-
1.
Effects of immediate-release niacin and dietary fatty acids on acute insulin and lipid status in individuals with metabolic syndrome.
Montserrat-de la Paz, S, Lopez, S, Bermudez, B, Guerrero, JM, Abia, R, Muriana, FJ
Journal of the science of food and agriculture. 2018;(6):2194-2200
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nature of dietary fats profoundly affects postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and glucose homeostasis. Niacin is a potent lipid-lowering agent. However, limited data exist on postprandial triglycerides and glycemic control following co-administration of high-fat meals with a single dose of niacin in subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS). The aim of the study was to explore whether a fat challenge containing predominantly saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) or MUFAs plus omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated (LCPUFAs) fatty acids together with a single dose of immediate-release niacin have a relevant role in postprandial insulin and lipid status in subjects with MetS. RESULTS In a randomized crossover within-subject design, 16 men with MetS were given a single dose of immediate-release niacin (2 g) and ∼15 cal kg-1 body weight meals containing either SFAs, MUFAs, MUFAs plus omega-3 LCPUFAs or no fat. At baseline and hourly over 6 h, plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, triglycerides, free fatty acids (FFAs), total cholesterol, and both high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were assessed. Co-administered with niacin, high-fat meals significantly increased the postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, triglycerides, FFAs and postprandial indices of β-cell function. However, postprandial indices of insulin sensitivity were significantly decreased. These effects were significantly attenuated with MUFAs or MUFAs plus omega-3 LCPUFAs when compared with SFAs. CONCLUSION In the setting of niacin co-administration and compared to dietary SFAs, MUFAs limit the postprandial insulin, triglyceride and FFA excursions, and improve postprandial glucose homeostasis in MetS. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.
-
2.
Genetic Variants Associated With Plasma Lipids Are Associated With the Lipid Response to Niacin.
Tuteja, S, Qu, L, Vujkovic, M, Dunbar, RL, Chen, J, DerOhannessian, S, Rader, DJ
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;(19):e03488
Abstract
Background Niacin is a broad-spectrum lipid-modulating drug, but its mechanism of action is unclear. Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple loci associated with blood lipid levels and lipoprotein (a). It is unknown whether these loci modulate response to niacin. Methods and Results Using data from the AIM - HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL /High Triglycerides and Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial (n=2054 genotyped participants), we determined whether genetic variations at validated loci were associated with a differential change in plasma lipids and lipoprotein (a) 1 year after randomization to either statin+placebo or statin+niacin in a variant-treatment interaction model. Nominally significant interactions ( P<0.05) were found for genetic variants in MVK , LIPC , PABPC 4, AMPD 3 with change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SPTLC 3 with change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TOM 1 with change in total cholesterol; PDXDC 1 and CYP 26A1 with change in triglycerides; and none for lipoprotein (a). We also investigated whether these loci were associated with cardiovascular events. The risk of coronary disease related death was higher in the minor allele carriers at the LIPC locus in the placebo group (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.11-3.90, P=0.02) but not observed in the niacin group (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.48-1.65, P=0.7); P-interaction =0.02. There was a greater risk for acute coronary syndrome (odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.77, P=0.02) and revascularization events (odds ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.22, P=0.002) in major allele carriers at the CYP 26A1 locus in the placebo group not seen in the niacin group. Conclusions Genetic variation at loci previously associated with steady-state lipid levels displays evidence for lipid response to niacin treatment. Clinical Trials Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00120289.
-
3.
Niacin and heart disease prevention: Engraving its tombstone is a mistake.
Superko, HR, Zhao, XQ, Hodis, HN, Guyton, JR
Journal of clinical lipidology. 2017;(6):1309-1317
Abstract
Niacin (nicotinic acid) has been used for primary and secondary coronary heart disease prevention for over 40 years. Until recently clinical trials incorporating niacin as part of an intervention strategy consistently demonstrated reduction in clinical events and lesion improvement, including ≥6% absolute mortality reduction. Two large clinical event trials in 2011 (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides and Impact on Global Health Outcomes) and 2014 (Heart Protection Study 2-Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events) concluded that niacin added to statin therapy did not provide clinical event benefit over statin alone. This has prompted some individuals to call for an end to the use of niacin in statin-treated patients and the US Food and Drug Administration to halt marketing of statin/niacin combination tablets. There are significant differences between the earlier clinical trials that revealed cardiovascular benefit of niacin and the 2 trials that failed to demonstrate a benefit. These differences include dyslipidemia types, niacin formulation, dosing, and timing. In general, the patient population that benefits the most from incorporating niacin in their treatment regimen can be defined by elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The niacin formulation and dose should be capable of achieving adequate lipoprotein change. Mealtime dosing of niacin, as opposed to bedtime dosing, may avoid a counter-regulatory hormone response, including catecholamines, because of altered fuel supply potentially leading to unexpected cardiovascular outcomes.
