1.
Distribution of energy intake across the day and weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Young, IE, Poobalan, A, Steinbeck, K, O'Connor, HT, Parker, HM
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023;24(3):e13537
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity increases an individual's risk of metabolic disease, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis, and some cancers. “Chrononutrition” relates to the timing of meals and distribution of total energy intake across the day. Evidence is building chrononutrition as a potential target in both weight loss and metabolic disease interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss, and to evaluate the potential for utilizing altered energy distribution as a tool in weight loss interventions. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine clinical studies. Total number of participants was 485 (earlier distributed total energy intakes: n = 244, later distributed total energy intakes; n = 241). Results show that energy intakes with a focus on earlier distribution resulted in significantly greater weight loss when compared with similarly energy-restricted diets with individuals consuming a larger proportion of their total energy intake later in the day and into the evening. Authors conclude that earlier energy intakes may be a promising tool to be used in conjunction with other weight loss strategies such as energy restriction to enhance weight loss. However, further research is required to elucidate the additional positive impacts that earlier distributed total energy intakes may have on weight and metabolic health.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Implementing a dietary strategy where a higher proportion of energy is consumed earlier in the day may offer additional benefits to an energy restricted diet for weight loss, blood glucose, improve markers of insulin resistance, increase satiety and improve hunger management. Based on the findings, earlier distribution of energy intake may serve as an effective component of a weight loss protocol.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Chrononutrition refers to the timing and distribution of total daily energy intake across the day. It has been proposed that consuming a greater proportion of total daily energy intake earlier in the day as opposed to the evening may be beneficial for weight loss and metabolic health.
Aims
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss.
Results
A total of 9 randomised controlled trials involving 485 participants were included in this analysis. The study durations ranged from 5-16 weeks. All of the studies included in this analysis applied energy-restricted diets to both intervention arms. The mean percentages of energy intake in 8 of the 9 studies per meal were:
- Earlier distributed intakes: breakfast: 34% ± 16%, lunch: 38% ± 7%, dinner: 20% ± 6%.
- Later distributed intakes: breakfast: 19% ± 6%, lunch: 30% ± 10%, dinner; 40% ± 11%.
One of the studies advised percentage of energy intakes as either:
- Earlier: 70% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 30% for afternoon tea and dinner
- Late: 55% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 45% for afternoon tea and dinner.
The earlier distributed energy intake groups demonstrated significantly greater weight loss when compared with later distributed energy intake groups ( Mean Difference (MD) −1.23 kg; 95% CI −2.40, −0.06, p = 0.04;
I2 = 98%).
The earlier energy intake groups also displayed lower fasting and bedtime glucose levels (fasting: −0.83 vs. −0.27 mmol/L, p = 0.001; before sleep: −1.70 vs. −0.28 mmol/L, p = 0.009).
A random-effects model demonstrated that the earlier intake groups displayed greater reductions in LDL (MD: −0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.14, −0.07, p < 0.01), fasting glucose (MD: 0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.23, −0.06, p < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (MD: −0.38; 95% CI −0.64, −0.11, p = 0.005).
One study reported that earlier distribution energy intake also led to a greater reduction in medications following the intervention for type 2 diabetics (31% vs. 0%, P=0.002).
Two of the studies assessed both appetite and hunger and identified that earlier distribution of energy led to improvements in their urge to eat, preoccupation with food and cravings for sweets and fats.
Clinical practice applications:
Earlier distribution of energy intake may be beneficial for:
- Weight loss
- Improve fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose and HbA1c
- Reducing LDL
- Improving satiety and hunger management
- Supporting the reduction of medications for individuals with type 2 diabetes
- Improving regularity of sleep and waking times
Considerations for future research:
As the included studies only ranged from 5-16 weeks, longer duration studies would be useful to identify the effect of earlier distribution of energy intake on body weight, metabolic health and appetite over a longer period of time. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies and a lack of uniformity in the distributions of energy intake across the day. Further studies with more uniformity of energy distribution would be needed to identify the optimal distribution of energy across the day to improve body weight and metabolic health.
