-
1.
Impact of probiotics on muscle mass, muscle strength and lean mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Prokopidis, K, Giannos, P, Kirwan, R, Ispoglou, T, Galli, F, Witard, OC, Triantafyllidis, KK, Kechagias, KS, Morwani-Mangnani, J, Ticinesi, A, et al
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2023;14(1):30-44
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sarcopenia is a progressive skeletal muscle disorder involving accelerated loss of muscle mass, strength and function. It generally occurs in older age groups but can also be seen in younger people. Multiple factors contribute to the development of the condition. Besides nutritional management strategies, probiotics have recently caught the interest of researchers. As probiotics promote metabolic building activity, aid digestion and absorption and reduce muscle breakdown by favourably managing inflammation, they present great potential for the management of sarcopenia. This systematic review and meta-analysis explored the impact of probiotic supplementation on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in human adults. The review included 24 studies, with probiotics mainly from the Bifidobacteria or Lactobacilli family. The analysis concluded that probiotic supplementation improved muscle mass in comparison to placebos. It also significantly increased overall muscle strength in 6 randomized controlled trials, which was most obvious in age groups of 50 and above. However, no changes were seen concerning total lean mass. It appeared that longer studies, of >12 weeks or more, showed better outcomes in this review. Furthermore, Bifidobacteria species seemed to exhibit more favourable effects, and the authors also noted the beneficial results were more significant in Asian populations. Further research is needed to understand more about the underlying mechanism, best probiotics strains and the specifics of different demographic groups. This article yields a concise overview of sarcopenia, the nutritional aspects of the disease and how probiotics may be beneficial in disease management, strengthened with data from the review.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This was a well-conducted meta-analysis based on its methodological approach that demonstrated that Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium probiotic supplementation may contribute to improved muscle mass in younger adults and improved muscle strength in older adults.
- Bifidobacterium probiotic supplementation was associated with enhanced muscle mass in younger adults, a potential focus for those considering probiotic supplements.
- The duration of probiotic therapy matters, with longer-term (12 weeks or more) supplementation showing improvements in muscle mass and strength..
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of probiotics on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in both young and older adults.
Methods
- The search encompassed PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, from inception up to June 2022; studies included spanned a period from 2013 to June 2022.
- The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines and included the Risk-of-Bias tool to assess study quality.
- The study focused on changes in muscle mass, total lean mass, and muscle strength.
- Inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adult participants (>18 years); interventions involving any probiotics, and a control group receiving either no treatment or a placebo.
Results
- 24 RCTs were included (709 participants), with studies conducted in Europe, USA, and Asia. Intervention durations: ranged from 3 weeks to 12 months.
- Participants included overweight, untrained healthy and resistance-trained individuals, and those with specific conditions like metabolic syndrome and frailty.
- Body composition assessments were conducted using bioelectrical impedance (BIA) and/or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
- Probiotic strains employed in the included studies varied, with Lactobacillus the most common, followed by Bifidobacterium; some combined both. 5 of 24 studies also used additional strains.
- Dosages: ranged from 2 × 10^9 to 11.2 × 10^10 colony-forming units (CFU).
- 4 out of 24 studies used fermented food products like cheese and noodles as sources of probiotics.
- 22 RCTs measured muscle mass and total lean mass; 6 RCTs measured global muscle strength.
- Probiotic supplementation (≥12 weeks) moderately increased muscle mass, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of 0.42. This significant effect (95% CI: 0.10–0.74, P=0.009) was observed only in younger Asian adults (<50 years) after Bifidobacterium supplementation, based on a meta-analysis of 10 studies.
- Probiotic supplementation (≥12 weeks) significantly increased global muscle strength in older adults (>50 years; SMD: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.33–1.06, P = 0.0002).
- Probiotic supplementation showed no significant impact on lean mass (SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: 0.19 – 0.13, P = 0.69).
Conclusion
Probiotic supplementation, especially Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may have a positive impact on muscle mass and global strength
Clinical practice applications:
- Consumption of probiotics, mainly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may contribute to improved muscle strength in older individuals (>50y).
- Consumption of Bifidobacterium strains was associated with improved muscle mass in younger individuals (<50y) in Asian countries, in a low number of studies (k=2).
