1.
Effect of Chamomile on the Complications of Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Maleki, M, Mardani, A, Manouchehri, M, Ashghali Farahani, M, Vaismoradi, M, Glarcher, M
Integrative cancer therapies. 2023;22:15347354231164600
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer and its treatments are associated with a wide range of complications such as mucositis, nausea/vomiting and dermatitis as well as implication for mental health, such as anxiety and depression, which can reduce quality of life (QOL) of patients. Chamomile is a commonly used medicinal herbal that is used in various forms orally and topically. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of chamomile, in its various forms of administration, for complications of cancer (any type) and its treatments. 18 controlled intervention studies including 1099 patients were included in the review. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies a meta-analysis was not possible. Benefits were reported for locally applied forms of chamomile for prevention of mucositis (7 of 8 studies), topical application for prevention of dermatitis or phlebitis (4/5), aromatherapy massage for anxiety (2) and QOL (2), tea for depression but not anxiety (1). No effect was seen of syrup for QOL (1). No side effects were reported in the included studies. The authors conclude that chamomile is a safe method to help mitigate the suffering from cancer complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Oral use of chamomile infusion may be helpful for people receiving treatment for cancer.
- Studies of this intervention report no safety concerns.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review examined the use of chamomile in the support of people receiving treatment for cancer. Studies of a variety of chamomile preparations were considered.
Methods
- The authors retrieved 2240 studies from 5 on-line databases, from which 18 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
- Fifteen of these studies were randomised control trials (RCT), three were non-randomised studies. German (Matricaria recutita) and Roman (Chamaemelum nobile) chamomile varieties were included. Studies using blends with other herbs were excluded.
- A narrative review was produced due to heterogeneous patient groups, preparations and trial protocols.
Results
- 1099 patients were included in the analysis, 57% female.
- Risk of bias assessment of 15 RCTs identified 2 RCTs with high risk of bias in blinding or in reporting outcome data.
- Studies in several cancer types were included, four in head and neck cancer (HNC), four in leukaemia, three in breast cancer, one in digestive system cancers, remaining in mixed cancer types.
- Eight studies reported the impact on oral mucositis of chamomile infusions used as mouthwash, or ice chips, or applied as an oral gel. Patients were receiving chemotherapy orstem cell transplantation, with interventions for up to 21 days after chemotherapy. Seven studies reported reduced severity and/or duration of mucositis and associated pain. One study of 14 days’ use after 5-fluorouracil treatment for colorectal cancer showed no impact on oral mucositis.
- One of three studies of psychological impact of cancer treatment used chamomile tea and reported no impact on anxiety but decreased depression. In comparison, two studies of weekly aromatherapy massage using chamomile oil reported reduced anxiety.
- One RCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia reported increased neutrophil count with 125mg chamomile in syrup versus placebo (p=0.019, 955 CI 15.076-171.324)
- One RCT in breast cancer randomised 45 women receiving usual antiemetics to additional chamomile capsules (500mg) or ginger (500mg) capsules, twice daily for 5 days before and after chemotherapy, or control group of no additional botanicals. Both botanical interventions reduced frequency of vomiting compared with the control group. Frequency of nausea was also reduced by ginger but not by chamomile.
- Five studies evaluated external treatments of chamomile on skin complications of radiotherapy. Reduction in radiation dermatitis in HNC patients with compresses soaked in chamomile infusion was reported.
- No side effects of using chamomile preparations were reported by the studies included in the systematic review.
