-
1.
Effect of gut microbiome modulation on muscle function and cognition: the PROMOTe randomised controlled trial.
Ni Lochlainn, M, Bowyer, RCE, Moll, JM, García, MP, Wadge, S, Baleanu, AF, Nessa, A, Sheedy, A, Akdag, G, Hart, D, et al
Nature communications. 2024;15(1):1859
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Humans lose skeletal muscle with advancing age, and this can progress to sarcopenia. Dietary protein is crucial for maintaining skeletal muscle health; however, several factors can lead to reduced protein intake in older age. The aim of this study was to test whether the addition of gut microbiome modulation could augment established muscle function improvements from combined protein (branched chain amino acids [BCAA]) and resistance exercise. This study was based on the PROMOTe (effect of PRebiotic and prOtein on Muscle in Older Twins) trial which was a randomised controlled trial in which twin pairs (n= 72) were randomised, one twin to each study arm. Results showed that prebiotics improved cognition but did not impact muscle strength and function, compared with placebo. Furthermore, gut microbiome modulation via prebiotic supplementation in the context of ageing-muscle research is feasible and well tolerated, with clear responses noted in the gut microbiota composition and function. Authors concluded that cheap and readily available gut microbiome interventions hold promise for improving cognitive frailty in our ageing population.
Abstract
Studies suggest that inducing gut microbiota changes may alter both muscle physiology and cognitive behaviour. Gut microbiota may play a role in both anabolic resistance of older muscle, and cognition. In this placebo controlled double blinded randomised controlled trial of 36 twin pairs (72 individuals), aged ≥60, each twin pair are block randomised to receive either placebo or prebiotic daily for 12 weeks. Resistance exercise and branched chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation is prescribed to all participants. Outcomes are physical function and cognition. The trial is carried out remotely using video visits, online questionnaires and cognitive testing, and posting of equipment and biological samples. The prebiotic supplement is well tolerated and results in a changed gut microbiome [e.g., increased relative Bifidobacterium abundance]. There is no significant difference between prebiotic and placebo for the primary outcome of chair rise time (β = 0.579; 95% CI -1.080-2.239 p = 0.494). The prebiotic improves cognition (factor score versus placebo (β = -0.482; 95% CI,-0.813, -0.141; p = 0.014)). Our results demonstrate that cheap and readily available gut microbiome interventions may improve cognition in our ageing population. We illustrate the feasibility of remotely delivered trials for older people, which could reduce under-representation of older people in clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04309292.
-
2.
Effects of Morning Vs. Evening exercise on appetite, energy intake, performance and metabolism, in lean males and females.
Mode, WJA, Slater, T, Pinkney, MG, Hough, J, James, RM, Varley, I, James, LJ, Clayton, DJ
Appetite. 2023;182:106422
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Long-term weight management is notoriously difficult, with many people experiencing progressive weight gain throughout adult life. The aim of this study was to assess the acute effects of morning and evening cycling exercise on appetite, post-exercise ad-libitum energy intake, substrate metabolism, voluntary performance, and subjective responses to exercise, in young, healthy males and females. Sixteen healthy participants (eight males and eight females) were recruited to the study. Each participant completed two preliminary trials, followed by two experimental trials which involved exercising at 10:30 or 18:30. Results show that: - post-exercise energy intake was greater after acute cycling exercise performed in the evening compared to the morning, despite no post-exercise differences in subjective appetite. - there wasn’t any difference in exercise performance between morning and evening exercise. - exercise timing did not affect performance during a 15-min all-out performance test. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate a disconnect between subjective appetite and ad-libitum energy intake but provide some evidence that exercise can offset circadian-related appetite profiles.
