-
1.
Effect of an Immune-Boosting, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Food Supplement in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.
Reino-Gelardo, S, Palop-Cervera, M, Aparisi-Valero, N, Espinosa-San Miguel, I, Lozano-Rodríguez, N, Llop-Furquet, G, Sanchis-Artero, L, Cortés-Castell, E, Rizo-Baeza, M, Cortés-Rizo, X
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide, reaching pandemic proportions. The symptoms caused by COVID-19 disease are nonspecific and may range from asymptomatic to severe pneumonia and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. This study was a prospective, randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. A total of 162 patients were enrolled at Sagunto Hospital, 42.0% of whom were women. Participants were assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic or control group. Results showed that higher mortality was found in men, older patients and those with severe radiological involvement. Furthermore, administration of the food supplement product Gasteel Plus®, as an adjuvant to the treatment established in the hospital for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated pneumonia, reduced the duration of digestive symptoms and hospital stay in patients with mild–moderate pulmonary involvement. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate the importance of considering the use of the food supplement under review in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2, including severe cases, which showed no side effects.
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 disease is a serious global health problem. Few treatments have been shown to reduce mortality and accelerate time to recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. METHODS A prospective randomized non-blinded clinical trial was conducted in a sample of 162 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 recruited over eight months. All patients received standard treatment, but the intervention group (n = 67) was given one food supplement stick daily during their admission. After collecting the study variables, a statistical analysis was performed comparing the intervention and control groups and a multivariate analysis controlling for variables that could act as confounding factors. RESULTS ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability. Moreover, the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001); patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS In this trial, the administration of a food supplement (Gasteel Plus®) was shown to be a protective factor in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 and allowed early recovery from digestive symptoms and a shorter hospital stay in patients with a normal-mild-moderate chest X-ray at admission (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04666116).
-
2.
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body compositions of people with diabetes mellitus: A retrospective longitudinal observational study.
Sawada, M, Ohkuma, K, Aihara, M, Doi, S, Sekine, R, Kaneko, T, Iimuro, S, Ichi, I, Usami, S, Ohe, K, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2023;14(2):321-328
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted to evaluate the prognosis of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in people with diabetes mellitus have reported an approximately two- to three-fold higher risk of mortality from COVID-19 in people with diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the state of emergency on the glycaemic control, eating habits, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus. This study is a retrospective, longitudinal observational study in outpatients with diabetes mellitus. A total of 408 participants were included in this study, including 239 men (58.6%) and 169 women (41.4%). People with type 2 diabetes mellitus were predominant in this study (96.8%). Results show that: - there was a significant increase of the haemoglobin A1c level in people with diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic. - there was an increase in the changes in body weight and percent fat (increased) and skeletal muscle masses (decreased). Authors conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic caused a negative impact on the glycaemic control and body composition in people with diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, the increase of body weight and fat mass and the decrease of the skeletal muscle mass during the pandemic were associated with poor glycaemic control, independent of the age and sex, in people with diabetes mellitus.
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the glycemic control, eating habits, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus; to identify the determinants of worsening glycemic control in people with diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, longitudinal observational study was performed in outpatients with diabetes mellitus who visited our hospital between April 2019 and March 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period) and continued for follow up from April 2020 to March 2021 (COVID-19 period). We compared the glycemic control, nutritional intakes, and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus between the two periods. The changes in the HbA1c values (ΔHbA1c) and other study variables were compared between the two periods. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the increase of HbA1c levels. RESULTS A significant increase of HbA1c was observed during the COVID-19 period. The percent fat mass (FM) also increased, while the percent skeletal muscle mass (SMM) decreased during the COVID-19 period. After adjustments for age and sex, the ΔBMI (OR:2.33), ΔFM (OR:1.45), and ΔSMM (OR:0.51) were identified as being associated with elevated levels of HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on the glycemic control and body composition of people with diabetes mellitus. The increased body weight and FM and decreased SMM observed during the pandemic were associated with poor glycemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.
-
3.
REsCue trial: Randomized controlled clinical trial with extended-release calcifediol in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.
