-
1.
The effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Li, G, Feng, H, Mao, XL, Deng, YJ, Wang, XB, Zhang, Q, Guo, Y, Xiao, SM
Journal of translational medicine. 2023;21(1):442
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), an endocrine and metabolic disease, is influenced by host physiology and environmental factors. Recent studies have shown that the gut microbiota plays a key role in the maintenance of host homeostasis and pathogenesis of T2DM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a probiotic intervention on glycaemic control in T2DM patients and to evaluate the variations in these effects due to participant characteristics and intervention characteristics. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty randomised-controlled studies including a total of 1,827 individuals. Results showed that probiotic supplementation had favourable effects on glycaemic control in T2DM patients. Bifdobacterium and food-type probiotics had greater glucose-lowering effects than other probiotic genera and types of vehicles used to deliver the probiotics. Authors concluded that the administration of probiotics may be a promising adjuvant therapy for glycaemic control in T2DM patients.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on the data from the randomised clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS PubMed, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception to October 2022, and RCTs about probiotics and T2DM were collected. The standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate the effects of probiotics supplementation on glycaemic control related parameters, e.g. fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and homeostasis model of assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). RESULTS Thirty RCTs including 1,827 T2MD patients were identified. Compared with the placebo group, the probiotics supplementation group had a significant decrease in the parameters of glycaemic control, including FBG (SMD = - 0.331, 95% CI - 0.424 to - 0.238, Peffect < 0.001), insulin (SMD = - 0.185, 95% CI - 0.313 to - 0.056, Peffect = 0.005), HbA1c (SMD = - 0.421, 95% CI - 0.584 to - 0.258, Peffect < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (SMD = - 0.224, 95% CI - 0.342 to - 0.105, Peffect < 0.001). Further subgroup analyses showed that the effect was larger in the subgroups of Caucasians, high baseline body mass index (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2), Bifidobacterium and food-type probiotics (Psubgroup < 0.050). CONCLUSION This study supported that probiotics supplementation had favourable effects on glycaemic control in T2DM patients. It may be a promising adjuvant therapy for patients with T2DM.
-
2.
Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics on depression: results from a meta-analysis.
Zhang, Q, Chen, B, Zhang, J, Dong, J, Ma, J, Zhang, Y, Jin, K, Lu, J
BMC psychiatry. 2023;23(1):477
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a mood disorder that impairs psychosocial function and quality of life. Recent studies show that prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics reveal a novel way to treat psychiatric disorders such as depression through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in alleviating depressive symptoms. This study was a meta-analysis of thirteen studies with a total of 786 participants who were allocated to the intervention group (n=427) and the placebo group (n=359). Results showed that the overall effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on depressive symptoms were significantly superior to those of placebo. Additionally, biological sex was a vital factor that influenced patients’ responses to the treatment. Authors concluded that agents that manipulate gut microbiota might become a novel approach to treat patients with mild-to-moderate depression.
Abstract
Accumulating studies have shown the effects of gut microbiota management tools in improving depression. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on patients with depression. We searched six databases up to July 2022. In total, 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 786 participants were included. The overall results demonstrated that patients who received prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics had significantly improved symptoms of depression compared with those in the placebo group. However, subgroup analysis only confirmed the significant antidepressant effects of agents that contained probiotics. In addition, patients with mild or moderate depression could both benefit from the treatment. Studies with a lower proportion of females reported stronger effects for alleviating depressive symptoms. In conclusion, agents that manipulate gut microbiota might improve mild-to-moderate depression. It is necessary to further investigate the benefits of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic treatments relative to antidepressants and follow up with individuals over a longer time before these therapies are implemented in clinical practice.
-
3.