Abstract
Exercise is an important component of a weight management strategy. However, little is known about whether circadian variations in physiological and behavioural processes can influence the appetite and energy balance responses to exercise performed at different times of the day. This study compared the effects of morning and evening exercise on appetite, post-exercise energy intake, and voluntary performance. In randomised, counterbalanced order, 16 healthy males and females (n = 8 each) completed two trials, performing morning exercise at 10:30 (AMEx) or evening exercise at 18:30 (PMEx). Exercise consisted of 30 min steady-state cycling (60% V˙ O2peak), and a 15-min performance test. A standardised meal (543 ± 86 kcal) was consumed 2-h before exercise and ad-libitum energy intake was assessed 15 min after exercise, with subjective appetite measured throughout. Absolute ad-libitum energy intake was 152 ± 126 kcal greater during PMEx (P < 0.001), but there was no differences in subjective appetite between trials immediately pre-exercise, or immediately before the post-exercise meal (P ≥ 0.060). Resting energy expenditure (P < 0.01) and carbohydrate oxidation (P < 0.05) were greater during AMEx, but there were no differences in substrate oxidation or energy expenditure during exercise (P ≥ 0.155). Exercise performance was not different between trials (P = 0.628). In conclusion, acute morning and evening exercise prompt similar appetite responses, but post-exercise ad-libitum energy intake is greater following evening exercise. These findings demonstrate discordant responses between subjective appetite and ad-libitum energy intake but suggest that exercise might offset circadian variations in appetite. Longer-term studies are required to determine how exercise timing affects adherence and weight management outcomes to exercise interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04742530, February 8, 2021.
-
3.
Influence of water-based exercise on energy intake, appetite, and appetite-related hormones in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Grigg, MJ, Thake, CD, Allgrove, JE, King, JA, Thackray, AE, Stensel, DJ, Owen, A, Broom, DR
Appetite. 2023;180:106375
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Exercise is an effective way to improve mental and physical health and can influence weight management due to the energy expenditure. Energy balance is influenced by day-to-day variations in energy intake and expenditure. The aim of this study was to address whether water-based exercise influences energy intake, appetite, and appetite related hormones differently to land based exercise in adults. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies which include randomised crossover ( 7 trials), semi-random (1 trial) (water-trial was required prior to iso-energetically matched water trial) and independent group (1 trial) (used in the 12-week study) designs. Results show that post-exercise energy intake is higher after water-based exercise versus a resting control. However, there wasn’t any difference in energy intake when water-based exercise was compared with land-based exercise. Furthermore, when different water temperatures were analysed, post-exercise energy intake was higher in cold water versus neutral water. Additionally, cycling and swimming did not alter fasting plasma concentrations of appetite regulating hormones (ghrelin and leptin), insulin or total peptide YY [gut hormone] but contributed to body mass loss. Authors conclude that if body mass management is a person’s primary focus, it is important to be mindful of the tendency to eat more in the subsequent hours after water-based exercise, as energy intake may be increased when compared to a no exercise control.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The only type of exercise reporting an increase in energy intake was in water-based activities, where the temperature was between 18-20• C. However, this was only when explored in comparison to a resting control. No difference was reported in energy intake when water-based exercise was compared with land-based exercise.
- Any form of exercise, whether land or water-based should be considered where appropriate to reduce the risks of sedentary behaviour.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction:
Exercise is effective for weight-management alongside other physical and mental health benefits. Changes in appetite-regulating hormones may affect energy balance, e.g. some exercise may suppress appetite, known as exercise-induced anorexia. This review evaluated differences in energy intake, appetite and appetite-related hormones in land-based versus water-based exercise.
Methods:
The meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. Literature searching resulted in eight studies published between 1991 and 2021, which met the inclusion criteria (water v control), 5 studies (water v land) and 2 studies (water at different temperatures). Risk of Bias was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias for randomised trials.
Results:
Data were analysed in RevMan 5.4.1 using fixed effects, generic inverse variance method on energy intake. High heterogeneity prevented analysis on appetite and appetite-related hormones. Standard deviation was inputted based on estimated values for missing data. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 index. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 and analyses based on two-tailed Z tests.
All participants had a healthy BMI, were aged 19-39 and ranged from well-trained to non-exercisers. A single bout of water-based exercise increased ad-libitum energy intake compared to a non-exercise control (mean difference [95% CI]: 330 [118, 542] kJ, P = 0.002) but no difference was identified between water and land-based exercise (78 [-176, 334] kJ, P = 0.55). Cold water exercise (18–20 •C) increased energy intake more than neutral water (27–33 •C) temperature (719 [222, 1215] kJ; P < 0.005). One 12-week study reported cycling and swimming did not alter fasting plasma concentrations of total ghrelin, insulin, leptin or total PYY but contributed to body mass loss 87.3 (5.2) to 85.9 (5.0) kg and 88.9 (4.9) to 86.4 (4.5) kg (P < 0.05) respectively.
