-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Effect of the probiotic strain, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9, on chronic constipation: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ma, T, Yang, N, Xie, Y, Li, Y, Xiao, Q, Li, Q, Jin, H, Zheng, L, Sun, Z, Zuo, K, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;191:106755
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastroenterological problem encountered in clinical practice, and it negatively impacts patients’ quality of life. Growing evidence indicates that the occurrence of CC is closely linked to gut dysbiosis. Several main probiotics have been used to relieve constipation. The main aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the beneficial effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 (P9) administration on alleviating CC and impact on the host gut microbiota and its metabolites. This study was a 42-day longitudinal double-blind randomised controlled trial which enrolled a total of 181 patients with CC. Subjects were randomly assigned to the probiotic or placebo group. Subjects in P9 group received one sachet of P9 powder per day after meal. Results show that P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency. In fact, P9 administration effectively alleviated constipation, and the symptom relief effects were linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes. Authors conclude that administering P9 could effectively relieve chronic constipation in adults and improve some aspects of their quality of life.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study suggested that P9-associated constipation symptom relief was not attributed to macroscopic changes in the host gut bacteriome and phageome
- However, results supported that taking P9 could alleviate constipation, with the symptom relief effects linked to desired changes and interactions with different types of host microbes, including the gut commensal bacteria (L. plantarum, Ruminococcus_B gnavus, Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp.) and the bacteriophage family, Herelleviridae.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study investigated the effect of a specific probiotic strain in alleviating Chronic Constipation (CC).
Methods
- The study employed a 42-day randomised control trial (RTC) double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with 163 patients, (mean age =22.68 ±5.66 years for the probiotic group and 21.59 ±4.59 years for the placebo group), diagnosed with CC (Rome IV criteria)
- The male to female ratio was 15–63 and 17–68 in probiotic and placebo groups respectively
- Groups were standardised with no differences observed in baseline age, gender ratio, drug treatment, high-fibre diet and smoking between the two groups (P >0.18)
- Participants were randomly assigned to the probiotic Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 (n=78; 2 g per sachet, 1 ×1011 CFU/day) or the placebo (n =85; maltodextrin powder) groups.
Results
Primary outcomes: weekly mean complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs):
- At 28-days CSBM was 28% higher in the P9 group (P=0.039) compared with the placebo group
- At 42-days CSBM remained significantly higher in the P9 group (P=0.026) compared with the placebo group, and increased 2-fold compared with baseline (P <0.05)
- Authors noted that the CSBM benefits were maintained even after 14 days of not taking the supplement.
Secondary outcomes: The effects of P9 supplementation on constipation-related parameters, including the weekly mean frequency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) demonstrated:
- After 28-days of P9 supplementation, SBMs were 12% higher than the placebo group (P=0.039)
- No differences were observed in the weekly mean stool consistency and straining scores between groups (P>0.05).
Patients’ quality of life and psychological state, using a PAC-QOL questionnaire related to: worries and concerns (WO), physical discomfort, psychosocial discomfort, and satisfaction and found:
- At day 14 WO in the P9 group was 1.22-fold lower than those in the placebo group (P <0.05)
- No differences in the other 3 items between P9 and placebo groups (P >0.05) were observed
- Supplementation resulted in a significant change in relative abundance of the P9 genome (≥0.01%)
- However, no differences were observed in alpha diversity after P9 consumption compared with placebo.
Conclusion
- The results indicated that P9 administration alleviated patients’ constipation symptoms and improved their quality of life but did not impact on gut bacteria or phageome
- Lactiplantibacillis plantarum P9 supplementation impacted several beneficial bacteria species (e.g. (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), and reduced levels of other bacteria and phage taxa (e.g. Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae) which may be implicated in constipation relief mechanisms.