Bishop, CW, Ashfaq, A, Melnick, JZ, Vazquez-Escarpanter, E, Fialkow, JA, Strugnell, SA, Choe, J, Kalantar-Zadeh, K, Federman, NC, Ng, D, et al
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2023;107:111899
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Literature shows that vitamin D repletion may reduce the risk for infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), mitigate severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and accelerate recovery. Sufficient serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) is postulated to potentiate COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, boost innate and control adaptive immunity, and reduce post-infection cytokine storm and lung injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended-release calcifediol capsules to treat symptomatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial titled REsCue. One hundred seventy-one symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients participants were enrolled. Patients were randomised (1:1) to 4 weeks of treatment with extended-release calcifediol (30 mcg/capsule) or matching placebo and a 2-week follow-up. Results show that extended-release calcifediol treatment was effective in increasing serum 25D levels to ≥50 ng/mL, which may have yielded significantly shorter resolution times for three aggregated respiratory symptoms (trouble breathing, chest congestion, and dry or hacking cough) commonly observed in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Authors conclude that the positive findings from this study warrant confirmation in additional larger studies.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This double-blind randomized controlled trial investigated raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D) with extended-release calcifediol (ERC) on time to symptom resolution in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. METHODS COVID-19 outpatients received oral ERC (300 mcg on days 1-3 and 60 mcg on days 4-27) or placebo (NCT04551911). Symptoms were self-reported daily. Primary end points were raising 25D to ≥50 ng/mL and decreasing resolution time for five aggregated symptoms (three respiratory). RESULTS In all, 171 patients were randomized, 160 treated and 134 (65 ERC, 69 placebo) retained. The average age was 43 y (range 18-71), 59% were women. The mean baseline 25D was 37 ± 1 (SE) ng/mL. In the full analysis set (FAS), 81% of patients in the ERC group achieved 25D levels of ≥50 ng/mL versus 15% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). In the per-protocol (PP) population, mean 25D increased with ERC to 82 ± 4 (SE) ng/mL (P < 0.0001) by day 7; the placebo group trended lower. Symptom resolution time was unchanged in the FAS by ERC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.695-1.390; P = 0.922). In the PP population, respiratory symptoms resolved 4 d faster when 25D was elevated above baseline level at both days 7 and 14 (median 6.5 versus 10.5 d; HR, 1.372; 95% CI, 0.945-1.991; P = 0.0962; Wilcoxon P = 0.0386). Symptoms resolved in both treatment groups to a similar extent by study end. Safety concerns including hypercalcemia were absent with ERC treatment. CONCLUSION ERC safely raised serum 25D to ≥50 ng/mL in outpatients with COVID-19, possibly accelerating resolution of respiratory symptoms and mitigating the risk for pneumonia. These findings warrant further study.
-
4.
Overweight and obesity as risk factors for COVID-19-associated hospitalisations and death: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sawadogo, W, Tsegaye, M, Gizaw, A, Adera, T
BMJ nutrition, prevention & health. 2022;5(1):10-18
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2, causing COVID-19, emerged in late 2019. The prognosis of COVID-19 has been consistently reported to worsen with older age, male sex and comorbidities. The aim of this study was to quantify the association between overweight or obesity and COVID-19-related hospitalisations and death, and to assess the magnitude of the association and the potential dose–response relationships. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 208 studies. A total of 3 550 977 participants from over 32 countries were included in this study. Results indicate that being overweight increases the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisations but not death while obesity and extreme obesity increase the risk of both COVID-19-related hospitalisations and death. In addition, there was a linear dose–response association between obesity categories and COVID-19 outcomes. However, the strength of the association has weakened over time following the pattern of the first wave of COVID-19. Authors conclude that their findings suggest the importance of increased vigilance towards people with excess adiposity. Some preventative measures for this vulnerable group include prompt access to COVID-19 testing and healthcare, as well as prioritisation for COVID-19 vaccination.