Conclusion:
Despite limitations, this review may provide preliminary evidence on energy intake and appetite for water-based activities. If weight management is a primary focus, then water temperature needs to be considered, particularly if sub 20•C .
Clinical practice applications:
Although this study suggests cold water exercise may cause an increase in energy intake, 95% confidence intervals for individual studies are very large so results should be interpreted cautiously. Those preferring exercise in cold water, should be encouraged, providing they are mindful of the tendency to eat more post-exercise.
It is not possible to draw any robust conclusions about the ratings of hunger in response to different types of exercise due to limited data. However, according to the review, five studies demonstrated that hunger was suppressed more than control prior at the start of water-based exercise, and during and immediately after exercise.
Considerations for future research:
Most participants were of healthy weight and physically active, however since appetite signals may be dysregulated in obesity, including all weight categories and different activity levels may generate a more comprehensive overview.
Further research recommendations include:
- Measuring the effects of water- based activities on appetite, appetite related hormones and energy intake at different time points following exercise in order to provide recommendations for effective weight management strategies and in a range of different temperatures.
- Using a ‘no exercise’ water immersion control. Evidence suggests that immersion in cold water alone may increase energy expenditure
- Evaluating the effect of a water-based activity, such as swimming performed in a ‘fasted’ and ‘non-fasted’ state to investigate the impact on appetite, appetite related hormones and energy intake.
Abstract
Single bouts of land-based exercise suppress appetite and do not typically alter energy intake in the short-term, whereas it has been suggested that water-based exercise may evoke orexigenic effects. The primary aim was to systematically review the available literature investigating the influence of water-based exercise on energy intake in adults (PROSPERO ID number CRD42022314349). PubMed, Medline, Sport-Discus, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and Public Health Database were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1900 to May 2022. Included studies implemented a water-based exercise intervention versus a control or comparator. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane 'Risk of bias tool for randomised trials' (RoB 2.0). We identified eight acute (same day) exercise studies which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects generic inverse variance method on energy intake (8 studies (water versus control), 5 studies (water versus land) and 2 studies (water at two different temperatures)). Appetite and appetite-related hormones are also examined but high heterogeneity did not allow a meta-analysis of these outcome measures. We identified one chronic exercise training study which met the inclusion criteria with findings discussed narratively. Meta-analysis revealed that a single bout of exercise in water increased ad-libitum energy intake compared to a non-exercise control (mean difference [95% CI]: 330 [118, 542] kJ, P = 0.002). No difference in ad libitum energy intake was identified between water and land-based exercise (78 [-176, 334] kJ, P = 0.55). Exercising in cold water (18-20 °C) increased energy intake to a greater extent than neutral water (27-33 °C) temperature (719 [222, 1215] kJ; P < 0.005). The one eligible 12-week study did not assess whether water-based exercise influenced energy intake but did find that cycling and swimming did not alter fasting plasma concentrations of total ghrelin, insulin, leptin or total PYY but contributed to body mass loss 87.3 (5.2) to 85.9 (5.0) kg and 88.9 (4.9) to 86.4 (4.5) kg (P < 0.05) respectively. To conclude, if body mass management is a person's primary focus, they should be mindful of the tendency to eat more in the hours after a water-based exercise session, particularly when the water temperature is cold (18-20 °C).
-
4.
Habitual daily intake of a sweet and fatty snack modulates reward processing in humans.
