0
selected
-
1.
Impact of 18-Month Soy Protein Supplementation on Steroid Hormones and Serum Biomarkers of Angiogenesis, Apoptosis, and the Growth Hormone/IGF-1 Axis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Males Following Prostatectomy.
Bosland, MC, Huang, J, Schlicht, MJ, Enk, E, Xie, H, Kato, I
Nutrition and cancer. 2022;74(1):110-121
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Studies focusing on the effect of soy on risk for breast cancer are extensive, however there is very little research assessing its affects in men with prostate cancer. This post-hoc analysis of individuals enrolled in a randomised control trial looking at individuals on a soy protein isolate or milk protein placebo aimed to determine if soy had any effect on prostate cancer. The results showed that both circulating testosterone and its carrier molecule, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), were both decreased in individuals consuming the soy protein. All other hormones and measures related to cancer cell death and growth remained unaffected. It was concluded that 18 months of consumption of soy protein isolate reduced circulating testosterone and SHBG but had little effect on other measures related to cancer development. This study could be used by healthcare professionals that a diet high in soy may have limited effect on prostate cancer.
Abstract
Many studies have addressed the effects of dietary supplementation with soy protein on cancer risk and mortality, but there are only few randomized studies with soy in males. We used serum samples from a two-year trial of soy protein isolate supplementation in middle-aged to older males at risk of recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to determine soy effects on steroid hormones involved in prostate cancer (testosterone, SHBG, and estradiol) and explore the effects on biomarkers of the growth hormone/IGF-1 axis, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Compared with a casein-based placebo, 18 mo, of consumption of 19.2 g/day of whole soy protein isolate containing 24 mg genistein-reduced circulating testosterone and SHBG, but not free testosterone, and did not affect serum concentrations of estradiol, VEGF, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio, soluble Fas, Fas-ligand, and sFas/Fas-ligand ratio. Thus, soy protein supplementation for 18 mo, affected the androgen axis, but the effects on other cancer biomarkers remain to be more definitively determined. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00765479).
-
2.
Randomized trial of weight loss in primary breast cancer: Impact on body composition, circulating biomarkers and tumor characteristics.
Demark-Wahnefried, W, Rogers, LQ, Gibson, JT, Harada, S, Frugé, AD, Oster, RA, Grizzle, WE, Norian, LA, Yang, ES, Della Manna, D, et al
International journal of cancer. 2020;146(10):2784-2796
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity directly impacts survival in individuals with breast cancer. Previous studies in animals and at the cellular level have shown that calorie restriction and increased physical activity to achieve a negative energy balance may inhibit cancer progression, however effects in patients are unknown. This randomised control trial aimed to determine the impact of a pre surgery weight loss programme in 32 women with breast cancer on tumour biology and other markers of disease. The results were mixed and showed that proteins which bind to hormones involved in breast cancer were increased, which could decrease severity of disease. However, tumour biology was negatively affected; specific genes involved in breast cancer progression were increased and those involved in tumour suppression were decreased. Although this did result in no net effect on the rate at which new tumours were formed. It was concluded that although the study showed mixed results, ultimately the rate at which new tumours were formed remained unaffected. This trial could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the role of negative energy intake in breast cancer development is complicated and warrants further research.
Abstract
Obesity adversely impacts overall and cancer-specific survival among breast cancer patients. Preclinical studies demonstrate negative energy balance inhibits cancer progression; however, feasibility and effects in patients are unknown. A two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled weight-loss trial was undertaken presurgery among 32 overweight/obese, Stage 0-II breast cancer patients. The attention control arm (AC) received basic nutritional counseling and upper-body progressive resistance training whereas the weight loss intervention (WLI) arm received identical guidance, plus counseling on caloric restriction and aerobic exercise to promote 0.68-0.92 kg/week weight loss. Anthropometrics, body composition, blood and survey data were collected at baseline and presurgery ∼30 days later. Tumor markers (e.g., Ki67) and gene expression were assessed on biopsy and surgical specimens; sera were analyzed for cytokines, growth and metabolic factors. Significant WLI vs. AC differences were seen in baseline-to-follow-up changes in weight (-3.62 vs. -0.52 kg), %body fat (-1.3 vs. 0%), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (+224 vs. +115 min/week), caloric density (-0.3 vs. 0 kcal/g), serum leptin (-12.3 vs. -4.0 ng/dl) and upregulation of tumor PI3Kinase signaling and cell cycle-apoptosis related genes (CC-ARG; all p-values <0.05). Cytolytic CD56dim NK cell expression was positively associated with weight loss; CC-ARG increased with physical activity. Increased tumor (nuclear) TNFα and IL-1β, CX3CL1 and CXCL1 gene expression was observed in the WLI. Tumor Ki67 did not differ between arms. Feasibility benchmarks included 80% accrual, 100% retention, no adverse effects and excellent adherence. Short-term weight loss interventions are feasible; however, mixed effects on tumor biology suggest unclear benefit to presurgical caloric restriction, but possible benefits of physical activity.
-
3.
