-
1.
Alternate-Day Fasting Combined with Exercise: Effect on Sleep in Adults with Obesity and NAFLD.
Ezpeleta, M, Gabel, K, Cienfuegos, S, Kalam, F, Lin, S, Pavlou, V, Varady, KA
Nutrients. 2023;15(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as the presence of 5% or more fat in the liver, confirmed by hepatic imaging or biopsy. Poor sleep may adversely affect insulin sensitivity and inflammatory status, thereby contributing to the development and progression of NAFLD. The aim of this study was to investigate how intermittent fasting combined with exercise impacts body weight and sleep measures in adults with NAFLD. This study was a secondary analysis of a 3-month randomised, controlled, parallel-arm study. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 intervention groups: alternate-day fasting (ADF) plus exercise, ADF alone, exercise alone, or a no-intervention control group. Results showed that intermittent fasting combined with exercise produced significant reductions in body weight and intrahepatic triglyceride content but no changes in sleep quality, duration, insomnia severity, or risk of obstructive sleep apnoea. Authors conclude that the weight loss induced by ADF combined with exercise does not improve sleep quality, duration, insomnia severity or risk of obstructive sleep apnea in individuals with obesity and NAFLD.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated how alternate-day fasting (ADF) combined with aerobic exercise impacts body weight and sleep in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: Adults with obesity and NAFLD (n = 80) were randomized into one of four groups for 3 months: combination of ADF (600 kcal "fast day," alternated with an ad libitum intake "feast day") and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise (five sessions per week, 60 min/session); ADF alone; exercise alone; or a no-intervention control group. Results: By month 3, body weight and intrahepatic triglyceride content decreased (p < 0.001, group × time interaction) in the combination group versus the exercise group and control group, but not versus the ADF group. Sleep quality, measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI), did not change in the combination group (baseline: 6.0 ± 0.7; month 3: 5.6 ± 0.7), ADF group (baseline: 8.9 ± 1.0; month 3: 7.5 ± 0.8), or exercise group (baseline: 6.4 ± 0.6; month 3: 6.7 ± 0.6), versus controls (baseline: 5.5 ± 0.7; month 3: 4.6 ± 0.5). Wake time, bedtime, sleep duration, and insomnia severity did not change (no group x time interaction) over the course of the study in any group. Risk for obstructive sleep apnea was present in 30% of combination subjects, 75% of ADF subjects, 40% of exercise subjects, and 75% of controls, and did not change in the intervention groups, versus controls, by month 3. No associations were observed between changes in body weight, intrahepatic triglyceride content, and any sleep outcome. Conclusions: The weight loss induced by ADF combined with exercise does not improve sleep quality, duration, insomnia severity, or risk of obstructive sleep apnea in individuals with NAFLD.
-
2.
The effects of time-restricted eating and weight loss on bone metabolism and health: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.