Clinical practice applications:
- In this study, the use of P9 administration significantly improved patients’ defecation frequency which could have beneficial implications for patients suffering from chronic constipation
- Probiotic effects are known to be strain- and host-specific, and based on this study P9 administration for relief of constipation needs to be taken for at least two weeks to improve aspects of patients’ quality of life and 4 weeks for improvements in constipation.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials should include factors that impact gut motility and constipation symptoms, such as: a detailed daily diet (dietary composition, fibre content, and water intake) and physical activity scale (intensity and duration), and longer term use of P9 or comparison across strains
- The relatively small study size and short duration of this study, as well as the younger age groups included may be pertinent when considering future research.
Abstract
Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastrointestinal condition associated with intestinal inflammation, and the condition considerably impairs patients' quality of life. We conducted a large-scale 42-day randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of probiotics in alleviating CC. 163 patients diagnosed with CC (following Rome IV criteria) were randomly divided into probiotic (n = 78; received Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 [P9]; 1 ×1011 CFU/day) and placebo (n = 85; received placebo material) groups. Ingesting P9 significantly improved the weekly mean frequency of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) and spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), while significantly reducing the level of worries and concerns (WO; P < 0.05). Comparing with the placebo group, P9 group was significantly enriched in potentially beneficial bacteria (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Ruminococcus_B gnavus), while depriving of several bacterial and phage taxa (Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp., and Herelleviridae; P < 0.05). Interesting significant correlations were also observed between some clinical parameters and subjects' gut microbiome, including: negative correlation between Oscillospiraceae sp. and SBMs; positive correlation between WO and Oscillospiraceae sp., Lachnospiraceae sp. Additionally, P9 group had significantly (P < 0.05) more predicted gut microbial bioactive potential involved in the metabolism of amino acids (L-asparagine, L-pipecolinic acid), short-/medium-chain fatty acids (valeric acid and caprylic acid). Furthermore, several metabolites (p-cresol, methylamine, trimethylamine) related to the intestinal barrier and transit decreased significantly after P9 administration (P < 0.05). In short, the constipation relief effect of P9 intervention was accompanied by desirable changes in the fecal metagenome and metabolome. Our findings support the notion of applying probiotics in managing CC.
-
3.
Predictors of Symptom-Specific Treatment Response to Dietary Interventions in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Colomier, E, Van Oudenhove, L, Tack, J, Böhn, L, Bennet, S, Nybacka, S, Störsrud, S, Öhman, L, Törnblom, H, Simrén, M
Nutrients. 2022;14(2)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction, formerly known as a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder. Apart from abdominal pain, altered stool frequency, diarrhoea, and constipation, a large proportion of patients with IBS also experience other GI symptoms such as abdominal distention, bloating and flatulence. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of treatment response to the low FODMAP (short-chain carbohydrates, i.e., fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols) and the traditional IBS diet while focusing on the four core IBS symptoms (bloating, constipation, diarrhoea, and pain). This study was a post-hoc analysis of a previously published randomised controlled trial. In total, 33 patients on low FODMAP diet and 34 patients on the traditional IBS diet were included in the analysis. Results showed that patterns of psychological, dietary, and microbial factors can predict IBS symptom response to two dietary advice systems—the traditional IBS and the low FODMAP diet. A clinical profile with less severe IBS features appears to predict a better symptom-specific response to both dietary interventions. Authors conclude that larger prospective randomised controlled trials which include different treatment approaches are required as they may help to optimize personalized treatment algorithms in IBS.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Dietary intervention for IBS related symptoms was efficacious for up to 75% of patients in this study
- Recommendation for a traditional IBS dietary intervention should supersede the low-FODMAP diet, with the latter only implemented when symptoms persist.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study of 67 individuals fulfilling the Rome III criteria for IBS drew comparisons between the efficacy of the traditional IBS diet - as directed by the British Dietetic Association and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) - and the low fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) diet on specific IBS-related symptoms (pain, constipation, diarrhoea, and bloating).
