-
1.
Effect of gut microbiome modulation on muscle function and cognition: the PROMOTe randomised controlled trial.
Ni Lochlainn, M, Bowyer, RCE, Moll, JM, García, MP, Wadge, S, Baleanu, AF, Nessa, A, Sheedy, A, Akdag, G, Hart, D, et al
Nature communications. 2024;15(1):1859
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Humans lose skeletal muscle with advancing age, and this can progress to sarcopenia. Dietary protein is crucial for maintaining skeletal muscle health; however, several factors can lead to reduced protein intake in older age. The aim of this study was to test whether the addition of gut microbiome modulation could augment established muscle function improvements from combined protein (branched chain amino acids [BCAA]) and resistance exercise. This study was based on the PROMOTe (effect of PRebiotic and prOtein on Muscle in Older Twins) trial which was a randomised controlled trial in which twin pairs (n= 72) were randomised, one twin to each study arm. Results showed that prebiotics improved cognition but did not impact muscle strength and function, compared with placebo. Furthermore, gut microbiome modulation via prebiotic supplementation in the context of ageing-muscle research is feasible and well tolerated, with clear responses noted in the gut microbiota composition and function. Authors concluded that cheap and readily available gut microbiome interventions hold promise for improving cognitive frailty in our ageing population.
Abstract
Studies suggest that inducing gut microbiota changes may alter both muscle physiology and cognitive behaviour. Gut microbiota may play a role in both anabolic resistance of older muscle, and cognition. In this placebo controlled double blinded randomised controlled trial of 36 twin pairs (72 individuals), aged ≥60, each twin pair are block randomised to receive either placebo or prebiotic daily for 12 weeks. Resistance exercise and branched chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation is prescribed to all participants. Outcomes are physical function and cognition. The trial is carried out remotely using video visits, online questionnaires and cognitive testing, and posting of equipment and biological samples. The prebiotic supplement is well tolerated and results in a changed gut microbiome [e.g., increased relative Bifidobacterium abundance]. There is no significant difference between prebiotic and placebo for the primary outcome of chair rise time (β = 0.579; 95% CI -1.080-2.239 p = 0.494). The prebiotic improves cognition (factor score versus placebo (β = -0.482; 95% CI,-0.813, -0.141; p = 0.014)). Our results demonstrate that cheap and readily available gut microbiome interventions may improve cognition in our ageing population. We illustrate the feasibility of remotely delivered trials for older people, which could reduce under-representation of older people in clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04309292.
-
2.
Acceptability, Tolerability, and Estimates of Putative Treatment Effects of Probiotics as Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nikolova, VL, Cleare, AJ, Young, AH, Stone, JM
JAMA psychiatry. 2023;80(8):842-847
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
About 60% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not fully respond to anti-depressant treatments. The microbiota-gut-brain axis is thought to be involved in the development of MDD, making the microbiome a promising target for new treatments. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, including 50 adult patients with major depressive disorder, was to evaluate the tolerability, acceptability and efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic supplement for 8 weeks as an adjunctive to antidepressant drugs. There were no serious adverse events; all reported non-serious events were of gastrointestinal nature and more common in the probiotic group (it was not reported whether the difference was statistically significant). A high adherence rate of 97.2% suggests a high level of acceptability. Depressive mood symptoms improved significantly more in the probiotic group. Greater improvements in anxiety in the probiotic were also seen in some, but not all anxiety scales. The authors concluded that a multi-strain probiotic supplement is a promising adjunct to anti-depressant treatment in patients with MDD, with high tolerability and acceptability.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The microbiota-gut-brain axis is a promising target for novel treatments for mood disorders, such as probiotics. However, few clinical trials have been conducted, and further safety and efficacy data are needed to support this treatment approach. OBJECTIVE To provide acceptability and tolerability data and estimates of intervention effect size for probiotics as adjunctive treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot randomized clinical trial, adults aged 18 to 55 years with MDD taking antidepressant medication but having an incomplete response were studied. A random sample was recruited from primary and secondary care services and general advertising in London, United Kingdom. Data were collected between September 2019 and May 2022 and analyzed between July and September 2022. INTERVENTION Multistrain probiotic (8 billion colony-forming units per day) or placebo daily for 8 weeks added to ongoing antidepressant medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The pilot outcomes of the trial were retention, acceptability, tolerability, and estimates of putative treatment effect on clinical symptoms (depression: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD-17] and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology [IDS] scores; anxiety: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAMA] and General Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] scores) to be used as indicators for a definitive trial. RESULTS Of 50 included participants, 49 received the intervention and were included in intent-to-treat analyses; of these, 39 (80%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 31.7 (9.8) years. A total of 24 were randomized to probiotic and 25 to placebo. Attrition was 8% (1 in the probiotic group and 