1.
Probiotics fortify intestinal barrier function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Zheng, Y, Zhang, Z, Tang, P, Wu, Y, Zhang, A, Li, D, Wang, CZ, Wan, JY, Yao, H, Yuan, CS
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1143548
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intestinal barrier function is closely related to the pathogenesis of various immune and inflammatory diseases. The intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in maintaining gut homeostasis and functionality in the presence of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory microbes. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the role of probiotics in contributing to intestinal barrier function, and the related immune function, inflammatory status, and gut microbiota composition. This study was a systematic review of 28 articles (qualitative synthesis), and a meta-analysis of 26 randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics could significantly improve intestinal barrier function according to specific indicators. The meta-analysis also indicated that probiotic supplementation could reduce inflammatory factors. Furthermore, it also demonstrated that probiotics could modulate gut microbiota compositions by elevating the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Authors conclude that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function to some extent, but more high-quality randomised controlled studies are needed to reach a solid conclusion.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for health by addressing imbalances in gut bacteria (dysbiosis), reducing inflammation in the gut and improving the integrity and function of the gut barrier
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Probiotics are microorganisms that are considered beneficial to health. The aim of this study was to assess the role of probiotics in protecting intestinal barrier function as well as their effects on the composition of gut microbiota, inflammatory status, and immune function for reducing the risk of related diseases.
Methods
26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2005-2021 with a total population of n=1891 (n = 955 Intervention, n = 936 controls)) were included in the meta-analysis. Outcome measures were categorised under indicators relating to intestinal barrier function, inflammatory markers, immune function and microbiota composition. Studies were conducted worldwide with participants being healthcare patients or athletes. Study durations ranged from 3 days to 6 months. Different dosages and forms of probiotics were used. Data was pooled for Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species.
Results
Gut barrier function in the probiotic groups was improved as measured by transepithelial resistance (TER) mean difference (MD) 5.27 {95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, p = < 0.00001], lipopolysaccharide (LPS) standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.47 (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, p = 0.02), serum zonulin SMD -1.58 (95% CI,-2.49 to -0.66, p = 0.0007), and endotoxin SMD -3.20 (95% CI, -5.41 to - 0.98, p = 0.005).
The inflammatory markers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) were also improved compared to control groups. Lactobacillus (95% CI p=0.02) and Bifidobacterium (95% CI, p=0.01) enhanced microbial composition, however, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species did not. Immune function as measured by Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G IgG and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) were not improved.
Conclusion
The findings of this study suggest that intestinal barrier function and microbial composition could be improved using probiotics. They were also found to help alleviate inflammation. Further studies of high quality are however needed to confirm these results.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
Clinical practice applications:
The use of the probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for:
- supporting the integrity of gut barrier function
- improving the composition of gut microbiota
- lowering inflammation
Considerations for future research:
High heterogeneity between studies may affect the applicability of the results. Future research development should focus on the following areas:
- testing methods
- study durations
- measuring indicators
- the type and dose of probiotics
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics play a vital role in treating immune and inflammatory diseases by improving intestinal barrier function; however, a comprehensive evaluation is missing. The present study aimed to explore the impact of probiotics on the intestinal barrier and related immune function, inflammation, and microbiota composition. A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. METHODS Four major databases (PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, CENTRAL, and Embase) were thoroughly searched. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), heterogeneity among studies was evaluated utilizing I2 statistic (Chi-Square test), and data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS Meta-analysis of data from a total of 26 RCTs (n = 1891) indicated that probiotics significantly improved gut barrier function measured by levels of TER (MD, 5.27, 95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, P < 0.00001), serum zonulin (SMD, -1.58, 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.66, P = 0.0007), endotoxin (SMD, -3.20, 95% CI, -5.41 to -0.98, P = 0.005), and LPS (SMD, -0.47, 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, P = 0.02). Furthermore, probiotic groups demonstrated better efficacy over control groups in reducing inflammatory factors, including CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6. Probiotics can also modulate the gut microbiota structure by boosting the enrichment of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. CONCLUSION The present work revealed that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function, and alleviate inflammation and microbial dysbiosis. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to achieve a more definitive conclusion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=281822, identifier CRD42021281822.
2.
