1.
The Effect of a Food Addiction Explanation Model for Weight Control and Obesity on Weight Stigma.
O'Brien, KS, Puhl, RM, Latner, JD, Lynott, D, Reid, JD, Vakhitova, Z, Hunter, JA, Scarf, D, Jeanes, R, Bouguettaya, A, et al
Nutrients. 2020;12(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Research suggests that weight stigma is increasing and is associated with multiple negative health and psychological outcomes. Public health messaging presently emphasises weight gain as lack of personal control of diet and exercise, which contributes to the stigma and ignores the myriad of uncontrollable factors that also contribute to weight gain. One component of weight gain is food addiction, in which food is shown to be as rewarding to the brain as other addictive substances. It is currently unclear whether an explanation of the food addiction model (FAM) will affect weight stigma, and there is a need to understand the factors that contribute and reinforce weight stigmatisation. The aim of this study is to assess whether providing a FAM explanation for weight gain would impact expressions of weight stigma. Two experiments were done in which college students were randomly allocated to read a simulated article that focused on either food addiction or diet and exercise as contributing factors to obesity. The participants then completed a survey assessing their perception of obesity. This study found the FAM explanation resulted in a significantly lower weight stigma. Based on these results, the authors suggest current public health messaging that attributes obesity to lack of personal control needs to be changed as it exacerbates weight stigma.
Abstract
There is increasing scientific and public support for the notion that some foods may be addictive, and that poor weight control and obesity may, for some people, stem from having a food addiction. However, it remains unclear how a food addiction model (FAM) explanation for obesity and weight control will affect weight stigma. In two experiments (N = 530 and N = 690), we tested the effect of a food addiction explanation for obesity and weight control on weight stigma. In Experiment 1, participants who received a FAM explanation for weight control and obesity reported lower weight stigma scores (e.g., less dislike of 'fat people', and lower personal willpower blame) than those receiving an explanation emphasizing diet and exercise (F(4,525) = 7.675, p = 0.006; and F(4,525) = 5.393, p = 0.021, respectively). In Experiment 2, there was a significant group difference for the dislike of 'fat people' stigma measure (F(5,684) = 5.157, p = 0.006), but not for personal willpower weight stigma (F(5,684) = 0.217, p = 0.81). Participants receiving the diet and exercise explanation had greater dislike of 'fat people' than those in the FAM explanation and control group (p values < 0.05), with no difference between the FAM and control groups (p >0.05). The FAM explanation for weight control and obesity did not increase weight stigma and resulted in lower stigma than the diet and exercise explanation that attributes obesity to personal control. The results highlight the importance of health messaging about the causes of obesity and the need for communications that do not exacerbate weight stigma.
2.
Locus of control and obesity.
Neymotin, F, Nemzer, LR
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2014;5:159
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a multifactorial disease, which makes it a complicated issue to address. In particular psychology and a concept know as locus of control plays a huge role. Locus of control refers to an individual’s ability to acknowledge that their environment and choices are under their control. However, whether this is a cause of obesity or mutually occurring is unclear. This review of 49 papers aimed to determine the relationship between obesity and locus of control. The authors discussed that the majority of literature agrees on a correlation between locus of control and obesity, however it is not straight forward as there is no set definition for locus of control. Whether locus of control causes obesity or obesity causes locus of control was also difficult to determine, but it was stated that locus of control is difficult to change. The mechanisms behind causation were discussed and stress hormones and hormones which make you feel full or hungry were implicated. It was concluded that there is a correlation between locus of control and obesity, however which one is causal, still needs more research. This paper could be used by healthcare practitioners to understand the important role that psychology plays in the development of obesity.
Abstract
In the developed world, the hazards associated with obesity have largely outstripped the risk of starvation. Obesity remains a difficult public health issue to address, due in large part to the many disciplines involved. A full understanding requires knowledge in the fields of genetics, endocrinology, psychology, sociology, economics, and public policy - among others. In this short review, which serves as an introduction to the Frontiers in Endocrinology research topic, we address one cross-disciplinary relationship: the interaction between the hunger/satiation neural circuitry, an individual's perceived locus of control, and the risk for obesity. Mammals have evolved a complex system for modulating energy intake. Overlaid on this, in humans, there exists a wide variation in "perceived locus of control" - that is, the extent to which an individual believes to be in charge of the events that affect them. Whether one has primarily an internal or external locus of control itself affects, and is affected by, external and physiological factors and has been correlated with the risk for obesity. Thus, the path from hunger and satiation to an individual's actual behavior may often be moderated by psychological factors, included among which is locus of control.
3.
The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review.
Rees, R, Oliver, K, Woodman, J, Thomas, J
BMC public health. 2011;11:188
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity in children is an increasing problem in Westernised societies; obese children are more at risk of poorer health in the short and long term. The aim of the study was to explore the views of children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experience of these issues. This systemic review looked at 28 studies done in UK, conducted after 1997 in children aged 4-11. The review’s findings suggest that for children, the health consequences of obesity seemed to be mostly irrelevant. Impact on their social lives was far more important. Also, despite often having healthy body sizes, children continue to dislike their own bodies. This review highlights the need to consider the social aspect of childhood obesity and that children’s perspectives should be used in the policy making process. The authors conclude that the studies did not fully represent children’s diversity and therefore higher quality research is needed to enable relevant interventions to be put into place.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are high levels of concern about childhood obesity, with obese children being at higher risk of poorer health both in the short and longer terms. Children's attitudes to, and beliefs about, their bodies have also raised concern. Children themselves have a stake in this debate; their perspectives on this issue can inform the ways in which interventions aim to work.This systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research aimed to explore the views of UK children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experiences of these issues. METHODS We conducted sensitive searches of electronic databases and specialist websites, and contacted experts. We included studies published from the start of 1997 which reported the perspectives of UK children aged 4-11 about obesity or body size, shape or weight, and which described key aspects of their methods. Included studies were coded and quality-assessed by two reviewers independently.Findings were synthesised in two analyses: i) an interpretive synthesis of findings from open-ended questions; and ii) an aggregative synthesis of findings from closed questions. We juxtaposed the findings from the two syntheses. The effect of excluding the lowest quality studies was explored. We also consulted young people to explore the credibility of a subset of findings. RESULTS We included 28 studies. Instead of a focus on health, children emphasised the social impact of body size, describing experiences and awareness of abuse and isolation for children with a greater weight. Body size was seen as under the individual's control and children attributed negative characteristics to overweight people. Children actively assessed their own size; many wished their bodies were different and some were anxious about their shape.Reviewers judged that children's engagement and participation in discussion had only rarely been supported in the included studies, and few study findings had depth or breadth. CONCLUSIONS Initiatives need to consider the social aspects of obesity, in particular unhelpful beliefs, attitudes and discriminatory behaviours around body size. Researchers and policy-makers should involve children actively and seek their views on appropriate forms of support around this issue.