-
1.
Association between prealbumin, all-cause mortality, and response to nutrition treatment in patients at nutrition risk: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Bretscher, C, Buergin, M, Gurzeler, G, Kägi-Braun, N, Gressies, C, Tribolet, P, Lobo, DN, Evans, DC, Stanga, Z, Mueller, B, et al
JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. 2023;47(3):408-419
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Malnutrition amongst the elderly and those who are hospitalised due to multiple illnesses is frequent and increases risk of death. There have however been studies to show that there may be a way of identifying individuals at risk of malnutrition through measurements of biological markers. Prealbumin is a protein made in the liver that has been shown in smaller trials to be a possible biomarker for individuals at risk of malnutrition. This large cohort study of 517 individuals aimed to determine if prealbumin was associated with death and if nutritional support would improve survival. The results showed that individuals who were at risk of malnutrition with low prealbumin levels had almost double the mortality rate after 6 months. However individualised nutritional support did not improve mortality. It was concluded that prealbumin is a prognostic marker for death in nutritionally at-risk patients but does not identify individuals who may respond to nutritional support. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that prealbumin may be helpful in identifying mortality risk amongst individuals at risk of malnutrition but not those who may benefit from personalised nutrition recommendations.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the shorter half-life as compared with albumin, serum prealbumin concentrations have been proposed to be useful nutrition biomarkers for the assessment of patients at nutrition risk. In a post hoc analysis of patients at nutrition risk from a randomized controlled nutrition trial, we tested the hypothesis that (1) prealbumin is associated with higher all-cause 180-day mortality rates and that (2) individualized nutrition support compared with usual-care nutrition more effectively improves survival at 30 days in patients with low prealbumin levels compared with patients with normal prealbumin levels. METHODS We performed a prespecified cohort study in patients included in the pragmatic, Swiss, multicenter randomized controlled EFFORT trial comparing the effects of individualized nutrition support with usual care. We studied low prealbumin concentrations (<0.17 g/L) in a subgroup of 517 patients from one participating center. RESULTS A total of 306 (59.2%) patients (mean age 71.9 years, 53.6% men) had low admission prealbumin levels (<0.17 g/L). There was a significant association between low prealbumin levels and mortality at 180 days (115/306 [37.6%] vs 47/211 [22.3%], fully adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.28; P = 0.011). Prealbumin levels significantly improved the prognostic value of the Nutritional Risk Screening total score regarding mortality prediction at short- and long-term. The difference in mortality between patients receiving individualized nutrition support and usual-care nutrition was similar for patients with low prealbumin levels compared with patients with normal prealbumin levels (HR=0.90 [95% CI=0.51-1.59] vs HR=0.88 [95% CI=0.35-2.23]) with no evidence for interaction (P = 0.823). CONCLUSION Among medical inpatients at nutrition risk, low admission prealbumin levels correlated with different nutrition markers and higher mortality risk, but patients with low or high prealbumin levels had a similar benefit from nutrition support. Further studies should identify nutrition markers that help further personalize nutrition interventions.
-
2.
Trial of the MIND Diet for Prevention of Cognitive Decline in Older Persons.