Effects of probiotic administration on overweight or obese children: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Li, Y, Liu, T, Qin, L, Wu, L
Journal of translational medicine. 2023;21(1):525
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of overweight or obesity in children is increasing due to changes in dietary structure and exercise habits, as determined by the body mass index (BMI) calculated from height and weight. Childhood obesity can cause some clinical complications such as hypertension, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of probiotics on eight factors in children with overweight or obesity. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of four studies with a total of 206 overweight or obesity children. Among them, 105 were in the probiotic group, and 101 were in the placebo group. Results showed that probiotics can improve high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, adiponectin, leptin, and TNF-α in overweight or obese children. The systematic review showed that probiotics work mainly by reshaping disturbed intestinal microbiota, regulating lipid metabolism, reducing inflammation and immune response, playing a positive effect of short-chain fatty acids produced, alleviating oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inhibiting the growth and reproduction of pathogens in the gut. Authors concluded that probiotics could regulate lipid metabolism and immune response to some degree in children with overweight or obesity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper aimed to examine the effects of probiotics on eight factors in overweight or obese children by meta-analysis, namely, body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), adiponectin, leptin and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and summarize the mechanisms of action of probiotics based on the existing researches. METHODS Six databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed and CNKI) were searched until March 2023. Review Manager 5.4 was used for meta-analysis. The data were analysed using weighted mean differences (WMDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) under a fixed effect model or random effect model to observe the effects of probiotic administration on the included indicators. RESULTS Four publications with a total of 206 overweight or obesity children were included. According to the meta-analysis, probiotics were able to significantly decrease the levels of HDL-C (MD, 0.06; 95% CI 0.03, 0.09; P = 0.0001), LDL-C (MD, - 0.06; 95% CI - 0.12, - 0.00; P = 0.04), adiponectin (MD, 1.39; 95% CI 1.19, 1.59; P < 0.00001), leptin (MD, - 2.72; 95% CI - 2.9, - 2.54; P < 0.00001) and TNF-α (MD, - 4.91; 95% CI - 7.15, - 2.67; P < 0.0001) compared to those in the placebo group. Still, for BMI, the palcebo group seemed to be better than the probiotic group (MD, 0.85; 95% CI 0.04, 1.66; P = 0.04). TC (MD, - 0.05; 95% CI - 0.12, 0.02; P = 0.14) and TG (MD, - 0.16; 95% CI - 0.36, 0.05; P = 0.14) were not different between two groups. CONCLUSIONS This review drew that probiotics might act as a role in regulating HDL-C, LDL-C, adiponectin, leptin and TNF-α in overweight or obesity children. Additionally, our systematic review yielded that probiotics might regulate lipid metabolism and improve obese associated symptoms by some paths. This meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with ID: CRD42023408359.
-
4.
A randomized trial of probiotic supplementation in nurses to reduce stress and viral illness.
Slykerman, RF, Li, E
Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):14742
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dynamic communication occurs between the gut microbiota and the central nervous system along multiple physiological pathways. Stress increases glucocorticoid production and activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, affecting immunological function and neuronal changes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 could reduce symptoms of stress and anxiety and improve psychological wellbeing in nurses working during the COVID19 pandemic. This study was a large double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of probiotic supplementation with two parallel arms and a ratio of allocation to probiotic or placebo of 1:1. Results showed that following the intervention, stress, anxiety, and psychological wellbeing were not significantly different between nurses supplemented with the probiotic and those who received the placebo. Furthermore, the average number of days per week that nurses reported symptoms of cold or flu-like illness did not significantly differ between the probiotic and placebo supplemented groups. Authors conclude that there weren’t significant differences in outcomes between the probiotic and placebo groups.
Abstract
Animal studies demonstrate how the gut microbiota influence psychological health and immunity to viral infections through their actions along multiple dynamic pathways in the body. Considerable interest exists in probiotics to reduce stress and illness symptoms through beneficial effects in the gut, but translating pre-clinical evidence from animal models into humans remains challenging. We conducted a large trial in nurses working during the 2020 COVID19 pandemic year to establish whether daily ingestion of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 reduced perceived stress and the number of days participants reported symptoms of a viral illness. Our results showed no significant difference in perceived stress or the average number of illness days between probiotic supplemented nurses and the placebo group. Stress and viral illness symptoms reduced during the study for all participants, a trajectory likely influenced by societal-level factors. The powerful effect of a well-managed public health response to the COVID19 pandemic and the elimination of COVID19 from the community in 2020 may have altered the trajectory of stress levels and reduced circulating viral infections making it difficult to detect any effect of probiotic supplementation. Our study highlights the challenge in controlling environmental factors in human trials.
-
5.
Low FODMAP diet reduces gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome and clinical response could be predicted by symptom severity: A randomized crossover trial.