Feasibility outcomes of a presurgical randomized controlled trial exploring the impact of caloric restriction and increased physical activity versus a wait-list control on tumor characteristics and circulating biomarkers in men electing prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Demark-Wahnefried, W, Nix, JW, Hunter, GR, Rais-Bahrami, S, Desmond, RA, Chacko, B, Morrow, CD, Azrad, M, Frugé, AD, Tsuruta, Y, et al
BMC cancer. 2016;16:61
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is a strong body of evidence associating obesity and increased risk for more aggressive and progressive cancer. This paper aims to assess the feasibility of a presurgical diet and exercise weight loss intervention in men with newly-diagnosed prostate cancer who elected for prostatectomy. It also aims to explore the intervention’s effects on tumour proliferation rates and other biomarkers. The 3-weeks randomised controlled study included 40 overweight or obese men newly-diagnosed with prostate cancer. Participants in experimental arm were assigned to a healthy energy-restricted diet versus wait-list control arm. All feasibility endpoints were achieved with accrual completed within 2 years, retention of 85%, adherence of 95% and no adverse events. Biologic outcomes were not included in this paper, as biological testing was still ongoing. Authors concluded that this study’s methods and data on feasibility could provide useful framework for the design of future trials. They also highlighted the importance of presurgical trials as a feasible and safe means to assess the impacts of diet and exercise on tumour tissue.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is associated with tumor aggressiveness and disease-specific mortality for more than 15 defined malignancies, including prostate cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that weight loss from caloric restriction and increased physical activity may suppress hormonal, energy-sensing, and inflammatory factors that drive neoplastic progression; however, exact mechanisms are yet to be determined, and experiments in humans are limited. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial among 40 overweight or obese, newly-diagnosed prostate cancer patients who elected prostatectomy to explore feasibility of a presurgical weight loss intervention that promoted a weight loss of roughly one kg. week(-1) via caloric restriction and physical activity, as well as to assess effects on tumor biology and circulating biomarkers. Measures of feasibility (accrual, retention, adherence, and safety) were primary endpoints. Exploratory aims were directed at the intervention's effect on tumor proliferation (Ki-67) and other tumor markers (activated caspase-3, insulin and androgen receptors, VEGF, TNFβ, NFκB, and 4E-BP1), circulating biomarkers (PSA, insulin, glucose, VEGF, TNFβ, leptin, SHBG, and testosterone), lymphocytic gene expression of corresponding factors and cellular bioenergetics in neutrophils, and effects on the gut microbiome. Consenting patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: 1) weight loss via a healthful, guidelines-based diet and exercise regimen; or 2) a wait-list control. While biological testing is currently ongoing, this paper details our methods and feasibility outcomes. RESULTS The accrual target was met after screening 101 cases (enrollment rate: 39.6%). Other outcomes included a retention rate of 85%, excellent adherence (95%), and no serious reported adverse events. No significant differences by age, race, or weight status were noted between enrollees vs. non-enrollees. The most common reasons for non-participation were "too busy" (30%), medical exclusions (21%), and "distance" (16%). CONCLUSIONS Presurgical trials offer a means to study the impact of diet and exercise interventions directly on tumor tissue, and other host factors that are feasible and safe, though modifications are needed to conduct trials within an abbreviated period of time and via distance medicine-based approaches. Pre-surgical trials are critical to elucidate the impact of lifestyle interventions on specific mechanisms that mediate carcinogenesis and which can be used subsequently as therapeutic targets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01886677.
-
4.
Effects of a 2-year randomized soy intervention on sex hormone levels in premenopausal women.
Maskarinec, G, Franke, AA, Williams, AE, Hebshi, S, Oshiro, C, Murphy, S, Stanczyk, FZ
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2004;13(11 Pt 1):1736-44
-
-
Plain language summary
Countries that have a high consumption of soy, such as Japan and China, tend to have lower breast cancer rates. Soy contains isoflavones, phytoestrogens which may have oestrogenic and antieostrogenic effects. The aim of this trial was to examine the effect of soy foods on menstrual cycle length and circulating sex hormone levels. 189 healthy premenopausal women completed the 2-year study, during which the treatment group consumed two daily servings of soy foods (tofu, soy milk, roasted soy nuts, soy protein powder or soy protein bars) containing a total of 50 mg of isoflavones. The control group maintained their regular diet. Blood samples were taken 5 days after ovulation in months 0, 3, 6, 12 and 24. Soy did not have any significant effects on the levels of circulating sex hormones or length of menstrual cycle. The authors concluded that any preventative effects of soy on breast cancer risk may be mediated by mechanisms other than its effect on circulating sex hormone levels.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several epidemiologic studies have described protective effects of soy consumption against breast cancer. The goal of this trial among premenopausal women was to examine the effect of soy foods on menstrual cycle length and circulating sex hormone levels. METHODS This 2-year dietary intervention randomized 220 healthy premenopausal women. The intervention group consumed two daily servings of soy foods containing approximately 50 mg of isoflavones; the control group maintained their regular diet. Five blood samples (obtained in months 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24) were taken 5 days after ovulation as determined by an ovulation kit. The serum samples were analyzed for estrone, estradiol, sex hormone binding globulin, androstenedione, and progesterone by immunoassay. RESULTS At baseline, both groups had similar demographic, anthropometric, and nutritional characteristics. The dropout rates of 15.6% (17 of 109) in the intervention group and 12.6% (14 of 111) in the control group did not differ significantly. According to soy intake logs, 24-hour recalls, and urinary isoflavone excretion, the women closely adhered to the study regimen. Menstrual cycles became slightly shorter in both groups but did not differ by group. Mixed general linear models indicated no significant intervention effect on any of the serum hormones. However, androstenedione and progesterone decreased significantly over time in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that the preventive effects of soy on breast cancer risk in premenopausal women may not be mediated by circulating sex hormone levels. Different mechanisms of actions or effects of exposure earlier in life are alternate hypotheses that require further investigation.