Barnes, LL, Dhana, K, Liu, X, Carey, VJ, Ventrelle, J, Johnson, K, Hollings, CS, Bishop, L, Laranjo, N, Stubbs, BJ, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2023;389(7):602-611
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Lifestyle interventions targeting diet are a possible approach that could affect public health. Most clinical trials have investigated comprehensive diets, in contrast to dietary manipulation of single foods or nutrients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 3-year dietary intervention on cognitive decline and brain-imaging markers of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older, cognitively unimpaired adults at risk for dementia because of family history. This study was a 3-year, two-site, randomised, controlled trial. The participants were randomly assigned to follow the MIND diet with mild caloric restriction for weight loss or their usual diet with the same mild caloric restriction for weight loss (control diet). Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio. Results showed that the participants who followed the MIND diet had small improvements in a global measure of cognition that were similar to those who followed a control diet with mild caloric restriction. Authors concluded that brain health, cognitive function and brain imaging outcomes (after 3 years) did not differ significantly between participants who followed the MIND diet and those who followed a control diet with a mild caloric restriction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Findings from observational studies suggest that dietary patterns may offer protective benefits against cognitive decline, but data from clinical trials are limited. The Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay, known as the MIND diet, is a hybrid of the Mediterranean diet and the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet, with modifications to include foods that have been putatively associated with a decreased risk of dementia. METHODS We performed a two-site, randomized, controlled trial involving older adults without cognitive impairment but with a family history of dementia, a body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) greater than 25, and a suboptimal diet, as determined by means of a 14-item questionnaire, to test the cognitive effects of the MIND diet with mild caloric restriction as compared with a control diet with mild caloric restriction. We assigned the participants in a 1:1 ratio to follow the intervention or the control diet for 3 years. All the participants received counseling regarding adherence to their assigned diet plus support to promote weight loss. The primary end point was the change from baseline in a global cognition score and four cognitive domain scores, all of which were derived from a 12-test battery. The raw scores from each test were converted to z scores, which were averaged across all tests to create the global cognition score and across component tests to create the four domain scores; higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. The secondary outcome was the change from baseline in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived measures of brain characteristics in a nonrandom sample of participants. RESULTS A total of 1929 persons underwent screening, and 604 were enrolled; 301 were assigned to the MIND-diet group and 303 to the control-diet group. The trial was completed by 93.4% of the participants. From baseline to year 3, improvements in global cognition scores were observed in both groups, with increases of 0.205 standardized units in the MIND-diet group and 0.170 standardized units in the control-diet group (mean difference, 0.035 standardized units; 95% confidence interval, -0.022 to 0.092; P = 0.23). Changes in white-matter hyperintensities, hippocampal volumes, and total gray- and white-matter volumes on MRI were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Among cognitively unimpaired participants with a family history of dementia, changes in cognition and brain MRI outcomes from baseline to year 3 did not differ significantly between those who followed the MIND diet and those who followed the control diet with mild caloric restriction. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02817074.).
-
3.
Circulating levels of maternal vitamin D and risk of ADHD in offspring: results from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial.
Chu, SH, Huang, M, Kelly, RS, Kachroo, P, Litonjua, AA, Weiss, ST, Lasky-Su, J
International journal of epidemiology. 2022;51(3):910-918
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acting as both a nutrient and a hormone, vitamin D has been found to play a critical role in neurodevelopment across sensitive periods in utero, infancy and early childhood. Among neurodevelopmental and behavioural disorders in early life, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common among children worldwide. Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent ADHD. The aims of this study were to (i) determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and the risk of offspring ADHD by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potential sensitive periods in utero during which vitamin D levels might be most important for reducing risk of ADHD. This is an ancillary study of the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART). The VDAART was a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre, clinical trial in which 876 participating mothers were recruited between 10–18 weeks of gestation and assigned to receive either 4400 or 400 IU/day of vitamin D throughout pregnancy. Results show protective associations between maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency in the third trimester and child ADHD, but not at baseline. Furthermore, both at baseline and in the third trimester, there were higher odds of ADHD in male offspring as compared with female offspring with 25(OH)D insufficient mothers (analyses limited by small sample sizes) Authors conclude that higher levels of maternal vitamin D during pregnancy may play a protective role against risk of ADHD in offspring, but further studies are needed to confirm this association and any therapeutic potential therein.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Ensure that women in pregnancy, and possibly also those seeking to conceive, have adequate vitamin D status in order to reduce the risk of ADHD in offspring.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
This paper describes a secondary data analysis from an RCT that looked at the effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on risk of childhood asthma in offspring. Enrolled women aged 18–39 years with a history of asthma, eczema or allergic rhinitis, or whose partner (biological father of child) had a history of the aforementioned condition, received either 400 IU or 4400 IU vitamin D daily for the duration of their pregnancy. Offspring follow-up is still ongoing.
Aims
The current study aims were twofold: (i) to determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in trimesters 1 and 3 and the risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring diagnosed by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potentially sensitive periods during gestation in which vitamin D levels may be especially important for reducing risk of ADHD.
Methods
The analytical sample included 679 mother-child pairs, from the original sample of 876 participating mothers. No sample size calculation was reported, though the sample was considered representative of the overall RCT study population.
Maternal vitamin D (serum 25(OH)D) was classified as follows
- Highly deficient <12 ng/mL
- Deficient 12 ng/mL to 19.9 ng/mL
- Insufficient 20 ng/mL to 29.9 ng/mL
- Sufficient ≥30 ng/mL
ADHD status was assessed through parental reporting between ages 6 and 9 years.
