1.
Comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements in the management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xia, J, Yu, J, Xu, H, Zhou, Y, Li, H, Yin, S, Xu, D, Wang, Y, Xia, H, Liao, W, et al
Pharmacological research. 2023;188:106647
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), characterised by sustained hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance, remains a severe driver of chronic metabolic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of vitamin and mineral supplements in the management of glycaemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetic patients to inform clinical practice. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of one hundred and seventy articles with a total of 4223 adults with T2DM. Participants were randomised to either the placebo/no treatment group (n= 6345) or to the treatment group (n= 7878). Results show that: - chromium was the most effective micronutrient for decreasing fasting blood glucose and insulin resistance. - vitamin K was the top-ranked micronutrient in reducing haemoglobin A1C and fasting insulin levels. - vanadium was the top-ranked micronutrient in total cholesterol reductions. - niacin was ranked as the most effective in triglycerides reductions and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. - vitamin E was the top-ranked micronutrient in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions. Authors conclude that micronutrient supplements especially chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be more effective in the management of T2DM compared with other micronutrients.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Clinicians could consider the adjunctive effect of micronutrients supplements, such as chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements in a nutrition protocol to manage T2DM and slow or prevent its complications.
- The study authors state that the vitamin and mineral supplements under review had a statistically significant improvement, however they did not reach the study threshold for clinical significance. Therefore they advise caution in utilising micronutrient supplements in the management of glucose and lipid metabolism for T2DM.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Objectives
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on managing glycemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methodology
This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO and adhered to PRISMA-2020 guidelines for network meta-analysis
The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk-of-bias tool was used to assess eligible randomised trials
8 prespecified markers identified and assessed in this study : 1) HbA1c (%), 2) fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), 3) total cholesterol (mmol/L), 4) triglycerides (mmol/L), 5) fasting insulin (μIU/mL), 6) HOMA-IR, 7) LDL-c (mmol/L), and 8) HDL-c (mmol/L).
Results
- 170 RCT trials of 14223 participants with T2DM treated with vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, or placebo/no treatment were included
- Low to very low certainty evidence established chromium supplements as the most effective in reducing fasting blood glucose levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SUCRAs: 90.4% and 78.3%, respectively)
- Vitamin K supplements ranked best in reducing glycated haemoglobin A1c and fasting insulin levels (SUCRAs: 97.0% and 82.3%, respectively), with moderate to very low certainty evidence
- Vanadium supplements ranked best in lowering total cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:100%)
- Niacin supplements ranked best in triglyceride reductions and increasing high-density lipo-protein cholesterol levels with low to very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:93.7% and 94.6%, respectively)
- Vitamin E supplements ranked best in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:80.0%).
Conclusion
- Micronutrient supplements, such as chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be efficacious in managing T2DM
- It should be noted that the evidence certainty for all was low.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chromium plays an important role in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and was the most effective micronutrient for decreasing fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR reductions. More pronounced effects were seen for chromium than vitamin E, vitamin C, niacin, selenium, and magnesium supplements
- Vitamin K was the top-ranked micronutrient in reducing HbA1c and fasting insulin levels. The mechanism through which Vitamin K affects glucose metabolism is proposed as activation of the AMP-activated protein kinase/sirtuin 1, that in turn increases phosphocreatine 3-kinase and glucose transporter 2 to decrease insulin resistance and fasting glucose.
- Vanadium was the top-ranked micronutrient in total cholesterol (TC) reductions, where supplementation dosage should be carefully considered, as vanadium compounds can be moderately or highly toxic. Vanadium supplementation is only recommended in cases of vanadium deficiency or diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, where the intake of vanadium from food should be enhanced in preference to supplementation
- Niacin was ranked as the most effective in triglyceride (TG) reductions and increasing HDL cholesterol levels. The dose of niacin could not be determined
- Vitamin E was the top-ranked micronutrient in low-density lipo- protein (LDL) cholesterol reductions.
Considerations for future research:
- Considering the clinical importance of these findings, new research is needed to get better insight into the efficacy of micronutrient supplements in managing T2DM
- Selenium homeostasis, selenoprotein, insulin signaling/secretion, and carbohydrate/lipid metabolism are linked in multiple and complex ways but the authors could not explain why chromium supplementation would lower blood glucose more effectively than selenium supplementation, and suggest more research is needed to clarify this
- While vitamin K status could be an emerging treatment target in T2DM prevention and management, it remains to be determined whether vitamin K supplementation has an advantage over other nutrients in terms of hypoglycemic effect, and further research is necessary
- The beneficial effect of vitamin E and niacin supplements regarding lipid metabolism warrant investigation through more rigorous comparative studies.