Papageorgiou, M, Biver, E, Mareschal, J, Phillips, NE, Hemmer, A, Biolley, E, Schwab, N, Manoogian, ENC, Gonzalez Rodriguez, E, Aeberli, D, et al
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2023;31 Suppl 1:85-95
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) involves an alternation of abstinence and consumption of food and caloric beverages over a cycle of hours to days. Time-restricted feeding (in animals) or eating (TRE in humans) is a form of IF that entails restricting eating within a window of 4 to 12 hours per 24-hour cycle and prolonging the time spent in the fasted state to realign eating-fasting patterns with circadian rhythms. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of a 6-month randomised controlled trial of TRE versus standard dietary advice (SDA, active control arm) on bone metabolism and health in a population with at least one component of the metabolic syndrome. This study is a secondary analysis of an open-label 6-month randomised controlled trial in which participants who ate within a time interval > 14 hours per 24-hour cycle (n=54) were randomised to TRE or SDA (active control) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A total of 42 participants (76% women) with available bone turnover markers and/or bone mass measurements were included in this study. Results show that there weren’t any detrimental effects on bone health outcomes i.e. bone metabolism or bone loss after 6 months of TRE. Additionally, weight loss following a period of TRE might be associated with small bone-sparing effects compared with SDA. Authors conclude that future studies of longer duration (>6 months) assessing multiple bone phenotypes are required in order to confirm the study’s findings and explore the effects of various TRE regimens particularly among individuals at risk for bone fragility such as postmenopausal women and the elderly.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored the impact of time-restricted eating (TRE) versus standard dietary advice (SDA) on bone health. METHODS Adults with ≥1 component of metabolic syndrome were randomized to TRE (ad libitum eating within 12 hours) or SDA (food pyramid brochure). Bone turnover markers and bone mineral content/density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry were assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed in the total population and by weight loss response. RESULTS In the total population (n = 42, 76% women, median age 47 years [IQR: 31-52]), there were no between-group differences (TRE vs. SDA) in any bone parameter. Among weight loss responders (≥0.6 kg weight loss), the bone resorption marker β-carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen tended to decrease after TRE but increase after SDA (between-group differences p = 0.041), whereas changes in the bone formation marker procollagen type I N-propeptide did not differ between groups. Total body bone mineral content decreased after SDA (p = 0.028) but remained unchanged after TRE (p = 0.31) in weight loss responders (between-group differences p = 0.028). Among nonresponders (<0.6 kg weight loss), there were no between-group differences in bone outcomes. CONCLUSIONS TRE had no detrimental impact on bone health, whereas, when weight loss occurred, it was associated with some bone-sparing effects compared with SDA.
-
3.
Randomized crossover trial of a modified ketogenic diet in Alzheimer's disease.
Phillips, MCL, Deprez, LM, Mortimer, GMN, Murtagh, DKJ, McCoy, S, Mylchreest, R, Gilbertson, LJ, Clark, KM, Simpson, PV, McManus, EJ, et al
Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2021;13(1):51
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Most people with dementia have Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a disorder that characteristically results in progressive cognitive and functional decline. Brain energy metabolism is impaired in AD. Ketogenic diets can theoretically mitigate impaired brain energy metabolism in AD, leading to improved cognition, daily function, or quality of life. Ketogenic diets are high-fat, low-carbohydrate diets that shift the body towards fat metabolism. The aim of this study was to determine whether a 12-week modified ketogenic diet was well-tolerated and improved cognition, daily function, or quality of life in a hospital clinic of AD patients. This study is a single-phase, assessor-blinded, two-period randomised crossover trial. Participants (n=26) were randomised (1:1 allocation) to a modified ketogenic diet (intervention diet) or their usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines and optional recipes (control diet). Results show that high rates of retention and adherence are achievable by following a 12-week modified ketogenic diet to AD patients. Compared with a usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines, patients on the ketogenic diet improved in daily function and quality of life. Furthermore, changes in cardiovascular risk factors were mostly favourable and adverse effects were mild. Authors conclude that ketogenic diets may hold promise as viable and effective treatment strategies in AD, but larger and longer studies are needed in order to draw definitive conclusions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain energy metabolism is impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD), which may be mitigated by a ketogenic diet. We conducted a randomized crossover trial to determine whether a 12-week modified ketogenic diet improved cognition, daily function, or quality of life in a hospital clinic of AD patients. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with clinically confirmed diagnoses of AD to a modified ketogenic diet or usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines and enrolled them in a single-phase, assessor-blinded, two-period crossover trial (two 12-week treatment periods, separated by a 10-week washout period). Primary outcomes were mean within-individual changes in the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination - III (ACE-III) scale, AD Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) inventory, and Quality of Life in AD (QOL-AD) questionnaire over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes considered changes in cardiovascular risk factors and adverse effects. RESULTS We randomized 26 patients, of whom 21 (81%) completed the ketogenic diet; only one withdrawal was attributed to the ketogenic diet. While on the ketogenic diet, patients achieved sustained physiological ketosis (12-week mean beta-hydroxybutyrate level: 0.95 ± 0.34 mmol/L). Compared with usual diet, patients on the ketogenic diet increased their mean within-individual ADCS-ADL (+ 3.13 ± 5.01 points, P = 0.0067) and QOL-AD (+ 3.37 ± 6.86 points, P = 0.023) scores; the ACE-III also increased, but not significantly (+ 2.12 ± 8.70 points, P = 0.24). Changes in cardiovascular risk factors were mostly favourable, and adverse effects were mild. CONCLUSIONS This is the first randomized trial to investigate the impact of a ketogenic diet in patients with uniform diagnoses of AD. High rates of retention, adherence, and safety appear to be achievable in applying a 12-week modified ketogenic diet to AD patients. Compared with a usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines, patients on the ketogenic diet improved in daily function and quality of life, two factors of great importance to people living with dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001450202 . The trial was registered on August 28, 2018.
