1.
Increased Colonic Permeability and Lifestyles as Contributing Factors to Obesity and Liver Steatosis.
Di Palo, DM, Garruti, G, Di Ciaula, A, Molina-Molina, E, Shanmugam, H, De Angelis, M, Portincasa, P
Nutrients. 2020;12(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intestinal permeability (IP) is dependent on the structure and function of the intestinal barrier. The gut barrier integrity is the result of ongoing equilibrium and crosstalk involving the microbiome, the mucus, the enterocytes [intestinal absorptive cells], the gut immune system, and the gut–vascular barrier. The main aim of this study was to explore the pan-enteric IP (stomach, small intestine, and colon) with respect to size and fat distribution, as well as the presence of liver steatosis. The study is a cohort study that examined 120 subjects (obese n = 45, overweight n=30, normal weight n = 45). Groups were gender-matched except for the prevalence of males in the overweight group. Results highlight the existence of an association between colonic (but not stomach and small intestinal) permeability, obesity, and liver steatosis. Findings show that: - liver steatosis was detected in 69 (57.5%) subjects, of which 36 (52%) were males. The prevalence of liver steatosis increased from 4% in normal weight subjects to 77%, and to 98% in overweight and obese subjects, respectively. - gastrointestinal permeability changed between age groups at every tract, whereas stomach and small intestine IP decreased with age. Furthermore, this finding also occurred in subjects aged over or equal to 65 years, with respect to colonic permeability. Authors conclude that further studies must evaluate the possibility of modulating colonic permeability to allow both primary prevention measures and new therapeutic strategies in metabolic and liver diseases.
Abstract
Intestinal permeability (IP) is essential in maintaining gut-metabolic functions in health. An unequivocal evaluation of IP, as marker of intestinal barrier integrity, however, is missing in health and in several diseases. We aimed to assess IP in the whole gastrointestinal tract according to body mass index (BMI) and liver steatosis. In 120 patients (61F:59M; mean age 45 ± SEM 1.2 years, range: 18-75), IP was distinctively studied by urine recovery of orally administered sucrose (SO, stomach), lactulose/mannitol ratio (LA/MA, small intestine), and sucralose (SA, colon). By triple quadrupole mass-spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography, we measured urinary recovery of saccharide probes. Subjects were stratified according to BMI as normal weight, overweight, and obesity, and answered questionnaires regarding dietary habits and adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. Liver steatosis was assessed by ultrasonography. IP at every gastrointestinal tract was similar in both sexes and decreased with age. Stomach and small intestinal permeability did not differ according to BMI. Colonic permeability increased with BMI, waist, neck, and hip circumferences and was significantly higher in obese than in lean subjects. As determined by logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) of BMI increment was significantly higher in subjects in the highest tertile of sucralose excretion, also after adjusting for age and consumption of junk food. The presence of liver steatosis was associated with increased colonic permeability. Patients with lower score of adherence to Mediterranean diet had a higher score of 'junk food'. Intestinal permeability tended to increase in subjects with a lower adherence to Mediterranean diet. In conclusion, colonic (but not stomach and small intestinal) permeability seems to be linked to obesity and liver steatosis independently from dietary habits, age, and physical activity. The exact role of these last factors, however, requires specific studies focusing on intestinal permeability. Results should pave the way to both primary prevention measures and new therapeutic strategies in metabolic and liver diseases.
2.
Role of Probiotics in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Does Gut Microbiota Matter?
Xie, C, Halegoua-DeMarzio, D
Nutrients. 2019;11(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by an excessive accumulation of fat in the liver tissue, without excessive alcohol consumption, and appears to be related to metabolic syndrome. It is thought to have a prevalence of 25% globally and there are no pharmacological treatments available. This review discusses the connection between the gut microbiota (GM) and NAFLD. Various mechanisms by which the GM may be involved in the development of NAFLD are discussed. As probiotics and prebiotics can normalise GM and reverse dysbiosis their use may benefit patients with NAFLD. This has been confirmed in animal models. The authors review 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics and/or prebiotics in the treatment of NAFLD which evaluate biochemical markers, as well as five meta-analyses, and found that overall there is strong evidence that probiotics and/or prebiotics can lower ALT and AST (markers of NAFLD), although results for other biochemical markers were mixed. They also reviewed RCTs assessing NAFLD by imaging and histological means, and again found benefits from probiotic and/or prebiotic supplementation.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic consequence of metabolic syndrome, which often also includes obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The connection between gut microbiota (GM) and NAFLD has attracted significant attention in recent years. Data has shown that GM affects hepatic lipid metabolism and influences the balance between pro/anti-inflammatory effectors in the liver. Although studies reveal the association between GM dysbiosis and NAFLD, decoding the mechanisms of gut dysbiosis resulting in NAFLD remains challenging. The potential pathophysiology that links GM dysbiosis to NAFLD can be summarized as: (1) disrupting the balance between energy harvest and expenditure, (2) promoting hepatic inflammation (impairing intestinal integrity, facilitating endotoxemia, and initiating inflammatory cascades with cytokines releasing), and (3) altered biochemistry metabolism and GM-related metabolites (i.e., bile acid, short-chain fatty acids, aromatic amino acid derivatives, branched-chain amino acids, choline, ethanol). Due to the hypothesis that probiotics/synbiotics could normalize GM and reverse dysbiosis, there have been efforts to investigate the therapeutic effect of probiotics/synbiotics in patients with NAFLD. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that probiotics/synbiotics could improve transaminases, hepatic steatosis, and reduce hepatic inflammation. Despite these promising results, future studies are necessary to understand the full role GM plays in NAFLD development and progression. Additionally, further data is needed to unravel probiotics/synbiotics efficacy, safety, and sustainability as a novel pharmacologic approaches to NAFLD.