Algera, JP, Demir, D, Törnblom, H, Nybacka, S, Simrén, M, Störsrud, S
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;41(12):2792-2800
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction, characterised by chronic abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. Currently, many patients follow an exclusion diet where specific food components are eliminated. One of these exclusion diets is a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs). The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in IBS. This study was a double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover study which enrolled 31 participants who were randomly assigned to the diet periods. Results showed that the severity of GI symptoms was reduced, and bowel habits were affected in the direction of less frequent and firmer stool by the low FODMAP diet, but not by a diet with moderate amounts of FODMAPs. Authors conclude that assessment of overall IBS severity and predominant bowel habits before the intervention may be helpful for clinicians in their IBS management before considering a trial period with the low FODMAP diet as a treatment option.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
A low (4 g/day) FODMAP diet could provide clinical benefits in the context of an acute strategy for IBS clients with frequent loose stools (IBS-Diarrhoea and/or IBS-Mixed) compared to those with hard and less frequent stools (IBS-Constipation) to improve the severity of GI symptoms, including lower abdominal pain intensity and frequency, bowel habits, daily life interference, and psychological distress.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
The aim of this paper was to investigate the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and bowel habits, and to identify possible predictors of clinical response to a low FODMAP diet and FODMAP sensitivity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).
Methods
- This study involved a double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover trial of 29 participants (18-75 years), mostly female, diagnosed with IBS (Rome IV)
- The primary outcome was to assess the effects of a low (4 g/day) vs. moderate (23 g/day) FODMAP diet on GI symptoms over a 7-day period
- Secondary outcomes involved assessing the effects of low vs. moderate FODMAP diets on i) somatic symptoms, ii) psychological distress, iii) predictors of clinical and IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) sensitivity to FODMAP
- Breakfast was standardised, with prescribed low FODMAP list deviations recorded
- Main dishes and snacks were also provided
- Participants were requested to limit alcohol, caffeine, fatty- and spicy foods, ate regularly, chewed thoroughly and drank enough water
- GI symptoms and bowel habits were recorded during the 7-day screening period, then participants undertook a Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT)
- The first 7-day diet started one day after the LNCT
- A 14-day wash-out period allowed participants to eat and drink as usual, thereafter following the second 7-day diet period as part of the cross over design.
Results
A low FODMAP intervention (compared to a moderate FODMAP diet); resulted in:
- Reduced overall IBS rating (10 ± 72 vs. 57 ± 108, P=0.04)
- Improved abdominal pain frequency (10 ± 32 vs. 18 ± 29 (P=0.02)
- Improved stool consistency (0.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.6 ± 1.2, P= 0.01) and frequency (0.1 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.7, P= 0.01)
- Overall, 34% of participants positively responded to the low FODMAP diet, which could be predicted based on higher baseline IBS-SSS scores (P=0.02)
- Participants sensitive to FODMAPs had increased pre- and postprandial ratings of gas, abdominal pain and bloating and higher exhaled methane concentrations compared to non-sensitive participants to FODMAPs
- Authors highlighted a non-significant association between FODMAP sensitivity and GI symptoms during the LNCT, with higher visceral hypersensitivity (45 ± 20, P=0.73) after ingestion of poorly absorbed and fermentable carbohydrates, with no independent predictors identified.
Conclusions
This study showed that a diet low in FODMAPs reduces GI symptoms and positively impacts bowel habits in IBS, compared with a moderate FODMAP diet.
Clinical practice applications:
- While this was a short term study, a low FODMAP diet reduced GI symptoms and affected bowel habits (more firm and less frequent stools) in IBS, compared with a diet containing moderate amounts of FODMAPs
- Knowing the above, an assessment of overall IBS severity and predominant bowel habits before the intervention may be helpful for clinicians working with younger females in their IBS management before considering a trial period with the low FOD-MAP diet as a treatment option.