-
4.
Effects of DHA-Rich n-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation and/or Resistance Training on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers in Overweight and Obese Post-Menopausal Women.
Félix-Soriano, E, Martínez-Gayo, A, Cobo, MJ, Pérez-Chávez, A, Ibáñez-Santos, J, Palacios Samper, N, Goikoetxea Galarza, I, Cuervo, M, García-Unciti, M, González-Muniesa, P, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Menopause may increase risk for chronic diseases such as obesity, osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes. Interventions to limit menopausal changes such as diet and exercise may improve outcomes. Resistance training and polyunsaturated fats may increase muscle production, however previous studies in postmenopausal women have had mixed outcomes. Therefore this randomised placebo control trial of 124 postmenopausal women aimed to determine if a polyunsaturated fat rich fish oil in combination with resistance training or alone for 16 weeks could affect overweight and obese postmenopausal women. The results showed no combined effect of resistance training and fish oil on body composition, muscle strength, blood pressure, lipids, or blood sugar balance. The resistance training group maintained bone density, increased muscle mass, decreased fat mass and increased blood sugar balance. The fish oil group showed lower blood pressure, lowered triglycerides, and improved muscle quality in lower limbs. It was concluded that resistance training improved body composition, bone density and blood sugar balance and fish oil improved heart health in postmenopausal women. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend fish oil and resistance training to improve all aspects of physiological changes associated with menopause.
Abstract
Resistance training (RT) and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) supplementation have emerged as strategies to improve muscle function in older adults. Overweight/obese postmenopausal women (55-70 years) were randomly allocated to one of four experimental groups, receiving placebo (olive oil) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-rich n-3 PUFA supplementation alone or in combination with a supervised RT-program for 16 weeks. At baseline and at end of the trial, body composition, anthropometrical measures, blood pressure and serum glucose and lipid biomarkers were analyzed. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) and strength tests were also performed. All groups exhibit a similar moderate reduction in body weight and fat mass, but the RT-groups maintained bone mineral content, increased upper limbs lean mass, decreased lower limbs fat mass, and increased muscle strength and quality compared to untrained-groups. The RT-program also improved glucose tolerance (lowering the OGTT incremental area under the curve). The DHA-rich supplementation lowered diastolic blood pressure and circulating triglycerides and increased muscle quality in lower limbs. In conclusion, 16-week RT-program improved segmented body composition, bone mineral content, and glucose tolerance, while the DHA-rich supplement had beneficial effects on cardiovascular health markers in overweight/obese postmenopausal women. No synergistic effects were observed for DHA supplementation and RT-program combination.
-
5.
The Obemat2.0 Study: A Clinical Trial of a Motivational Intervention for Childhood Obesity Treatment.