3 in the placebo group), adherence was 97.2%, and there were no serious adverse reactions. For the probiotic group, mean (SD) HAMD-17 scores at weeks 4 and 8 were 11.00 (5.13) and 8.83 (4.28), respectively; IDS, 30.17 (11.98) and 25.04 (11.68); HAMA, 11.71 (5.86) and 8.17 (4.68); and GAD-7, 7.78 (4.12) and 7.63 (4.77). For the placebo group, mean (SD) HAMD-17 scores at weeks 4 and 8 were 14.04 (3.70) and 11.09 (3.22), respectively; IDS, 33.82 (9.26) and 29.64 (9.31); HAMA, 14.70 (5.47) and 10.95 (4.48); and GAD-7, 10.91 (5.32) and 9.48 (5.18). Standardized effect sizes (SES) from linear mixed models demonstrated that the probiotic group attained greater improvements in depressive symptoms according to HAMD-17 scores (week 4: SES, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.01-0.98) and IDS Self Report scores (week 8: SES, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87) as well as greater improvements in anxiety symptoms according to HAMA scores (week 4: SES, 0.67; 95% CI, 0-0.95; week 8: SES, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.06-1.05), but not GAD-7 scores (week 4: SES, 0.57; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.82; week 8: SES, 0.32; 95% CI, -0.19 to 0.65), compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The acceptability, tolerability, and estimated effect sizes on key clinical outcomes are promising and encourage further investigation of probiotics as add-on treatment for people with MDD in a definitive efficacy trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03893162.
-
3.
Effects of Probiotics on Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
He, X, Liu, W, Tang, F, Chen, X, Song, G
Nutrients. 2023;15(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a developmental disability caused by differences in the brain and is characterized by a series of neurodevelopmental disorders, including language and social disorders, restricted interests, and repetitive stereotyped activities. The aim of this study was to explore whether probiotics could improve the overall severity of ASD symptoms in children. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven studies. Results showed that probiotic supplementation did not improve the associated behavioural symptoms in children with ASD. However, multiple-strain probiotic blend intervention exhibited a positive therapeutic effect on children with ASD and was more effective than single-strain probiotics in subgroup analyses. Authors concluded that to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of probiotics on children with ASD, randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled studies following strict trial guidelines are needed.
Abstract
Many studies have explored the efficacy of probiotics on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children, but there is no consensus on the curative effect. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively investigate whether probiotics could improve behavioral symptoms in children with ASD. A systematic database search was conducted and a total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found a nonsignificant overall effect size of probiotics on behavioral symptoms in children with ASD (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.60 to 0.11, p = 0.18). However, a significant overall effect size was found in the subgroup of the probiotic blend (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.02, p = 0.04). Additionally, these studies provided limited evidence for the efficacy of probiotics due to their small sample sizes, a shorter intervention duration, different probiotics used, different scales used, and poor research quality. Thus, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled studies following strict trial guidelines are needed to precisely demonstrate the therapeutic effects of probiotics on ASD in children.
-
4.
Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics on depression: results from a meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Chen, B, Zhang, J, Dong, J, Ma, J, Zhang, Y, Jin, K, Lu, J
BMC psychiatry. 2023;23(1):477
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder that impairs psychosocial function and quality of life. Recent studies show that prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics reveal a novel way to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in alleviating depressive symptoms. This study was a meta-analysis of thirteen studies with a total of 786 participants who were allocated to the intervention group (n=427) and the placebo group (n=359). Results showed that the overall effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on depressive symptoms were significantly superior to those of placebo. Additionally, biological sex was a vital factor that influenced patients’ responses to the treatment. Authors concluded that agents that manipulate gut microbiota might become a novel approach to treat patients with mild-to-moderate depression.
Abstract
Accumulating studies have shown the effects of gut microbiota management tools in improving depression. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on patients with depression. We searched six databases up to July 2022. In total, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 786 participants were included. The overall results demonstrated that patients who received prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics had significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with those in the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis only confirmed the significant antidepressant effects of agents that contained probiotics. In addition, patients with mild or moderate depression could both benefit from the treatment. Studies with a lower proportion of females reported stronger effects for alleviating depressive symptoms. In conclusion, agents that manipulate gut microbiota might improve mild-to-moderate depression. It is necessary to further investigate the benefits of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic treatments relative to antidepressants and follow up with individuals over a longer time before these therapies are implemented in clinical practice.