Physical Training and Healthy Diet Improved Bowel Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Fatigue in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Scheffers, LE, Vos, IK, Utens, EMWJ, Dieleman, GC, Walet, S, Escher, JC, van den Berg, LEM
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2023;77(2):214-221
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, characterised by periods of remission and relapse of symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a tailored lifestyle intervention on physical fitness (maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, strength, and core stability), the patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, and fear), clinical disease activity, and nutritional status. This study was a prospective single-centre randomised semi-crossover-controlled trial. Children were randomized into group A (start exercise) or group B (start control period). Results showed improved physical fitness, quality of life, and parent-reported fatigue. Additionally, a combination of lower clinical disease activity scores accompanied by fewer IBD symptoms suggests positive effects on intestinal inflammation. Authors concluded that based on the findings of their study, children and adolescents with IBD should be motivated and supported to acquire and maintain a healthy lifestyle.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- IBD is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract, characterised by periods of abdominal pain, severe diarrhoea, and fatigue
- This clinical trial suggests that a 12-week program of physical training plus personalised healthy dietary advice may improve physical fitness, quality of life, and fatigue in children with IBD.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised semi-crossover controlled trial was conducted to investigate the impact of a 12-week lifestyle program (3 physical training sessions per week plus personalised healthy dietary advice) in children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
Method
- Sixteen children with a median age of 15 [IQR: 12–16]) that were diagnosed with IBD (CD, UC, or IBD-unclassified) were randomized to group A (start exercise) or group B (start control period). Group A started the intervention immediately after the first assessment and did not have a control period. Group B started after a control period (this was planned to last for 6 weeks but due to the COVID-19 lockdown extended to 6 months)
- The lifestyle intervention lasted 12 weeks and consisted of 3 physiotherapist-supervised training sessions per week, lasting 60 minutes each. In addition, all participants received a recommended caloric intake per day based on measured rest energy expenditure and a brochure regarding healthy diet in children
- Endpoints were physical fitness (maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, strength, and core stability), patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, and fears for exercise), clinical disease activity (faecal calprotectin and disease activity scores), and nutritional status (energy balance and body composition)
- A total of 15 out of 16 participants (93%) completed the program, one patient dropped out after one training session due to motivational problems.
Results
The primary findings of this study were as follows:
- While medical treatment remained unchanged, Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index decreased versus the control period (15 [3–25] vs 2.5 [0–5], P = 0.012)
- The number of patients in clinical remission increased from 5 to 12 (P < 0.001), compared to the control period
- Quality of life (IMPACT-III) improved on 4 out of 6 domains and the total score (+13 points) versus the control period including a large improvement in bowel-related symptoms, P= 0.029)
- Fecal calprotectin decreased, but not compared to the control period, mainly due to relatively large intra-patient fluctuations (400 μg/g [57.1–1662.7] vs 128 μg/g [23.8–642.3], P = 0.016)
- Parents reported an improvement in the quality of life versus the control period on the child health questionnaire and total fatigue score (PedsQoL • Multidimensional Fatigue Scale) (+14 points, P = 0.048)
- Walking distance improved after the 12-week program, compared to the control period (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
This study revealed that a 12-week physical training program and personalised dietary advice improved bowel symptoms, quality of life, and fatigue in children with IBD.
Clinical practice applications:
- The mechanism behind the anti-inflammatory effects of exercise has not been clarified
- Multiple theories have been suggested in previously published studies such as a reduced release of adipokines due to less visceral fat, increased secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, and reduced transient stool time
- This clinical trial demonstrated that a 12-week program of physical training sessions plus personalised healthy dietary advice resulted in improved physical fitness, quality of life, and parent-reported fatigue.
Considerations for future research:
- A sample size calculation was not provided in the study report and it is therefore assumed that the sample size of 16 children in this trial was too small to draw a definite conclusion. A larger study over a longer period is therefore needed across diverse age and ethnic population groups to draw better conclusions
- This study did not measure mucosal inflammation before and after the intervention due to the invasive nature of the procedure. It would however be useful that future research investigate this to gain more insight into the effect of lifestyle interventions on IBD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physical activity programs have been suggested as adjunctive therapy in adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We assessed the effects of a 12-week lifestyle intervention in children with IBD. METHODS This study was a randomized semi-crossover controlled trial, investigating a 12-week lifestyle program (3 physical training sessions per week plus personalized healthy dietary advice) in children with IBD. Endpoints were physical fitness (maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, strength, and core stability), patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, and fears for exercise), clinical disease activity (fecal calprotectin and disease activity scores), and nutritional status (energy balance and body composition). Change in maximal exercise capacity (peak VO 2 ) was the primary endpoint; all others were secondary endpoints. RESULTS Fifteen patients (median age 15 [IQR: 12-16]) completed the program. At baseline, peak VO 2 was reduced (median 73.3% [58.8-100.9] of predicted). After the 12-week program, compared to the control period, peak VO 2 did not change significantly; exercise capacity measured by 6-minute walking test and core-stability did. While medical treatment remained unchanged, Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index decreased significantly versus the control period (15 [3-25] vs 2.5 [0-5], P = 0.012), and fecal calprotectin also decreased significantly but not versus the control period. Quality of life (IMPACT-III) improved on 4 out of 6 domains and total score (+13 points) versus the control period. Parents-reported quality of life on the child health questionnaire and total fatigue score (PedsQoL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale) also improved significantly versus the control period. CONCLUSIONS A 12-week lifestyle intervention improved bowel symptoms, quality of life, and fatigue in pediatric IBD patients.