Luque, V, Feliu, A, Escribano, J, Ferré, N, Flores, G, Monné, R, Gutiérrez-Marín, D, Guillen, N, Muñoz-Hernando, J, Zaragoza-Jordana, M, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Multicomponent interventions consisting of dietary modification, physical activity, behavioural therapy, and education have shown to improve body mass index, blood pressure, and lipids profile. The Obemat2.0 trail was designed and conducted to implement and to test the efficacy of a structured multicomponent motivational therapy to treat childhood obesity. The study is a randomised clustered clinical trial with a treatment on children with obesity lasting 12 months. The study had two arms: a control group and an intervention group. The recruitment started in June 2016 and the fieldwork is expected to end in June 2019. The study results will show whether a multicomponent program, including a bundle of motivational strategies conducted in primary centres by therapists with 12h of specific training could be more effective than usual care. Authors expect this clinical trial to open a window of opportunity to support professionals at the primary care level to treat childhood obesity.
Abstract
The primary aim of the Obemat2.0 trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent motivational program for the treatment of childhood obesity, coordinated between primary care and hospital specialized services, compared to the usual intervention performed in primary care. This was a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in Spain, with two intervention arms: motivational intervention group vs. usual care group (as control), including 167 participants in each. The motivational intervention consisted of motivational interviewing, educational materials, use of an eHealth physical activity monitor and three group-based sessions. The primary outcome was body mass index (BMI) z score increments before and after the 12 (+3) months of intervention. Secondary outcomes (pre-post intervention) were: adherence to treatment, waist circumference (cm), fat mass index (z score), fat free mass index (z score), total body water (kg), bone mineral density (z score), blood lipids profile, glucose metabolism, and psychosocial problems. Other assessments (pre and post-intervention) were: sociodemographic information, physical activity, sedentary activity, neuropsychological testing, perception of body image, quality of the diet, food frequency consumption and foods available at home. The results of this clinical trial could open a window of opportunity to support professionals at the primary care to treat childhood obesity. The clinicaltrials.gov identifier was NCT02889406.
-
6.
Effect of intermittent vs. daily calorie restriction on changes in weight and patient-reported outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis.
Fitzgerald, KC, Vizthum, D, Henry-Barron, B, Schweitzer, A, Cassard, SD, Kossoff, E, Hartman, AL, Kapogiannis, D, Sullivan, P, Baer, DJ, et al
Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2018;23:33-39
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease of the central nervous system. Dietary modification is emerging as a safe intervention to potentially modify disease course. The main aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of an intermittent fasting diet in people with MS. Secondary outcomes explored the effects of calorie restriction (CR) diets on body weight and anthropometric characteristics as well as on patient-reported outcomes including fatigue, sleep and mood. The study is a pilot randomised controlled feeding study of three different types of diets. Each participant (n=36) was randomized to 1 of 3 diets: a control diet (placebo), a daily CR diet and intermittent CR diet. Results indicate that daily CR diet was associated with marginally greater weight loss than the intermittent CR diet. Both CR diets were associated with trends toward improvements in cardiometabolic outcomes. Furthermore, CR diets were associated with in improvements in emotional well-being. Authors conclude that CR and weight loss represent interventions for clinically relevant symptoms due to MS, such as emotional well-being, without adding meaningful risks or adverse outcomes.
Abstract
An intermittent fasting or calorie restriction diet has favorable effects in the mouse forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) and may provide additional anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective advantages beyond benefits obtained from weight loss alone. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled feeding study in 36 people with MS to assess safety and feasibility of different types of calorie restriction (CR) diets and assess their effects on weight and patient reported outcomes in people with MS. Patients were randomized to receive 1 of 3 diets for 8 weeks: daily CR diet (22% daily reduction in energy needs), intermittent CR diet (75% reduction in energy needs, 2 days/week; 0% reduction, 5 days/week), or a weight-stable diet (0% reduction in energy needs, 7 days/week). Of the 36 patients enrolled, 31 (86%) completed the trial; no significant adverse events occurred. Participants randomized to CR diets lost a median 3.4 kg (interquartile range [IQR]: -2.4, -4.0). Changes in weight did not differ significantly by type of CR diet, although participants randomized to daily CR tended to have greater weight loss (daily CR: -3.6 kg [IQR: -3.0, -4.1] vs. intermittent CR: -3.0 kg [IQR: -1.95, -4.1]; P = 0.15). Adherence to study diets differed significantly between intermittent CR vs. daily CR, with lesser adherence observed for intermittent CR (P = 0.002). Randomization to either CR diet was associated with significant improvements in emotional well-being/depression scores relative to control, with an average 8-week increase of 1.69 points (95% CI: 0.72, 2.66). CR diets are a safe/feasible way to achieve weight loss in people with MS and may be associated with improved emotional health.