Abstract
Medical nutrition treatment can manage diabetes and slow or prevent its complications. The comparative effects of micronutrient supplements, however, have not yet been well established. We aimed at evaluating the comparative effects of vitamin and mineral supplements on managing glycemic control and lipid metabolism for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to inform clinical practice. Electronic and hand searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed until June 1, 2022. We selected RCTs enrolling patients with T2DM who were treated with vitamin supplements, mineral supplements, or placebo/no treatment. Data were pooled via frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses. A total of 170 eligible trials and 14223 participants were included. Low to very low certainty evidence established chromium supplements as the most effective in reducing fasting blood glucose levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (SUCRAs: 90.4% and 78.3%, respectively). Vitamin K supplements ranked best in reducing glycated hemoglobin A1c and fasting insulin levels (SUCRAs: 97.0% and 82.3%, respectively), with moderate to very low certainty evidence. Vanadium supplements ranked best in lowering total cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:100%). Niacin supplements ranked best in triglyceride reductions and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with low to very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:93.7% and 94.6%, respectively). Vitamin E supplements ranked best in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with very low evidence certainty (SUCRAs:80.0%). Our analyses indicated that micronutrient supplements, especially chromium, vitamin E, vitamin K, vanadium, and niacin supplements, may be more efficacious in managing T2DM than other micronutrients. Considering the clinical importance of these findings, new research is needed to get better insight into this issue.
2.
Advancements in Nutritional Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence.
Sánchez-García, JC, Saraceno López-Palop, I, Piqueras-Sola, B, Cortés-Martín, J, Mellado-García, E, Muñóz Sánchez, I, Rodríguez-Blanque, R
Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;13(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) causes hyperglycaemia due to the deficit of insulin during pregnancy. Dietary and lifestyle management plays a vital role in maintaining glycaemic control in women with GDM to avoid health risks to the mother and baby. Therefore, this systematic review of fourteen randomised controlled trials evaluated the latest research advancements to identify effective nutritional strategies for managing hyperglycaemia in women with GDM. Among all the dietary strategies implemented in the included randomised controlled trials, probiotic supplementation and supplementation of probiotics and vitamin D were most effective in GDM. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the potential effectiveness of different nutritional strategies for managing GDM. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review to understand the latest evidence supporting nutritional strategy for women with GDM and the need for personalised support for managing hyperglycaemia in GDM.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as hyperglycaemia first detected at any time during pregnancy with values lower than those determined by the WHO for diabetes diagnosis in adults. This pathology, with a worldwide prevalence of 13.4%, causes significant maternal and foetal risks. The first line of treatment consists of maintaining normo-glycaemia through an adequate diet and lifestyle changes. The aim is to synthesize the scientific evidence updating the nutritional recommendations for the effective management of GDM. A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized clinical trials published within the last five years and providing information on nutritional recommendations to achieve an effective management of gestational diabetes were selected. The databases searched were PubMed, the WOS Core Collection, SCOPUS, and CINAHL, using the MeSH terms: "Diabetes, Gestational"; "Nutrition Assessment (nutrition*)"; "Diet"; "Eating"; and "Food"; with the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR". The PEDro scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) was used to assess the scientific quality of the studies, with a mean score of 8.9, indicating an average good scientific quality. Results: A total of 809 papers were collected, of which, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 randomized clinical trials were selected. Probiotic supplementation and co-supplementation with vitamin D have been found to be the most beneficial options for both mothers with GDM and neonates, but the most effective regimens are not known. Diets enriched with extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) and oat bran, as well as some recommendations focused on carbohydrates also seem effective, as well as diets designed for this group of women with GDM such as "CHOICE". Conclusions: Although there are numerous proposals that have been published in recent years focused on the diet of women with GDM in order to improve their results and those of their children, it is the supplementation with probiotics and the co-supplementation with vitamin D that is most agreed upon as beneficial; however, more research is needed into which protocols are most effective. Other proposals that could also be beneficial should be further studied.
3.
Nutritional intervention for diabetes mellitus with Alzheimer's disease.