- Bifidobacterium breve B-3 was associated with an improvement in muscle mass in older overweight individuals, although a causal relationship was not established.
- Probiotics may enhance muscle mass or strength by enhancing protein digestion and amino acid absorption for muscle synthesis and function.
- Considering an individual’s goals, a practitioner could consider probiotic supplementation as a complementary intervention when aiming to enhance muscle mass or strength .
Considerations for future research:
- Future research could focus on pinpointing which specific probiotic strains are most effective for muscle strength or muscle mass to tailor more precise interventions.
- Most studies did not exceed 12 weeks, highlighting the need for long-term research on probiotics sustained muscle impact.
- Future research could investigate the effects of probiotics across diverse demographic groups including different ages, sexes, and ethnic backgrounds to understand the impact in different populations.
- Delving deeper into the mechanisms by which probiotics influence muscle health could lead to targeted probiotic therapies that address specific physiological pathways.
- Finally, future research could explore how probiotics can be combined with other interventions, such as exercise or nutritional modifications, to synergistically improve muscle health and function.
Abstract
Probiotics have shown potential to counteract sarcopenia, although the extent to which they can influence domains of sarcopenia such as muscle mass and strength in humans is unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the impact of probiotic supplementation on muscle mass, total lean mass and muscle strength in human adults. A literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception until June 2022. Eligible RCTs compared the effect of probiotic supplementation versus placebo on muscle and total lean mass and global muscle strength (composite score of all muscle strength outcomes) in adults (>18 years). To evaluate the differences between groups, a meta-analysis was conducted using the random effects inverse-variance model by utilizing standardized mean differences. Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effects of probiotics on muscle mass, total lean mass and global muscle strength. Our main analysis (k = 10) revealed that muscle mass was improved following probiotics compared with placebo (SMD: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.10-0.74, I2 = 57%, P = 0.009), although no changes were revealed in relation to total lean mass (k = 12; SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.19 - 0.13, I2 = 0%, P = 0.69). Interestingly, a significant increase in global muscle strength was also observed among six RCTs (SMD: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.33-1.06, I2 = 64%, P = 0.0002). Probiotic supplementation enhances both muscle mass and global muscle strength; however, no beneficial effects were observed in total lean mass. Investigating the physiological mechanisms underpinning different ageing groups and elucidating appropriate probiotic strains for optimal gains in muscle mass and strength are warranted.
-
2.
Association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis in children: systematic review and meta-analysis.
McDonnell, L, Gilkes, A, Ashworth, M, Rowland, V, Harries, TH, Armstrong, D, White, P
Gut microbes. 2021;13(1):1-18
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome and immune system are intricately connected and recent studies have demonstrated a link between antibiotic exposure and gut microbiome alteration in neonates. Antibiotics in childhood may be linked to a variety of diseases and although the mechanism of association for diseases has not been fully explored, the underlying cause could be linked to dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the association between paediatric antibiotic exposure and gut microbiome disruption. Among the existing literature, 12 studies were included and the results showed a significant reduction in both diversity and richness of the gut microbiome in children aged 0-18 following antibiotic exposure. Based on these findings, the authors conclude antibiotics appear to disrupt the normal maturation of the microbiome and alter the healthy balance of bacteria. They recommend healthcare providers consider the potential damage to the gut microbiome when prescribing antibiotics for children.
Abstract
Antibiotics in childhood have been linked with diseases including asthma, juvenile arthritis, type 1 diabetes, Crohn's disease and mental illness. The underlying mechanisms are thought related to dysbiosis of the gut microbiome. We conducted a systematic review of the association between antibiotics and disruption of the pediatric gut microbiome. Searches used MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. Eligible studies: association between antibiotics and gut microbiome dysbiosis; children 0-18 years; molecular techniques of assessment; outcomes of microbiome richness, diversity or composition. Quality assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis where possible. A total of 4,668 publications identified: 12 in final analysis (5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 5 cohort studies, 2 cross-sectional studies). Microbiome richness was measured in 3 studies, species diversity in 6, and species composition in 10. Quality of evidence was good or fair. 5 studies found a significant reduction in diversity and 3 a significant reduction in richness. Macrolide exposure was associated with reduced richness for twice as long as penicillin. Significant reductions were seen in Bifidobacteria (5 studies) and Lactobacillus (2 studies), and significant increases in Proteobacteria such as E. coli (4 studies). A meta-analysis of RCTs of the effect of macrolide (azithromycin) exposure on the gut microbiome found a significant reduction in alpha-diversity (Shannon index: mean difference -0.86 (95% CI -1.59, -0.13). Antibiotic exposure was associated with reduced microbiome diversity and richness, and with changes in bacterial abundance. The potential for dysbiosis in the microbiome should be taken into account when prescribing antibiotics for children.Systematic review registration number: CRD42018094188.