-
5.
Effects of probiotics on neurocognitive outcomes in infants and young children: a meta-analysis.
Lin, FL, Chen, CM, Sun, CK, Cheng, YS, Tzang, RF, Chiu, HJ, Wang, MY, Cheng, YC, Hung, KC
Frontiers in public health. 2023;11:1323511
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There have been increasing investigations into the use of probiotics for treating a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders and also for improvement of neurocognitive outcomes in preterm infants or children. The aim of this study was to provide updated evidence of the therapeutic effects of probiotics on enhancing different neurocognitive functions in infants and children as well as to identify important factors that may influence their treatment efficacies. This study was a meta-analysis of nine randomised controlled studies with 3,026 participants. Results did not show significantly better neurocognitive outcomes in those receiving probiotic treatments than those in the placebo group. However, significantly better neurocognitive development was noted in the probiotic group when focusing on studies that used probiotics for more than six months. Authors concluded that further investigations into the enhancement of therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development is required since current evidence is still not strong enough to rule out the beneficial effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic efficacies of probiotics in improving neurocognitive functions in infants and young children remained unclear. This meta-analysis focused on different cognitive outcomes in this population. METHODS Major databases were searched electronically from inception to October 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics in enhancing cognitive functions assessed by standardized tasks. The overall effect size was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) based on a random effects model. RESULTS Nine RCTs with 3,026 participants were identified. Both our primary and secondary results demonstrated no significant difference in neurocognitive outcomes between infants/children treated with probiotics and those receiving placebos. However, our subgroup analysis of studies that offered a probiotics treatment course of over six months demonstrated a significantly better neurocognitive outcome than placebos (SMD = 0.21, p = 0.03, two studies with 451 participants), but this finding was based on only two RCTs. CONCLUSION Despite lack of significant therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive outcomes, our finding of a positive impact of probiotics on neurocognitive development in those undergoing treatment for over six months may provide an important direction for further investigations into the enhancement of therapeutic effects of probiotics on neurocognitive development in infants and young children. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023463412.
-
6.
A randomized trial of probiotic supplementation in nurses to reduce stress and viral illness.
Slykerman, RF, Li, E
Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):14742
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dynamic communication occurs between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system along multiple physiological pathways. Stress increases glucocorticoid production and activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, affecting immunological function and neuronal changes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 could reduce symptoms of stress and anxiety and improve psychological wellbeing in nurses working during the COVID19 pandemic. This study was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of probiotic supplementation with two parallel arms and a ratio of allocation to probiotic or placebo of 1:1. Results showed that following the intervention, stress, anxiety, and psychological wellbeing were not significantly different between nurses supplemented with the probiotic and those who received the placebo. Furthermore, the average number of days per week that nurses reported symptoms of cold or flu-like illness did not significantly differ between the probiotic and placebo supplemented groups. Authors conclude that there weren’t significant differences in outcomes between the probiotic and placebo groups.
Abstract
Animal studies demonstrate how the gut microbiota influence psychological health and immunity to viral infections through their actions along multiple dynamic pathways in the body. Considerable interest exists in probiotics to reduce stress and illness symptoms through beneficial effects in the gut, but translating pre-clinical evidence from animal models into humans remains challenging. We conducted a large trial in nurses working during the 2020 COVID19 pandemic year to establish whether daily ingestion of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 reduced perceived stress and the number of days participants reported symptoms of a viral illness. Our results showed no significant difference in perceived stress or the average number of illness days between probiotic supplemented nurses and the placebo group. Stress and viral illness symptoms reduced during the study for all participants, a trajectory likely influenced by societal-level factors. The powerful effect of a well-managed public health response to the COVID19 pandemic and the elimination of COVID19 from the community in 2020 may have altered the trajectory of stress levels and reduced circulating viral infections making it difficult to detect any effect of probiotic supplementation. Our study highlights the challenge in controlling environmental factors in human trials.
-
7.
COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come?