Methods
A 10-day screening period included faecal sample analysis, 4-day food diary (pre-randomisation and last week of intervention), and daily stool diary (Bristol Stool Form scale). After 10 days, patients compiled several GI and non-GI related questionnaires, inclusive of IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS). Patients who scored ≥175 for the IBS-SSS were randomly allocated to follow either a low-FODMAP or traditional IBS diet for a period of 4-weeks. Thorough explanations were provided by trained Dietitians. During intervention, patients compiled symptom questionnaires (Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale-IBS) on a weekly basis.
Results
- Both diets reduced symptoms of pain, diarrhoea and bloating (all p<0.0001), but not constipation (p=0.15)
- There was no difference between following the traditional IBS diet and low-FODMAP diet in terms of pain (p=0.80), constipation (p=0.63), diarrhoea (p=0.96) and bloating (p=0.35)
- Less severe gut dysbiosis was weakly associated with better dietary response and improvement of constipation (p=0.05)
- Higher energy intake at baseline predicted better pain improvement with both dietary types compared to lower energy intake (p=0.03)
- More severe psychological distress predicted worse intervention response for bloating (p=0.03)
- Higher baseline oligosaccharide intake predicted a worse response to the low FODMAP diet (p=0.01) but not the traditional IBS diet (p=0.16).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that based on 4 distinct IBS-related symptomatology, better treatment response to 2 different dietary strategies was noted in patients with less severe clinical characteristics. Higher energy intake at baseline and gut dysbiosis scores that were similar to healthy controls were associated with better improvements following dietary interventions. Thus patients who already follow a calorie restricted diet and who have more significant gut dysbiosis profiles might need more bespoke intervention. Severe psychological distress patients responded worse to both diets.
Clinical practice applications:
- Even a short 4-week specific dietary intervention (low FODMAP or traditional IBS diet) can result in IBS-related symptomatic improvement for pain, bloating, and diarrhoea, but not constipation
- The preferred starting point for dietary intervention should be the traditional IBS diet given its relative ease to follow
- The more restrictive low FODMAP protocol could be considered if symptoms persist
- More bespoke interventions are required for patients who suffer with severe psychological stress, have tested and found gut dysbiosis, and individuals who already follow a restrictive diet.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include not only larger but more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the efficacy of IBS symptom-related dietary interventions
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm dietary intervention efficacy.
Abstract
(1) Background: Predictors of dietary treatment response in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remain understudied. We aimed to investigate predictors of symptom improvement during the low FODMAP and the traditional IBS diet for four weeks. (2) Methods: Baseline measures included faecal Dysbiosis Index, food diaries with daily energy and FODMAP intake, non-gastrointestinal (GI) somatic symptoms, GI-specific anxiety, and psychological distress. Outcomes were bloating, constipation, diarrhea, and pain symptom scores treated as continuous variables in linear mixed models. (3) Results: We included 33 and 34 patients on the low FODMAP and traditional IBS diet, respectively. Less severe dysbiosis and higher energy intake predicted better pain response to both diets. Less severe dysbiosis also predicted better constipation response to both diets. More severe psychological distress predicted worse bloating response to both diets. For the different outcomes, several differential predictors were identified, indicating that baseline factors could predict better improvement in one treatment arm, but worse improvement in the other treatment arm. (4) Conclusions: Psychological, nutritional, and microbial factors predict symptom improvement when following the low FODMAP and traditional IBS diet. Findings may help individualize dietary treatment in IBS.
-
4.