Results
No baseline associations between a vitamin D sufficient status and offspring ADHD in maternal samples collected during trimester 1 were observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.51–2.19; P.0.871), though this association became statistically significant at trimester 3 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.84; P.0.011). This translated to a 53% less chance of having a child with ADHD at age 6 or later among mothers with vitamin D sufficiency compared with children of mothers with vitamin D deficiency. There was also a linear trend in the protective association of vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) on reduced risk of offspring ADHD at age 6 years or later in data from trimester 3. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal vitamin D status and offspring ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.94).
Conclusions
The authors concluded that vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) in the 3rd trimester of gestation may decrease the risk of ADHD development in offspring.
Notes: The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Ensuring a sufficient vitamin D status by the 3rd trimester of pregnancy may help to lessen the risk of ADHD in offspring. Nutritional therapists and other clinicians working with pregnant women or women looking to conceive should consider checking vitamin D status and providing corrective supplementation and lifestyle advice to augment vitamin D levels where indicated.
Considerations for future research:
The authors of this study postulated that the statistically significant protective association between vitamin D at trimester 3 and ADHD in offspring was not significant in trimester 1 due to a low observed variability in vitamin D status (>75% of women were vitamin D insufficient), and thus the statistical test being underpowered to see difference between groups with sufficient or insufficient status.
Further research could expand upon this hypothesis to test whether vitamin D status in trimester 1, or preconceptually, may offer a protective association for ADHD and other related neurological conditions that may manifest in early life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but few studies have examined the association between 25(OH)D during fetal development and risk of childhood ADHD. METHODS Maternal plasma 25(OH)D was measured at 10-18 and 32-38 weeks of gestation, with sufficiency defined as 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/ml. Offspring ADHD status between ages 6-9 years was measured by parent report of clinical ADHD diagnosis among 680 mother-child pairs from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial. Association between maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity. Effect modification by offspring sex was also assessed. RESULTS No associations between maternal 25(OH)D at 10-18 weeks of gestation and offspring ADHD were observed. In the third trimester, we observed associations between maternal vitamin D sufficiency and offspring ADHD [odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.84], in addition to maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency category, comparing the deficient (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.94), insufficient (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.15-1.10) and sufficient (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54) categories against highly deficient 25(OH)D, respectively. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.94); the synergy index for additive effect modification of risk was 1.78 (95% CI 0.62-5.08). CONCLUSIONS Higher levels of maternal vitamin D in the third trimester are associated with lower risk of ADHD in offspring, with modest evidence for a stronger effect among male offspring. However, larger studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.
-
4.
Adherence to Mediterranean Diet and NAFLD in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: The FLIPAN Study.
Montemayor, S, Mascaró, CM, Ugarriza, L, Casares, M, Llompart, I, Abete, I, Zulet, MÁ, Martínez, JA, Tur, JA, Bouzas, C
Nutrients. 2022;14(15)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by fat deposition that is not linked to excessive alcohol intake. This condition is often linked to other health issues such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and they share common diagnostic biomarkers. An unhealthy diet and lifestyle are also linked to the progression of NAFLD. Mediterranean diet is a predominantly plant-based diet that may have an association with lower risk and reduced severity of NAFLD. This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial included one hundred and thirty-six NAFLD patients to analyse the effect of Mediterranean diet adherence on NAFLD in patients with metabolic syndrome. The NAFLD patients followed a personalised Mediterranean diet and physical activity interventions for six months. Individuals with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet and physical activity interventions showed improvements in body mass index, body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure and intrahepatic fat content after six months of intervention. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet and physical activity interventions in reducing NAFLD severity and metabolic irregularities. However, due to the small sample size of this study, further robust studies are required to evaluate the benefits of different dietary strategies, the therapeutic value of different food items and the intervention duration required to achieve improvements in NAFLD and metabolic syndrome.
