1.
How and why weight stigma drives the obesity 'epidemic' and harms health.
Tomiyama, AJ, Carr, D, Granberg, EM, Major, B, Robinson, E, Sutin, AR, Brewis, A
BMC medicine. 2018;16(1):123
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Weight stigma is defined as the social rejection and devaluation that accrues to those who do not comply with prevailing social norms of adequate body weight and shape. In this opinion-based study, authors discuss that: • Latest literature indicates that weight stigma can trigger physiological and behavioural changes linked to poor metabolic health and increased weight gain. • Healthcare is a setting in which weight stigma is particularly pervasive, with significant consequences for the health of higher-weight patients. This stigma has direct and observable consequences for the quality and nature of services provided to those with obesity. • Stigma may be an unintended consequence of anti-obesity efforts, undermining their intended effect. Moreover, focusing solely on obesity treatment runs the risk of missing other diagnoses. • The science of weight stigma crystallizes a key point for future success – to tackle the obesity ‘epidemic’ we must tackle the parallel epidemic of weight stigma. • Public service messages are needed to educate people about the stigma, discrimination, and challenges facing higher-weight individuals. Authors conclude that to advance as an equal society, healthcare providers should lead the way for weight stigma eradication.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In an era when obesity prevalence is high throughout much of the world, there is a correspondingly pervasive and strong culture of weight stigma. For example, representative studies show that some forms of weight discrimination are more prevalent even than discrimination based on race or ethnicity. DISCUSSION In this Opinion article, we review compelling evidence that weight stigma is harmful to health, over and above objective body mass index. Weight stigma is prospectively related to heightened mortality and other chronic diseases and conditions. Most ironically, it actually begets heightened risk of obesity through multiple obesogenic pathways. Weight stigma is particularly prevalent and detrimental in healthcare settings, with documented high levels of 'anti-fat' bias in healthcare providers, patients with obesity receiving poorer care and having worse outcomes, and medical students with obesity reporting high levels of alcohol and substance use to cope with internalized weight stigma. In terms of solutions, the most effective and ethical approaches should be aimed at changing the behaviors and attitudes of those who stigmatize, rather than towards the targets of weight stigma. Medical training must address weight bias, training healthcare professionals about how it is perpetuated and on its potentially harmful effects on their patients. CONCLUSION Weight stigma is likely to drive weight gain and poor health and thus should be eradicated. This effort can begin by training compassionate and knowledgeable healthcare providers who will deliver better care and ultimately lessen the negative effects of weight stigma.
2.
Predictors of weight stigma experienced by middle-older aged, general-practice patients with obesity in disadvantaged areas of Australia: a cross-sectional study.
Spooner, C, Jayasinghe, UW, Faruqi, N, Stocks, N, Harris, MF
BMC public health. 2018;18(1):640
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
People in higher categories of obesity are at substantially increased health risk because mortality increases sharply as body mass index rises above 30. In addition to physical health risks, people with obesity commonly experience weight-related stigma. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of perceived weight stigma among patients with obesity attending general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban areas of Australia. This is a cross-sectional study for which data from telephone interviews with patients with obesity were used. Patients were recruited from 17 general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas of Sydney and Adelaide. Results indicate that one-third of the sample had experienced direct forms of weight discrimination in the week before being interviewed. Furthermore, weight discrimination was more likely to be experienced by patients in higher obesity categories, who were not employed, who spoke a language other than English at home and who had lower scores on the Health Literacy Questionnaire domain (that measures the ability to actively engage with healthcare providers). Authors conclude that weight stigma may compound other forms of social disadvantage. Thus, strategies are needed to address weight stigma at the individual, system and population levels and to educate primary care providers to be more alert to the needs of their patients with obesity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of obesity have increased globally and weight stigma is commonly experienced by people with obesity. Feeling stigmatised because of one's weight can be a barrier to healthy eating, physical activity and to seeking help for weight management. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of perceived weight among middle-older aged patients with obesity attending general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban areas of Australia. METHODS As part of a randomised clinical trial in Australia, telephone interviews were conducted with 120 patients from 17 general practices in socioeconomically disadvantaged of Sydney and Adelaide. Patients were aged 40-70 years with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. The interviews included questions relating to socio-demographic variables (e.g. gender, language spoken at home), experiences of weight-related discrimination, and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Multi-level logistic regression data analysis was undertaken to examine predictors of recent experiences of weight-related discrimination ("weight stigma"). RESULTS The multi-level model showed that weight stigma was positively associated with obesity category 2 (BMI = 35 to < 40; OR 4.47 (95% CI 1.03 to 19.40)) and obesity category 3 (BMI = ≥ 40; OR 27.06 (95% CI 4.85 to 150.95)), not being employed (OR 7.70 (95% CI 2.17 to 27.25)), non-English speaking backgrounds (OR 5.74 (95% CI 1.35 to 24.45)) and negatively associated with the HLQ domain: ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.28)). There was no association between weight stigma and gender, age, education or the other HLQ domains examined. CONCLUSIONS Weight stigma disproportionately affected the patients with obesity most in need of support to manage their weight: those with more severe obesity, from non-English speaking backgrounds and who were not in employment. Additionally, those who had experienced weight stigma were less able to actively engage with healthcare providers further compounding their disadvantage. This suggests the need for a more proactive approach to identify weight stigma by healthcare providers. Addressing weight stigma at the individual, system and population levels is recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN126400102162 .