Edwin Thanarajah, S, DiFeliceantonio, AG, Albus, K, Kuzmanovic, B, Rigoux, L, Iglesias, S, Hanßen, R, Schlamann, M, Cornely, OA, Brüning, JC, et al
Cell metabolism. 2023;35(4):571-584.e6
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prolific amount of sugar and fat in modern Western diets is regarded as a significant contributor to overeating and consequential weight gain. Dopamine, a neurotransmitter involved in learning and reward signalling, is also important in regulating food intake. Energy-dense foods, often high in both sugar and fat, stimulate pleasure-signalling dopamine to encourage eating, even if no more energy is needed. It is acknowledged that in many cases of obesity, the function of dopamine appears to be altered. Yet it is uncertain whether this was pre-existing to obesity, a result of obesity or whether it was re-shaped though exposure to high sugar and high-fat diets. To gain more insights, this study evaluated whether adding a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack to a regular diet could change the candidates liking for fat, their brain responses to likeable foods like fat and sugar and if it impacted on sensory associative learning. The randomised controlled study was conducted for 8-weeks and included 49 people of normal-weight. The candidates were also monitored for any changes in weight and body fat, insulin resistance, leptin levels, and blood fats, and all completed self-reported dietary intake forms. The findings demonstrated that repeated exposure to HF/HS food reduced the preference for low-fat foods and up-regulated the brain responses when anticipating and consuming such highly palatable, energy-dense foods. Beyond increased brain response to HF/HS food, HF/HS exposure also induced a general rewiring of the brain by enhancing new sensory associations and behavioural adaptations that were unrelated to food. Notably, these changes all occurred independent of weight gain or alterations in metabolic function, thus suggesting that repeated exposure to HF/HS foods can change the physiology in healthy weight individuals to reduce their liking of healthier foods whilst at the same time increasing the reward responses to more palatable HF/ HS foods. The authors highlighted this as a risk for overeating and weight gain, arguing that reducing the exposure to energy-dense HF/HS food items therefore is critical in the prevention and management of obesity.
Abstract
Western diets rich in fat and sugar promote excess calorie intake and weight gain; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Despite a well-documented association between obesity and altered brain dopamine function, it remains elusive whether these alterations are (1) pre-existing, increasing the individual susceptibility to weight gain, (2) secondary to obesity, or (3) directly attributable to repeated exposure to western diet. To close this gap, we performed a randomized, controlled study (NCT05574660) with normal-weight participants exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar snack or a low-fat/low-sugar snack for 8 weeks in addition to their regular diet. The high-fat/high-sugar intervention decreased the preference for low-fat food while increasing brain response to food and associative learning independent of food cues or reward. These alterations were independent of changes in body weight and metabolic parameters, indicating a direct effect of high-fat, high-sugar foods on neurobehavioral adaptations that may increase the risk for overeating and weight gain.
-
5.
Oligofructose-Enriched Inulin Consumption Acutely Modifies Markers of Postexercise Appetite.
Hamilton, CC, Bomhof, MR
Nutrients. 2023;15(24)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Exercise is commonly used to manage weight but longer-term studies show that actual weight loss corresponds to only a fraction of energy expenditure from exercise, which is likely due to a compensatory increase in energy intake. Inulin-type prebiotics have shown to reduce appetite through affecting various hormones involved in appetite regulation. The aim of this randomised crossover study was to evaluate the acute effects of oligofructose-enriched inulin (OI) consumption after exercise on appetite-regulating hormones, self-reported appetite and energy intake over the following 2 days. 14 adults received sweetened milk either with (SM+OI) or without OI (SM) following a 45 min workout session. Total energy intake over the 3 days did not differ between the groups although the SM group had a significantly higher energy intake on the day after the exercise compared to the day of the exercise. Exercise-related effects on hunger hormones and subjective appetite perception were seen in both groups with no statistically significant difference between groups. The SM+OI group experienced significant increases in abdominal discomfort, flatulence and rumbling, which were not observed in the control SM group. The authors conclude that OI may induce subtle reductions in appetite but that longer term outcomes require further research.
Abstract
Enhancing the effectiveness of exercise for long-term body weight management and overall health benefits may be aided through complementary dietary strategies that help to control acute postexercise energy compensation. Inulin-type fructans (ITFs) have been shown to induce satiety through the modified secretion of appetite-regulating hormones. This study investigated the acute impact of oligofructose-enriched inulin (OI) consumption after exercise on objective and subjective measures of satiety and compensatory energy intake (EI). In a randomized crossover study, following the completion of a 45 min (65-70% VO2peak) evening exercise session, participants (BMI: 26.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2, Age: 26.8 ± 6.7 yrs) received one of two beverages: (1) sweetened milk (SM) or (2) sweetened milk + 20 g OI (SM+OI). Perceived measures of hunger were reduced in SM+OI relative to SM (p = 0.009). Within SM+OI, but not SM, plasma concentrations of GLP-1 and PYY were increased and acyl-ghrelin reduced from pre-exercise to postexercise. EI during the ad libitum breakfast in the morning postexercise tended to be lower in SM+OI (p = 0.087, d = 0.31). Gastrointestinal impacts of OI were apparent with increased ratings of flatulence (p = 0.026, d = 0.57) in participants the morning after the exercise session. Overall, the ingestion of a single dose of OI after an exercise session appears to induce subtle reductions in appetite, although the impact of these changes on acute and prolonged EI remains unclear.