Abstract
Unhealthy diet is an important factor in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Previous studies showed the benefits of a Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) on Metabolic syndrome (MetS), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cardiovascular diseases, which usually have a pathophysiological relationship with NAFLD. To assess the effect of adherence to a MedDiet on NAFLD in MetS patients after lifestyle intervention, this multicentre (Mallorca and Navarra, Spain) prospective randomized trial, with personalized nutritional intervention based on a customized MedDiet, coupled with physical activity promotion was performed to prevent, and reverse NAFLD among patients with MetS. The current analysis included 138 patients aged 40 to 60 years old, Body Mass Index (BMI) 27-40 kg/m2, diagnosed with NAFLD using MRI, and MetS according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to assess dietary intake. Adherence to Mediterranean diet by means of a 17-item validated questionnaire, anthropometrics, physical activity, blood pressure, blood biochemical parameters, and intrahepatic fat contents (IFC) were measured. The independent variable used was changes in MedDiet adherence, categorized in tertiles after 6 months follow-up. Subjects with high adherence to the MedDiet showed higher decreases in BMI, body weight, WC, SBP, DBP, and IFC. An association between improvement in adherence to the MedDiet and amelioration of IFC after 6-month follow-up was observed. High adherence to the MedDiet is associated with better status of MetS features, and better values of IFC.
-
5.
High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial.
Annweiler, C, Beaudenon, M, Gautier, J, Gonsard, J, Boucher, S, Chapelet, G, Darsonval, A, Fougère, B, Guérin, O, Houvet, M, et al
PLoS medicine. 2022;19(5):e1003999
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused hundreds of thousands of deaths, mostly in older adults. The aim of this study was to test whether a single oral high-dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults who are positive to COVID-19. This study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, intent-to-treat, randomised controlled superiority clinical trial which involves the collaboration of 9 medical centres. Eligible participants (n=260) were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of either 400,000 IU (n=130) or 50,000 IU (n=130) cholecalciferol on the day of inclusion. Results show: - reduced overall mortality at day 14. - that high-dose cholecalciferol was safe and did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. - that some benefits were also found on the 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 as well as on the overall mortality between day 6 and day 14. - that there was no evidence that the single high-dose vitamin D3 administered early in COVID-19 provided any benefit on overall mortality for up to 28 days. Authors conclude that high-dose oral cholecalciferol supplementation is a simple, safe, and inexpensive treatment which may be of interest as an adjuvant to provide a bridge to recovery for at-risk older adults facing the emergence of immune escape variants.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D supplementation has been proposed as a treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on experimental data and data from small and uncontrolled observational studies. The COvid19 and VITamin d TRIAL (COVIT-TRIAL) study was conducted to test whether a single oral high dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS AND FINDINGS This multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, superiority trial involved collaboration of 9 medical centers in France. Patients admitted to the hospital units or living in nursing homes adjacent to the investigator centers were eligible if they were ≥65 years, had SARS-CoV-2 infection of less than 3 days, and at least 1 COVID-19 worsening risk factor (among age ≥75 years, SpO2 ≤94%, or PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mm Hg). Main noninclusion criteria were organ failure requiring ICU, SpO2 ≤92% despite 5 L/min oxygen, life expectancy <3 months, vitamin D supplementation >800 IU/day during the preceding month, and contraindications to vitamin D supplements. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either a single oral high-dose (400,000 IU) or standard-dose (50,000 IU) cholecalciferol administered under medical supervision within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but the Steering Committee and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board were masked to the randomization group and outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 14-day overall mortality. Between April 15 and December 17, 2020, of 1,207 patients who were assessed for eligibility in the COVIT-TRIAL study, 254 met eligibility criteria and formed the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 88 (IQR, 82 to 92) years, and 148 patients (58%) were women. Overall, 8 (6%) of 127 patients allocated to high-dose cholecalciferol, and 14 (11%) of 127 patients allocated to standard-dose cholecalciferol died within 14 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.99], P = 0.049, after controlling for randomization strata [i.e., age, oxygen requirement, hospitalization, use of antibiotics, anti-infective drugs, and/or corticosteroids] and baseline imbalances in important prognostic factors [i.e., sex, ongoing cancers, profuse diarrhea, and delirium at baseline]). The number needed to treat for one person to benefit (NNTB) was 21 [NNTB 9 to ∞ to number needed to treat for one person to harm (NNTH) 46]. Apparent benefits were also found on 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 (7 (6%) deaths in high-dose group and 14 (11%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86], P = 0.02). The protective effect of the single oral high-dose administration was not sustained at 28 days (19 (15%) deaths in high-dose group and 21 (17%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.36], P = 0.29). High-dose cholecalciferol did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. The open-label design and limited study power are the main limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we observed that the early administration of high-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D3 to at-risk older patients with COVID-19 improved overall mortality at day 14. The effect was no longer observed after 28 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344041.
-
6.
Probiotic Supplementation Improves Cognitive Function and Mood with Changes in Gut Microbiota in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial.
