-
1.
Association of Plasma Ceramides and Sphingomyelin With VLDL apoB-100 Fractional Catabolic Rate Before and After Rosuvastatin Treatment.
Ng, TW, Ooi, EM, Watts, GF, Chan, DC, Meikle, PJ, Barrett, PH
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2015;(6):2497-501
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of the study was to examine post hoc associations between plasma sphingolipids and lipoprotein kinetics in men with the metabolic syndrome after rosuvastatin treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plasma sphingolipid profiling, determined by tandem mass spectrometry, was performed in a randomized, double-blind, triple-crossover trial (n = 12) of 5-week treatment periods with placebo or rosuvastatin (10 or 40 mg/d) with 2-week washouts between treatments. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Baseline plasma ceramides were associated with very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) apolipoprotein (apo)-B-100 concentration (r = 0.58, P < .05) and inversely with VLDL apoB-100 fractional catabolic rate (FCR; r = -0.67, P = .02). Posttreatment changes with rosuvastatin (40 mg/d) in plasma ceramides were inversely associated with VLDL apoB-100 FCR (r = -0.62, P = .03) independent of changes in plasma triglycerides, cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. By contrast, baseline and postrosuvastatin treatment plasma sphingomyelin levels were not associated with apoB-100 kinetics. Plasma ceramides and sphingomyelin were not associated with the kinetics or concentrations of high-density lipoprotein apoA-I, and low-density lipoprotein apoB. In the metabolic syndrome, the ability of rosuvastatin to increase VLDL apoB-100 FCR may reflect ceramide-specific mechanistic actions and/or sphingolipid exchange.
-
2.
Effect of rosuvastatin monotherapy or in combination with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome.
Agouridis, AP, Kostapanos, MS, Tsimihodimos, V, Kostara, C, Mikhailidis, DP, Bairaktari, ET, Tselepis, AD, Elisaf, MS
International journal of clinical practice. 2012;(9):843-53
Abstract
BACKGROUND Raised triglycerides (TG), decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and a predominance of small dense low density lipoproteins (sdLDL) are characteristics of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin monotherapy with moderate dosing combined with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on the lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and MetS. METHODS We previously randomised patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 160 and TG > 200 mg/dl to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or ω-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (Rω group, n = 30). In the present study, only patients with MetS were included (24, 23 and 24 in the R, RF and Rω groups respectively). At baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, the lipoprotein subfraction profile was determined by polyacrylamide 3% gel electrophoresis. RESULTS The mean LDL size was significantly increased in all groups. This change was more prominent with RF than with other treatments in parallel with its greater hypotriglyceridemic capacity (p < 0.05 compared with R and Rω). A decrease in insulin resistance by RF was also noted. Only RF significantly raised HDL-C levels (by 7.7%, p < 0.05) by increasing the cholesterol of small HDL particles. The cholesterol of larger HDL subclasses was significantly increased by R and Rω. CONCLUSIONS All regimens increased mean LDL size; RF was the most effective. A differential effect of treatments was noted on the HDL subfraction profile.
-
3.
The effect of rosuvastatin on incident pneumonia: results from the JUPITER trial.
Novack, V, MacFadyen, J, Malhotra, A, Almog, Y, Glynn, RJ, Ridker, PM
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2012;(7):E367-72
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence from observational studies have raised the possibility that statin treatment reduces the incidence of certain bacterial infections, particularly pneumonia. We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of rosuvastatin to examine this hypothesis. METHODS We analyzed data from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). In this trial, 17,802 healthy participants (men 50 years and older and women 60 and older) with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level below 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) and a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of 2.0 mg/L or greater were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin or placebo. We evaluated the incidence of pneumonia on an intention-to-treat basis by reviewing reports of adverse events from the study investigators, who were unaware of the treatment assignments. RESULTS Among 17,802 trial participants followed for a median of 1.9 years, incident pneumonia was reported as an adverse event in 214 participants in the rosuvastatin group and 257 in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.00). In analyses restricted to events occurring before a cardiovascular event, pneumonia occurred in 203 participants given rosuvastatin and 250 given placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). Inclusion of recurrent pneumonia events did not modify this effect (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98), nor did adjustment for age, sex, smoking, metabolic syndrome, lipid levels and C-reactive protein level. INTERPRETATION Data from this randomized controlled trial support the hypothesis that statin treatment may modestly reduce the incidence of pneumonia. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT0023968.).
-
4.
Comparative study of low doses of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on lipid and glycemic control in patients with metabolic syndrome and hypercholesterolemia.