-
4.
Effects of Extended-Release Niacin Added to Simvastatin/Ezetimibe on Glucose and Insulin Values in AIM-HIGH.
Goldberg, RB, Bittner, VA, Dunbar, RL, Fleg, JL, Grunberger, G, Guyton, JR, Leiter, LA, McBride, R, Robinson, JG, Simmons, DL, et al
The American journal of medicine. 2016;(7):753.e13-22
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Niacin is an antidyslipidemic agent that may cause blood sugar elevation in patients with diabetes, but its effects on glucose and insulin values in nondiabetic statin-treated subjects with cardiovascular disease and at high risk for diabetes are less well known. METHODS This was a prespecified, intent-to-treat analysis of the Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low high-density lipoprotein/high triglycerides: Impact on Global Health outcomes trial which randomized 3,414 participants at 92 centers in the US and Canada to extended-release niacin (ERN) plus simvastatin/ezetimibe (ERN) or simvastatin/ezetimibe plus placebo (Placebo). Baseline and annual fasting glucose and insulin values were measured. Those experiencing an adverse event indicative of diabetes or starting medications for diabetes were considered to have confirmed diabetes. In addition, nondiabetic subjects with 2 annual follow-up glucose measurements were categorized into normal, impaired fasting glucose or newly diagnosed diabetes (presumed or confirmed) states. RESULTS Compared with placebo, ERN increased annual fasting glucose from baseline to 1 year in both those with normal (7.9 ± 15.8 vs 4.3 ± 10.3 mg/dL; P < .001) and impaired fasting glucose (4.1 ± 18.7 vs 1.4 ± 14.9; P < .02) and increased insulin levels. Both effects waned over the next 2 years. There were less consistent effects in those with baseline diabetes. There was an increased risk of progressing from normal to presumed or confirmed impaired fasting glucose (ERN 197/336) cases (58.6%) vs placebo 135/325 cases (41.5%; P < .001) over time, but no difference in diabetes development in the 2 treatment groups except in those with normal fasting glucose at baseline. CONCLUSIONS The addition of ERN to simvastatin/ezetimibe had marginal effects on glycemia in those with diabetes at baseline, and there was a trend toward increased development of new-onset diabetes. In addition, ERN increased the risk of developing impaired fasting glucose, which may have deleterious consequences over time and warrants further study.
-
5.
Effects of niacin and omega-3 fatty acids on the apolipoproteins in overweight patients with elevated triglycerides and reduced HDL cholesterol.
Savinova, OV, Fillaus, K, Harris, WS, Shearer, GC
Atherosclerosis. 2015;(2):520-5
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prescription omega-3 acid ethyl esters (P-OM3) and extended release niacin (ERN) both have beneficial effects on plasma lipids and lipoproteins. The purpose of this study was to describe the effects of mono- and combination (Combo) therapy of these agents in patients with the metabolic syndrome. METHODS Very low density (VLDL), intermediate/low density (IDL/LDL, hereafter LDL), and high density lipoproteins (HDL) were isolated from 56 overweight patients with elevated triglyceride/HDL-C ratios at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment with placebo, ERN (2g/day), P-OM3 (4g/day), or Combo and then analyzed by quantitative electrophoresis for apolipoproteins (apo) A1, A2, B, C2, C3 and E. Total plasma concentrations and the ratios of each apo with apoB (in VLDL and LDL) and with apoA1 (in HDL) were calculated. An apoC3 glycosylation index (a ratio between di- and mono-sialylated isoforms) was also determined in plasma and in each lipoprotein fraction. RESULTS ERN reduced plasma apoB (-11%, p < 0.05). Combo increased LDL apoE/apoB ratio (64%, p < 0.01) and LDL apoA1/apoB (91%, p < 0.05). ERN increased the apoC3 glycosylation index only in HDL (37%, p < 0.05), whereas P-OM3 and Combo increased the index in whole plasma (48% and 49%, respectively, p < 0.05 for both) and in every lipoprotein class (VLDL: 26%, p < 0.01 and 26%, p < 0.05; LDL: 55%, p < 0.01 and 61%, p < 0.01; HDL: 43%, p < 0.001 and 44%, p < 0.001, respectively). All findings were significant after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, medications, and baseline apo value. CONCLUSIONS ERN produced a beneficial reduction in plasma apoB. The enrichment of LDL with apoE and apoA1 was unique to the Combo group and might be beneficial owing to the atheroprotective properties of apoE and HDL2 (a likely source of apoA1 in LDL fraction). The effect of therapies on the apoC3 glycosylation index is a novel finding, the implications of which will require further study.