Kim, CS, Cha, L, Sim, M, Jung, S, Chun, WY, Baik, HW, Shin, DM
The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences. 2021;76(1):32-40
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Aging is characterized by progressive decline in biological functions of the organism. Diet is one of the critical lifestyle factors for physical and mental well-being throughout the life span, including later life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of probiotics consumption on intestinal and brain health in elders over the age of 65. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. All participants, study coordinators, and researchers were blinded throughout the entire study. Sixty-three participants were randomized, with 31 and 32 subjects in the placebo and probiotics group, respectively. Results demonstrate that probiotics have system-wide effects on the gut–brain axis in healthy community-dwelling older adults by promoting cognitive and mental health and changing the gut microbial composition. Authors conclude that their findings provide evidence that probiotics have health-promoting properties as part of a healthy diet in the general population of independently living older adults.
Abstract
Probiotics have been proposed to ameliorate cognitive impairment and depressive disorder via the gut-brain axis in patients and experimental animal models. However, the beneficial role of probiotics in brain functions of healthy older adults remains unclear. Therefore, a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted to determine the effects of probiotics on cognition and mood in community-dwelling older adults. Sixty-three healthy elders (≥65 years) consumed either placebo or probiotics containing Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Bifidobacterium longum BORI for 12 weeks. The gut microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing and bioinformatics. Brain functions were measured using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease, Satisfaction with life scale, stress questionnaire, Geriatric depression scale, and Positive affect and negative affect schedule. Blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Relative abundance of inflammation-causing gut bacteria was significantly reduced at Week 12 in the probiotics group (p < .05). The probiotics group showed greater improvement in mental flexibility test and stress score than the placebo group (p < .05). Contrary to placebo, probiotics significantly increased serum BDNF level (p < .05). Notably, the gut microbes significantly shifted by probiotics (Eubacterium and Clostridiales) showed significant negative correlation with serum BDNF level only in the probiotics group (RS = -0.37, RS = -0.39, p < .05). In conclusion, probiotics promote mental flexibility and alleviate stress in healthy older adults, along with causing changes in gut microbiota. These results provide evidence supporting health-promoting properties of probiotics as a part of healthy diet in the older adults.
-
7.
Effects of a 2-Week 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Recovery of Symptoms in Patients with Mild to Moderate Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sabico, S, Enani, MA, Sheshah, E, Aljohani, NJ, Aldisi, DA, Alotaibi, NH, Alshingetti, N, Alomar, SY, Alnaami, AM, Amer, OE, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A highly contagious virus called SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic. Vitamin D adjuvant therapy has been identified as a promising strategy for reducing the severity of Covid-19 outcomes in the elderly. Also, a low Vitamin D status significantly correlates with Covid-19 severity. This multi-centre randomised, open-label clinical trial evaluated the beneficial effects of 5000 IU versus 1000 IU Vitamin D3 daily supplementation for two weeks on recovery of symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate Covid-19 and suboptimal Vitamin D status. Thirty-six Covid-19 patients received 5000 IU Vitamin D3 daily, and thirty-three Covid-19 patients received 1000 IU Vitamin D3 daily. The 5000 IU Vitamin D3 group was significantly younger and had a significantly lower BMI than the 1000 IU Vitamin D3 group. The 5000 IU Vitamin D3 group showed significant improvements in the severity of the Covid-19 symptoms compared to the 1000 IU Vitamin D3 group. Further robust studies are needed to evaluate the effects of Vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with high BMI, severe Covid-19 symptoms, and prevention of Covid-19. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the effects of different doses of Vitamin D3 supplements in patients with mild-to-moderate Covid-19 symptoms and suboptimal Vitamin D status.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 severity. This multi-center randomized clinical trial aims to determine the effects of 5000 IU versus 1000 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation in the recovery of symptoms and other clinical parameters among mild to moderate COVID-19 patients with sub-optimal vitamin D status. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A total of 69 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 positive adults who were hospitalized for mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were allocated to receive once daily for 2 weeks either 5000 IU oral vitamin D3 (n = 36, 21 males; 15 females) or 1000 IU oral vitamin D3 (standard control) (n = 33, 13 males; 20 females). Anthropometrics were measured and blood samples were taken pre- and post-supplementation. Fasting blood glucose, lipids, serum 25(OH)D, and inflammatory markers were measured. COVID-19 symptoms were noted on admission and monitored until full recovery. RESULTS Vitamin D supplementation for 2 weeks caused a significant increase in serum 25(OH)D levels in the 5000 IU group only (adjusted p = 0.003). Within-group comparisons also showed a significant decrease in BMI and IL-6 levels overtime in both groups (p-values < 0.05) but was not clinically significant in between-group comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 5000 IU group had a significantly shorter time to recovery (days) than the 1000 IU group in resolving cough, even after adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, and D-dimer (6.2 ± 0.8 versus 9.1 ± 0.8; p = 0.039), and ageusia (loss of taste) (11.4 ± 1.0 versus 16.9 ± 1.7; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION A 5000 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation for 2 weeks reduces the time to recovery for cough and gustatory sensory loss among patients with sub-optimal vitamin D status and mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms. The use of 5000 IU vitamin D3 as an adjuvant therapy for COVID-19 patients with suboptimal vitamin D status, even for a short duration, is recommended.
