1.
The Association between ADHD and Celiac Disease in Children.
Gaur, S
Children (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;9(6)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Untreated coeliac disease (CeD) can be accompanied by an array of neurological symptoms. Some of these symptoms are similar to those observed in attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD), like an inability to focus, lack of mental alertness, physical under-activity and clinically measurable under-activity in particular brain regions. The mechanism of such symptoms is not fully understood but is thought to be linked to low-grade inflammation in the brain as a result of permeability in the gut and blood-brain barrier, which could contribute to the presentation of ADHD-like symptoms. CeD can persist for many years in seemingly healthy people (silent CeD) without gut symptoms. In this period, ADHD-like symptoms are particularly common and may be treatment resistant if not accompanied by a gluten-free diet Since 2015, there have been several studies showing an association between CeD and ADHD. This is an updated systematic review including 23 studies of children and young adults, which found an association between ADHD and CeD, in contrast to previous reviews that found no clear association. This review paid particular attention to the diagnostic criteria of ADHD and its subtypes, highlighting the need to examine the subtypes of ADHD in future studies. Specifically, the inattentive subtype may be a behavioural ADHD phenotype that could respond to a gluten-free diet. The authors advocate screening ADHD patients for CeD and encourage the consideration of non-neurological symptoms in the assessment of ADHD to identify potential CeD cases.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- There is an association between celiac disease (CeD) and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD).
- Some children with ADHD may respond well to gluten-free diet.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This systematic review explored the association between coeliac disease (CeD) and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD).
Methods
The review was conducted following the PRISMA reporting guidelines.
Inclusion criteria for the search:
- Search terms of ADHD and CeD
- Participants < 18 years.
52 papers were retrieved and screened
23 met inclusion/exclusion criteria
Results
- 13 studies (out of the 23) demonstrated an association between ADHD and CeD
- Most studies reporting a positive association were published post 2015
- The largest study reported (112,240 patients with CeD) demonstrates that ADHD showed an association of OR = 1.75 in in CeD.
- The study was limited by several factors including study design of the studies included in the review, which were mostly observational and some without control.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
- Evidence from across the literature suggests that children with untreated or newly diagnosed CeD may find that following a gluten-free diet can help improve some symptoms associated with ADHD
- The author suggests that there may be a behavioural phenotype of ADHD that responds to a gluten-free diet. If this is the case, it suggests that screening of ADHD patients for celiac disease may be important.
Considerations for future research:
- The number of studies were relatively small and varied in design. Further large-scale studies would help further inform the understanding of the association and potential therapeutic benefits of gluten-free diet.
- It would be interesting to further explore how different subtypes of ADHD, especially the inattentive subtype, may be associated with CeD.
- In particular, it might be useful to consider how the clinical construct of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is associated, since SCT symptoms overlap with the neurological manifestations of CeD.
Abstract
UNLABELLED Controversy around the association between celiac disease (CeD) and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) was addressed by a systematic review in 2015, ultimately showing no association. Since 2015, there have been several studies showing an association between celiac disease and attention deficit hyperactive disorder. This is an updated systematic review. BACKGROUND Most experts agree on the recommendation to not screen as part of the standard of care for ADHD in persons with CeD or vice versa. Simultaneously, they propose that untreated patients with CeD and neurological symptoms such as chronic fatigue, inattention, pain, and headache could be predisposed to ADHD-like behavior, namely inattention (which may be alleviated by following a gluten-free diet). The inattentive subtype of ADHD that encompasses the symptoms of inattention is phenotypically heterogeneous, as it includes the clinical construct of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT). SCT symptoms overlap with the neurological manifestations of CeD. METHODS A systematic search (PRISMA) of PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, Web of Science, Stanford Lane, SCOPUS, and Ovid was conducted for articles up to 21 February 2022. Of these, 23 studies met the criteria. RESULTS Out of the 23 studies, 13 showed a positive association between ADHD and CeD. Most studies that showed a positive association had been published in the last five years. Inconsistencies in the results remain due to the heterogeneous methodology used, specifically for ADHD and the outcome questionnaires, as well as a lack of reporting on ADHD subtypes. CONCLUSION There is an association between ADHD and celiac disease. The current methodological limitations will be lessened if we examine the subtypes of ADHD.
2.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.