Consumption of 85% cocoa dark chocolate improves mood in association with gut microbial changes in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Shin, JH, Kim, CS, Cha, L, Kim, S, Lee, S, Chae, S, Chun, WY, Shin, DM
The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2022;99:108854
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances in a person’s mood interrupts their personal well-being and the ability to participate in social interactions, leading to physical health problems such as chronic diseases. The role of diet as a mood regulator has received a great deal of interest. Certain dietary components have been shown to reduce anxiety and depression and improve quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. This study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants who met the criteria for eligibility were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) control group (CON, n=14); 2) 85% cocoa chocolate group (DC85, n=18); and 3) 70% cocoa chocolate group (DC70, n=16). Results show that daily intake of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in the DC85, but not in the DC70. Furthermore, gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than the CON. Authors conclude that dark chocolate has prebiotic effects by restructuring the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome, which may in turn improve mood via the gut-brain axis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- To highlight the potential benefits of high cocoa content dark chocolate in relation to mental states
- To promote more awareness of how dietary habits may impact emotional wellbeing
- To emphasise the importance of microbiota and the gut-brain axis regarding dietary habits.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
The authors highlight that dark chocolate has been continually identified for its effects on mood. However, there is a dearth of evidence concerning the emotional impact of daily consumption of dark chocolate. Hence, the impact of dark chocolate consumption on daily mood, focusing on the gut-brain axis, is being investigated in this study.
Objectives
- To evaluate the correlation between the effect on emotional state after consuming dark chocolate and the gut microbiota in healthy adults
- To identify alterations in the composition and diversity of the microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract on account of dark chocolate intake.
Study Design
A randomised controlled trial was performed at Seoul National University from July to December 2017, This involved. consumption of two types of dark chocolate (70% and 85% cocoa content). Subjects in the treatment groups were blinded although investigators and the control cohort were unblinded.
Participants
117 individuals were screened. However, 48 healthy males and females aged 20-30 years were eligible at baseline.
Interventions
- Subjects (n=16): Consumed 30g/day of 70% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=18): Consumed 30g/day of 85% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=14): The control group consumed no chocolate for 3 weeks.
Main Health Outcomes Measured
- Mood states were quantified via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in tandem with Microbiota analysis pre- and post-experiment
- Body composition analysis and dietary assessment were also conducted pre- and post-intervention
- Faecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of bacterial genomic DNA was conducted for the cohort who consumed 85% cocoa chocolate and the control arm to evaluate the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota
- Statistical tests were performed based on intention-to-treat analysis. The Chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, one-way ANOVA, unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed for inter-group analysis. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to assess the association between gut microbiota composition and mood scores and P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
- Daily intake of dark chocolate substantially diminished negative emotional states in the cohort consuming 85% cocoa content, but not in the 70% cocoa treatment arm
- Gut microbial diversity was substantially greater in the 85% cacao cohort than the control group (P<.05)
- Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were decreased in the 85% cacao cohort than the control arm (P<.05).
- Furthermore, it was observed that changes in negative affect scores were inversely correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05).
Conclusions
The observations suggest that consumption of dark chocolate with a higher cocoa content may induce prebiotic effects due to its capacity to restructure the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota. Furthermore, consuming dark chocolate with a higher cocoa might exert a positive effect on negative emotional states through the gut-brain axis.
Clinical practice applications:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of 30g/day high (85%) cocoa chocolate consumption and its potential positive impact on mood through the gut-brain axis
- To educate clients regarding the potential benefits of daily high cocoa content chocolate consumption and its possible favourable effect on emotional states associated with gut microbiota.
Considerations for future research:
- More extensive research could investigate interventions of a longer period
- Further studies could evaluate if any difference exists between cocoa and cacao consumption and emotional states via the gut-brain axis, and the strength of any associations
- Interventions could investigate which strains of bacteria that high cocoa content dark chocolate may affect.
Abstract
Dark chocolate has long been recognized for its mood-altering properties; however, the evidence regarding the emotional effects of daily dark chocolate intake is limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. Two different dark chocolates (85% and 70% cocoa content) were tested in this study. In a randomized controlled trial, healthy adults (20-30 y) consumed either 30 g/d of 85% cocoa chocolate (DC85, n=18); 70% cocoa chocolate (DC70, n=16); or no chocolate (control group, CON; n=14); for 3 weeks. Mood states were measured using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Daily consumption of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in DC85, but not in DC70. To assess the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota, we performed fecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis for the DC85 and CON groups. Gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than CON (P<.05). Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were reduced in DC85 compared to CON (P<.05). Furthermore, we found that the observed changes in negative affect scores were negatively correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05). These findings indicate that dark chocolate exerts prebiotic effects, as evidenced by its ability to restructure the diversity and abundance of intestinal bacteria; thus, it may improve negative emotional states via the gut-brain axis.
