0
selected
-
1.
Does weight-related stigmatisation and discrimination depend on educational attainment and level of income? A systematic review.
Bernard, M, Fankhänel, T, Riedel-Heller, SG, Luck-Sikorski, C
BMJ open. 2019;9(11):e027673
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a global health issue due to its association with many chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. Stigmatisation and discrimination against people with obesity has increased over the past few decades. According to the “Theory of class” a person’s “habitus”, that is their general attitude, lifestyle and even body shape, can be seen as a metaphor for social status. The aim of this systematic review of 17 studies was to investigate whether socioeconomic status is associated with “weight bias”, that is stigmatising and discriminating attitudes towards people with obesity. 11 of the 17 studies found a significant association between educational attainment and/or income with stigmatising and/or discriminatory attitudes, but results were mixed, with some studies showing that people with higher education and/or income level were more likely to display stigmatising and/or discriminating attitudes, whilst other studies showed the opposite. The authors conclude that the findings have to be discussed in the cultural context, including cultural and governmental differences.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Obesity is considered a global health issue, because of its health-related consequences and also because of its impact on social status as a result of stigma. This study aims to review the quantitative state of research regarding socioeconomic characteristics' influence on weight-related stigmatisation and discrimination. Based on Bourdieu's Theory of Class and his concept of 'habitus', it is assumed that people with a higher level of education and income show stronger negative attitudes towards people with obesity. METHOD A narrative systematic literature review was conducted in 2017 using PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Seventeen studies that measured weight bias and either educational attainment or level of income were included in the analysis. RESULTS The results of the studies included were inconsistent: six of these studies were found to support the hypothesis, whereas two of the studies contradicted it. The remaining seven studies did not show any significant correlation between weight bias and either education or income. CONCLUSION In light of the inconsistent and heterogeneous results of the studies that report a significant association between weight bias and socioeconomic variables, the findings must be discussed concerning their cultural context, that is, cultural and governmental differences. Furthermore, educational attainment seems to be more likely to predict weight bias than income. The review revealed a lack of research when it came to examining the impact of socioeconomic capital on weight bias.
-
2.
A sympathetic nervous system evaluation of obesity stigma.
Oliver, MD, Datta, S, Baldwin, DR
PloS one. 2017;12(10):e0185703
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The negative health consequences of obesity are well known. Those classified as obese also suffer from discrimination which has further negative psychological and physiological effects on well-being. The aim of this study was to see if attitudes to obesity can be modified at the physiological and psychological level by priming. 70 people aged 18-53 were randomly assigned to 2 groups. One group was shown images of obesity in negative settings, the other in positive settings. All participants then viewed an actual obesity discrimination incident. Levels of the digestive enzyme salivary alpha amylase (sAA) and skin conductance (SC) were taken as measures of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. Individuals in the negative priming group had significantly more SC arousal and exhibited the highest overall sAA response after viewing the incident when compared to the positively primed group. The authors conclude that clinicians addressing stigma issues should consider the use of positively primed images as a method for reducing the possible long-term physiological consequences of the negative attitudes surrounding obesity.
Abstract
The portrayal of obesity in the media is often one of negativity. Consequently, it may generate an increase in stigma. Obesity stigma, a form of social discrimination, is responsible for many of the negative psychological and physiological effects on individual wellness. These effects not only impact individual health, but also affect the economy, and ultimately, societal wellness. In an attempt to examine the influence of the media on obesity stigma, this study tested the hypothesis that positive priming would lead to a reduction in obesity stigma. To further our understanding of this relationship, we: 1) examined the role of priming on physiological measures (e.g. salivary alpha amylase and skin conductance) in 70 college students by introducing positive and negative media images of individuals with obesity, and 2) assessed psychological measures (e.g. perceived stress, need to belong, and self-esteem, and Body Mass Index). After the priming manipulation, participants read a vignette depicting the discrimination of an individual with obesity and answered subsequent questions assessing participants' attributional blame of obesity. Results of this study revealed that priming affects physiological responding to obesity stigmatization. In conclusion, these findings suggest that incorporating positive media images of individuals with obesity may be an effective tool for reducing stigma and the various physiological consequences associated with it, which in turn, can enhance societal health and wellness.
