Short-term hot water immersion results in substantial thermal strain and partial heat acclimation; comparisons with heat-exercise exposures.

Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, 8432 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA, 92504, USA. Electronic address: andrew.m.greenfield.ctr@mail.mil. Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, 8432 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA, 92504, USA. Electronic address: FelipeGoriniLienert.Pereira@calbaptist.edu. Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, 8432 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA, 92504, USA. Electronic address: wboyer@calbaptist.edu. Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Biola University, 13800 Biola Ave, La Mirada, CA, 90639, USA. Electronic address: marc.apkarian@biola.edu. Department of Exercise Science, High Point University, 1 N. University Parkway, High Point, NC, 27268, USA. Electronic address: mkuennen@highpoint.edu. Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, 8432 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA, 92504, USA. Electronic address: tgillum@calbaptist.edu.

Journal of thermal biology. 2021;:102898
Full text from:

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the effectiveness of hot water immersion (HWI) as a heat acclimation strategy in comparison to time and temperature matched, exercise-heat acclimation (EHA). METHODS 8 males performed heat stress tests (HST) (45 min of cycling at 50% of VO2max in 40 °C, 40% RH) before and after heat acclimation sessions. Acclimation sessions were either three consecutive bouts of HWI (40 min of submersion at 40 °C) or EHA (40 min of cycling at 50% VO2max in 40 °C, 40% RH). RESULTS Average change in tympanic temperature (TTympanic) was significantly higher following HWI (2.1 °C ± 0.4) compared to EHA (1.5 °C ± 0.4) (P < 0.05). Decreases in peak heart rate (HR) (HWI: -10 bpm ± 8; EHA: -6 ± 7), average HR (-7 bpm ± 6; -3 ± 4), and average core temperature (-0.4 °C ± 0.3; -0.2 ± 0.4) were evident following acclimation (P < 0.05), but not different between interventions (P > 0.05). Peak rate of perceived exertion (RPEPeak) decreased for HWI and EHA (P < 0.05). Peak thermal sensation (TSPeak) decreased following HWI (P < 0.05) but was not different between interventions (P > 0.05). Plasma volume increased in both intervention groups (HWI: 5.9% ± 5.1; EHA: 5.4% ± 3.7) but was not statistically different (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION HWI induced significantly greater thermal strain compared to EHA at equivalent temperatures during time-matched exposures. However, the greater degree of thermal strain did not result in between intervention differences for cardiovascular, thermoregulatory, or perceptual variables. Findings suggest three HWI sessions may be a potential means to lower HR, TCore, and perceptual strain during exercise in the heat.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Clinical Trial

Metadata