-
5.
Feed your microbes to deal with stress: a psychobiotic diet impacts microbial stability and perceived stress in a healthy adult population.
Berding, K, Bastiaanssen, TFS, Moloney, GM, Boscaini, S, Strain, CR, Anesi, A, Long-Smith, C, Mattivi, F, Stanton, C, Clarke, G, et al
Molecular psychiatry. 2022
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Psychobiotic describe any exogenous intervention that leads to a bacterially mediated impact on the brain. Probiotics and prebiotics have shown promising results as psychobiotic agents in both animal and human studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of a whole diet psychobiotic approach to modulate the microbiota composition and function, affect responses to and feelings of stress and improve mood in a healthy population. This study is a single-blind, randomized, controlled study which recruited healthy adult (male and female) participants with poor dietary habits, aged 18–59 years. Participants were block randomized (block of 4, stratified by gender) into either intervention or control group using randomly permuted blocks and were instructed to follow their respective diet for 4 weeks. Results show that a short term psychobiotic dietary intervention improved perceived stress in a healthy population, while eliciting specific metabolic changes in the gut microbiota. Authors conclude that underlying microbial influences need to be investigated and future preclinical experiments are required to explore causality and decipher mechanistic pathways.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Eating foods known to have a positive influence on gut microbial composition could elicit benefits in terms of reducing perceived stress and improving sleep quality.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This RCT explored the impact of a psychobiotic diet, compared to a control diet, on perceived stress, sleep and gut microbiota.
A high psychobiotic diet is one high in prebiotic and fermented foods. In this study, a psychobiotic diet included daily recommended consumption and servings of the following:
- High prebiotic fruit & veg (6-8)
- Grains (5-8)
- Fermented foods (2-3)
- Legumes (3-4 per week)
Methodology:
- A single-blind, randomised, controlled study
- 45 healthy adults (18-59 years) with poor dietary habits
- Sample size determined by previous microbiome research - target not reached due to introduction of covid restrictrictions
- Active intervention (n=24) received dietitian advice to follow psychobitoic diet
- Control intervention (n=21) received dietitian advice largely based on the Irish Healthy Eating Guidelines food pyramid
- Intervention duration 4 weeks.
- Assessed on questionnaire measures of perceived stress and sleep, pre and post-intervention (no primary outcome defined)
- Shotgun microbiome analysis on stool samples, pre and post-intervention
Results:
- Perceived stress improved in the psychobiotic diet group
- Subjective sleep quality improved in the psychobiotic diet group
- Only subtle changes in microbial composition and function
- More stable microbiota throughout the study (regardless of diet) was correlated with greater changes in perceived stress
- Neither cortisol awakening response nor measured immune markers were affected by dietary intervention
Conclusions:
- Using a diet targeted to positively modulate gut-brain communication may have the potential for reducing stress and improving sleep
- Although improvements in stress were only observed for the intervention group – the post-intervention stress levels were not significantly different between the groups.