Park, JS, Kim, YJ, Choi, JY, Kim, YN, Hong, TJ, Kim, DS, Kim, KY, Jeong, MH, Chae, JK, Oh, SK, et al
The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2010;(1):27-35
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This multicenter, open-labeled, randomized trial was performed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin 10 mg and atorvastatin 10 mg on lipid and glycemic control in Korean patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome. METHODS In total, 351 patients who met the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria for metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > or = 130 mg/dL were randomized to receive either rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 173) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 178) for over 6 weeks. RESULTS After 6 weeks of treatment, greater reductions in total cholesterol (- 35.94 +/- 11.38 vs. - 30.07 +/- 10.46%, p < 0.001), LDL-C (48.04 +/- 14.45 vs. 39.52 +/- 14.42%, p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (- 42.93 +/- 13.15 vs. - 35.52 +/- 11.76%, p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein-B (- 38.7 +/- 18.85 vs. - 32.57 +/- 17.56%, p = 0.002) levels were observed in the rosuvastatin group as compared to the atorvastatin group. Overall, the percentage of patients attaining the NCEP ATP III goal was higher with rosuvastatin as compared to atorvastatin (87.64 vs. 69.88%, p < 0.001). Changes in glucose and insulin levels, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index were not significantly different between the two groups. The safety and tolerability of the two agents were similar. CONCLUSIONS Rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in achieving NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals in patients with nondiabetic metabolic syndrome, especially in those with lower NCEP ATP III target level goals.
-
5.
Number needed to treat with rosuvastatin to prevent first cardiovascular events and death among men and women with low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: justification for the use of statins in prevention: an intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin (JUPITER).
Ridker, PM, MacFadyen, JG, Fonseca, FA, Genest, J, Gotto, AM, Kastelein, JJ, Koenig, W, Libby, P, Lorenzatti, AJ, Nordestgaard, BG, et al
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2009;(6):616-23
Abstract
BACKGROUND As recently demonstrated, random allocation to rosuvastatin results in large relative risk reductions for first cardiovascular events among apparently healthy men and women with low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. However, whether the absolute risk reduction among such individuals justifies wide application of statin therapy in primary prevention is a controversial issue with broad policy and public health implications. METHODS AND RESULTS Absolute risk reductions and consequent number needed to treat (NNT) values were calculated across a range of end points, timeframes, and subgroups using data from Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), a randomized evaluation of rosuvastatin 20 mg versus placebo conducted among 17 802 apparently healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <130 mg/dL and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >or=2 mg/L. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to address the potential impact that alternative statin regimens might have on a similar primary prevention population. For the end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, or death, the 5-year NNT within JUPITER was 20 (95% CI, 14 to 34). All subgroups had 5-year NNT values for this end point below 50; as examples, 5-year NNT values were 17 for men and 31 for women, 21 for whites and 19 for nonwhites, 18 for those with body mass index 300). CONCLUSIONS Absolute risk reductions and consequent NNT values associated with statin therapy among those with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and low low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are comparable if not superior to published NNT values for several widely accepted interventions for primary cardiovascular prevention, including the use of statin therapy among those with overt hyperlipidemia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier NCT00239681.
-
6.
Effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on LDL and HDL particle concentrations in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.
Rosenson, RS, Otvos, JD, Hsia, J
Diabetes care. 2009;(6):1087-91
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of statin therapy on lipoprotein particle concentrations in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Changes in lipoprotein particle concentration may predict the risk of coronary heart disease more accurately than lipoprotein cholesterol levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with dyslipidemia and the metabolic syndrome (n = 318) were randomly assigned in a double-blind study comparing 10 mg rosuvastatin (RSV), 10 mg atorvastatin, or placebo daily for 6 weeks. From weeks 6 to 12, patients in the RSV and placebo groups received 20 mg RSV, whereas the ATV group increased their dose to 20 mg daily. Lipoprotein particle concentrations were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, LDL cholesterol was measured by beta-quantification, and other lipoproteins were measured by standard methods at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Lipoprotein levels were compared by analysis of covariance. RESULTS Statins reduced LDL particle concentration less than LDL cholesterol (-30 to -38 vs. -38 to -51%). Reductions were greater with RSV than with ATV (P < 0.05 for LDL particle concentration and P < 0.001 for LDL cholesterol). Most patients attained LDL cholesterol <2.59 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) at 12 weeks (80% with RSV and 59% with ATV; P = 0.003), but only 27% of patients receiving RSV and 19% receiving ATV attained the goal of LDL particle concentration <1,000 nmol/l (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS In patients with the metabolic syndrome, statin-induced changes in LDL cholesterol do not accurately reflect changes in LDL particle concentration. Consequently, despite attainment of LDL cholesterol goals, these patients may retain considerable residual coronary heart disease risk.
-
7.
[The JUPITER study: background and research hypotheses].