-
8.
The Effect of Moderate Weight Loss on a Non-Invasive Biomarker of Liver Fibrosis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Koutoukidis, DA, Jebb, SA, Aveyard, P, Astbury, NM
Obesity facts. 2020;13(2):144-151
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease covers a range of conditions from excess fat in the liver through inflammation and fibrosis, to advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score is emerging as a promising blood biomarker for fibrosis. The aim of this study was to examine whether a community weight loss programme reduces ELF score over 12 months compared with a weight-loss intervention which is less effective. This study is a secondary analysis of a published randomised controlled trial. Participants (n=73) were equally randomised to a community weight loss programme (WeightWatchers) or usual care. Results indicate that there was no evidence of an effect of a community weight loss programme on changes in the ELF score and no association between weight loss and the ELF score in people who had, on average, an ELF score compatible with moderate fibrosis. Authors conclude that using the ELF test to assess weight loss treatment efficacy in improving liver fibrosis may be of limited value, thus biopsy remains the gold-standard assessment for liver fibrosis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Referral to weight loss programmes is the only effective treatment for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Clinicians should advise weight loss and screen for liver fibrosis using the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score. AIM: To examine if the ELF score changes with weight loss. DESIGN AND SETTING Randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN85485463) in UK primary care during 2007-2008. METHOD Adults with a BMI of 27-35 kg/m2 and ≥1 risk factor for obesity-related disease were randomised to attend a community weight loss programme (n = 45) or receive usual weight loss advice from a practice nurse (n = 28). Weight and the ELF score were measured at baseline and 1 year. Analysis of covariance examined mean changes in the ELF score between groups and its relationship with weight loss. RESULTS Mean (SD) BMI was 31.10 kg/m2 (2.55) with evidence of moderate levels of liver fibrosis at baseline (mean ELF score: 8.93 [0.99]). There was no evidence that the community weight loss programme reduced the ELF score compared with usual care (difference +0.13 points, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.52) despite greater weight loss (difference: -2.66 kg, 95% CI: -5.02 to -0.30). Mean weight loss in the whole cohort was 7.8% (5.9). There was no evidence of an association between weight change and change in ELF; the coefficient for a 5% weight loss was -0.15 (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.0002). CONCLUSION We found no evidence that the ELF score changed meaningfully following moderate weight loss. Clinicians should not use the ELF score to measure improvements in NAFLD fibrosis following weight loss programmes.
-
9.
Interaction Between Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Strategies and Genetic Determinants of Coronary Artery Disease on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.