-
6.
Timing of daily calorie loading affects appetite and hunger responses without changes in energy metabolism in healthy subjects with obesity.
Ruddick-Collins, LC, Morgan, PJ, Fyfe, CL, Filipe, JAN, Horgan, GW, Westerterp, KR, Johnston, JD, Johnstone, AM
Cell metabolism. 2022;34(10):1472-1485.e6
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Recent research has shown that the time of the day when a larger meal is consumed may influence energy utilisation, positively affecting weight loss. This randomised, crossover, isocaloric and eucaloric controlled feeding trial compared morning-loaded calorie intake with evening-loaded calorie intake to assess its effects on weight and metabolism. Thirty healthy, overweight, or obese individuals participated in this study for four weeks and assessed their energy intake and energy expenditure. Based on the findings of this study, there were no discernible variations in either resting metabolic rate or total energy expenditure based on the timing of energy intake. Morning loaded diet can significantly lower hunger and improve satiety compared to the evening-loaded diet. Because of these effects, a morning-loaded diet may aid weight loss through behavioural adaptations. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of morning-loaded calorie intake in terms of hunger suppression and increased satiety which may promote weight loss through behavioural change. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the metabolic outcomes and energy metabolism followed by morning-loaded energy intake and evening-loaded energy intake.
Abstract
Morning loaded calorie intake in humans has been advocated as a dietary strategy to improve weight loss. This is also supported by animal studies suggesting time of eating can prevent weight gain. However, the underlying mechanisms through which timing of eating could promote weight loss in humans are unclear. In a randomized crossover trial (NCT03305237), 30 subjects with obesity/overweight underwent two 4-week calorie-restricted but isoenergetic weight loss diets, with morning loaded or evening loaded calories (45%:35%:20% versus 20%:35%:45% calories at breakfast, lunch, and dinner, respectively). We demonstrate no differences in total daily energy expenditure or resting metabolic rate related to the timing of calorie distribution, and no difference in weight loss. Participants consuming the morning loaded diet reported significantly lower hunger. Thus, morning loaded intake (big breakfast) may assist with compliance to weight loss regime through a greater suppression of appetite.
-
7.
Effect of sleep duration on dietary intake, desire to eat, measures of food intake and metabolic hormones: A systematic review of clinical trials.
Soltanieh, S, Solgi, S, Ansari, M, Santos, HO, Abbasi, B
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2021;45:55-65
-
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Adequate sleep is crucial to health. Yet, sleep disturbances have become very common in modern societies. A lack of sleep is linked to increased risk for several chronic diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, appetite-regulating hormones can be disrupted by sleep shortages, which is thought to drive chronic overeating, leading to weight gain, obesity and its associated health consequences. This review examined the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption and energy intake, whilst also monitoring changes in body weight and appetite-regulating hormones. The review encompassed 50 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 3387 participants, including 1079 children and adolescents and 2308 adults. The findings suggested that sleep shortages contribute to significant increases in calorie intake, fat intake, increased body weight, appetite, hunger, more frequent eating and bigger portion sizes. In this review lack of sleep did not change protein and carbohydrate intake. Nor did lack of sleep make people exert more or less energy overall, however, a variance amongst ethnic groups was observed here. There was not enough evidence for changes in metabolic rate, so the review assumed no significant effect. When viewed collectively, the appetite-regulating hormones of leptin and ghrelin, the stress hormone cortisol and the sugar-regulating hormone insulin were not significantly influenced by sleep duration. However, there seemed to be a wide variance of outcomes when looking at individual studies' results. In conclusion, the authors reiterated the importance of sleep for health maintenance, advocating for a minimum of 7 hours of sleep per day for adults and that, despite busy modern lifestyles, sleep optimisation strategies should be prioritised. Less than 6 hours of sleep per day increases the risk of health consequences, like weight gain and metabolic disorders and sleep management should be considered part of their treatment protocols.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Reduced sleep duration may serve as a mediator for weight gain in part due to increased appetite, increased fat intake and disruptions to energy balance.