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the current weight of evidence of the association between overweight and obesity as risk factors for COVID-19-related hospitalisations (including hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation) and death, and to assess the magnitude of the association and the potential dose-response relationships. Design: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, WHO COVID-19 database and Google Scholar were used to identify articles published up to 20 July 2021. Peer-reviewed studies reporting adjusted estimates of the association between overweight or obesity and COVID-19 outcomes were included. Three authors reviewed the articles and agreed. The quality of eligible studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the combined effects. Results: A total of 208 studies with 3 550 997 participants from over 32 countries were included in this meta-analysis. Being overweight was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisations (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28, n=21 studies), but not death (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.13, n=21). However, patients with obesity were at increased risk of both COVID-19-related hospitalisations (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.62 to 1.84, n=58) and death (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.32, n=77). Similarly, patients with extreme obesity were at increased risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisations (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.84, n=12) and death (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.00, n=19). There was a linear dose-response relationship between these obesity categories and COVID-19 outcomes, but the strength of the association has decreased over time. Conclusion: Being overweight increases the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisations but not death, while obesity and extreme obesity increase the risk of both COVID-19-related hospitalisations and death. These findings suggest that prompt access to COVID-19 care, prioritisation for COVID-19 vaccination and other preventive measures are warranted for this vulnerable group.
-
5.
Lifestyle risk behaviours among adolescents: a two-year longitudinal study of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Gardner, LA, Debenham, J, Newton, NC, Chapman, C, Wylie, FE, Osman, B, Teesson, M, Champion, KE
BMJ open. 2022;12(6):e060309
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The global spread of COVID-19 and subsequent lockdown measures have presented challenges worldwide. Previous research has highlighted the importance of six key lifestyle behaviours, including diet, physical activity, sleep, sedentary behaviour (including recreational screen time), alcohol use and smoking—collectively referred to as the ‘Big 6’—for the short-term and long-term health of adolescents. The aim of this study was to examine changes in the prevalence of six key chronic disease risk factors from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic, and also to explore whether differences over time are associated with gender and lockdown status. This study is a prospective cohort study among a large and geographically diverse sample of adolescents. The sample included 983 students (girls = 54.8%) from 22 schools. Results show that: - over the 2-year period, the prevalence of excessive recreational screen time, insufficient fruit intake and alcohol and tobacco use increased. - alcohol use increased more among girls compared to boys. - the prevalence of insufficient sleep reduced in the overall sample; yet, increased among girls. - being in lockdown was associated with improvements in sugar-sweetened beverages consumption and discretionary food intake. Authors conclude that supporting young people to improve or maintain their health behaviours, regardless of the course of the pandemic, is important, alongside targeted research and intervention efforts to support groups that may be disproportionately impacted, such as adolescent girls.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine changes in the prevalence of six key chronic disease risk factors (the "Big 6"), from before (2019) to during (2021) the COVID-19 pandemic, among a large and geographically diverse sample of adolescents, and whether differences over time are associated with lockdown status and gender. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Three Australian states (New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australia) spanning over 3000 km. PARTICIPANTS 983 adolescents (baseline Mage=12.6, SD=0.5, 54.8% girl) drawn from the control group of the Health4Life Study. PRIMARY OUTCOMES The prevalence of physical inactivity, poor diet (insufficient fruit and vegetable intake, high sugar-sweetened beverage intake, high discretionary food intake), poor sleep, excessive recreational screen time, alcohol use and tobacco use. RESULTS The prevalence of excessive recreational screen time (prevalence ratios (PR)=1.06, 95% CI=1.03 to 1.11), insufficient fruit intake (PR=1.50, 95% CI=1.26 to 1.79), and alcohol (PR=4.34, 95% CI=2.82 to 6.67) and tobacco use (PR=4.05 95% CI=1.86 to 8.84) increased over the 2-year period, with alcohol use increasing more among girls (PR=2.34, 95% CI=1.19 to 4.62). The prevalence of insufficient sleep declined across the full sample (PR=0.74, 95% CI=0.68 to 0.81); however, increased among girls (PR=1.24, 95% CI=1.10 to 1.41). The prevalence of high sugar-sweetened beverage (PR=0.61, 95% CI=0.64 to 0.83) and discretionary food consumption (PR=0.73, 95% CI=0.64 to 0.83) reduced among those subjected to stay-at-home orders, compared with those not in lockdown. CONCLUSION Lifestyle risk behaviours, particularly excessive recreational screen time, poor diet, physical inactivity and poor sleep, are prevalent among adolescents. Young people must be supported to find ways to improve or maintain their health, regardless of the course of the pandemic. Targeted approaches to support groups that may be disproportionately impacted, such as adolescent girls, are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000431123).