3.
A Mediterranean Diet Pattern Improves Intestinal Inflammation Concomitant with Reshaping of the Bacteriome in Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Haskey, N, Estaki, M, Ye, J, Shim, RK, Singh, S, Dieleman, LA, Jacobson, K, Gibson, DL
Journal of Crohn's & colitis. 2023;17(10):1569-1578
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with debilitating symptoms. Patients live with considerable symptom burden, increased risk of disability, and lower quality of life despite medical treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the Mediterranean Diet Pattern (MDP) compared with a Canadian Habitual Diet Pattern (CHD) on UC disease activity, inflammation, and the gut microbiome. This study was a randomised controlled trial where participants were randomly assigned to follow the MDP or CHD for 12 weeks. Results showed that: - the MDP reduces clinical symptoms and reduces inflammation. - the MDP promotes faecal secretory immunoglobulin A [the principal weapon protecting us from pathogens and toxins that might otherwise penetrate mucosal surfaces. - the MDP is positively associated with microbes that produce potentially beneficial metabolites. - the MDP is negatively associated with microbes predicted to carry pathobiont traits. - the MDP increases faecal short-chain fatty acids production. Authors conclude that the MDP is well tolerated and is a reasonable, healthy eating pattern that practitioners can recommend to patients with UC in remission to prevent relapses, in addition to their standard medical therapy.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
This study concluded that a MDP promotes beneficial changes in gut microbiome, reduces FC, improves SigA, and increases SCFA when compared to CHD, over a relatively short period of time, in a small cohort of UC patients in remission.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This human prospective randomised, controlled trial investigated the efficacy of a Mediterranean Diet Pattern (MDP) compared to a Canadian Habitual Diet Pattern (CHD) on disease activity, inflammation, and gut microbiome for patients diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis (UC).
Methods
This trial included 28 mild-moderate diseased UC patients in remission - inclusive of participants who were on a stable dose of UC therapy. Participants were randomised to either MDP (n=15) or CHD (n=13). MDP participants received one-on-one dietary coaching from a dietician whilst the CHD group continued with their regular diet. Health markers included nutrition and medical history, blood work, and stool analysis at baseline and week 12 with disease activity assessed using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) and Partial Mayo Scores for the two intervals.
Biomarkers included:
- Complete Blood Count
- C-reactive protein
- Albumin
- Vitamin B12
- Vitamin D
- Short-chain Fatty Acids (SCFA)
- Faecal secretory Immunoglobulin A (SigA)
- Faecal DNA
- Faecal Calprotectin (FC)
Results
Difference in scores between baseline and week 12, per group:
- Clinically significant reduction in the primary outcome of SCCAI>1.5: MDP 4/15 (27%); CHD 3/13 (23%)
- Change in secondary outcome of FC: MDP no change (p=0.375); CHD increase in FC (p=0.0488)
- Change in SigA: MDP increase (p=0.0040); CHD unchanged (p=0.0803)
- Change in SCFA: MDP increase in total SCFA (p=0.0129); CHD decrease of Acetic acid (p=0.0398) and Valeric acid (p=0.0215) only
- Change in Bacteriome: Using the BIRDMAn tool the study showed notable changes in microbiome variation for both positively and negatively associated outcomes between the two groups (p=0.00018).
Conclusion
Despite the small size of this study (note: no sample size calculation was reported), a 12-week MDP intervention appears to decrease disease activity with improved SCCAI scores. Inflammatory markers (e.g. FC) in the MDP cohort remained unchanged but increased in 75% of the control group. The CHD group had lower levels of beneficial SCFA that has been shown to be associated with opportunistic infection related microbes.
Clinical practice applications:
- A standard Western Style diet (typically low in fibre with increased animal protein and ultra-processed food) is associated with both onset and progression of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
- A Mediterranean diet that consists of legumes, whole grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, seeds, olive oil, fish, poultry and dairy products is associated with reduced inflammation and improved gut microbiome diversity.