Considerations for future research:
- Future trials could target a larger sample size with a more representative population, as well as assessing low FODMAP interventions over longer timeframes
- . Additionally, the assessment of biological measures such as microbiota diversity and stability, as well as metabolites (such as short chain fatty acids) could be important to understand mechanistic attributes of low FODMAP diets in IBS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) can provoke symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to compare the effects of diets with low vs. moderate FODMAP content on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and bowel habits, and to identify possible predictors of clinical response to a low FODMAP diet and FODMAP sensitivity in IBS. METHODS Adult participants with IBS (Rome IV criteria, n = 29) were included and adhered to two 7-day diet periods, with either low (4 g/day) or moderate (23 g/day) amounts of FODMAPs, in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. The periods were separated by a wash-out period (≥14 days). IBS-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and a stool diary (Bristol Stool Form) were completed before and after the diet periods. At baseline, severity of GI symptoms and gut microbial fermentation were assessed (every 15 min, 4 h) during the Lactulose Nutrient Challenge Test (LNCT). Clinical response and FODMAP sensitivity were defined by reduction after low FODMAP period, and increase after moderate FODMAP period in IBS-SSS (≥50 points), respectively. RESULTS Severity of GI symptoms (P = 0.04), stool consistency (P = 0.01), and stool frequency (P = 0.01) differed between the interventions, with reduced overall GI symptom severity, abdominal pain intensity and frequency, bowel habits dissatisfaction, and daily life interference (P < 0.05 for all), as well as more firm (P = 0.03) and less frequent (P < 0.01) stools after low FODMAP intervention, but not after moderate FODMAP intervention. A third (34%) responded clinically to the low FODMAP diet, and the response could be predicted by higher IBS-SSS at baseline (P = 0.02). Although modest associations between FODMAP sensitivity (22%) and GI symptoms during LNCT were observed, no independent predictors could be identified. CONCLUSIONS A diet low in FODMAPs reduces GI symptoms and affects bowel habits in IBS, compared with a moderate FODMAP diet. Assessment of IBS severity before the intervention may be used to predict clinical response to a low FODMAP diet. Trial registry (http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov): Registered under Clinical Trial number NCT05182593.
-
6.
Association between Allium vegetables and the risk of non-digestive tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies.
Guo, L, Yuan, X, Yang, B, Tang, G, Liang, H, Guo, F
Cancer treatment and research communications. 2022;32:100598
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Allium vegetables, such as garlic, onion, and leeks, are characterized by a high content of organosulfur compounds, flavonoids, glutathione, selenium compounds, and vitamins E and C. The aim of this study was to clarify the role of Allium vegetables in non-digestive tract cancer. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5 studies (11 cohort and 14 case-control studies) on Allium vegetables involving 18,070 patients. Results showed that Allium vegetable consumption could reduce the risk of non-digestive tract cancer demonstrating the protective role of Allium vegetables. Authors conclude that further randomized controlled trials or well-designed cohort studies with high quality are needed to further confirm the findings of this study.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that allium vegetable consumption is correlated with a 14% decreased risk of non-digestive tract cancer
- Of the allium vegetables studied, onion and garlic were more likely to lower the risk of non-digestive tract cancer. Due to the limited under of eligible studies and small sample sizes, the authors of this study suggest that the impact of leeks on non-digestive cancers be interpreted with caution
- Allium vegetables appear to inhibit hepatocarcinogenesis, as well as the formation of nitrosamines. They also stress the endoplasmic reticulum and the death receptor pathway, hence reducing inflammation and modulating the immune system.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of allium vegetable intake in non-digestive cancer prevention, such as lung, breast, ovarian and prostate
- This is a well-designed meta-analysis which was performed following PRISMA guidelines and included 11 cohort and 14 case-control studies of 18,070 patients
- The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality. All included studies had NOS scores of >=7, indicating a lower risk of bias and better study quality.
Results
Overall, significant associations were found between higher Allium vegetable intake and lowered risk of non-digestive tract cancer (OR: 0.86; 95% Cl: 0.80-0.93) in a random-effects model.
When stratified:
- By study design, statistically significant effects were observed in cohort studies (OR; 0.78, 95% Cl: 0.69-0.90) but not case controlled studies (OR 0.94; 95% Cl: 0.87-1.02)
- By sex, statistically significant effects were observed in both women (OR: 0.89; 95% Cl: 0.81-0.98) and men (OR: 0.81, 95% Cl: 0.69-0.96)
- By allium vegetable type, onion (OR: 0.81, 95% Cl: 0.69-0.95) and garlic (OR: 0721, 95% Cl: 0.63-0.82) were more likely to have a lower risk of non-digestive tract cancer than leek (OR: 0.88, 95% Cl: 0.56-1.38)
- By study location, statistically significant correlation was found among studies in China (OR: 0731, 95% Cl: 0.57-0.94) but not Europe (OR: 0.93, 95% Cl: 0.85-1.02) or America (OR: 0.88, 95% Cl: 0.76-1.03)
- By cancer type, statistically significant risk decreases were seen with prostate cancer (OR: 0.81, 95% Cl: 0.69-0.96), marginal risk decrease with ovarian cancer (OR: 0.77, 95% Cl: 0.60-1.00), whilst no statistically significance was reached with breast cancer (OR: 0.94, 95% Cl: 0.83-1.05).