Conclusion
Chamomile has been studied in a variety of preparations for people receiving treatment for cancer. Several RCTs reported significant amelioration of common side effects of cancer treatments, with reduced severity and/or duration of oral mucositis and associated pain.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chamomile infusion used in the mouth, as mouthwash or ice chips, may be useful for oral mucositis, a common side effect of cancer treatment
- Chamomile infusion may also be considered for mental wellbeing
- Several protocols for using chamomile preparations are described in the review and practitioners may refer to the individual studies cited
- This use of chamomile in the described applications appears to be safe
- (Reviewer’s note: allergy to ragwort would be a contraindication for use of chamomile preparations)
Considerations for future research:
- More detailed comparisons of chamomile preparations would be useful, for use in oral mucositis
- Topical applications may be studied further by researchers in aromatherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, many people across the world still suffer from this chronic disease and its complications. Chamomile as an herbal medicine has gained an increasing attention for relieving cancer complications. This study aimed to integrate and synthesize current international evidence regarding the effect of chamomile on cancer complications. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken. Five online databases including Web of Science, PubMed [including MEDLINE], Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were searched and articles published from inception to January 2023 were retrieved. All clinical trials and similar interventional studies on human subjects examining the effects of chamomile on cancer complications were included in the review and research synthesis. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies after quality appraisals using proper methodological tools. The review results were presented narratively given that meta-analysis was impossible. RESULTS A total of 2240 studies were retrieved during the search process, but 18 articles were selected. The total sample size was 1099 patients with cancer of which 622 participants were female. Fifteen studies used an RCT design. Various forms of chamomile were used such as mouthwash, topical material, tea, capsule, syrup and aromatherapy massage. Chamomile effectively reduced oral mucositis, skin complications, depression, and vomiting and also improved appetite and quality of life among cancer patients. CONCLUSION The use of chamomile as a non-pharmacologic and safe method can be helpful for mitigating cancer complications in patients with cancer. Therefore, it can be incorporated into routine care along with other therapeutic measures to reduce patients' suffering related to cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42022307887.
2.
Micronutrients for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youths: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.
Johnstone, JM, Hatsu, I, Tost, G, Srikanth, P, Eiterman, LP, Bruton, AM, Ast, HK, Robinette, LM, Stern, MM, Millington, EG, et al
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2022;61(5):647-661
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition that affects about 5-7% of children. Characteristics of ADHD are age-inappropriate hyperactivity, impulsivity, and difficulties in focusing attention which arise from an impaired ability to regulate executive and emotional functions. The condition often persists into adulthood, where it presents an increased risk for poor educational achievements, substance abuse, incarceration, and mental health problems. In many cases, drug treatment can improve ADHD symptoms, yet concern remains about the side effects of these treatments. Some research has investigated the impact of nutrient supplementation on ADHD management, as many nutrients are essential for healthy brain function and are also involved in the production of neurotransmitters. In previous studies, supplementation with nutrients has shown some benefits but likewise also inconsistent results. This eight-week randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated the effects of a multi-nutrient supplement in 135 children with ADHD, aged 6-12 years. The study specifically focused on irritable mood symptoms. The multi-nutrient formula contained vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and antioxidants. Outcomes were measured by scores rated by clinicians (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement aka CGI-I) and scores rated by parents (Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 aka CASI-5). The multi-nutrient formula showed overall benefit in the blinded clinician rating but not by parental reports. According to the parents, overall improvement was reported, both in the placebo and intervention groups. The authors discussed how this absence of difference can be explained. Yet, on a subscale, the multi-nutrient group parents were more likely to report improvements. In addition, children with the additional micronutrients demonstrated greater height growth during the intervention. The supplement was well tolerated with good adherence and the monitored blood markers demonstrated safety of use.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
This fully-blinded RCT of micronutrients addresses several concerns related to existing ADHD treatment, including the possibility of counteracting height suppression and treating associated irritable mood, emotional dysregulation, and aggression.
Although further research is needed, multinutrient supplementation should be considered for children with ADHD.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common psychiatric condition that can result in low educational performance and achievement. Around 5-7% of children are believed to be affected. Alongside inattention and hyperactivity, emotional dysregulation is a common feature of ADHD. Psychiatric problems can continue into adulthood and an increased risk of incarceration and substance abuse have been reported.
Treatment with prescription medications may improve symptoms of ADHD, however, potential side effects include mild growth suppression, and mood and emotional dysregulation. Non-pharmacological treatments are therefore being investigated.