- However, given the established inflammatory nature of IBD it is advisable to introduce gut microbiome altering food options - in line with ongoing therapeutic intervention - slowly whilst constantly monitoring the patient.
- Note that the conclusions were based on a very small, select cohort with associations between specific nutrients (e.g. catechins found in grapes that metabolise quercetin to produce butyrate) based on previous studies inclusive of murine models.
Considerations for future research:
- The background diet of two participants in the CHD cohort was similar to a Mediterranean type diet, which may have biased SCCAI scores and other biomarkers in this group due to the small sample size. Larger cohorts and longer trial periods are therefore needed to confirm tolerance, efficacy and safety of a MDP in IBD patients.
- The effect of a MDP on patients with more severe symptomatology still needs to be assessed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Dietary patterns are important in managing ulcerative colitis [UC], given their influence on gut microbiome-host symbiosis and inflammation. We investigated whether the Mediterranean Diet Pattern [MDP] vs the Canadian Habitual Diet Pattern [CHD] would affect disease activity, inflammation, and the gut microbiome in patients with quiescent UC. METHODS We performed a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in adults [65% female; median age 47 years] with quiescent UC in an outpatient setting from 2017 to 2021. Participants were randomised to an MDP [n = 15] or CHD [n = 13] for 12 weeks. Disease activity [Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index] and faecal calprotectin [FC] were measured at baseline and week 12. Stool samples were analysed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. RESULTS The diet was well tolerated by the MDP group. At week 12, 75% [9/12] of participants in the CHD had an FC >100 μg/g, vs 20% [3/15] of participants in the MDP group. The MDP group had higher levels of total faecal short chain fatty acids [SCFAs] [p = 0.01], acetic acid [p = 0.03], and butyric acid [p = 0.03] compared with the CHD. Furthermore, the MDP induced alterations in microbial species associated with a protective role in colitis [Alistipes finegoldii and Flavonifractor plautii], as well as the production of SCFAs [Ruminococcus bromii]. CONCLUSIONS An MDP induces gut microbiome alterations associated with the maintenance of clinical remission and reduced FC in patients with quiescent UC. The data support that the MDP is a sustainable diet pattern that could be recommended as a maintenance diet and adjunctive therapy for UC patients in clinical remission. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT0305371.
4.
Efficacy and Acceptability of Dietary Therapies in Non-Constipated Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Trial of Traditional Dietary Advice, the Low FODMAP Diet, and the Gluten-Free Diet.
Rej, A, Sanders, DS, Shaw, CC, Buckle, R, Trott, N, Agrawal, A, Aziz, I
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2022;20(12):2876-2887.e15
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder characterised by stomach pain, bloating, and altered bowel movements. Dietary therapy is a way to manage IBS, with 3 diets becoming popular amongst health care professionals and those who suffer from IBS. Traditional dietary advice (TD), which involves adopting healthy, sensible eating patterns with adequate hydration, is the first line recommendation in the UK. The low-FODMAP diet (LFD) is the avoidance of carbohydrates, which tend to ferment in the stomach and are found in certain fruits and vegetables. The gluten free diet (GFD) is the avoidance of foods which contain gluten such as bread and pasta. All three diets have little evidence to support their use in IBS and this randomised control trial of 101 individuals with IBS aimed to determine whether the GFD and LFD are superior in relieving IBS symptoms compared to TD. The results showed that GFD, LFD and TD were all effective in the management of non-constipated IBS, but that TD was easier to follow and cheaper compared to the other two diets. It was concluded that TD should be used as first-line therapy for people with non-constipated IBS and that GFD and LFD should be reserved for specific patients under the care of a health care professional.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- TDA, LFD and GFD can all lead to significant improvements in non-constipation IBS with no statistically significant difference in effectiveness between the diets.
- Most patients find a TDA easier and cheaper to implement than a LFD or GFD.
- TDA is therefore recommended as a first line approach in non-constipation IBS.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and patient acceptability of traditional dietary advice (TDA) vs a low FODMAP diet (LFD) vs a gluten-free diet (GFD, cross-contamination allowed) in patients with non-constipation irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
TDA definition: healthy, sensible eating pattern, including regular meals, not eating too little/too much, adequate hydration, and reducing the intake of: alcohol/caffeine/fizzydrinks/fatty/spicy/ processed foods; fresh fruit (maximum of 3 per day); fibre/gas-producing foods and perceived food intolerances.