-
6.
Evidence for the Efficacy of a High Dose of Vitamin D on the Hyperinflammation State in Moderate-to-Severe COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sarhan, N, Abou Warda, AE, Sarhan, RM, Boshra, MS, Mostafa-Hedeab, G, ALruwaili, BF, Ibrahim, HSG, Schaalan, MF, Fathy, S
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2022;58(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Vitamin D insufficiency is an example of the factors which may affect snowballed COVID-19 risk and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical results and prognoses of COVID-19 patients are enhanced by supplementing a high dose of vitamin D relative to the conventional low dose. This study is a randomised controlled trial of 116 patients. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups i.e. 58 patients received treatment with low-dose vitamin D and 58 received treatment with high-dose vitamin D. Results show that the incidence of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit hospitalisation, death, sepsis, and atrial fibrillation in the high-dosage vitamin D group was considerably reduced compared to the low-dosage vitamin D group. However, the need for high oxygen was significantly higher in the high-dose vitamin D group compared to the low-dose group. Additionally, there was a significant difference in the monitored parameters before and after treatment in favour of the high-dose vitamin D group, which were significantly lower in the high-dose vitamin D group compared to the low-dose group. Authors conclude that the sooner micronutrients are administered to outpatients, the better the outcome, especially before supportive or specific treatment is commenced.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Vitamin D supplementation plays a key effect in lowering cytokine storms among COVID-19 patients by influencing the activity of the renin-angiotensin system and the production of the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme. The study was conducted to explore the effect of high-dose intramuscular vitamin D in hospitalized adults infected with moderate-to-severe SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with the standard of care in the COVID-19 protocol. Materials and Methods: Two groups of patients were compared in this prospective randomized controlled trial as the vitamin D was administered orally to group 1 (alfacalcidol 1 mcg/day) and intramuscularly to group 2 (cholecalciferol 200,000 IU). One hundred and sixteen participants were recruited in total, with fifty-eight patients in each group. Following the Egyptian Ministry of Health's policy for COVID-19 management, all patients received the same treatment for a minimum of five days. Results: A significant difference was recorded in the length of hospital stay (8.6 versus 6.8 days), need for high oxygen or non-invasive mechanical ventilator (67% versus 33%), need for a mechanical ventilator (25% versus 75%), clinical improvement (45% versus 55%), the occurrence of sepsis (35% versus 65%), and in the monitored laboratory parameters in favor of high-dose vitamin D. Moreover, clinical improvement was significantly associated with the need for low/high oxygen, an invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilator (MV/NIMV), and diabetes, while mortality was associated with the need for MV, ICU admission, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and the occurrence of secondary infection. Conclusions: Our study showed that high-dose vitamin D was considered a promising treatment in the suppression of cytokine storms among COVID-19 patients and was associated with better clinical improvement and fewer adverse outcomes compared to low-dose vitamin D.
-
7.
Positive Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
De Niet, S, Trémège, M, Coffiner, M, Rousseau, AF, Calmes, D, Frix, AN, Gester, F, Delvaux, M, Dive, AF, Guglielmi, E, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(15)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Literature shows that having enough vitamin D can help prevent many diseases, such as heart disease, bone disease and cancer. Recent data also showed that vitamin D can reduce the risk of respiratory tract infections, and particularly, the risk of viral infections. The aim of this study was to assess whether the proposed dosing regimen of a daily dose of 25,000 international units (IU) vitamin D administered over 4 consecutive days, followed by a weekly dose of 25,000 IU, was adequate to rapidly increase the concentrations of calcifediol in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and to explore its impact on hospital length and other clinical outcomes of the disease. This study is an interventional, randomized, parallel, two-treatment, two-arm, double-blind and placebo-controlled pilot study, carried out in one clinical site in Belgium. The patients (n=50) were randomized in the two different treatment groups (vitamin D (n=26) or placebo (n=24)). Patients participated in the study for a maximum of 9 weeks, including an up to 6-week treatment period and a maximum of 3-week follow-up period. Results show that the study’s regimen was adequate to rapidly raise the calcifediol level above 20 ng/mL and improve the clinical outcome of patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19. In fact, administration of cholecalciferol significantly reduced the hospital length of stay, reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen and improved the clinical status assessed by the World Health Organisation scale. Authors conclude that further studies with a larger number of patients are needed in order to further confirm their study’s findings.