-
6.
Fenofibrate and extended-release niacin improve the endothelial protective effects of HDL in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Gomaraschi, M, Ossoli, A, Adorni, MP, Damonte, E, Niesor, E, Veglia, F, Franceschini, G, Benghozi, R, Calabresi, L
Vascular pharmacology. 2015;:80-86
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibrates and niacin are at present the most effective therapies to increase plasma levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C); to date, limited data are available on their effects on HDL protective functions. METHODS AND RESULTS Within a multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over study, 37 patients with metabolic syndrome received 6weeks' treatment with fenofibrate or extended-release niacin (ER niacin), with a 4weeks' wash-out period. HDL ability to preserve endothelial cell homeostasis was assessed by incubating cultured endothelial cells with HDL isolated from patients at baseline and after each treatment. HDL isolated from patients at baseline were as effective as control HDL in inhibiting vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expression, but less efficient in promoting endothelial cell nitric oxide (NO) release. Both fenofibrate and ER niacin increased HDL ability to inhibit TNFα-induced VCAM-1 expression (+7% and +11%, respectively). Fenofibrate and ER niacin also improved the impaired HDL ability to induce the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and NO production (+10% and +8%, respectively). Interestingly, HDL isolated after treatment showed an ability to promote endothelial NO release similar to HDL isolated from controls. No differences were observed between the two drugs. With both drugs, HDL function was improved irrespective of baseline HDL-C levels. CONCLUSION Treatment with fenofibrate or ER niacin in patients with metabolic syndrome not only increased HDL-C levels but also improved the endothelial protective effects of HDL.
-
7.
Postprandial effects of long-term niacin/laropiprant use on glucose and lipid metabolism and on cardiovascular risk in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Aye, MM, Kilpatrick, ES, Afolabi, P, Wootton, SA, Rigby, AS, Coady, AM, Sandeman, DD, Atkin, SL
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2014;(6):545-52
Abstract
AIM: This study investigated the effect of long-term niacin/laropiprant therapy on CV risk and IR in obese women with PCOS. METHODS In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 13 and 12 PCOS women completed a 12 week course of niacin/laropiprant or placebo, respectively. Fasted subjects had an endothelial function test (EndoPat2000) and then consumed a mixed meal with blood sampled postprandially for 6 h before and after intervention. RESULTS By 12 weeks, niacin/laropiprant lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (13%) and increased HDL-c (17%). Despite a reduction in fasting triglycerides (21%), the drug had no effect on their postprandial rise (2.69 ± 1.44 vs. 2.49 ± 1.14 mmol/l, p = 0.72). However, following the mixed meal, plasma glucose area under the response curve increased from 13.1 ± 2.9 to 14.0 ± 2.8 mmol/l, p = 0.05, as a consequence of both increased insulin resistance [HOMA-IR: 2.2 (1.2, 4.2) vs. 3.8(1.3, 5.5), p = 0.02] and a reduced acute insulin response to glucose [424 (211, 975) vs. 257(122, 418) pmol/mmol, p = 0.04]. Niacin/laropiprant did not improve RHI (1.97 ± 0.40 vs. 2.05 ± 0.58, p = 0.33) or hsCRP. CONCLUSIONS In PCOS, niacin/laropiprant had a significant negative impact on postprandial glucose and no improvement in postprandial hypertriglyceridaemia, with at least the former mediated through increased IR and reduced β-cell function. This data may help explain why the improvement in fasting lipids has not translated into improved CV risk markers in PCOS.
-
8.
Recent clinical trials evaluating benefit of drug therapy for modification of HDL cholesterol.