Limitations
- This meta-analysis included retrospective observational studies, which may introduce recall bias.
Clinical practice applications:
- Healthcare providers can use the results of this study to encourage the consumption of allium vegetables, in particular garlic and onion, to reduce the risk of non-digestive cancers, in particular prostate
- The results of this study could be used to encourage dietary variety, particularly in light of allium vegetables falling under the category of high-FODMAP foods. FODMAP dietary eliminations are not discussed in this paper.
Considerations for future research:
- To build on these findings, randomised-controlled trials or high quality cohort studies are needed.
Abstract
PURPOSE To clarify the role of Allium vegetables in non-digestive tract cancer, we conducted this meta-analysis. METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies assessing the associations between Allium vegetables and the risk of non-digestive tract cancer. We estimated the pooled odds ratio (OR) of non-digestive tract cancer for the highest and lowest Allium vegetable consumption using random-effects models. A dose-response regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between Allium vegetables and non-digestive tract cancer risk. RESULTS In a pooled analysis of 25 studies (11 cohort and 14 case-control studies) on Allium vegetables, a total of 18,070 patients with non-digestive tract cancer were finally included. Integrated OR of non-digestive tract cancer was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.80-0.93] for the highest versus the lowest Allium vegetable consumption for all studies, 0.78 (95% CI:0.69-0.90) for case-control studies and 0.94 (95%CI: 0.87-1.02) for cohort studies. Sensitivity analysis showed that the pooled effect was stable. No apparent publication bias was identified in this study; however, the cumulative meta-analysis suggested that studies conducted earlier (from 1994 to 1997) might be a source of heterogeneity. Dose-response regression model indicated that Allium vegetable consumption was associated with the risk of non-digestive tract cancer (P = 0.001 for non-linearity; P = 0.032 for linearity). CONCLUSION Higher Allium vegetable consumption could reduce the risk of non-digestive tract cancers, demonstrating the protective role of Allium vegetables.
-
7.
The Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Luo, C, Peng, S, Li, M, Ao, X, Liu, Z
Frontiers in immunology. 2022;13:848279
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is characterized by a nasal sensitive inflammation. Common symptoms of AR are nasal itching, sneezing, rhinorrhoea, and nasal congestion. In addition, some patients experience symptoms of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, such as watery or itchy or red eyes. The aim of this study was to address the effect and safety of probiotics on AR and to explore the possible causes of between-study heterogeneity via subgroup. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-eight randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics supplementation for patients with AR can ameliorate AR symptoms and improve the quality of life. Probiotics supplementation can correct the T helper cell 1/ T helper cell 2 balance. Furthermore, there was no significant change in overall or antigen-specific immunoglobulin E levels between probiotic-treated and placebo-treated subjects. Authors conclude that in spite of the positive results of some outcomes, there is weak evidence that probiotics have a potential benefit in the treatment of AR.
Abstract
Background: Probiotics have proven beneficial in a number of immune-mediated and allergic diseases. Several human studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of probiotics in allergic rhinitis; however, evidence for their use has yet to be firmly established. Objective: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to address the effect and safety of probiotics on allergic rhinitis. Methods: We systematically searched databases [MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials] from inception until June 1, 2021. Qualified literature was selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data were extracted, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. The results showed that probiotics significantly relieved allergic rhinitis symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.44, -0.13]; p = 0.0003, I 2 = 89%), decreased Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) scores compared with the control group (SMD, -0.64, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.49], p < 0.00001, I 2 = 97%), and increased T helper cell 1(Th1)/Th2 ratio (mean difference [MD], -2.47, 95% CI [-3.27, -1.68], p < 0.00001, I 2 = 72%). There was no significant change in overall or specific IgE levels between probiotic-treated and placebo-treated subjects (SMD, 0.09, 95% CI [-0.16, 0.34], I 2 = 0%, and SMD, -0.03, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.13], p = 0.72, I 2 = 0%, respectively). Conclusions: To sum up, probiotic supplement seems to be effective in ameliorating allergic rhinitis symptoms and improving the quality of life, but there is high heterogeneity in some results after subgroup analysis and clinicians should be cautious when recommending probiotics in treating allergic rhinitis. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO (CRD42021242645).