-
3.
Obese children, adults and senior citizens in the eyes of the general public: results of a representative study on stigma and causation of obesity.
Sikorski, C, Luppa, M, Brähler, E, König, HH, Riedel-Heller, SG
PloS one. 2012;7(10):e46924
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a major health problem and associated with higher mortality and worse health outcomes. Obese individuals are commonly blamed for their excess weight which may lead to stigmatisation and discrimination which can further exacerbate unhealthy eating and activity behaviour, cause psychological problems, and prevent them from seeking help and health care. The aim of this telephone interview study of 3,003 persons was to investigate the prevalence of stigmatizing attitudes and determining the causal attribution of obesity by the German general public. Assessment of attitudes was through vignettes, i.e. presenting participants with a brief description of an obese or normal weight person, followed by vignette specific questions. The average Fat Phobia Score (FPS), which assesses stigmatising attitudes on a scale of 1 (positive attitude) to 5 (negative attitude), was 3.65 for obese vignettes compared to 2.38 for normal weight vignettes, indicating a negative attitude towards obesity, which was stronger towards obese children than towards obese adults or elderly. Causal attribution was significantly stronger for internal factors (lack of activity, eating too much, lack of willpower), whilst external and genetic factors were rated similar. For children genetic causes were agreed on less whilst external factors were seen as more important for a child’s obesity. Participants who favoured internal factors were also more likely to have a more negative view of obesity. Participants with a higher level of education or who were themselves overweight/obese or had an overweight/obese partner had a more positive attitude towards obesity.
Abstract
Obese individuals are blamed for their excess weight based on causal attribution to the individual. It is unclear whether obese individuals of different age groups and gender are faced with the same amount of stigmatization. This information is important in order to identify groups of individuals at risk for higher stigmatization and discrimination. A telephone interview was conducted in a representative sample of 3,003 participants. Experimental manipulation was realized by vignettes describing obese and normal-weight children, adults and senior citizens. Stigmatizing attitudes were measured by semantic differential. Causal attribution was assessed. Internal factors were rated with highest agreement rates as a cause for the vignette's obesity. Lack of activity behavior and eating too much are the most supported causes. Importance of causes differed for the different vignettes. For the child, external causes were considered more important. The overweight vignette was rated consistently more negatively. Higher educational attainment and personal obesity were associated with lower stigmatizing attitudes. The vignette of the obese child was rated more negatively compared to that of an adult or senior citizen. Obesity is seen as a controllable condition, but for children external factors are seen as well. Despite this finding, they are faced with higher stigmatizing attitudes in the general public, contradicting attribution theory assumptions. Internal and external attribution were found to be inter-correlated. Obese children are the population most at risk for being confronted with stigmatization, making them a target point in stigma-reduction campaigns.
-
4.
The stigma of obesity in the general public and its implications for public health - a systematic review.