Wostyn, P
Medical hypotheses. 2021;146:110469
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
A proportion of COVID-19 patients develop post-COVID-19 syndrome, with long-term symptoms such as persistent fatigue, muscle pains, depressive symptoms, and non-restorative sleep, similar to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). In this article the author presents his medical hypothesis that, in a subset of patients at least, post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome may result from damage to olfactory (smell) sensory neurons, which in turn may lead to toxic build-up within the central nervous system (CNS) through congestion of the glymphatic system (the waste clearance system of the CNS). Loss of smell and altered sensation of taste have been reported in 33–80% of COVID-19 patients but the underlying mechanisms are not yet known. Most of these patients regain their sense of smell within 1-3 weeks, suggesting that the virus does not affect the olfactory neurons but their surrounding supporting cells. Some patients, however, do not regain their sense of smell for months which may point to the destruction of neurons. A decrease in olfactory neurons may affect the flow of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in an area important for CSF drainage. This may cause an increase in intracranial pressure (idiopathic intracranial hypertension, IIH) and congestion of the glymphatic system, which have been associated with chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as with headaches and tinnitus, symptoms also commonly seen in COVID-19 patients. The author states that if this hypothesis is confirmed, glymphatic-lymphatic drainage therapies, such as osteopathy, should be recommended as early treatment for patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome.
Abstract
There has been concern about possible long-term sequelae resembling myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome in COVID-19 patients. Clarifying the mechanisms underlying such a "post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome" is essential for the development of preventive and early treatment methods for this syndrome. In the present paper, by integrating insights pertaining to the glymphatic system and the nasal cerebrospinal fluid outflow pathway with findings in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and COVID-19, I provide a coherent conceptual framework for understanding the pathophysiology of post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. According to this hypothesis, this syndrome may result from damage to olfactory sensory neurons, causing reduced outflow of cerebrospinal fluid through the cribriform plate, and further leading to congestion of the glymphatic system with subsequent toxic build-up within the central nervous system. I further postulate that patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome may benefit from cerebrospinal fluid drainage by restoring glymphatic transport and waste removal from the brain. Obviously, further research is required to provide further evidence for the presence of this post-viral syndrome, and to provide additional insight regarding the relative contribution of the glymphatic-lymphatic system to it. Other mechanisms may also be involved. If confirmed, the glymphatic-lymphatic system could represent a target in combating post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. Moreover, further research in this area could also provide new insights into the understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome.
-
8.
Systemic Perturbations in Amine and Kynurenine Metabolism Associated with Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Inflammatory Cytokine Responses.
Lawler, NG, Gray, N, Kimhofer, T, Boughton, B, Gay, M, Yang, R, Morillon, AC, Chin, ST, Ryan, M, Begum, S, et al
Journal of proteome research. 2021;20(5):2796-2811
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Understanding the action of Covid-19 and the host response is paramount to developing personalised treatments and improving recovery rates. This cohort study of 64 individuals aimed to determine underlying biological signatures of individuals with severe and mild Covid-19, to potentially risk stratify patients and provide targeted treatments. The results showed that several biological signatures were disrupted with infection, some increased and some decreased and indicated possible liver, brain, and inflammatory disruptions. There was also evidence of a time-based pattern of biological disruptions, which may be of significance when looking at “long Covid” syndrome. It was concluded that identifying the hosts biological response to the virus offers insights into the viral action on the body. The action of Covid-19 on processes in the brain may indicate a secondary effect of the virus. Using biological markers to predict recovery of individuals suffering from “long Covid” may also be a possibility. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand which biological processes may be disrupted during Covid-19 infection, with the view to testing to understand who may be at risk of long-term complications post recovery.
Abstract
We performed quantitative metabolic phenotyping of blood plasma in parallel with cytokine/chemokine analysis from participants who were either SARS-CoV-2 (+) (n = 10) or SARS-CoV-2 (-) (n = 49). SARS-CoV-2 positivity was associated with a unique metabolic phenotype and demonstrated a complex systemic response to infection, including severe perturbations in amino acid and kynurenine metabolic pathways. Nine metabolites were elevated in plasma and strongly associated with infection (quinolinic acid, glutamic acid, nicotinic acid, aspartic acid, neopterin, kynurenine, phenylalanine, 3-hydroxykynurenine, and taurine; p < 0.05), while four metabolites were lower in infection (tryptophan, histidine, indole-3-acetic acid, and citrulline; p < 0.05). This signature supports a systemic metabolic phenoconversion following infection, indicating possible neurotoxicity and neurological disruption (elevations of 3-hydroxykynurenine and quinolinic acid) and liver dysfunction (reduction in Fischer's ratio and elevation of taurine). Finally, we report correlations between the key metabolite changes observed in the disease with concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines showing strong immunometabolic disorder in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
-
9.
Brain Neurotransmitter Modulation by Gut Microbiota in Anxiety and Depression.