- Enhancing sleep quality may serve to support weight loss protocols.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Short sleep duration and disruptions to circadian rhythm have been associated with being overweight and obese. It has been suggested that sleep restriction may interfere with appetite regulating hormones leading to increased appetite and disrupted energy balance.
This study aimed to systematically review studies exploring the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption, energy intake, anthropometric characteristics and appetite-regulating hormones.
Methods
This systematic review included 50 randomised controlled trials including 3,387 participants.
Results
Energy intake
- 13 out of 30 the included studies found that short sleep conditions led to higher energy intake.
- 1 study identified that sleep restriction resulted in a 15.3% and 9.2% increase in energy intake in both women and men.
- 3 studies noted that prolonging sleep duration led to a reduction in energy intake.
- 1 study reported a reduction in energy intake after sleep restriction (P=0.031).
Fat consumption
- 9 studies out of 22 identified a significant association between short sleep and increased fat consumption.
- 7 studies did not identify a difference between groups.
- 3 studies noted a decrease in fat consumption following prolonged sleep (P<0.001, P<0.05, P=0.04).
Hunger and appetite
- 11 studies out of 17 observed that sleep restriction resulted in increased hunger ratings.
- 3 studies found an increase in appetite following sleep restriction (P<0.01) with 3 finding no difference..
- 1 study reported a decrease in appetite following sleep restriction.
- 2 studies noted that portion sizes increased as a result of sleep restriction (P<0.01).
- 1 study reported an increase in eating occasions following restricted sleep compared to habitual sleep (6.08 vs 4.96).
Body weight
- 6 studies out of 14 found no effect of sleep loss on body weight.
- 4 studies identified that sleep restriction led to weight gain (P<0.001, P<0.05, P=0.14, P=0.031).
- 2 studies reported weight loss following increased sleep duration (P<0.001).
Ghrelin and leptin
- Leptin and ghrelin levels were generally not found to be influenced by sleep duration, with the exception of a few studies.
Clinical practice applications:
Reduced sleep duration may promote weight gain by:
- Increasing energy intake.
- Increasing fat consumption.
- Increasing hunger and appetite.
- Increasing portion sizes and eating occasions.
Prolonging sleep duration may support weight loss by:
- Reducing energy intake.
- Reducing fat intake.
Considerations for future research:
- Mixed results on the influence of sleep restriction on appetite regulating hormones, leptin and ghrelin.
- Some studies noted the negative impact of sleep restriction on leptin and ghrelin concentrations, collectively shortened sleep duration did not appear to influence these hormones.
- Further sleep restriction studies exploring additional appetite regulating hormones and neuropeptides and the reward system may provide a more definitive understanding of the underlying mechanism for reduced sleep duration to disrupt the appetite and energy balance and promote weight gain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Sleep, as well as diet and physical activity, plays a significant role in growth, maturation, health, and regulation of energy homeostasis. Recently, there is increasing evidence indicating a possible causal association between sleep duration and energy balance. We aimed to examine the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption, energy intake, anthropometric characteristics, and appetite-regulating hormones by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS Electronic literature searches were conducted on Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until July 2020. The search was conducted with the following words: "Sleep Duration", "Circadian Rhythm", "Sleep Disorders" in combination with "Obesity", "Overweight", "Abdominal Obesity", "Physical Activity", "Energy Intake", "Body Mass Index", "Lipid Metabolism", "Caloric Restriction", Leptin, "Weight Gain", and "Appetite Regulation" using human studies.methods RESULTS After screening 708 abstracts, 50 RCTs (7 on children or adolescents and 43 on adults) were identified and met the inclusion criteria. In general, the findings suggested that sleep restriction may leads to a significant increment in energy intake, fat intake, body weight, appetite, hunger, eating occasions, and portion size, while protein and carbohydrate consumption, total energy expenditure, and respiratory quotient remained unaffected as a result of sleep restriction. Serum leptin, ghrelin, and cortisol concentrations were not influenced by sleep duration as well. CONCLUSION Insufficient sleep can be considered as a contributing factor for energy imbalance, weight gain, and metabolic disorders and it is suggested that to tackle disordered eating it may be necessary to pay more attention to sleep duration.