- Thus, we should interpret the results with some caution
Clinical practice applications:
- Providing advice on dietary intake of foods known to positively impact gut microbiota may be helpful for individuals affected by stress or sleep problems
- The inclusion of the following foods may be helpful:
- High prebiotic fruit & veg (6-8 per day)
- Grains (5-8 per day)
- Fermented foods (2-3 per day)
- Legumes (3-4 per week)
Considerations for future research:
- Important to replicate these results in a larger sample
- It might be helpful to investigate individual aspects of the diet separately, to assess their individual impact
- Objective measures of sleep (such as actigraphy recordings) might provide additionally useful findings
- It would be interesting to explore the effect of the psychobiotic diet in other conditions
- Chronobiology or chrononutrition - i.e. looking at timing of the foods proposed in the section above
Abstract
The impact of diet on the microbiota composition and the role of diet in supporting optimal mental health have received much attention in the last decade. However, whether whole dietary approaches can exert psychobiotic effects is largely understudied. Thus, we investigated the influence of a psychobiotic diet (high in prebiotic and fermented foods) on the microbial profile and function as well as on mental health outcomes in a healthy human population. Forty-five adults were randomized into either a psychobiotic (n = 24) or control (n = 21) diet for 4 weeks. Fecal microbiota composition and function was characterized using shotgun sequencing. Stress, overall health and diet were assessed using validated questionnaires. Metabolic profiling of plasma, urine and fecal samples was performed. Intervention with a psychobiotic diet resulted in reductions of perceived stress (32% in diet vs. 17% in control group), but not between groups. Similarly, biological marker of stress were not affected. Additionally, higher adherence to the diet resulted in stronger decreases in perceived stress. While the dietary intervention elicited only subtle changes in microbial composition and function, significant changes in the level of 40 specific fecal lipids and urinary tryptophan metabolites were observed. Lastly, microbial volatility was linked to greater changes in perceived stress scores in those on the psychobiotic diet. These results highlight that dietary approaches can be used to reduce perceived stress in a human cohort. Using microbiota-targeted diets to positively modulate gut-brain communication holds possibilities for the reduction of stress and stress-associated disorders, but additional research is warranted to investigate underlying mechanisms, including the role of the microbiota.
-
6.
Gut microbiome-related effects of berberine and probiotics on type 2 diabetes (the PREMOTE study).
Zhang, Y, Gu, Y, Ren, H, Wang, S, Zhong, H, Zhao, X, Ma, J, Gu, X, Xue, Y, Huang, S, et al
Nature communications. 2020;11(1):5015
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Berberine, which is a naturally occurring alkaloid found in plants, has been traditionally used as a remedy to protect against Type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. It is important to study how berberine affects the human gut microbiome, specifically in regard to its impact on short-chain fatty acid and bile acid metabolism, due to its low oral bioavailability. The PREMOTE study investigated the glycaemic lowering effects of individual and combination of berberine and probiotics in newly diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes patients. This randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial included four hundred and nine Type 2 diabetic patients and randomly assigned them (1:1:1:1 ratio) to receive berberine alone, berberine combined with probiotics, probiotics alone or a placebo for twelve weeks. A combination of berberine plus probiotics and berberine alone significantly improved glycated haemoglobin levels compared to the placebo and probiotics alone treatment. The antidiabetic effects of berberine could be due to the Ruminococcus bromii abundance followed by the berberine treatment and its ability to inhibit deoxycholic acid biotransformation. Further robust studies are required to consider the therapeutic application of berberine and probiotics in a general population due to the limitations of the present study. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this trial to understand the mechanism behind the anti-diabetic effects of berberine and probiotics.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The use of berberine, as a specific antimicrobial agent, along with high strength probiotics may be beneficial for managing blood glucose and potentially other metabolic health markers alongside diet and lifestyle modifications
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Dysbiosis of the human gut microbiome has been associated with the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Research has found that, in part, mechanisms of action for the antidiabetic medications, Metformin and Acarbose, include alterations in the gut microbiome as well as the inhibition of bile acid (BA) metabolism and signalling. Remedies targeting the gut microbiota for treatment of T2D and other metabolic diseases have therefore been investigated.
Berberine (BBR) has been used in Indian Ayurvedic and Traditional Chinese Medicine to treat metabolic conditions for hundreds of years. Probiotics have also been extensively researched for their potential metabolic benefits. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to investigate whether BBR and probiotics may be effective in managing T2D.
Methods
A total of 409 participants aged 42-61 years were recruited from 20 medical centres in China. All patients were newly diagnosed (<12 months) with T2D and had no previous antidiabetic medication history. Participants were randomised into 4 groups; Probiotics and BBR, BBR only, probiotics only or a placebo for 12 weeks. Subgroup analysis was also completed for those aged >50 and >54.