Abstract
Retrospective studies showed a relationship between vitamin D status and COVID-19 severity and mortality, with an inverse relation between SARS-CoV-2 positivity and circulating calcifediol levels. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on the length of hospital stay and clinical improvement in patients with vitamin D deficiency hospitalized with COVID-19. The study was randomized, double blind and placebo controlled. A total of 50 subjects were enrolled and received, in addition to the best available COVID therapy, either vitamin D (25,000 IU per day over 4 consecutive days, followed by 25,000 IU per week up to 6 weeks) or placebo. The length of hospital stay decreased significantly in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (4 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.003). At Day 7, a significantly lower percentage of patients were still hospitalized in the vitamin D group compared to the placebo group (19% vs. 54%; p = 0.0161), and none of the patients treated with vitamin D were hospitalized after 21 days compared to 14% of the patients treated with placebo. Vitamin D significantly reduced the duration of supplemental oxygen among the patients who needed it (4 days vs. 7 days in the placebo group; p = 0.012) and significantly improved the clinical recovery of the patients, as assessed by the WHO scale (p = 0.0048). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization was improved by administration of vitamin D.
-
8.
Prognostic and Therapeutic Role of Vitamin D in COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Dissanayake, HA, de Silva, NL, Sumanatilleke, M, de Silva, SDN, Gamage, KKK, Dematapitiya, C, Kuruppu, DC, Ranasinghe, P, Pathmanathan, S, Katulanda, P
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2022;107(5):1484-1502
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Vitamin D is implicated in optimum function of the immune system. Its deficiency has been linked to susceptibility to respiratory infections. It is postulated that vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency is also associated with COVID-19. The aim of this study was to determine the association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and susceptibility to COVID-19, its severity, mortality and role of vitamin D in its treatment. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventy-six publications. Results show increased odds of developing COVID-19, progression to severe COVID-19 and death in people with vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency. In fact, people who developed COVID-19, severe COVID-19 and fatal disease had lower 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration compared to people without COVID-19 or non-severe COVID-19 or non-fatal COVID-19 respectively. Authors conclude that Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency may increase the risk of developing COVID-19 infection and susceptibility to more severe disease.
Abstract
PURPOSE Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency may increase the susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to determine the association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and susceptibility to COVID-19, its severity, mortality, and role of vitamin D in its treatment. METHODS We searched CINAHL, Cochrane library, EMBASE, PubMED, Scopus, and Web of Science up to May 30, 2021, for observational studies on association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and susceptibility to COVID-19, severe disease, and death among adults, and, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vitamin D treatment against standard care or placebo, in improving severity or mortality among adults with COVID-19. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies and AUB-KQ1 Cochrane tool for RCTs. Study-level data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 and R (v4.1.0). Heterogeneity was determined by I2 and sources were explored through prespecified sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions. RESULTS Of 1877 search results, 76 studies satisfying eligibility criteria were included. Seventy-two observational studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 1 976 099). Vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency increased the odds of developing COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28-1.65; P < 0.0001; I2 = 92%), severe disease (OR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.52-2.38; P < 0.0001; I2 = 81%), and death (OR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.28-3.35; P = 0.003; I2 = 73%). The 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations were lower in individuals with COVID-19 compared with controls (mean difference [MD] -3.85 ng/mL; 95% CI, -5.44 to -2.26; P ≤ 0.0001), in patients with severe COVID-19 compared with controls with nonsevere COVID-19 (MD -4.84 ng/mL; 95% CI, -7.32 to -2.35; P = 0.0001) and in nonsurvivors compared with survivors (MD -4.80 ng/mL; 95% CI, -7.89 to -1.71; P = 0.002). The association between vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and death was insignificant when studies with high risk of bias or studies reporting unadjusted effect estimates were excluded. Risk of bias and heterogeneity were high across all analyses. Discrepancies in timing of vitamin D testing, definitions of severe COVID-19, and vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency partly explained the heterogeneity. Four RCTs were widely heterogeneous precluding meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Multiple observational studies involving nearly 2 million adults suggest vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency increases susceptibility to COVID-19 and severe COVID-19, although with a high risk of bias and heterogeneity. Association with mortality was less robust. Heterogeneity in RCTs precluded their meta-analysis.