Previous research on single nutrients have shown mixed results for emotional dysregulation and mood issues in ADHD. The aim of this study was to test whether supplementation with a multi-nutrient could be beneficial to children aged 6-12 years with ADHD and irritability.
Methods
126 unmedicated children from North America with ADHD (mean age 9.8 years) completed this 8-week study. All participants had at least 1 symptom of anger, irritability, peer conflict or Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD).
Randomisation was into an intervention (n=71) or placebo (N=55) group with a 3:2 ratio to promote enrolment. Participants were required to take 6-12 capsules daily, depending on age and tolerance, of micronutrients or a placebo. Micronutrient dosages were above the recommended dietary allowance (RDA). Outcomes were measured using clinician and parent rated assessments and by a further adult who knew the child well.
The trial was blinded to all participants, parents and study staff.
Results
The clinician-rated results found 54% of the micronutrient group and 18% of the placebo group had improvements in irritability symptoms (Risk ratio =2.97, 97.5% CI: 1.5, 5.90, p<0.001). This was not replicated in the parent/adult rated results. Children in the micronutrient group grew on average 6mm more than the placebo group (p=0.002). No serious adverse treatment effects were reported. Adherence to protocol was met by >74% of participants (n=93).
Conclusions
In this study, clinicians reported that micronutrients showed greater benefits than placebo for treating irritability and supporting growth in children with ADHD.
The study and authors received funding from several research and association bodies. However, no funder was involved in the study design or reporting. No conflicts of interest were declared.
Clinical practice applications:
- Multinutrient supplementation including vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and antioxidants may support height growth in children who take pharmacologic treatment
- Multi nutrient supplementation may also help with irritable mood, emotional dysregulation, and aggression in ADHD children
- Micronutrients given at doses between the Recommended Dietary Allowance and Upper Tolerable Intake Level appear safe and may be developed into an alternative or complementary treatment for ADHD.
Considerations for future research:
- Further large scale research is needed into the potential benefits of micronutrients for children with ADHD and irritability
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether micronutrients (vitamins/minerals) benefit attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and irritability in a North American pediatric sample. METHOD A 3-site, 8-week, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of micronutrients was conducted in nonmedicated children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD and at least 1 impairing irritability symptom by parent report on the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 (CASI-5). A priori-defined primary outcomes were Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) (CGI-I of 1 or 2 = treatment responder) and parent-rated CASI-5 composite score of ADHD, oppositional defiant, disruptive mood dysregulation, and peer conflict symptoms, including impairment scores. RESULTS Of 135 randomized (mean age 9.8 years), 126 youths (93%) comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. Blinding was maintained. For the CGI-I, 54% of the micronutrient and 18% of the placebo group were responders (risk ratio = 2.97, 97.5% CI = 1.50, 5.90, p < .001). CASI-5 composite scores improved significantly for both groups (p < .01), with a mean change of -0.31 (95% CI = -0.39, -0.23) in the micronutrient group and a mean change of -0.28 (95% CI = -0.38, -0.19) in the placebo group. However, the between-group difference was not significant (mean change = -0.02; 97.5% CI = -0.16, 0.12, effect size = 0.07, p = .70). The micronutrient group grew 6 mm more than the placebo group (p = .002). No serious adverse events or clinically significant changes from baseline in blood and urine tests occurred. CONCLUSION Micronutrients showed global benefit over placebo by blinded clinician rating, but not by parent-report CASI-5 composite rating in a population with ADHD and irritability. Micronutrients showed greater height growth. Micronutrients were well tolerated, and the majority of participants adhered to the number of capsules prescribed. This randomized controlled trial replicates safety and efficacy reported for ADHD in 2 smaller trials of a similar formula containing all vitamins and known essential minerals in amounts between the Recommended Dietary Allowance and Upper Tolerable Intake Level. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION Micronutrients for ADHD in Youth (MADDY) Study; https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03252522.