-
3.
Flavonoid-Rich Orange Juice Intake and Altered Gut Microbiome in Young Adults with Depressive Symptom: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Park, M, Choi, J, Lee, HJ
Nutrients. 2020;12(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a common brain disorder, which may be negatively affected by poor dietary intake. Naturally occurring compounds in fruits, vegetables, tea and cocoa called flavonoids, reportedly improve brain function and may help to lower risk of depression. Possible reasons for this are their influence on the gut microbiota, which can influence the brain. This randomised control trial of 40 individuals with depression aimed to determine the influence of flavonoid rich orange juice on the gut microbiome and symptoms of depression over 8 weeks. The results showed a marginal increase in a key blood indicator associated with symptoms of depression in the flavonoid supplemented group. Symptoms of depression were also decreased in the flavonoid treatment group. Interestingly gut microbiota diversity was higher before treatment, but the abundance of key gut microbiota species were influenced by flavonoid treatment. Biomarkers for depression were also associated with the abundance of gut microbiota. It was concluded that the consequences of high microbial diversity in individuals with depression is not fully understood. However, treatment with flavonoids may alter the gut microbiome and improve symptoms of depression. This study could be used by healthcare practitioners to understand the role of the gut microbiota in depression and recommend dietary changes to include high amounts of flavonoids.
Abstract
Depression is not just a general mental health problem but a serious medical illness that can worsen without treatment. The gut microbiome plays a major role in the two-way communication system between the intestines and brain. The current study examined the effects of flavonoids on depression by observing the changes in the gut microbiome and depressive symptoms of young participants consuming flavonoid-rich orange juice. The depressive symptom was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), a psychiatric screening tool used to detect preexisting mental disorders. The study population was randomly divided into two groups: the flavonoid-rich orange juice (FR) and an equicaloric flavonoid-low orange cordial (FL) group. For 8 weeks, participants consumed FR (serving a daily 380 mL, 600 ± 5.4 mg flavonoids) or FL (serving a daily 380 mL, 108 ± 2.6 mg flavonoids). In total, 80 fecal samples from 40 participants (mean age, 21.83 years) were sequenced. Regarding depression, we observed positive correlations between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and the Lachnospiraceae family (Lachnospiraceae_uc and Murimonas) before flavonoid orange juice treatment. Most notably, the abundance of the Lachnospiraceae family (Lachnospiraceae_uc, Eubacterium_g4, Roseburia_uc, Coprococcus_g2_uc, Agathobacter_uc) increased after FR treatment compared to that after FL treatment. We also validated the presence of unclassified Lachnospiraceae through sensitive real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction using stool samples from participants before and after flavonoid treatment. Our results provide novel interventional evidence that alteration in the microbiome due to flavonoid treatment is related to a potential improvement in depression in young adults.
-
4.
Effects of Synbiotic Supplement on Human Gut Microbiota, Body Composition and Weight Loss in Obesity.
Sergeev, IN, Aljutaily, T, Walton, G, Huarte, E
Nutrients. 2020;12(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiota plays a role in the development of obesity and associated diseases. Whilst energy-restricted, low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets can facilitate substantial weight-loss, they also have been linked to ill-effects and unfavourable changes in the gut microbiota from excess protein fermentation. Pro-and prebiotics (synbiotics) have become a promising intervention in the management of obesity. This small placebo-controlled clinical trial involved 20 obese adults following an energy-restricted (approx.950 kcal/day) low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet. The study examined whether a supplementary synbiotic contributed to additional changes in body composition and metabolic biomarkers. The synbiotic contained Lactobacilli spp. and Bifidobacteria spp. and a prebiotic mixture of galactooligosaccharides. Overall, at the end of the 3-month trial, there was no remarkable difference between the groups. Both experienced a significant and decreasing trend in body mass, waist circumference, body mass index, fat mass, fat percentage, and glucose level, affirming the known benefits of the described weight-loss diet. However, the synbiotic supplementation group had a greater decrease in HbA1C and significant alterations in gut microbiota, showing an increased abundance of gut bacteria associated with positive health effects. Due to the complexity of microbial species and host interactions, the authors advocate for more research to identify their significance and shed light on contradictory findings. This study identified that synbiotics may not contribute to additional changes in body composition when combined with an energy-restricted, low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet but they can offer additional health benefits by inducing favourable changes to the gut microbiota.