Merino, J, Jablonski, KA, Mercader, JM, Kahn, SE, Chen, L, Harden, M, Delahanty, LM, Araneta, MRG, Walford, GA, Jacobs, SBR, et al
Diabetes. 2020;69(1):112-120
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Individual risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes reflects the interplay between lifestyle behaviours acting on a backdrop of genetic predisposition. The aim of this study was to examine whether type 2 diabetes prevention strategies, either an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin treatment (MET), modify the association between CAD genetic risk and cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs) in participants at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The study is a randomised controlled trial were participants were randomly allocated to one of the three groups; ILS (n = 1,079), MET (850 mg twice daily [n = 1,073]), or placebo (n = 1,082). Results indicate that there weren’t major significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for lower high-density lipoprotein and higher triglyceride in the placebo individuals compared with individuals assigned to MET or ILS. In fact, either an ILS or MET has a beneficial effect on 1-year change in different CRFs. Authors conclude that type 2 diabetes–preventive strategies for individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes provide beneficial effects on CRFs regardless of CAD genetic risk profile.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is more frequent among individuals with dysglycemia. Preventive interventions for diabetes can improve cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs), but it is unclear whether the benefits on CRFs are similar for individuals at different genetic risk for CAD. We built a 201-variant polygenic risk score (PRS) for CAD and tested for interaction with diabetes prevention strategies on 1-year changes in CRFs in 2,658 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) participants. We also examined whether separate lifestyle behaviors interact with PRS and affect changes in CRFs in each intervention group. Participants in both the lifestyle and metformin interventions had greater improvement in the majority of recognized CRFs compared with placebo (P < 0.001) irrespective of CAD genetic risk (P interaction > 0.05). We detected nominal significant interactions between PRS and dietary quality and physical activity on 1-year change in BMI, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol in individuals randomized to metformin or placebo, but none of them achieved the multiple-testing correction for significance. This study confirms that diabetes preventive interventions improve CRFs regardless of CAD genetic risk and delivers hypothesis-generating data on the varying benefit of increasing physical activity and improving diet on intermediate cardiovascular risk factors depending on individual CAD genetic risk profile.
-
10.
Effect of a Nutritional and Behavioral Intervention on Energy-Reduced Mediterranean Diet Adherence Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: Interim Analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus Randomized Clinical Trial.
Sayón-Orea, C, Razquin, C, Bulló, M, Corella, D, Fitó, M, Romaguera, D, Vioque, J, Alonso-Gómez, ÁM, Wärnberg, J, Martínez, JA, et al
JAMA. 2019;322(15):1486-1499
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Excess caloric intake and poor nutritional quality are associated with overweight and obesity. A traditional Mediterranean diet has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality, and in particular to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and overweight. The aim of this randomised, prospective, single-blinded study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive lifestyle intervention programme in 6874 overweight or obese men and women with metabolic syndrome in Spain. The intervention group was advised on an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet and exercise and received behavioural support, with initial group sessions and interviews, and monthly follow-up phone calls for one year. The control group received advice on a Mediterranean diet and usual care, with 6 monthly follow-ups. After 12 months, the more intensively counselled patients showed a significantly better adherence to an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet than the control group. They had greater reductions in refined grains, pastries, red and processed meats and greater increases in vegetable, fruit and nut consumption than the control group. The intervention group had also better improvements in cardiovascular risk factors.
Abstract
Importance: High-quality dietary patterns may help prevent chronic disease, but limited data exist from randomized trials about the effects of nutritional and behavioral interventions on dietary changes. Objective: To assess the effect of a nutritional and physical activity education program on dietary quality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Preliminary exploratory interim analysis of an ongoing randomized trial. In 23 research centers in Spain, 6874 men and women aged 55 to 75 years with metabolic syndrome and no cardiovascular disease were enrolled in the trial between September 2013 and December 2016, with final data collection in March 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomized to an intervention group that encouraged an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet, promoted physical activity, and provided behavioral support (n = 3406) or to a control group that encouraged an energy-unrestricted Mediterranean diet (n = 3468). All participants received allotments of extra-virgin olive oil (1 L/mo) and nuts (125 g/mo) for free. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 12-month change in adherence based on the energy-reduced Mediterranean diet (er-MedDiet) score (range, 0-17; higher scores indicate greater adherence; minimal clinically important difference, 1 point). Results: Among 6874 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [4.9] years; 3406 [52%] men), 6583 (96%) completed the 12-month follow-up and were included in the main analysis. The mean (SD) er-MedDiet score was 8.5 (2.6) at baseline and 13.2 (2.7) at 12 months in the intervention group (increase, 4.7 [95% CI, 4.6-4.8]) and 8.6 (2.7) at baseline and 11.1 (2.8) at 12 months in the control group (increase, 2.5 [95% CI, 2.3-2.6]) (between-group difference, 2.2 [95% CI, 2.1-2.4]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary analysis of an ongoing trial, an intervention that encouraged an energy-reduced Mediterranean diet and physical activity, compared with advice to follow an energy-unrestricted Mediterranean diet, resulted in a significantly greater increase in diet adherence after 12 months. Further evaluation of long-term cardiovascular effects is needed. Trial Registration: isrctn.com Identifier: ISRCTN89898870.