1.
Effects of Low Versus Moderate Glycemic Index Diets on Aerobic Capacity in Endurance Runners: Three-Week Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Durkalec-Michalski, K, Zawieja, EE, Zawieja, BE, Jurkowska, D, Buchowski, MS, Jeszka, J
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
During athletic performance, adequate amounts of carbohydrates are required to prolong the onset of fatigue. Research on whether the glycaemic index (GI) of ingested carbohydrates effects performance has been explored but has produced equivocal results. The aim of this randomised crossover study was to assess the effect of low- and moderate- GI diets on the aerobic capacity and endurance performance in 21 runners. Participants consumed a low- and moderate- GI, high carbohydrate and nutrient balanced diets for three weeks each with a two-week washout period. Aerobic capacity and body composition were measured at the beginning and end of each diet period through various athletic performance tests. This study found that after a low-GI, high-carbohydrate diet, improvements were seen in time to exhaustion and running performance. Gas exchange was improved by both diets. The low-GI carbohydrate diet helped athletes to maintain a more stable blood glucose concentration during exertion tests. Based on these results the authors suggest considering GI when planning a diet for performance athletes, and also urge further research be completed to better understand the effects of long-term GI diets with regards to exercise performance.
Abstract
The glycemic index (GI) of ingested carbohydrates may influence substrate oxidation during exercise and athletic performance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of low- and moderate-GI three-week diets on aerobic capacity and endurance performance in runners. We conducted a randomized crossover feeding study of matched diets differing only in GI (low vs. moderate) in 21 endurance-trained runners. Each participant consumed both, low- (LGI) and moderate-GI (MGI) high-carbohydrate (~60%) and nutrient-balanced diets for three weeks each. At the beginning and end of each diet, participants had their aerobic capacity and body composition measured and performed a 12-min running test. After LGI, time to exhaustion during incremental cycling test (ICT) and distance covered in the 12-min run were significantly increased. The MGI diet led to an increase in maximal oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O₂max), but no performance benefits were found after the MGI diet. The LGI and MGI diets improved time and workload at gas exchange threshold (GET) during ICT. The results indicate that a three-week high-carbohydrate LGI diet resulted in a small but significant improvement in athletic performance in endurance runners. Observed increase in V ˙ O₂max on MGI diet did not affect performance.
2.
Effect of protein and carbohydrate solutions on running performance and cognitive function in female recreational runners.
Gui, Z, Sun, F, Si, G, Chen, Y
PloS one. 2017;12(10):e0185982
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Research has shown that consuming a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES) during endurance exercise can improve performance, delay fatigue and ameliorate post-exercise cognitive dysfuction when compared with a noncaloric placebo (PLA). The addition of protein to the CES (CPES) has been suggested to increase these benefits however the current data is limited. The aim of this crossover study was to investigate whether the added protein to a CES would improve exercise performance and cognitive function in 11 female recreational marathon runners. Participants were randomised to consume one of the three solutions (CES, CPES or PLA) every 2.5km during a 21km run, with a 28-day interval, and their VO2max and cognitive function were recorded after the run. This study showed that CES improved endurance performance compared with PLA, however adding protein to the CES did not provide any additional performance benefit. The CPES solution did benefit visual motor speed compared to PLA, but no differences were found in the other cognitive function tests.
Abstract
This study compared the effects of a carbohydrate-electrolyte-protein solution (CEPS, 2% protein plus 4% carbohydrate), carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES, 6% carbohydrate), and noncaloric sweetened placebo (PLA) on both 21-km running performance and cognitive function. Eleven female recreational endurance runners performed a 21-km time-trial running on three occasions, separated by at least 28 days. In a randomized cross-over design, they ingested CEPS, CES, or PLA at a rate of 150 mL every 2.5 km with no time feedback. A cognitive function test was performed before and after the run. Participants ingested approximately 24 g/h carbohydrate plus 12 g/h protein in CEPS trial, and 36 g/h carbohydrate in CES trial during each 21-km trial. Time to complete the time-trial was slightly shorter (P < 0.05) during CES (129.6 ± 8.8 min) than PLA (134.6 ± 11.5 min), with no differences between CEPS and the other two trials. The CEPS trial showed higher composite of visual motor speed than the PLA trial (P < 0.05). In conclusion, CES feedings might improve 21-km time-trial performance in female recreational runners compared with a PLA. However, adding protein to the CES provided no additional time-trial performance benefit. CEPS feeding during prolonged exercise could benefit visual motor speed compared to PLA alone, but no differences in the performance of the other cognitive function tests were found.