1.
Effects of acute sleep loss on leptin, ghrelin, and adiponectin in adults with healthy weight and obesity: A laboratory study.
van Egmond, LT, Meth, EMS, Engström, J, Ilemosoglou, M, Keller, JA, Vogel, H, Benedict, C
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2023;31(3):635-641
-
-
-
-
Plain language summary
A lack of sleep may be a risk factor for weight gain. Leptin is an adipocyte-derived hormone that activates satiety networks within the brain. Ghrelin, as opposed to leptin, is mainly produced by the stomach and it acts as a hunger hormone, signalling fuel status to the central nervous system. Some studies have found either no alterations or higher leptin and lower ghrelin blood levels following experimental sleep deprivation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether blood concentrations of leptin, ghrelin, and adiponectin are affected by acute total sleep deprivation in a sex- and weight-specific manner. This study is a laboratory study based on blood samples from 44 participants, mainly university students. Results show that: - acute total sleep deprivation is linked to lower serum levels of the adipokine leptin and higher blood levels of ghrelin. - following sleep deprivation, serum adiponectin levels were elevated. - the drop in serum leptin was larger in women after total sleep deprivation; however, there wasn’t a significant association between biological sex and experimental condition. - the increase in blood levels of adiponectin was slightly more pronounced among women, whereas there weren’t any differences in the effects of sleep loss on plasma ghrelin. Authors conclude that acute total sleep deprivation shifts the endocrine balance from the satiety hormone leptin toward the hunger-promoting hormone ghrelin. However, further investigation in larger samples focusing on their findings linked to sex- and weight-specific differences in leptin, ghrelin, and adiponectin are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Sleep deprivation may shift the balance of appetite controlling hormones causing an increase in hunger and decreased satiety and therefore resulting in increased food intake. These changes may be more pronounced in biological females.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Sleep deprivation may contribute to weight gain and obesity through its effect on the hormonal pathways promoting hunger and satiety. Research has also linked chronic sleep loss with an increase in the brain reward response to food, thus driving an increase in daily food intake. Leptin and ghrelin are hormones involved in the control of food intake. Some research has associated alterations in these hormones following sleep loss, whilst others have not.
This study aimed to investigate whether biological sex and weight status affect fasting serum levels of leptin, ghrelin and adiponectin following chronic sleep deprivation in a supervised laboratory setting.
Methods
This randomised crossover design study included n=44 mixed sex participants with a mean age of 24.9 years. A total of 19 of the participants were classed as obese, with the remaining n= 25 participants were considered normal weight. Participants completed 2 nights in experimental sessions under continuously supervised conditions in a laboratory. One night was spent awake and the other asleep. Fasting blood samples were taken the morning after each session to measure levels of leptin, ghrelin and adiponectin.
Results
Serum levels of leptin after one night’s sleep loss were around 7% lower than those measured after sleep (17.3 = +/-2.6 vs 18.6 +/- 2.8 ng/mL, p = 0.037). Adjustments using sex-stratified analysis showed significantly lower levels of serum leptin in women (25.8 +/_4.3 vs 28.1 +/_ 4.7 ng/mL, p = 0.030) but not for men (10.1 +/_ 2.4 vs 10.6 +/_ 2.3 ng/mL, p = 0.458). However, when comparing individual participant differences between sleep and wake sessions, the results were not significant. Additionally, no significant differences were found between normal weight and obese participants.
Higher levels of ghrelin were found following sleep deprivation in both sexes and weight sub-groups (839.4 +/-77.5 vs 741.4+/-63.2 pg/mL, p= 0.003). Adiponectin was also found to be elevated in all participants regardless of biological sex or weight status (7.5 +/- 0.6 vs 6.8 +/- 0.6ug/mL, p= 0.003). However, ghrelin was observed to increase slightly more in participants with obesity, whereas elevations in adiponectin were slightly greater in those of normal weight.
Conclusion
In this study, sleep loss was associated with lowered levels of leptin and higher levels of ghrelin. Analysis between biological sexes indicated that there may be a greater decrease in leptin in females. Serum levels of adiponectin were also found to be elevated after sleep deprivation for both sexes with a slightly larger increase in women. These changes may result in increased hunger and food intake and decreased satiety. No significant differences were found between normal weight and obese participants.
Notes: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Sleep deprivation may lead to lower levels of leptin in both sexes with a greater decrease for females. Ghrelin and adiponectin levels may be increased in both men and women after sleep loss with a slightly larger increase in adiponectin for women. This could lead to an increase in appetite, food consumption and therefore weight gain, particularly in women.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger studies are needed to investigate sex and weight status related differences in serum levels of ghrelin, leptin and adiponectin.
- It may be beneficial for blood samples to be taken at different points during the day to allow for fluctuations in hormone levels.
- Food intake should be measured to monitor any increases in food intake.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated whether blood concentrations of leptin, ghrelin, and adiponectin are affected by acute total sleep deprivation in a sex- and weight-specific manner. METHODS A total of 44 participants (mean age 24.9 years; 20 women; 19 with obesity) participated in a crossover design, including one night of sleep deprivation and one night of sleep in the laboratory. After each night, fasting blood was collected. RESULTS After sleep deprivation, fasting levels of leptin were lower (mean [SE], vs. sleep: 17.3 [2.6] vs. 18.6 [2.8] ng/mL), whereas those of ghrelin and adiponectin were higher (839.4 [77.5] vs. 741.4 [63.2] pg/mL and 7.5 [0.6] vs. 6.8 [0.6] μg/mL, respectively; all p < 0.05). The changes in leptin and adiponectin following sleep loss were more pronounced among women. Furthermore, the ghrelin increase was stronger among those with obesity after sleep loss. Finally, the sleep loss-induced increase in adiponectin was more marked among normal-weight participants. CONCLUSIONS Acute sleep deprivation reduces blood concentrations of the satiety hormone leptin. With increased blood concentrations of ghrelin and adiponectin, such endocrine changes may facilitate weight gain if persisting over extended periods of sleep loss. The observed sex- and weight-specific differences in leptin, ghrelin, and adiponectin call for further investigation.
2.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.