1.
Precision Medicine Approach to Alzheimer's Disease: Successful Pilot Project.
Toups, K, Hathaway, A, Gordon, D, Chung, H, Raji, C, Boyd, A, Hill, BD, Hausman-Cohen, S, Attarha, M, Chwa, WJ, et al
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2022;88(4):1411-1421
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease are without effective therapeutics. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a precision medicine approach to historical controls in patients with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia. This study is a proof-of-concept study which recruited twenty-five patients with Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment, aged between 50–76 years. Patients were treated for nine months with a personalised, precision medicine protocol that addressed each patient’s identified potentially contributory factors. Results show that a precision medicine approach to the cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment may be an effective strategy, especially with continued optimization over time. Authors conclude that their findings indicate that it is possible to reverse cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia with a personalised, precision medicine (/systems medicine) protocol. This is a small study that requires larger scale initiatives, including examining the practicalities of integrating this approach into healthcare systems.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease are needed. However, previous clinical trials have pre-determined a single treatment modality, such as a drug candidate or therapeutic procedure, which may be unrelated to the primary drivers of the neurodegenerative process. Therefore, increasing data set size to include the potential contributors to cognitive decline for each patient, and addressing the identified potential contributors, may represent a more effective strategy. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a precision medicine approach to Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment is effective enough in a proof-of-concept trial to warrant a larger, randomized, controlled clinical trial. METHODS Twenty-five patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 19 or higher, were evaluated for markers of inflammation, chronic infection, dysbiosis, insulin resistance, protein glycation, vascular disease, nocturnal hypoxemia, hormone insufficiency or dysregulation, nutrient deficiency, toxin or toxicant exposure, and other biochemical parameters associated with cognitive decline. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with volumetrics was performed at baseline and study conclusion. Patients were treated for nine months with a personalized, precision medicine protocol, and cognition was assessed at t = 0, 3, 6, and 9 months. RESULTS All outcome measures revealed improvement: statistically significant improvement in MoCA scores, CNS Vital Signs Neurocognitive Index, and Alzheimer's Questionnaire Change score were documented. No serious adverse events were recorded. MRI volumetrics also improved. CONCLUSION Based on the cognitive improvements observed in this study, a larger, randomized, controlled trial of the precision medicine therapeutic approach described herein is warranted.
2.
The Differences between Gluten Sensitivity, Intestinal Biomarkers and Immune Biomarkers in Patients with First-Episode and Chronic Schizophrenia.
Dzikowski, M, Juchnowicz, D, Dzikowska, I, Rog, J, Próchnicki, M, Kozioł, M, Karakula-Juchnowicz, H
Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous neuroimmune disorder with unknown mechanisms and aetiology. The goal of this clinical study was to compare and evaluate IgG and IgA sensitivity, inflammation, and gut integrity between 52 first episode Schizophrenia patients, 50 chronic Schizophrenia patients, and 60 healthy controls to explain whether there were any associations between these markers. Study results show that antigliadin IgG and IgA antibodies, as well as inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP and IL-6, were significantly higher in the first episodes of schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia patients when compared to the healthy controls. Schizophrenia risk was 4-7% higher among those with elevated Antigliadin IgG and IgA antibody levels. In addition, smoking cigarettes has been shown to increase the risk of developing schizophrenia. Patients with chronic schizophrenia showed elevated levels of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody and soluble CD14, indicating bacterial translocation and immune activation. To understand the mechanisms behind chronic Schizophrenia, which link inflammation, immune responses, and the gut-brain axis, further robust larger studies are necessary. The results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the relationship between intestinal permeability, inflammation, and food hypersensitivity.
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous disorder without a fully elucidated etiology and mechanisms. One likely explanation for the development of schizophrenia is low-grade inflammation, possibly caused by processes in the gastrointestinal tract related to gluten sensitivity. The aims of this study were to: (1) compare levels of markers of gluten sensitivity, inflammation and gut permeability, and (2) determine associations between gluten sensitivity, inflammation, and intestinal permeability in patients with first-episode/chronic (FS/CS) schizophrenia and healthy individuals (HC). The total sample comprised 162 individuals (52 FS; 50 CS, and 60 HC). The examination included clinical variables, nutritional assessment, and serum concentrations of: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble CD14 (sCD14), anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), antigliadin antibodies (AGA) IgA/IgG, antibodies against tissue transglutaminase 2 (anti-tTG) IgA, anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-DGP) IgG. A significant difference between groups was found in sCD14, ASCA, hs-CRP, IL-6 and AGA IgA levels. AGA IgG/IgA levels were higher in the FS (11.54%; 30.77%) and CS (26%; 20%) groups compared to HC. The association between intestinal permeability and inflammation in the schizophrenic patients only was noted. The risk for developing schizophrenia was odds ratio (OR) = 4.35 (95% confidence interval (CI 1.23-15.39) for AGA IgA and 3.08 (95% CI 1.19-7.99) for positive AGA IgG. Inflammation and food hypersensitivity reactions initiated by increased intestinal permeability may contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The immune response to gluten in FS differs from that found in CS.