Abstract
Targeting gut microbiota with synbiotics (probiotic supplements containing prebiotic components) is emerging as a promising intervention in the comprehensive nutritional approach to reducing obesity. Weight loss resulting from low-carbohydrate high-protein diets can be significant but has also been linked to potentially negative health effects due to increased bacterial fermentation of undigested protein within the colon and subsequent changes in gut microbiota composition. Correcting obesity-induced disruption of gut microbiota with synbiotics can be more effective than supplementation with probiotics alone because prebiotic components of synbiotics support the growth and survival of positive bacteria therein. The purpose of this placebo-controlled intervention clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of a synbiotic supplement on the composition, richness and diversity of gut microbiota and associations of microbial species with body composition parameters and biomarkers of obesity in human subjects participating in a weight loss program. The probiotic component of the synbiotic used in the study contained Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium bifidum and the prebiotic component was a galactooligosaccharide mixture. The results showed no statistically significant differences in body composition (body mass, BMI, body fat mass, body fat percentage, body lean mass, and bone mineral content) between the placebo and synbiotic groups at the end of the clinical trial (3-month intervention, 20 human subjects participating in weight loss intervention based on a low-carbohydrate, high-protein, reduced energy diet). Synbiotic supplementation increased the abundance of gut bacteria associated with positive health effects, especially Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and it also appeared to increase the gut microbiota richness. A decreasing trend in the gut microbiota diversity in the placebo and synbiotic groups was observed at the end of trial, which may imply the effect of the high-protein low-carbohydrate diet used in the weight loss program. Regression analysis performed to correlate abundance of species following supplementation with body composition parameters and biomarkers of obesity found an association between a decrease over time in blood glucose and an increase in Lactobacillus abundance, particularly in the synbiotic group. However, the decrease over time in body mass, BMI, waist circumstance, and body fat mass was associated with a decrease in Bifidobacterium abundance. The results obtained support the conclusion that synbiotic supplement used in this clinical trial modulates human gut microbiota by increasing abundance of potentially beneficial microbial species.
-
5.
Gut microbial metabolites in depression: understanding the biochemical mechanisms.
Caspani, G, Kennedy, S, Foster, JA, Swann, J
Microbial cell (Graz, Austria). 2019;6(10):454-481
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder is a leading cause of disability and is linked to shortened life expectancy and suicide. Despite its prevalence, for near to a third of patients, long-term treatment options are ineffective. In addition to the primary presentation of persistent low mood, other emotional and physiological symptoms, researchers have also identified alterations in metabolism, hormones and the immune system. Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests that depression and depressive behaviour is also influenced by divergences in gut health and gut bacteria composition. With insights from animal and human research, this review highlights how the gut and gut bacteria-derived metabolites can directly or indirectly influence mood. Described are the pathways of how the gut and its microorganism communicate with the brain, the essential role the immune system has as part of the gut-brain communication, and the impact of low-grade, chronic inflammation on neurofunction. Comprehensive summaries are dedicated to how several metabolites or by-products from gut bacteria can influence the nervous system and gene expression in relation to depression. These include substances like neurotransmitters, short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan metabolites, lactate, bile acids, choline metabolites and folate. This article yields a detailed overview of how gut health and microbiota can influence neurofunction and mental health. The authors promote the idea of the gut as a suitable target for the management of depressive disorders, whilst also eluding to the current limitations and need for further research.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal and central function are intrinsically connected by the gut microbiota, an ecosystem that has co-evolved with the host to expand its biotransformational capabilities and interact with host physiological processes by means of its metabolic products. Abnormalities in this microbiota-gut-brain axis have emerged as a key component in the pathophysiology of depression, leading to more research attempting to understand the neuroactive potential of the products of gut microbial metabolism. This review explores the potential for the gut microbiota to contribute to depression and focuses on the role that microbially-derived molecules - neurotransmitters, short-chain fatty acids, indoles, bile acids, choline metabolites, lactate and vitamins - play in the context of emotional behavior. The future of gut-brain axis research lies is moving away from association, towards the mechanisms underlying the relationship between the gut bacteria and depressive behavior. We propose that direct and indirect mechanisms exist through which gut microbial metabolites affect depressive behavior: these include (i) direct stimulation of central receptors, (ii) peripheral stimulation of neural, endocrine, and immune mediators, and (iii) epigenetic regulation of histone acetylation and DNA methylation. Elucidating these mechanisms is essential to expand our understanding of the etiology of depression, and to develop new strategies to harness the beneficial psychotropic effects of these molecules. Overall, the review highlights the potential for dietary interventions to represent such novel therapeutic strategies for major depressive disorder.
