels of NOx before treatment. After treatment, MPO activity and MDA levels were significantly reduced; SOD activity and NOx levels were significantly increased with nebivolol but remained unchanged with metoprolol. CONCLUSION We have shown that patients with CSX who taken nebivolol have lower serum MPO activity, levels of MDA and higher serum SOD activity, NOx levels when compared with metoprolol treatment. Exercise stress test parameters were also ameliorated in patients who had taken nebivolol in contrast to metoprolol. Nebivolol treatment may be a novel treatment strategy in cases with CSX in the future.
2.
Endocannabinoids and related N-acylethanolamines in the control of appetite and energy metabolism: emergence of new molecular players.
Lambert, DM, Muccioli, GG
Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care. 2007;(6):735-44
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Endocannabinoids (anandamide and 2-arachidonoylgycerol) and related N-acylethanolamines (N-oleoylethanolamine) exhibit opposite effects in the control of appetite. The purpose of this review is to highlight the similarities and differences of three major lipid-signaling molecules by focusing on their mode of action and the proteins involved in the control of food intake and energy metabolism. RECENT FINDINGS Anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol promote food intake and are the main endogenous ligands of the cannabinoid receptors. One of them, the cannabinoid receptor 1, is responsible for the control of food intake and energy expenditure both at a central and a peripheral level, affecting numerous anorexigenic and orexigenic mediators (leptin, neuropeptide Y, ghrelin, orexin, endogenous opioids, corticotropin-releasing hormone, alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone, cocaine and amphetamine-related transcript). In the gut, N-oleoylethanolamine plays an opposite role in food regulation, by interacting with two molecular targets different from the cannabinoid receptors: the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and a G-protein coupled receptor GPR119. SUMMARY Recent findings on the molecular mechanisms underlying the promotion of food intake or, in contrast, the suppression of food intake by anandamide and N-oleoylethanolamine, are summarized. Potential strategies for treating overweight, metabolic syndrome, and type II diabetes are briefly outlined.