3.
Pilot Study: Comparison of Sourdough Wheat Bread and Yeast-Fermented Wheat Bread in Individuals with Wheat Sensitivity and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Laatikainen, R, Koskenpato, J, Hongisto, SM, Loponen, J, Poussa, T, Huang, X, Sontag-Strohm, T, Salmenkari, H, Korpela, R
Nutrients. 2017;9(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Among patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), many report wheat-consumption related symptoms. There is an on-going debate as to whether IBS symptoms from wheat consumption are due to FODMAPs (Fermentable, Oligo-, Di-, Mono-saccharides and Polyols) or wheat proteins such as gluten. The aim of this randomised double-blind controlled study was to evaluate the impact of sourdough fermentation on wheat tolerance in 26 participants with IBS as well as changes in the molecular content of bread. Participants were randomised to consume 150 grams of either sourdough-fermented or yeast-fermented bread daily for one week and adhered to a gluten-free diet one week prior to the start of intervention and throughout the intervention. Blood samples were taken and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded at baseline and post-intervention. The protein and FODMAP content of both types of bread was recorded as well. This study found sourdough fermentation reduced both the quantities of wheat proteins and FODMAPs significantly, however was not tolerated symptomatically any better than yeast-fermented bread. This sheds light on the fact that studies using unfermented wheat products cannot necessarily be extrapolated to fermented wheat products such as sourdough bread. Based on these results, the authors conclude further large-scale clinical studies are required to better classify the role of wheat proteins in functional gastrointestinal disorders.
Abstract
Many patients suspect wheat as being a major trigger of their irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms. Our aim was to evaluate whether sourdough wheat bread baked without baking improvers and using a long dough fermentation time (>12 h), would result in lower quantities of alpha-amylase/trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) and Fermentable, Oligo-, Di-, Mono-saccharides and Polyols (FODMAPs), and would be better tolerated than yeast-fermented wheat bread for subjects with IBS who have a poor subjective tolerance to wheat. The study was conducted as a randomised double-blind controlled 7-day study (n = 26). Tetrameric ATI structures were unravelled in both breads vs. baking flour, but the overall reduction in ATIs to their monomeric form was higher in the sourdough bread group. Sourdough bread was also lower in FODMAPs. However, no significant differences in gastrointestinal symptoms and markers of low-grade inflammation were found between the study breads. There were significantly more feelings of tiredness, joint symptoms, and decreased alertness when the participants ate the sourdough bread (p ≤ 0.03), but these results should be interpreted with caution. Our novel finding was that sourdough baking reduces the quantities of both ATIs and FODMAPs found in wheat. Nonetheless, the sourdough bread was not tolerated better than the yeast-fermented bread.
4.
Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity Has Narrowed the Spectrum of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Shahbazkhani, B, Sadeghi, A, Malekzadeh, R, Khatavi, F, Etemadi, M, Kalantri, E, Rostami-Nejad, M, Rostami, K
Nutrients. 2015;7(6):4542-54
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a condition that has a wide spectrum of symptoms and severity. This spectrum is narrowing due to advances in diagnostic tools and a better understanding of the etiologies of the disease. Recent studies have found that patients diagnosed with IBS may have specific food sensitivities that could relieve IBS-related symptoms. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a gluten-free diet on reducing the symptoms in patients with IBS. Clinical symptoms of 72 participants were measured for six weeks of either being on a gluten-free diet or gluten-containing diet. The findings of this study showed that a large number of patients with IBS are sensitive to gluten and their symptoms could be controlled with a gluten-free diet. Based on this study, the authors’ conclusions suggest that using the term of IBS can be misleading and that food sensitivities should be the first approach.
Abstract
Several studies have shown that a large number of patients who are fulfilling the criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are sensitive to gluten. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a gluten-free diet on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS. In this double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 148 IBS patients fulfilling the Rome III criteria were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. However, only 72 out of the 148 commenced on a gluten-free diet for up to six weeks and completed the study; clinical symptoms were recorded biweekly using a standard visual analogue scale (VAS). In the second stage after six weeks, patients whose symptoms improved to an acceptable level were randomly divided into two groups; patients either received packages containing powdered gluten (35 cases) or patients received placebo (gluten free powder) (37 cases). Overall, the symptomatic improvement was statistically different in the gluten-containing group compared with placebo group in 9 (25.7%), and 31 (83.8%) patients respectively (p < 0.001). A large number of patients labelled as irritable bowel syndrome are sensitive to gluten. Using the term of IBS can therefore be misleading and may deviate and postpone the application of an effective and well-targeted treatment strategy in gluten sensitive patients.