-
6.
Gut microbiota varies by opioid use, circulating leptin and oxytocin in African American men with diabetes and high burden of chronic disease.
Barengolts, E, Green, SJ, Eisenberg, Y, Akbar, A, Reddivari, B, Layden, BT, Dugas, L, Chlipala, G
PloS one. 2018;13(3):e0194171
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) can lead to alterations of the composition of the gut microbiota. The gut microbiota, in turn, has been suggested to play a role in the development of psychological conditions, such as anxiety, depression and drug addiction. This cross-sectional study included 99 mostly overweight/obese African American men, with or without T2D, and with or without opioid addiction and other psychiatric disorders. The aim of the study was to determine, whether the gut microbiota composition was linked to T2D and the use of opioids in these patients. Furthermore, the researchers looked at the associations between leptin and oxytocin levels in the blood and the gut microbiota, and whether these hormone biomarkers could be indicative of obesity and psychosocial behaviour, such as opioid addiction. The authors found that some bacterial species in the gut were affected by T2D, diabetes medication and opioid use in the studied subjects. A relationship was also observed between leptin and oxytocin levels and the abundance of certain bacteria in the gut in subjects without T2D. The authors conclude that targeting the gut microbiota could be used for the management of T2D and associated psychiatric disorders. However, more studies are needed to provide further understanding of the connections between the gut microbiota and the brain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The gut microbiota is known to be related to type 2 diabetes (T2D), psychiatric conditions, and opioid use. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that variability in gut microbiota in T2D is associated with psycho-metabolic health. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among African American men (AAM) (n = 99) that were outpatients at a Chicago VA Medical Center. The main outcome measures included fecal microbiota ecology (by 16S rRNA gene sequencing), psychiatric disorders including opioid use, and circulating leptin and oxytocin as representative hormone biomarkers for obesity and psychological pro-social behavior. RESULTS The study subjects had prevalent overweight/obesity (78%), T2D (50%) and co-morbid psychiatric (65%) and opioid use (45%) disorders. In the analysis of microbiota, the data showed interactions of opioids, T2D and metformin with Bifidobacterium and Prevotella genera. The differential analysis of Bifidobacterium stratified by opioids, T2D and metformin, showed significant interactions among these factors indicating that the effect of one factor was changed by the other (FDR-adjusted p [q] < 0.01). In addition, the pair-wise comparison showed that participants with T2D not taking metformin had a significant 6.74 log2 fold increase in Bifidobacterium in opioid users as compared to non-users (q = 2.2 x 10-8). Since metformin was not included in this pair-wise comparison, the significant 'q' suggested association of opioid use with Bifidobacterium abundance. The differences in Bifidobacterium abundance could possibly be explained by opioids acting as organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) inhibitors. Analysis stratified by lower and higher leptin and oxytocin (divided by the 50th percentile) in the subgroup without T2D showed lower Dialister in High-Leptin vs. Low-Leptin (p = 0.03). Contrary, the opposite was shown for oxytocin, higher Dialister in High-Oxytocin vs. Low-Oxytocin (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated for the first time that Bifidobacterium and Prevotella abundance was affected by interactions of T2D, metformin and opioid use. Also, in subjects without T2D Dialister abundance varied according to circulating leptin and oxytocin.
-
7.
Crosstalk between the microbiome and epigenome: messages from bugs.