Huang, F, Wu, X
Frontiers in cell and developmental biology. 2021;9:649103
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The causes of anxiety and depression are unclear, but growing evidence points to a role of the gut microbiota. One possible way that the gut microbiota may have an influence on mental health is through a group of chemical messengers in the brain, known as neurotransmitters. This review summarised the research surrounding neurotransmitters and gut microbiota. The review began by looking at research in animal models and the roles of various neurotransmitters and how they may be influenced by the gut microbiota. The neurotransmitters outlined were serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline and it was stated that there is evidence that gut microbiota may be able to influence them alleviating anxiety and/or depression, however there was limited evidence with noradrenaline. It was concluded that there is a close connection between the gut microbiota and anxiety and depression. There is more research needed in humans, as most work has been completed in animal models. This paper could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the role of the gut microbiota in mental health disorders and the importance of gut health in individuals suffering from these.
Abstract
Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent mental illnesses worldwide and have long been thought to be closely associated to neurotransmitter modulation. There is growing evidence indicating that changes in the composition of the gut microbiota are related to mental health including anxiety and depression. In this review, we focus on combining the intestinal microbiota with serotonergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic neurotransmission in brain, with special emphasis on the anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in stress-related rodent models. Therefore, we reviewed studies conducted on germ-free rodents, or in animals subjected to microbiota absence using antibiotics, as well as via the usage of probiotics. All the results strongly support that the brain neurotransmitter modulation by gut microbiota is indispensable to the physiopathology of anxiety and depression. However, a lot of work is needed to determine how gut microbiota mediated neurotransmission in human brain has any physiological significance and, if any, how it can be used in therapy. Overall, the gut microbiota provides a novel way to alter neurotransmitter modulation in the brain and treat gut-brain axis diseases, such as anxiety and depression.
-
10.
Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and the Gut Microbiome: Significance of the Gut Microbiome in Relation to Mechanism of Action, Treatment Response, Side Effects, and Tachyphylaxis.
Sjöstedt, P, Enander, J, Isung, J
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2021;12:682868
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In preceding centuries common thought was that psychiatric disorders originated from the gut. In later years this concept was replaced by the idea of it being a disorder of the brain and that an imbalance of neurotransmitters is the cause of depression and other psychiatric conditions (monoamine hypothesis). This theory has been dominating psychiatric research for the past decades, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have become a widespread treatment option for psychological disorders. Despite their benefits, their use also presents clinical challenges such as treatment resistance, side effects or loss of effect. Consequently, the monoamine hypothesis has become disputed with other pathophysiological mechanisms having been proposed in recent years. With an appreciation of the pathophysiological complexities, this opinion-based article sought to present alternate views and to suggest areas for future research regarding psychiatric disorders, SSRIs and the gut-brain axis. The gut-brain axis has complex communication and signalling pathways in essence, the gut microbiome can exert significant effects on emotions, behaviours, metabolic risks, and the metabolism of drugs. Nerve cells of the gut also generate substantial amounts of serotonin for use within the gut. Equally, the gut microbiome produces and uses serotonin. It appears that some of the side effects associated with SSRIs, such as weight gain, are mediated via the gut microbiome. Further evidence suggests that SSRIs and several other psychotropic drugs exert antimicrobial action, which can alter the balance and integrity of the gut microbiome. Therefore, it would be valuable to further investigate the impact of long-term SSRI use on the microbial constellation in the gut and whether certain microbiome patterns could help predict treatment responsiveness or side effects, that may be manageable via microbiome manipulation. The authors believe that an advanced understanding of the dynamics of the gut microbiome could provide better and personalized treatment options for mental health conditions. This article provides a brief insight into current thoughts and theories of psychiatric disorders, SSRIs and the gut.
Abstract
The monoamine hypothesis of psychopharmacology has been dominating the biological psychiatric research field for decades. Currently psychiatric research has increasingly appreciated psychiatric disorders and suicidal behavior as being highly complex and multi-etiological. In this pathway the gut microbiome and its interrelationship with the brain is gaining traction. The usage of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is increasing in the general population. This is due to their effect on a broad range of psychiatric disorders, and their favorable side effect profile. Still, there are enigmatic aspects about SSRIs, such as the difficulty to predict effect in individual patients, inter-individual differences in side effect, tachyphylaxis (a sudden loss of response to a certain drug), and to date, uncertainties on how they exert their clinical effect. A majority of the serotonin in the human body is produced within the gut, and SSRIs affect enteric neurons. They also exhibit antimicrobial properties that comes with the potential of disrupting microbial hemostasis. We propose that the role of the gut-brain axis and the gut microbiome in relation to psychopharmacology should be more highlighted. With this article, together with similar articles, we would like to provide a hypothetical framework for future studies within this field. We believe that this would have the potential to provide a paradigm shift within the field of psychopharmacology, and result in findings that potentially could contribute to the development of a more personalized and tailored treatment.