Abstract
Consuming a greater proportion of total energy intake earlier in the day rather than in the evening is proposed to positively influence weight loss and health, potentially due to greater synchronization of human body circadian rhythms. This systematic review provides an update on existing evidence regarding earlier distributed eating patterns in weight loss interventions. Using a robust search strategy in five electronic databases, nine randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of energy intake distribution on weight loss were identified. Following critical appraisal, a random-effects meta-analyses found that, in the context of an energy-reduced diet, distributing energy intake with a focus on earlier intake resulted in significantly greater weight loss (-1.23 kg; 95% CI 2.40, -0.06, p = 0.04). Improvements in HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, and LDL cholesterol were also seen. The current study provides a timely update on the evidence linking distribution of total daily energy intake and health, showing that a focus on earlier intakes can result in greater short-term weight loss compared with later intakes. Future studies are needed to elucidate the impact that earlier intakes may have on weight management and metabolic health.
2.
Low-carbohydrate diets and men's cortisol and testosterone: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Whittaker, J, Harris, M
Nutrition and health. 2022;28(4):543-554
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Testosterone is the primary male sex hormone, and vital for reproductive development and function. Moreover, low endogenous testosterone is associated with an increased risk of chronic disease, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on mens' testosterone and cortisol. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-seven studies with a total of 309 participants. Twelve of these studies were randomised trials whilst the rest were non-randomised. Results show an increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol on short-term low-carbohydrate diets (<3 weeks). In fact, resting cortisol levels return to baseline after <3 weeks on a LC diet, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. Furthermore, high-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone. Authors conclude that further research is required in order to warrant their findings.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Short-term LC-diets diets cause a moderate increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol however this effect is not seen in LC-diets followed for great than 3 weeks
- HP-LC diets caused a statistically significant decrease in resting TT, suggesting caution in relation to endocrine effects of LC diets
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction:
A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted on the effects of low-carbohydrate (LC) versus high-carbohydrate (HC) diets on men’s testosterone and cortisol.
The review was registered with PROSPERO and reported using PRISMA 2020 checklists.
Methods:
A comprehensive search strategy was used to find intervention studies looking at healthy adult males and LC diets of <35% carbohydrate. Studies were assessed for quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Sub-group analyses was conducted for diet duration, protein intake and exercise duration.
Results:
The literature search resulted in 27 studies with a total of 309 healthy adult male participants, age: 27.3 ± 4.7 (to minimise variation in steroid hormone metabolism), body mass: 78.6± 7.1kg and BMI: 24.8 ±1.6. 12 randomised and 15 non-randomised controlled trials were analysed. 21 studies were considered low risk bias, 5 medium and 1 high risk.
- Short-term (<3 weeks) LC diets moderately increased resting cortisol (0.41 [0.16, 0.66], p < 0.01) when compared to HC diets.
- Long-term (≥3 weeks) LC diets had no consistent effect on resting cortisol
- LC diets resulted in higher post-exercise cortisol, after long-duration exercise (≥20 min): 0 h (0.78 [0.47, 1.1], p < 0.01), 1 h (0.81 [0.31, 1.31], p < 0.01), and 2 h (0.82 [0.33, 1.3], p < 0.01).
- The overall results for resting total testosterone (TT) showed a significant decrease on LC versus HC diets (SMD = −0.48, p = 0.01. However, subgroup analyses revealed this effect to be limited to high-protein (HP) LC diets, which yielded a very large decrease in TT (SMD = −1.08, p < 0.01; ∼5.23 nmol/L), albeit in a small sample (n = 26).
- Moderate protein (MP) (<35%), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting total testosterone, however high-protein (≥35%), low-carbohydrate diets greatly decreased resting (−1.08 [−1.67, −0.48], p < 0.01) and post-exercise total testosterone (−1.01 [−2, −0.01] p = 0.05).