-
9.
Effects of Vitamin D Serum Level on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hu, Y, Kung, J, Cave, A, Banh, HL
Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques. 2022;25:84-92
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome resulting from the excessive inflammatory response at 5-7 days. It has been shown that low Vitamin D serum concentration is associated with increased pneumonia and viral respiratory infections. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical effects of Vitamin D serum concentration in COVID-19 patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 studies. Results show that Vitamin D serum concentration was not statistically associated with mortality and ICU admission, ventilator support requirement, and length of hospital stay. Authors conclude that additional randomized controlled trials are required to provide a specific supplemental vitamin dose and Vitamin D serum concentration.
Abstract
PURPOSE It has been shown that low Vitamin D serum concentration is associated with increased pneumonia and viral respiratory infections. Vitamin D is readily available, inexpensive, and easy to administer to subjects infected with COVID-19. If effective in reducing the severity of COVID-19, it could be an important and feasible therapeutic intervention. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to determine the effects of Vitamin D serum concentration on mortality and morbidity in COVID-19 patients. The primary objectives were to determine if Vitamin D serum concentration decrease mortality, ICU admissions, ventilator support, and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS A total of 3572 publications were identified. Ultimately, 20 studies are included. A total of 12,806 patients aged between 42 to 81 years old were analyzed. The pooled estimated RR for mortality, ICU admission, ventilator support and length of hospital stay were 1.49 (95% CI: 1.34, 1.65), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.14), 1.29 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.84), and 0.84 (95% CI -0.45, 2.13). CONCLUSION There is no statistical difference in mortality, ICU admission rate, ventilator support requirement, and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients with low and high Vitamin D serum concentration.
-
10.
Effects of L-carnitine supplementation in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease: a pilot study.
Talebi, SS, Ghasemi, M, Etminani-Esfahani, M, Mohammadi, Y, Haddadi, R
Pharmacological reports : PR. 2022;74(6):1296-1305
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus is an enveloped single-stranded-RNA positive-sense virus that includes four subgroups called alpha, beta, delta, and gamma, of which beta type is responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the nature of COVID-19, L-carnitine may be considered a suitable therapeutic supplement as it has shown promising results in some viral infections related to the respiratory system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of changes in inflammatory factors, such as c-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), following L-carnitine supplementation. This study is a single-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, and pilot clinical trial. Seventy-six patients who were hospitalised with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms were enrolled for the study. They were randomly divided into intervention (n=33) and control (n=43) groups. Results show that L-carnitine supplementation can decrease inflammation caused by infection, increase oxygen saturation levels through improvements in oxygen delivery and decrease liver enzymes levels. Furthermore, the mean CRP and ESR levels in patients receiving L-carnitine were significantly reduced. Authors conclude that L-carnitine can be suggested as a pharmacological supplement in patients with COVID-19, but further research and clinical studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm and extend their findings.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present single-center clinical trial was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of L-carnitine supplementation in patients with COVID-19 disease. METHODS AND PATIENTS The study was conducted on 75 patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 hospitalized in Shahid Beheshti Hospital-Hamadan, IRAN. The participants were randomly divided into intervention (n = 32) and control groups (n = 43). The control group received their standard hospital treatment only. In addition to standard medications, the intervention group received 3000 mg oral L-carnitine daily in three divided doses for five days. The blood samples were collected and para-clinical parameters were measured at the beginning and end of the treatment. Clinical outcomes were also recorded, and data were analyzed using χ2 and t-tests. RESULTS Higher means of O2 saturation were observed in the intervention rather than in the control group. Mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly lower in the intervention group. Furthermore, mean alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were lower in the intervention group. Also, lower mean serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) was observed in the intervention group. No significant differences were observed in terms of clinical symptoms; however, six patients (14%) in the control group died due to the complications of COVID-19, while all patients in the intervention group survived. CONCLUSION Taken together, L-carnitine can be considered as a drug supplement in patients with COVID-19.