Rapezzi, C, Gallo, P
Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006). 2009;(11-12 Suppl 3):25S-27S
Abstract
Many large-scale studies demonstrated in aggregate that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels are a strong, independent predictor of future vascular events and that hsCRP adds prognostic information on risk at all levels of LDL cholesterol, at all levels of the Framingham risk score, and at all levels of the metabolic syndrome. Moreover, hsCRP predicts risk of recurrent coronary events and has important prognostic value in acute coronary ischemia and after coronary interventions. The JUPITER study was aimed to determine whether long-term treatment with rosuvastatin (20 mg/die) will reduce the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or arterial revascularization among individuals with LDL cholesterol levels < 130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/I) who are at high risk because of an enhanced inflammatory response as indicated by hsCRP levels > 2 mg/I.
-
8.
[JUPITER, what now?].
Perna, GP
Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006). 2009;(11-12 Suppl 3):33S-38S
Abstract
The JUPITER study was conducted in apparently healthy, non-dyslipidemic subjects, but with high levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and showed a decrease in LDL cholesterol and hsCRP of 55% and 36%, respectively, with the administration of rosuvastatin at standard doses (20 mg/die), with a significant reduction in the incidence of major cardiovascular events. The event reduction was maximal in patients whose LDL cholesterol and hsCRP levels were lowered to < 70 mg/dl and <2 mg/I, respectively. The publication of the JUPITER data resulted in a wide debate within the international scientific community, particularly related to clinical implications of major findings. The main implications seem to be the confirmation of "the lower is better" philosophy and of the role of hsCRP as a marker to select, among intermediate risk subjects, patients who are actually at higher risk, who need to be treated with highly effective statins with a low side-effect profile, such as rosuvastatin. Patients with the "JUPITER phenotype" (metabolic syndrome + family history of cardiovascular disease) seem to benefit the most from a treatment that includes measurement of hsCRP and rosuvastatin administration.
-
9.
Another look at the results of the JUPITER trial.
Kappagoda, CT, Amsterdam, EA
The American journal of cardiology. 2009;(11):1603-5
Abstract
Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) was a placebo-controlled trial undertaken on "apparently healthy" subjects selected primarily on the basis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations >or=2.0 mg/L. JUPITER showed that rosuvastatin reduced the incidence of cardiac events compared to a control group. The study population (median age 66 years) included men and women with the metabolic syndrome (about 41%), median blood pressures in the prehypertensive range, current smoking (about 15%), median body mass indexes higher than normal, and Framingham 10-year risk >10% (about 50%). The presence of these risk factors indicates that a significant proportion of subjects were not "healthy" and warranted aggressive management under current guidelines, without the measurement of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Furthermore, <17% of the trial participants were taking guidelines-recommended aspirin, and 25% had systolic blood pressures >145 mm Hg and would have merited treatment for hypertension. It is likely that many of the participants did not receive care consistent with current standards. Thus, the benefit of statin therapy would have been more difficult to demonstrate if standard therapeutic recommendations had been followed. In conclusion, these considerations cast doubt on the contention that statin therapy should be initiated in apparently healthy individuals on the basis of elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels.
-
10.
Indices of reverse cholesterol transport in subjects with metabolic syndrome after treatment with rosuvastatin.
Sviridov, D, Hoang, A, Ooi, E, Watts, G, Barrett, PH, Nestel, P
Atherosclerosis. 2008;(2):732-9
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effects of the statin, rosuvastatin on indices of reverse cholesterol transport were studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 25 overweight subjects with defined metabolic syndrome. RESULT Four weeks' treatment with 40 mg/day rosuvastatin significantly reduced levels of plasma cholesterol (44%), LDL cholesterol (60%) and triglyceride (38%). HDL cholesterol (mean [S.D.]) rose (0.97[0.17] to 1.05[0.17]mmol/L; P<0.05) and the LpA-I component of HDL from 39[7] to 45[9]mg/dL (P<0.05). LCAT activity fell (0.55[0.13] to 0.35[0.07]nmol/mL/h; P<0.05); CETP activity and mass fell from 89[13] to 80[11]nmol//L/h and from 1.66[0.57] to 1.28[0.41]mug/mL respectively, (P<0.05). Cholesterol efflux in vitro (to plasmas from THP-1 activated cells) fell from 7.1[1.8]% (placebo) to 6.2[1.7]% (rosuvastatin); P<0.05, but when plasmas depleted of apoB lipoproteins were studied, the difference in efflux was no longer statistically significant. During placebo efflux was paradoxically inversely correlated with HDL-C (P=0.016) and LpA-I (P=0.035) concentrations but these correlations were absent after rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS The data suggest possible HDL dysfunctionality in subjects with metabolic syndrome. The reduced capacity of plasmas following statin treatment to stimulate cholesterol efflux in vitro occurred in association with reduction in apoB lipoproteins and reduced activities of CETP and LCAT, and despite increased levels of HDL cholesterol.