- There was no overall effect of LC versus HC diets on 0 h post-exercise TT (SMD = −0.03, p = 0.95). However, subgroup analysis showed 0 h post-exercise was non-significantly higher on long-term LC versus HC diets (SMD = 0.44, p = 0.18), and much lower on short-term LC versus HC diets (SMD = −1.01, p = 0.05)
Conclusion:
This systematic review and metanalysis found an increase in resting and post-exercise cortisol on short-term LC diets. Cortisol does return to baseline in the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet. The same response is, however, not seen in post-exercise cortisol, which remains elevated. In addition, the review showed that compared to moderate-protein diets, HP diets were found to cause a large decrease in resting and post-exercise TT (∼5.23 nmol/L).
Clinical practice applications:
The results of this review suggest that exercising whilst following a LC diet can increase cortisol in the short term, but not long-term. This suggests a period of diet adaptation. The effects of long-term LC diets on cardiovascular disease risk is uncertain and healthcare practitioners should monitor client responses and keep up-to-date with new research in this area
Since HP-LC diets were found to significantly decrease resting testosterone it highlights the need to ensure that protein intake does not exceed the urea cycle’s capacity due to potential adverse endocrine effects.
For clients where there is a desire to increase strength, power and hypertrophy, a MP-LC diet could be of benefit, as it showed potential to signal an increased anabolic state post exercise..
NB: Since the review only included a low number of studies and saw within these some heterogeneity that could not be explained, more research is needed before the paper’s findings can be conclusive. The above potential practice applications should therefore be seen as something to be mindful of when working with clients where cortisol and testosterone levels are relevant to their protocol.
Considerations for future research:
Future research should consider:
- Since LC diets have been shown to have a positive effect on health – decreased triglycerides, increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol and weight loss - future studies would benefit from including these markers so any positive and negative impacts can be monitored directly.
- Despite extensive analysis including sensitivity analysis to reduce bias and heterogeneity of the results, the paper highlights a need for further research to ensure consistency in key parameters e.g., exercise duration and intensity, carbohydrate supplements inclusion and period of dietary intervention. Since it was identified that HP-LP diets impact post exercise and resting TT, follow up studies would benefit from consistency in participants diets. This would help to reduce any potential confounding results.
Abstract
Background: Low-carbohydrate diets may have endocrine effects, although individual studies are conflicting. Therefore, a review was conducted on the effects of low- versus high-carbohydrate diets on men's testosterone and cortisol. Methods: The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021255957). The inclusion criteria were: intervention study, healthy adult males, and low-carbohydrate diet: ≤35% carbohydrate. Eight databases were searched from conception to May 2021. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Random-effects, meta-analyses using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, were performed with Review Manager. Subgroup analyses were conducted for diet duration, protein intake, and exercise duration. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included, with a total of 309 participants. Short-term (<3 weeks), low- versus high-carbohydrate diets moderately increased resting cortisol (0.41 [0.16, 0.66], p < 0.01). Whereas, long-term (≥3 weeks), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting cortisol. Low- versus high-carbohydrate diets resulted in much higher post-exercise cortisol, after long-duration exercise (≥20 min): 0 h (0.78 [0.47, 1.1], p < 0.01), 1 h (0.81 [0.31, 1.31], p < 0.01), and 2 h (0.82 [0.33, 1.3], p < 0.01). Moderate-protein (<35%), low-carbohydrate diets had no consistent effect on resting total testosterone, however high-protein (≥35%), low-carbohydrate diets greatly decreased resting (-1.08 [-1.67, -0.48], p < 0.01) and post-exercise total testosterone (-1.01 [-2, -0.01] p = 0.05). Conclusions: Resting and post-exercise cortisol increase during the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate diet. Afterwards, resting cortisol appears to return to baseline, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. High-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone (∼5.23 nmol/L).