Dosage of BBR was 0.6 g prior to a meal, twice daily. 4 g of powdered multi-strain probiotics including 9 strains of lactic acid bacteria were taken at bedtime. All participants were given a 7-day broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment immediately prior to baseline. 391 people completed the trial. The primary outcome measurement was glycaemic haemoglobin (HbA1c). Secondary evaluations of additional metabolic markers included fasting and post-load plasma glucose (FPG, PPG), homeostasis assessment model index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and serum triglycerides (TG).
Results
Results showed a reduction in glycaemic haemoglobin (HbA1c) for both the BBR plus probiotics group (least squares mean [95% CI] -1.04 [-1-19, -0.89]% ) and the BBR only group (-.99 [-1.16, 0.83]%). The results for these groups were significantly greater than the probiotics alone (-0.53 {-068, -0.37]%) and the placebo groups (0.59 [-0.75, -0.44]%).
Secondary metabolic evaluations for FPG and PPG, TC, LDL -c and TGs also showed similar improvements in the BBR and BBR plus probiotic groups only. Additionally, in the >50 and >54 subgroups BBR and probiotics marginally improved the HOMA-IR.
Metagenomic and metabolomic analysis of the gut microbiome was also undertaken after a one-week pre-treatment with antibiotics immediately prior to the trial and at week 13. These results showed that the blood glucose lowering effects of BBR may be due to decreased deoxycholic acid species (DCA) biotransformation by ruminococcus bromii.
Higher levels of adverse gastrointestinal side effects were reported in the BBR treatment groups, however, the authors reported that this did not affect glycemic control outcomes.
Conclusion
This study found that BBR had an antidiabetic effect through microbial alterations in the human gut microbiome
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
- 600mg of BBR twice daily prior to a meal plus a multi-strain (lactic acid) probiotic of >50 billion colony forming units (CFU) for 12 weeks may be effective in lowering HbA1c in T2D clients diagnosed within the previous 12 months
- Further research is needed for clients with longer term T2D diagnosis
- Insulin resistance may be marginally improved in clients >50
- Practitioners should be aware that in this study, adverse gastrointestinal side effects were more likely to be be experienced with the use of BBR
Considerations for future research:
The authors reported several limitations to this study:
- A population of Chinese people living in China may not be generalisable to other ethnic/racial populations
- The study was over a short duration. Longer studies are needed to confirm the results
- Participants had newly diagnosed T2D and had not received any previous medications. Future studies should include patients with a longer diagnosis time
- Records should be kept of any additional lifestyle changes made by the participants
- Adverse reactions were experienced in the BBR groups, in this study. It was reported that the gut microbiome and anti-diabetic effects were not affected, however, this may be something to be considered in longer trials.
Abstract
Human gut microbiome is a promising target for managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). Measures altering gut microbiota like oral intake of probiotics or berberine (BBR), a bacteriostatic agent, merit metabolic homoeostasis. We hence conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with newly diagnosed T2D patients from 20 centres in China. Four-hundred-nine eligible participants were enroled, randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) and completed a 12-week treatment of either BBR-alone, probiotics+BBR, probiotics-alone, or placebo, after a one-week run-in of gentamycin pretreatment. The changes in glycated haemoglobin, as the primary outcome, in the probiotics+BBR (least-squares mean [95% CI], -1.04[-1.19, -0.89]%) and BBR-alone group (-0.99[-1.16, -0.83]%) were significantly greater than that in the placebo and probiotics-alone groups (-0.59[-0.75, -0.44]%, -0.53[-0.68, -0.37]%, P < 0.001). BBR treatment induced more gastrointestinal side effects. Further metagenomics and metabolomic studies found that the hypoglycaemic effect of BBR is mediated by the inhibition of DCA biotransformation by Ruminococcus bromii. Therefore, our study reports a human microbial related mechanism underlying the antidiabetic effect of BBR on T2D. (Clinicaltrial.gov Identifier: NCT02861261).
-
7.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
8.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.