Wright, RS
Current opinion in cardiology. 2013;(4):389-98
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight the recent data evaluating pharmacological manipulation of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and examine whether medication-induced changes were associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced short-term and long-term cardiovascular risks. The review focuses on the studies with niacin and the new cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors torcetrapib, dalcetrapib, anacetrapib and evacetrapib. RECENT FINDINGS Several large randomized clinical trials have evaluated drug therapy on HDL-C and cardiovascular outcomes. Two studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes following HDL-C raising with niacin. Data from the Heart Protection 2 Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events and The Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health trials both demonstrated no clinical benefit from use of niacin therapy when added to background statin therapy with regard to short-term and long-term cardiovascular risk reduction. Both studies demonstrated excess side-effects from use of niacin. A number of clinical trials have evaluated HDL-C modification from use of a CETP inhibitor. All of the studies have demonstrated significant increases in HDL-C. To date, the outcome data are not favorable. Use of torcetrapib was associated with excess mortality. Use of dalcetrapib had no effect on short-term and long-term cardiovascular events. Two outcome studies with anacetrapib and evacetrapib are ongoing and will report out in a few years' time. SUMMARY Pharmacological manipulation of HDL-C has not improved the cardiovascular outcomes. Several agents have caused harm or unacceptable side-effects. Further studies are needed before one can recommend the use of additional lipid-modifying therapies beyond statins.
-
9.
The current state of niacin in cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-regression.
Lavigne, PM, Karas, RH
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;(4):440-446
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the efficacy of niacin for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, as indicated by the aggregate body of clinical trial evidence including data from the recently published AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial. BACKGROUND Previously available randomized clinical trial data assessing the clinical efficacy of niacin has been challenged by results from AIM-HIGH, which failed to demonstrate a reduction in CVD event incidence in patients with established CVD treated with niacin as an adjunct to intensive simvastatin therapy. METHODS Clinical trials of niacin, alone or combined with other lipid-altering therapy, were identified via MEDLINE. Odds ratios (ORs) for CVD endpoints were calculated with a random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression modeled the relationship of differences in on-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the magnitude of effect of niacin on CVD events. RESULTS Eleven eligible trials including 9,959 subjects were identified. Niacin use was associated with a significant reduction in the composite endpoints of any CVD event (OR: 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.89; p = 0.007) and major coronary heart disease event (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). No significant association was observed between niacin therapy and stroke incidence (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.54; p = 0.65). The magnitude of on-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol difference between treatment arms was not significantly associated with the magnitude of the effect of niacin on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The consensus perspective derived from available clinical data supports that niacin reduces CVD events and, further, that this may occur through a mechanism not reflected by changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration.
-
10.
Extended-release niacin/laropiprant effects on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Bays, H, Giezek, H, McKenney, JM, O'Neill, EA, Tershakovec, AM
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders. 2012;(4):260-6
Abstract
BACKGROUND A potentially atherogenic lipid profile often found in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) includes increased concentrations of small, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and decreased concentration of medium/large high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles. Extended-release niacin/laropiprant (ERN/LRPT) lowers LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG), and raises HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels with attenuation of niacin-induced flushing. METHODS Plasma HDL, LDL, IDL, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and chylomicron particle concentration and size at were evaluated at baseline and week 12 using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The data were acquired from a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study including 796 patients with T2DM treated with either 1 tablet of ERN 1 gram/LRPT 20 mg or matching placebo daily, increased after 4 weeks to 2 tablets daily. RESULTS ERN/LRPT significantly (P≤0.001 for all) reduced LDL-C 17.9% and TG 23.1%, and increased HDL-C levels 23.2%. Compared to placebo, ERN/LRPT decreased LDL, IDL, VLDL, and chylomicron particle concentrations [median concentration of smallest LDL particles decreased 16.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -22.3, -10.9, whereas the largest LDL particles decreased 11.0%, 95% CI -18.7, -3.2, and total VLDL/chylomicron mean plasma particle concentration decreased 34.7%, 95% CI -41.3, -28.1]. Compared to placebo, ERN/LRPT shifted the distribution of HDL particle diameter from smaller to larger (median concentration of the largest HDL particles increased 32.7% (95% CI 25.30, 40.58), whereas concentration of the smallest HDL particles decreased 8.2% (95% CI -11.29, -5.06). CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo in patients with T2DM, ERN/LRPT shifted the lipoprotein profile toward a potentially less atherogenic pattern with reduced atherogenic LDL and IDL particle concentrations, and increased large HDL plasma particle concentrations. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00485758).