Qin, Y, Wade, PA
Journal of biochemistry. 2018;163(2):105-112
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Trillions of microbes live symbiotically in and on an individual human being, most of them inside the digestive tract and communally known as the gut microbiome. The gut microbiome plays a vital role in the individual host’s health, not only by helping digest food and harvest energy, but also by regulating immune development and influencing gene expression. Diet and factors, such as infections and the use of antibiotics, can alter the balance of the microbiome and lead to various outcomes. This paper reviewed the current understanding of the ways in which the gut microbiome is capable of altering the host’s gene expression through microbial signals, including metabolites, bile acids, inflammation and altered composition. The studies highlighted in the paper show that gut microbes communicate both with local cells in the intestines and with more distant organs, such as the liver and the cardiovascular system. Through this communication, they can regulate the expression of immune cells, cancer cells, enzymes and inflammation-related molecules. The authors concluded that these interactions, or the crosstalk between the microbes and the host, demonstrate a crucial role of the gut microbiome in the host’s response to environmental signals. However, many of the mechanisms are still unclear, so further studies are needed to explain specific microbe-derived signals, affecting host gene expression, and to deepen our understanding of how lifestyle, health status and environmental exposures, such as antibiotics, regulate the microbiome and its influence.
Abstract
Mammals exist in a complicated symbiotic relationship with their gut microbiome, which is postulated to have broad impacts on host health and disease. As omics-based technologies have matured, the potential mechanisms by which the microbiome affects host physiology are being addressed. The gut microbiome, which provides environmental cues, can modify host cell responses to stimuli through alterations in the host epigenome and, ultimately, gene expression. Increasing evidence highlights microbial generation of bioactive compounds that impact the transcriptional machinery in host cells. Here, we review current understanding of the crosstalk between gut microbiota and the host epigenome, including DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs. These studies are providing insights into how the host responds to microbial signalling and are predicted to provide information for the application of precision medicine.
-
8.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
-
9.
Oral versus intravenous iron replacement therapy distinctly alters the gut microbiota and metabolome in patients with IBD.
Lee, T, Clavel, T, Smirnov, K, Schmidt, A, Lagkouvardos, I, Walker, A, Lucio, M, Michalke, B, Schmitt-Kopplin, P, Fedorak, R, et al
Gut. 2017;66(5):863-871
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Iron deficiency is common in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and the standard management is with oral iron replacement therapy. However, this is thought to worsen IBD symptoms, as free iron in the gut can alter the composition of the resident gut bacteria and may contribute to inflammation. This open-labelled clinical trial compared oral iron replacement to intravenous iron replacement in subjects with Crohn’s disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis and iron-deficient, non-inflamed subjects. The data collected included microbiome sequencing, metabolic profiling, serum iron and inflammation markers. Whilst both interventions alleviated deficiency, the intravenous iron replacement was slightly more effective at raising ferritin levels. The results showed that iron replacement therapy shifted the microbiome diversity and composition depending on free iron availability in the gut. A reduced microbiome diversity already distinguishes IBD from healthy subjects and a further decline in abundance following iron replacement therapy was particularly noticeable with oral iron supplementation and in Crohn's Disease subjects. However, over the short course of three months, this was not linked to disease severity in this study. This study affirms the importance of assessing for iron deficiency in IBD clients whilst supporting IV iron replacement being a favourable alternative to oral supplementation for individuals with unstable microbiota.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Iron deficiency is a common complication in patients with IBD and oral iron therapy is suggested to exacerbate IBD symptoms. We performed an open-labelled clinical trial to compare the effects of per oral (PO) versus intravenous (IV) iron replacement therapy (IRT). DESIGN The study population included patients with Crohn's disease (CD; N=31), UC (N=22) and control subjects with iron deficiency (non-inflamed, NI=19). After randomisation, participants received iron sulfate (PO) or iron sucrose (IV) over 3 months. Clinical parameters, faecal bacterial communities and metabolomes were assessed before and after intervention. RESULTS Both PO and IV treatments ameliorated iron deficiency, but higher ferritin levels were observed with IV. Changes in disease activity were independent of iron treatment types. Faecal samples in IBD were characterised by marked interindividual differences, lower phylotype richness and proportions of Clostridiales. Metabolite analysis also showed separation of both UC and CD from control anaemic participants. Major shifts in bacterial diversity occurred in approximately half of all participants after IRT, but patients with CD were most susceptible. Despite individual-specific changes in phylotypes due to IRT, PO treatment was associated with decreased abundances of operational taxonomic units assigned to the species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Ruminococcus bromii, Dorea sp. and Collinsella aerofaciens. Clear IV-specific and PO-specific fingerprints were evident at the level of metabolomes, with changes affecting cholesterol-derived host substrates. CONCLUSIONS Shifts in gut bacterial diversity and composition associated with iron treatment are pronounced in IBD participants. Despite similar clinical outcome, oral administration differentially affects bacterial phylotypes and faecal metabolites compared with IV therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER clinicaltrial.gov (NCT01067547).