-
8.
Gastric emptying of solutions containing the natural sweetener erythritol and effects on gut hormone secretion in humans: A pilot dose-ranging study.
Wölnerhanssen, BK, Drewe, J, Verbeure, W, le Roux, CW, Dellatorre-Teixeira, L, Rehfeld, JF, Holst, JJ, Hartmann, B, Tack, J, Peterli, R, et al
Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2021;23(6):1311-1321
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
In recent years, erythritol, a non-calorie sweetener, has gained popularity due to the rise in obesity and Type 2 diabetes worldwide. The purpose of this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial was to assess the effects of erythritol on the release of gut hormones, speed of gastric emptying, and the release of glucagon, motilin, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide after erythritol administration. Erythritol in doses of ten, twenty-five, and fifty grams was well tolerated by the participants. The administration of erythritol induced a statistically significant dose-dependent stimulation of gut hormones such as plasma cholecystokinin, active glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and peptide tyrosine. Compared to the placebo, participants had slower gastric emptying with erythritol. Erythritol had no effect on the levels of motilin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, blood glucose, insulin, glucagon, blood lipids, or uric acid. Erythritol should be evaluated in larger, robust studies to determine whether it improves glycaemic control. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the potential uses of erythritol in the management of obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
AIM: To determine whether a dose-dependent effect in the stimulation of gut hormone release (plasma cholecystokinin [CCK], active glucagon-like peptide-1 [aGLP-1] and peptide tyrosine tyrosine [PYY]) is found for the natural sweetener erythritol. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve healthy, lean volunteers received solutions with 10, 25 or 50 g erythritol, or tap water enriched with 13 C-sodium acetate on four study days via a nasogastric tube in this randomized (active treatments), placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial. Blood samples and breath samples (13 C-sodium acetate method for measurement of gastric emptying [GE]) were taken at regular intervals, and sensations of appetite and gastrointestinal symptoms were rated. RESULTS We found (a) a dose-dependent stimulation of CCK, aGLP-1 and PYY, and slowing of GE, (b) no effect on blood glucose, insulin, motilin, glucagon or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, (c) no effect on blood lipids and uric acid, and (d) no abdominal pain, nausea or vomiting. CONCLUSIONS Solutions with 10 and 50 g of erythritol stimulated gut hormone release. Emptying of erythritol-containing solutions from the stomach was slower compared with placebo. There was no effect on plasma glucose, insulin, glucagon, blood lipids or uric acid. All doses were well tolerated.
-
9.
Gut hormones in microbiota-gut-brain cross-talk.
Sun, LJ, Li, JN, Nie, YZ
Chinese medical journal. 2020;133(7):826-833
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The bidirectional communication between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain, termed the gut-brain axis (GBA), is evidenced to to play a role in physiological and psychological health. While precise communication pathways are not yet clear, it is hypothesised this pathway may be an important therapeutic target in complex psychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of gut hormones in the GBA and focus on how the microbiota interact with these hormones in health and disease. The literature shows the gut microbiota can affect the metabolism of various gut hormones, and these hormones can influence the microbiota. Evidence suggests this cross-talk may be a key regulator in appetite, immune response, stress response, and metabolism. Based on this review, the authors conclude the gut microbiota-hormone homeostatic relationship provides insight on the complex communication between the gut and the brain. They suggest future research should target the microbiota-hormones-gut-brain axis to develop new therapeutic strategies to psychiatric disorders.