-
8.
Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jonduo, ME, Vallely, LM, Wand, H, Sweeney, EL, Egli-Gany, D, Kaldor, J, Vallely, AJ, Low, N
BMJ open. 2022;12(8):e062990
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum, referred to together as genital mycoplasmas, commonly colonise the urogenital tract in women, and are often found together. These species do not appear to cause symptoms or harmful effects in non-pregnant women. However, studies have reported that colonisation with a genital mycoplasma has been associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes. The main objective of this study was to investigate the associations between M. hominis, U. urealyticum and/or U. parvum and the risk of pre-term birth, alone and in combination with bacterial vaginosis (BV). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of fifty-seven studies. Results show that genital mycoplasmas are associated with several different adverse pregnancy outcomes in univariable analysis only. Authors conclude that since only six of the fifty-seven studies reported multivariable analysis, the current available literature does not allow conclusions about the role of mycoplasmas in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, alone or with coexisting BV.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum (genital mycoplasmas) commonly colonise the urogenital tract in pregnant women. This systematic review aims to investigate their role in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, alone or in combination with bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS We searched Embase, Medline and CINAHL databases from January 1971 to February 2021. Eligible studies tested for any of the three genital mycoplasmas during pregnancy and reported on the primary outcome, preterm birth (PTB) and/or secondary outcomes low birth weight (LBW), premature rupture of membranes (PROM), spontaneous abortion (SA) and/or perinatal or neonatal death (PND).Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, read potentially eligible full texts and extracted data. Two reviewers independently assessed risks of bias using published checklists. Random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate summary ORs (with 95% CIs and prediction intervals). Multivariable and stratified analyses were synthesised descriptively. RESULTS Of 57/1194 included studies, 39 were from high-income countries. In meta-analysis of unadjusted ORs, M. hominis was associated with PTB (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.34), PROM, LBW and PND but not SA. U. urealyticum was associated with PTB (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.55), PROM, LBW, SA and PND. U. parvum was associated with PTB (1.60, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.30), PROM and SA. Nine of 57 studies reported any multivariable analysis. In two studies, analyses stratified by BV status showed that M. hominis and U. parvum were more strongly associated with PTB in the presence than in the absence of BV. The most frequent source of bias was a failure to control for confounding. CONCLUSIONS The currently available literature does not allow conclusions about the role of mycoplasmas in adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, alone or with coexisting BV. Future studies that consider genital mycoplasmas in the context of the vaginal microbiome are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42016050962.
-
9.
Gut Microbiota and Pathophysiology of Depressive Disorder.
Kunugi, H
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2021;77 Suppl 2:11-20
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Bidirectional communication between the brain and gastrointestinal tract has been established and evidence suggests the microbiota-gut-brain axis may play a role in many psychiatric diseases, including major depression disorder (MDD). Although there is currently no established biochemical marker used in the clinical setting, recent findings have identified four potential mechanisms underlying MDD. The aim of this review is to outline these mechanisms and summarise the current evidence related to the pathophysiology of MDD. The literature suggests the gut microbiota impacts each of the potential mechanisms in the pathophysiology of MDD, and recent clinical trials on probiotics indicate beneficial effects on depression symptoms. Based on these results, the author concludes that practices leading to a healthier gut microbiota may aid in the reduction of depression symptoms. Future research on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in MDD is a promising avenue for better understanding the pathophysiology of disease and developing improved treatments for MDD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accumulating evidence has suggested that the bi-directional communication pathway, the microbiota-gut-brain axis, plays an important role in the pathophysiology of many neuropsychiatric diseases including major depressive disorder (MDD). This review outlines current evidence and promising findings related to the pathophysiology and treatment of MDD. SUMMARY There are at least 4 key biological molecules/systems underlying the pathophysiology of MDD: central dopamine, stress responses by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system, inflammation, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Animal experiments in several depression models have clearly indicated that gut microbiota is closely related to these molecules/systems and administration of probiotics and prebitotics may have beneficial effects on them. Although the results of microbiota profile of MDD patients varied from a study to another, multiple studies reported that bacteria which produce short-chain fatty acids such as butyrate and those protective against metabolic diseases (e.g., Bacteroidetes) were reduced. Clinical trials of probiotics have emerged, and the majority of the studies have reported beneficial effects on depression symptoms and related biological markers. Key Messages: The accumulating evidence suggests that research on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in major depressive disorder (MDD) is promising to elucidate the pathophysiology and to develop novel treatment of MDD, although there is still a long distance yet to reach the goals.