Sikorski, C, Luppa, M, Kaiser, M, Glaesmer, H, Schomerus, G, König, HH, Riedel-Heller, SG
BMC public health. 2011;11:661
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity rates are still rising and, in addition to co-morbid diseases, perceived discrimination and stigmatisation leads to worse outcomes in obese individuals. The aim of this systematic review, including seven studies, was to investigate how the lay public perceive people with obesity or overweight (stigmatizing attitudes); (b) what they attribute obesity to (causal attribution) and (c) what types of interventions they support. Higher rates of stigmatising attitudes were associated with attributing obesity more to behaviour and less to heredity, lower levels of education and older age of the respondents, and not seeing obesity as an illness. Causal attributions varied slightly from study to study but most found that lack of activity behaviour, overeating and lack of willpower were the most prevalent causal attributions, with more than two thirds of respondents associating these factors to obesity, whilst only about a third agreed to heredity being an important factor. Environmental factors, in particular a bad food environment, was seen as a possible factor in obesity by about half of the respondents. In terms of prevention efforts, support was highest for childhood prevention and information campaigns, followed by banning junk foods in schools and banning junk food advertising, whilst taxation of unhealthy foods received the least support.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to this date, prevalence rates of obesity are still rising. Aside from co-morbid diseases, perceived discrimination and stigmatization leads to worsen outcomes in obese individuals. Higher stigmatizing attitudes towards obese individuals may also result in less support of preventive and interventive measures. In light of the immense burden of obesity on health care systems and also on the individuals' quality of life, accepted and subsidized preventive measures are needed. Policy support might be determined by views of the lay public on causes of obesity and resulting weight stigma. This study seeks to answer how representative samples of the lay public perceive people with obesity or overweight status (stigmatizing attitudes); what these samples attribute obesity to (causal attribution) and what types of interventions are supported by the lay public and which factors determine that support (prevention support). METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted. All studies of representative samples reporting results on (a) stigmatizing attitudes towards overweight and obese individuals, (b) causal beliefs and (c) prevention support were included. RESULTS Only 7 articles were found. One study reported prevalence rates of stigmatizing attitudes. About a quarter of the population in Germany displayed definite stigmatizing attitudes. Other studies reported causal attributions. While external influences on weight are considered as well, it seems that internal factors are rated to be of higher importance. Across the studies found, regulative prevention is supported by about half of the population, while childhood prevention has highest approval rates. Results on sociodemographic determinants differ substantially. CONCLUSIONS Further research on public attitudes toward and perception of overweight and obesity is urgently needed to depict the prevailing degree of stigmatization. Introducing a multidimensional concept of the etiology of obesity to the lay public might be a starting point in stigma reduction.
-
5.
The views of young children in the UK about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review.
Rees, R, Oliver, K, Woodman, J, Thomas, J
BMC public health. 2011;11:188
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity in children is an increasing problem in Westernised societies; obese children are more at risk of poorer health in the short and long term. The aim of the study was to explore the views of children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experience of these issues. This systemic review looked at 28 studies done in UK, conducted after 1997 in children aged 4-11. The review’s findings suggest that for children, the health consequences of obesity seemed to be mostly irrelevant. Impact on their social lives was far more important. Also, despite often having healthy body sizes, children continue to dislike their own bodies. This review highlights the need to consider the social aspect of childhood obesity and that children’s perspectives should be used in the policy making process. The authors conclude that the studies did not fully represent children’s diversity and therefore higher quality research is needed to enable relevant interventions to be put into place.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are high levels of concern about childhood obesity, with obese children being at higher risk of poorer health both in the short and longer terms. Children's attitudes to, and beliefs about, their bodies have also raised concern. Children themselves have a stake in this debate; their perspectives on this issue can inform the ways in which interventions aim to work.This systematic review of qualitative and quantitative research aimed to explore the views of UK children about the meanings of obesity and body size, shape or weight and their own experiences of these issues. METHODS We conducted sensitive searches of electronic databases and specialist websites, and contacted experts. We included studies published from the start of 1997 which reported the perspectives of UK children aged 4-11 about obesity or body size, shape or weight, and which described key aspects of their methods. Included studies were coded and quality-assessed by two reviewers independently.Findings were synthesised in two analyses: i) an interpretive synthesis of findings from open-ended questions; and ii) an aggregative synthesis of findings from closed questions. We juxtaposed the findings from the two syntheses. The effect of excluding the lowest quality studies was explored. We also consulted young people to explore the credibility of a subset of findings. RESULTS We included 28 studies. Instead of a focus on health, children emphasised the social impact of body size, describing experiences and awareness of abuse and isolation for children with a greater weight. Body size was seen as under the individual's control and children attributed negative characteristics to overweight people. Children actively assessed their own size; many wished their bodies were different and some were anxious about their shape.Reviewers judged that children's engagement and participation in discussion had only rarely been supported in the included studies, and few study findings had depth or breadth. CONCLUSIONS Initiatives need to consider the social aspects of obesity, in particular unhelpful beliefs, attitudes and discriminatory behaviours around body size. Researchers and policy-makers should involve children actively and seek their views on appropriate forms of support around this issue.