Abstract
The homeostasis of the gut-brain axis has been shown to exert several effects on physiological and psychological health. The gut hormones released by enteroendocrine cells scattered throughout the gastrointestinal tract are important signaling molecules within the gut-brain axis. The interaction between gut microbiota and gut hormones has been greatly appreciated in gut-brain cross-talk. The microbiota plays an essential role in modulating many gut-brain axis-related diseases, ranging from gastrointestinal disorders to psychiatric diseases. Similarly, gut hormones also play pleiotropic and important roles in maintaining health, and are key signals involved in gut-brain axis. More importantly, gut microbiota can affect the release and functions of gut hormones. This review highlights the role of gut microbiota in the gut-brain axis and focuses on how microbiota-related gut hormones modulate various physiological functions. Future studies could target the microbiota-hormones-gut brain axis to develop novel therapeutics for different psychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders, such as obesity, anxiety, and depression.
-
10.
Eating Behavior, Physical Activity and Exercise Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Young Healthy Adults.
Martinez-Avila, WD, Sanchez-Delgado, G, Acosta, FM, Jurado-Fasoli, L, Oustric, P, Labayen, I, Blundell, JE, Ruiz, JR
Nutrients. 2020;12(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Eating behaviours and physical activity levels are important factors affecting obesity and associated comorbidities such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. This randomised controlled researcher-blinded longitudinal trial investigated the effect of different physical activity levels on eating behaviours in 139 young adults. The participants were assigned to three groups: (1) a moderate-intensity aerobic exercise at 60% heart rate reserve (HRres) for 150 mins/week along with weekly two sessions of resistance training at 50% of the 1 repetition maximum (RM) for six months; (2) 75 minutes/week moderate-intensity aerobic exercise at 60% HRes along with 75 min/week vigorous intensity at 80% HRres and weekly two sessions of resistance training at 70% of the 1 RM for six months (3) a control group following their normal lifestyle. Six-month exercise intervention did not change behaviour traits, and furthermore, vigorous-intensity exercise significantly increased emotional eating in healthy young adults. A sedentary lifestyle showed an inverse association with binge eating, emotional eating, and uncontrolled eating. Moderate-intensity exercise and moderate to vigorous-intensity exercise showed an inverse association with craving control. Moderate to vigorous-intensity exercise showed a direct association with binge eating and uncontrolled eating. To determine the cause-effect relationship between physical activity and behavioural traits, further research is needed. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the relationship between behavioural traits and physical activity levels in young adults.
Abstract
Regular physical activity (PA) is an important part of the treatment of several medical conditions, including overweight and obesity, in which there may be a weakened appetite control. Eating behaviour traits influence weight control and may be different in active and sedentary subjects. This paper reports the relationships between the time spent in sedentary behaviour and physical activity (PA) of different intensity, and eating behaviour traits in young, healthy adults. Additionally, it reports the results of a six-month-long, randomized, controlled trial to examine the effect of an exercise intervention on eating behaviour traits. A total of 139 young (22.06 ± 2.26 years) healthy adults (68.35% women) with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 24.95 ± 4.57 kg/m2 were enrolled. Baseline assessments of habitual PA were made using wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers; eating behaviour traits were examined via the self-reported questionnaires: Binge Eating, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 and Control of Eating Questionnaire. The subjects were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: control (usual lifestyle), moderate-intensity exercise (aerobic and resistance training 3¨C4 days/week at a heart rate equivalent to 60% of the heart rate reserve (HRres) for the aerobic component, and at 50% of the 1 repetition maximum (RM) for the resistance component), or vigorous-intensity exercise (the same training but at 80% HRres for half of the aerobic training, and 70% RM for the resistance training). At baseline, sedentary behaviour was inversely associated with binge eating (r = -0.181, p < 0.05) and with uncontrolled eating (r = -0.286, p = 0.001). Moderate PA (MPA) was inversely associated with craving control (r = -0.188, p < 0.05). Moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) was directly associated with binge eating (r = 0.302, p < 0.001) and uncontrolled eating (r = 0.346, p < 0.001), and inversely associated with craving control (r = -0.170, p < 0.015). Overall, PA was directly associated with binge eating (r = 0.275, p = 0.001), uncontrolled eating (r = 0.321, p < 0.001) and emotional eating (r = 0.204, p < 0.05). Additionally, only emotional eating was modified by the intervention, increasing in the vigorous-intensity exercise group (p < 0.05). In summary, we observed that time spent in sedentary behaviour/PA of different intensity is associated with eating behaviour traits, especially binge eating in young adults. In contrast, the six-month exercise intervention did not lead to appreciable changes in eating behaviour traits.