-
10.
Dietary fructooligosaccharides affect intestinal barrier function in healthy men.
Ten Bruggencate, SJ, Bovee-Oudenhoven, IM, Lettink-Wissink, ML, Katan, MB, van der Meer, R
The Journal of nutrition. 2006;136(1):70-4
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) are nondigestible carbohydrates assumed beneficial because they stimulate the protective colonic microflora (bifidobacteria, lactobacilli) that produce organic acids that, in turn, increase host defence against invasive pathogens. However, studies show that FOS increases cytotoxicity of intestinal contents (fecal water), mucin excretion, and intestinal permeability in rats, reducing resistance to infection (since host defence depends on barrier function). This study aims to prove whether the adverse adverse effects of FOS that occurred before infection in rats would occur in humans. This is important because FOS has been added to a variety of products including dairy products and infant formulas. This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study design with 2 supplement periods of 2 wk. separated by 1 washout period of 2 wks. 34 healthy men were randomly divided in 2 groups. Subjects consumed either lemonade with 20g of FOS or 6g of sucrose (placebo) per day in 3 divided doses (morning, afternoon, and evening). They avoided dairy products and calcium rich foods (since FOS-induced adverse effects in rats is inhibited by calcium intake), foods high in fermentable nondigestible carbohydrates and pro- or prebiotics. Alcohol consumption was restricted. Habitual diet was otherwise maintained. The lemonade also contained the intestinal permeability marker chromium EDTA (CrEDTA). On the last 2 days of both supplement periods, quantitative food intake (self-reported) was measured, 24-h urine samples taken, and gastrointestinal symptoms rated (visual analogue scale). 24-h fecal samples were also collected. Dietary FOS consumption increased bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, lactic acid and decreased fecal pH. Cytotoxicity of fecal water and urinary and fecal CrEDTA excretion were not affected by FOS. Frequency of flatulence, bloating, abdominal pain and cramps were increased in the FOS period. The concept of stimulating endogenous microflora and intestinal organic acid production by rapid fermentation of nondigestible carbohydrates is beneficial for the intestinal barrier in humans is not supported.
Abstract
In contrast to most expectations, we showed previously that dietary fructooligosaccharides (FOS) stimulate intestinal colonization and translocation of invasive Salmonella enteritidis in rats. Even before infection, FOS increased the cytotoxicity of fecal water, mucin excretion, and intestinal permeability. In the present study, we tested whether FOS has these effects in humans. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 2 x 2 wk, with a washout period of 2 wk, was performed with 34 healthy men. Each day, subjects consumed lemonade containing either 20 g FOS or placebo and the intestinal permeability marker chromium EDTA (CrEDTA). On the last 2 d of each supplement period, subjects scored their gastrointestinal complaints on a visual analog scale and collected feces and urine for 24 h. Fecal lactic acid was measured using a colorimetric enzymatic kit. The cytotoxicity of fecal water was determined with an in vitro bioassay, fecal mucins were quantified fluorimetrically, and intestinal permeability was determined by measuring urinary CrEDTA excretion. In agreement with our animal studies, FOS fermentation increased fecal wet weight, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and lactic acid. Consumption of FOS increased flatulence and intestinal bloating. In addition, FOS consumption doubled fecal mucin excretion, indicating mucosal irritation. However, FOS did not affect the cytotoxicity of fecal water and intestinal permeability. The FOS-induced increase in mucin excretion in our human study suggests mucosal irritation in humans, but the overall effects are more moderate than those in rats.