Li, Z, Li, S, Xiao, Y, Zhong, T, Yu, X, Wang, L
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:1046726
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) affects more than 463 million people worldwide. Similarly, the number of deaths related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has increased by 145%. There are several common risk factors for Type 2 Diabetes and AD, including obesity, insulin resistance, and ageing, as well as common pathological mechanisms, including altered insulin signalling, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, formation of glycated proteins and metabolic syndrome. This review aims to summarize the therapeutic effects of different nutritional therapy strategies on the reduction of DM and AD risk. Controlling blood sugar levels and reducing calorie intake is crucial to preventing diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. The low-carbohydrate, ketogenic, and Mediterranean diets have been found to improve glucose control in people with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). In addition, MIND (Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) and a ketogenic diet may improve cognition in AD patients. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium probiotics, and prebiotics, such as inulin, may inhibit the progression of T2D and AD diseases by suppressing inflammation and modulating gut microbes. In addition, vitamins A, C, D, E, B6, B12, folate, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, zinc, magnesium, and polyphenols may improve cognitive decline, homocysteine levels, and insulin resistance in AD and T2D patients. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this review to understand the beneficial effects of dietary strategies and multi-nutrient supplementation on DM and AD. However, further robust studies are required to investigate the risk factors and underlying mechanisms behind DM-combined AD progression.
Abstract
The combined disease burden of diabetes mellitus (DM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing, and the two diseases share some common pathological changes. However, the pharmacotherapeutic approach to this clinical complexity is limited to symptomatic rather than disease-arresting, with the possible exception of metformin. Whether nutritional intervention might extend or synergize with these effects of metformin is of interest. In particular, dietary patterns with an emphasis on dietary diversity shown to affect cognitive function are of growing interest in a range of food cultural settings. This paper presents the association between diabetes and AD. In addition, the cross-cultural nutritional intervention programs with the potential to mitigate both insulin resistance (IR) and hyperglycemia, together with cognitive impairment are also reviewed. Both dietary patterns and nutritional supplementation showed the effects of improving glycemic control and reducing cognitive decline in diabetes associated with AD, but the intervention specificity remained controversial. Multi-nutrient supplements combined with diverse diets may have preventive and therapeutic potential for DM combined with AD, at least as related to the B vitamin group and folate-dependent homocysteine (Hcy). The nutritional intervention has promise in the prevention and management of DM and AD comorbidities, and more clinical studies would be of nutritional scientific merit.
4.
Effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting in the management of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vaz, EC, Porfírio, GJM, Nunes, HRC, Nunes-Nogueira, VDS
Archives of endocrinology and metabolism. 2018;62(3):337-345
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Glycaemic control of patients with diabetes mellitus is important because it impacts the development of diabetic complications. Carbohydrate counting is a meal planning tool that allows for great variation and flexibility in food choices among individuals with diabetes mellitus. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting in the treatment of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a systematic literature review. The study included randomised controlled trials with at least 3 months of follow-up, and evaluation of outcomes in which patients were randomly divided into two groups. The meta-analysis showed that the final haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) - a test that shows the average blood glucose levels for the last two to three months - was significantly lower in the carbohydrate counting group than in the control group. Authors conclude that the meta-analysis showed evidence favouring the use of carbohydrate counting in the management of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, this benefit was limited to the final HbA1c.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of carbohydrate counting (CHOC) in the treatment of adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic review of randomized studies that compared CHOC with general dietary advice in adult patients with DM1. The primary outcomes were changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), quality of life, and episodes of severe hypoglycemia. We searched the following electronic databases: Embase, PubMed, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The quality of evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS A total of 3,190 articles were identified, and two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts. From the 15 potentially eligible studies, five were included, and 10 were excluded because of the lack of randomization or different control/intervention groups. Meta-analysis showed that the final HbA1c was significantly lower in the CHOC group than in the control group (mean difference, random, 95% CI: -0.49 (-0.85, -0.13), p = 0.006). The meta-analysis of severe hypoglycemia and quality of life did not show any significant differences between the groups. According to the GRADE, the quality of evidence for severe hypoglycemia, quality of life, and change in HbA1c was low, very low, and moderate, respectively. CONCLUSION The meta-analysis showed evidence favoring the use of CHOC in the management of DM1. However, this benefit was limited to final HbA1c, which was significantly lower in the CHOC than in the control group.