-
7.
A Randomized Study of the Effects of Additional Fruit and Nuts Consumption on Hepatic Fat Content, Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Basal Metabolic Rate.
Agebratt, C, Ström, E, Romu, T, Dahlqvist-Leinhard, O, Borga, M, Leandersson, P, Nystrom, FH
PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0147149
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Fruits and vegetables intake has been advocated to improve blood lipids profile and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer. However, a low fat diet rich in fruits and vegetables has showed no effect on cardiovascular disease and cancer in a large randomized American trial. This might be due to the high sugar content in fruits, particularly fructose. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of adding either fruits or nuts to the diet of 30 healthy non-obese individuals on liver fat, metabolic rate and cardiovascular risk markers. Authors concluded that the trial only showed small effects on cardiovascular risk factors. Nevertheless, there was a significant change in lipoprotein (fats that transport fats in the blood) levels between the two groups, which tends to give an advantage to the consumption of nuts over fruits. They deduced that increased intake of fruits doesn’t negatively impact cardiovascular disease risk factors in healthy non-obese individuals. However, further research needs to evaluate the effects on obese and insulin-resistant participants.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fruit has since long been advocated as a healthy source of many nutrients, however, the high content of sugars in fruit might be a concern. OBJECTIVES To study effects of an increased fruit intake compared with similar amount of extra calories from nuts in humans. METHODS Thirty healthy non-obese participants were randomized to either supplement the diet with fruits or nuts, each at +7 kcal/kg bodyweight/day for two months. Major endpoints were change of hepatic fat content (HFC, by magnetic resonance imaging, MRI), basal metabolic rate (BMR, with indirect calorimetry) and cardiovascular risk markers. RESULTS Weight gain was numerically similar in both groups although only statistically significant in the group randomized to nuts (fruit: from 22.15 ± 1.61 kg/m(2) to 22.30 ± 1.7 kg/m(2), p = 0.24 nuts: from 22.54 ± 2.26 kg/m(2) to 22.73 ± 2.28 kg/m(2), p = 0.045). On the other hand BMR increased in the nut group only (p = 0.028). Only the nut group reported a net increase of calories (from 2519 ± 721 kcal/day to 2763 ± 595 kcal/day, p = 0.035) according to 3-day food registrations. Despite an almost three-fold reported increased fructose-intake in the fruit group (from 9.1 ± 6.0 gram/day to 25.6 ± 9.6 gram/day, p<0.0001, nuts: from 12.4 ± 5.7 gram/day to 6.5 ± 5.3 gram/day, p = 0.007) there was no change of HFC. The numerical increase in fasting insulin was statistically significant only in the fruit group (from 7.73±3.1 mIE/L to 8.81±2.9 mIE/L, p = 0.018, nuts: from 7.29±2.9 mIE/L to 8.62±3.0 mIE/L, p = 0.14). Levels of vitamin C increased in both groups while α-tocopherol/cholesterol-ratio increased only in the fruit group. CONCLUSIONS Although BMR increased in the nut-group only this was not linked with differences in weight gain between groups which potentially could be explained by the lack of reported net caloric increase in the fruit group. In healthy non-obese individuals an increased fruit intake seems safe from cardiovascular risk perspective, including measurement of HFC by MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02227511.