Methods
This was a randomised dietary trial over 4 weeks. Dietary advice was provided by a specialist dietitian in a session lasting 45-60 minutes. 99 patients completed the study (33 in each group). Stool analysis was performed in “around half“ (study authors terminology) of participants due to disruption of trial caused by COVID-19.
Results:
- Primary endpoint (reduction of 50 points or more on IBS symptom severity score) was met by 42% of patients on the TDA, 55% on LFD and 58% on GFD. The differences between groups were not statistically significant, p=0.43.
- Patients on the LFD had greater improvements in mood compared to the other diets under examination, reaching statistical significance (p=0.03) for Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and (p<0.01) for dysphoria score on IBS-QOL scale.
- Patients on TDA found their diet cheaper (p<0.01), less time consuming to shop (p<0.01) and easier to follow when eating out with family and friends (p=0.03), whilst TDA and GFD were considered easier to incorporate into daily diet than LFD (p=0.02).
- No significant differences were found between groups in changes to macro- and micronutrient composition, except a trend to lower fibre intake with LFD (p=0.06).
- There was a significant reduction in intake of FODMAPs in all groups, with greatest reduction in LFD (27.7 to 7.6 g/day, p<0.01), followed by TDA (24.9 to 15.2 g/day, p<0.01) and GFD (27.4 to 22.4 g/day, p=0.03). Differences between groups were statistically significant (p<0.01).
- No differences were noted in change to the dysbiosis index between groups.
- Neither clinical characteristics nor dysbiosis index predicted response to any of the diets.
Conclusion
- TDA, LFD and GFD are all effective approaches for non-constipation IBS.
- TDA should be first-line dietary advice due to being the most patient-friendly.
Clinical practice applications:
- When working with clients with non-constipation IBS, a TDA approach may be favoured over LFD and GFD as a first line intervention if the patient has not already tried a TDA diet.
- Patient preferences, budget, time and living situation should be taken into account when deciding on best dietary advice for IBS.
Considerations for future research:
- As all 3 approaches led to reduction in FODMAPs, trials comparing different levels of FODMAP exclusion could lead to valuable information, as a strict FODMAP exclusion, which is commonly recommended in IBS, is difficult and may not be necessary.
- Studies of longer duration would be valuable to confirm that benefits observed with the 3 approaches are not short-term only.
- Comparing individual approaches to appropriate control group would ensure that improvements are not due to a placebo effect.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Various diets are proposed as first-line therapies for non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) despite insufficient or low-quality evidence. We performed a randomized trial comparing traditional dietary advice (TDA) against the low FODMAP diet (LFD) and gluten-free diet (GFD). METHODS Patients with Rome IV-defined non-constipated IBS were randomized to TDA, LFD, or GFD (the latter allowing for minute gluten cross-contamination). The primary end point was clinical response after 4 weeks of dietary intervention, as defined by ≥50-point reduction in IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS). Secondary end points included (1) changes in individual IBS-SSS items within clinical responders, (2) acceptability and food-related quality of life with dietary therapy, (3) changes in nutritional intake, (4) alterations in stool dysbiosis index, and (5) baseline factors associated with clinical response. RESULTS The primary end point of ≥50-point reduction in IBS-SSS was met by 42% (n = 14/33) undertaking TDA, 55% (n = 18/33) for LFD, and 58% (n = 19/33) for GFD (P = .43). Responders had similar improvements in IBS-SSS items regardless of their allocated diet. Individuals found TDA cheaper (P < .01), less time-consuming to shop (P < .01), and easier to follow when eating out (P = .03) than the GFD and LFD. TDA was also easier to incorporate into daily life than the LFD (P = .02). Overall reductions in micronutrient and macronutrient intake did not significantly differ across the diets. However, the LFD group had the greatest reduction in total FODMAP content (27.7 g/day before intervention to 7.6 g/day at week 4) compared with the GFD (27.4 g/day to 22.4 g/day) and TDA (24.9 g/day to 15.2 g/day) (P < .01). Alterations in stool dysbiosis index were similar across the diets, with 22%-29% showing reduced dysbiosis, 35%-39% no change, and 35%-40% increased dysbiosis (P = .99). Baseline clinical characteristics and stool dysbiosis index did not predict response to dietary therapy. CONCLUSIONS TDA, LFD, and GFD are effective approaches in non-constipated IBS, but TDA is the most patient-friendly in terms of cost and convenience. We recommend TDA as the first-choice dietary therapy in non-constipated IBS, with LFD and GFD reserved according to specific patient preferences and specialist dietetic input. CLINICALTRIALS gov: NCT04072991.