-
10.
The Effect of Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Vaginal Microbiota: A Systematic Review.
Ratten, LK, Plummer, EL, Bradshaw, CS, Fairley, CK, Murray, GL, Garland, SM, Bateson, D, Tachedjian, G, Masson, L, Vodstrcil, LA
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2021;11:732423
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A vaginal microbiota associated with optimal reproductive and sexual health outcomes is characterised by Lactobacillus spp., although microbiome composition varies across geographical locations and specific populations. The aim of this study was to summarise the effect of specific oestrogen-containing or progestin-only contraceptives as well as menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) on the vaginal microbiota, and evaluate the strength of these findings. This study is a systematic review of twenty-nine studies out of which 25 studies reported on the effect of hormonal contraception among reproductive-aged women and four on the effect of MHT among post-menopausal women. This review shows that: - oestrogen-containing contraceptives, particularly the combined oestrogen and progestin-containing oral contraceptive pill, had a positive effect on the composition of the vaginal microbiota. - among post-menopausal women using MHT, exogenous oestrogen also appeared to positively influence the vaginal microbiota. - exogenous-oestrogen as an adjunctive therapy does not impact the composition of the vaginal microbiota in a detrimental way. - the impact of progestin-only hormonal contraceptives was less consistent as there was equal evidence that they have either a negative or neutral impact on the vaginal microbiota. Authors conclude that their findings confirm the potential benefits of exogenous oestrogen in conferring a vaginal microbiota associated with optimal health outcomes for women.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exogenous sex steroids within hormonal contraception and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) have been used for family planning and management of menopausal symptoms, without consideration of their effects on the vaginal microbiota. This is largely because their use predates our understanding of the importance of the vaginal microbiome on human health. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42018107730) to determine the influence of exogenous sex steroids, stratified by oestrogen-containing or progestin-only types of contraception, and MHT on the vaginal microbiome, as measured by molecular methods. METHODS Embase, PubMed and Medline were searched for relevant literature published through to December 1st 2020. Eligible studies reported on the effect of specific exogenous sex steroids on the vaginal microbiome using a molecular method. Data regarding the 'positive', 'negative' or 'neutral' effect of each type of contraceptive or MHT on the vaginal microbiome was extracted and summarised. A positive effect reflected sex steroid exposure that was associated with increased abundance of lactobacilli, a change to, or maintenance of, an optimal vaginal microbiota composition, or a decrease in bacterial diversity (specifically reflecting a low-diversity optimal microbiota state), relative to the control group. An exogenous sex steroid was designated as having a negative effect on the vaginal microbiome if it resulted in opposing effects (i.e. loss of lactobacilli, a non-optimal microbiota state). When no significant change was found, this was considered neutral/inconclusive. RESULTS We identified 29 manuscripts reporting on the effect of exogenous sex steroids on the vaginal microbiome; 25 investigating hormonal contraceptives, and 4 investigating MHT. Oestrogen-containing contraception, particularly reflecting the combined oestrogen and progestin-containing contraceptive pill, had a positive effect on the composition of the vaginal microbiota. Progestin-only contraception, particularly reflecting depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, had mixed effects on the microbiota. Among post-menopausal women using MHT, exogenous oestrogen applied topically was associated with increased prevalence of lactobacilli. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that oestrogen-containing compounds may promote an optimal vaginal microbiota, which could have clinical applications. The impact of progestin-only contraceptives on the vaginal microbiota is less clear; more data is needed to determine how progestin-only contraceptives contribute to adverse reproductive and sexual health outcomes.