1.
Neck-specific strengthening exercise compared with placebo sham ultrasound in patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial.
Benatto, MT, Florencio, LL, Bragatto, MM, Dach, F, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C, Bevilaqua-Grossi, D
BMC neurology. 2022;22(1):126
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Patients with migraine may experience neck pain, worsened performance of cervical muscles, reduced cervical spine range of motion, and increased muscle sensitivity in the craniocervical region. Physiotherapy is an important nonpharmacological treatment option for reducing the duration and frequency of migraine attacks and may include manual therapy, soft-tissue techniques, and strength and endurance training. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of craniocervical muscle-strengthening exercise (CMSE) in reducing the frequency and intensity of headache in migraine patients. This study is a two-armed, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Men and women aged between 18 and 55 years, diagnosed only with migraine and at least three days of pain per month were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups; intervention (n=21) or placebo (n=21) group. Results show that CMSE neither reduced the frequency and intensity of headache nor improved the performance and sensitivity of the cervical muscles, cervical range of motion, and migraine and neck pain-related disabilities. However, a significant improvement for pressure pain threshold was noticed in the sensitivity of the frontal muscle in favour of the intervention group. Authors conclude that performing CMSE is not enough to reduce the frequency and intensity of headache or improve the performance of the cervical muscles and reduce migraine and neck pain related disabilities.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine patients have musculoskeletal disorders and pain in the cervical. And, despite the pathophysiology demonstrating the relationship between migraine and the cervical spine, the effectiveness of craniocervical exercises in these patients has not been verified. So, the aimed of this study was verify the effectiveness of craniocervical muscle-strengthening exercise (CMSE) in reducing the frequency and intensity of headache in migraine patients. METHODS A two-armed, parallel-group randomized controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up was performed. For eight weeks, the volunteers in the intervention group (n = 21) performed a protocol of CMSE, while those in the sham ultrasound group (n = 21) received the application of disconnected therapeutic ultrasound in the upper trapezius and guideline for home-stretching. The primary outcomes were the frequency and intensity of the headache. The secondary outcomes were questionnaires about migraine and neck disability, and satisfaction with the treatment, cervical range of motion, the pressure pain threshold, craniocervical flexion test (CCFT), cervical muscle strength and endurance test, and the cervical muscle activity during the physical tests. RESULTS No differences were observed for the changes observed in primary outcomes after eight weeks and at the 3-months follow up (p > 0.05). For the secondary outcomes, craniocervical exercises improved the sensitivity of the frontal muscle (p = 0.040) and promoted a reduced amplitude of muscle activity of the anterior scalene and upper trapezius in the last stages of CCFT (p ≤ 0.010). There was also reduced muscle activity of the anterior scalene and splenius capitis in the endurance test (p ≤ 0.045), as evaluated by surface electromyography. CONCLUSION CMSE were insufficient in reducing the frequency and intensity of headache, improving the performance of the cervical muscles, or reducing migraine and neck pain-related disabilities. This was found despite a decreased electromyographic activity of the cervical muscles during the last stages of CCFT and increased median frequency during the endurance test. TRIAL REGISTRATION Accession code RBR-8gfv5j , registered 28/11/2016 in the Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC).
2.
The consequences of exercise-induced weight loss on food reinforcement. A randomized controlled trial.
Flack, KD, Hays, HM, Moreland, J
PloS one. 2020;15(6):e0234692
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Exercise is a long-standing remedy for nearly all of obesity’s comorbidities and often recommended as an economical and health-promoting option for weight loss and weight loss maintenance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of exercise on food reinforcement (reward-driven feeding), and to examine whether changes in body composition would be correlated with changes in food reinforcement. This study is randomized controlled trial with a total of 52 participants aged 18 to 40 years. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (six exercise sessions per week, two sessions per week, and sedentary control). Results indicate that there is great variability in individuals’ change in food reinforcement after a 12-week aerobic exercise intervention. Furthermore, those who did increase their food reinforcement were also those who lost the greatest amount of fat-free mass post-intervention. Authors conclude that preventing the loss of fat-free mass may be a valuable piece to a weight loss programme (with resistance training or dietary protein intake as adjunct therapy).
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity remains a primary threat to the health of most Americans, with over 66% considered overweight or obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or greater. A common treatment option many believe to be effective, and therefore turn to, is exercise. However, the amount of weight loss from exercise training is often disappointingly less than expected with greater amounts of exercise not always promoting greater weight loss. Increases in energy intake have been prescribed as the primary reason for this lack of weight loss success with exercise. Research has mostly focused on alterations in hormonal mediators of appetite (e.g.: ghrelin, peptide YY, GLP-1, pancreatic polypeptide, and leptin) that may increase hunger and/or reduce satiety to promote greater energy intake with exercise training. A less understood mechanism that may be working to increase energy intake with exercise is reward-driven feeding, a strong predictor of energy intake and weight status but rarely analyzed in the context of exercise. DESIGN Sedentary men and women (BMI: 25-35 kg/m2, N = 52) were randomized into parallel aerobic exercise training groups partaking in either two or six exercise sessions/week, or sedentary control for 12 weeks. METHODS The reinforcing value of food was measured by an operant responding progressive ratio schedule task (the behavioral choice task) to determine how much work participants were willing to perform for access to a healthy food option relative to a less healthy food option before and after the exercise intervention. Body composition and resting energy expenditure were assessed via DXA and indirect calorimetry, respectively, at baseline and post testing. RESULTS Changes in fat-free mass predicted the change in total amount of operant responding for food (healthy and unhealthy). There were no correlations between changes in the reinforcing value of one type of food (healthy vs unhealthy) to changes in body composition. CONCLUSION In support of previous work, reductions in fat-free mass resulting from an aerobic exercise intervention aimed at weight loss plays an important role in energy balance regulation by increasing operant responding for food.