1.
Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota-A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Lundtorp Olsen, C, Massarenti, L, Vendius, VFD, Gürsoy, UK, Van Splunter, A, Bikker, FJ, Gürsoy, M, Damgaard, C, Markvart, M, Belstrøm, D
Nutrients. 2023;15(22)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In oral health, the oral microbiota thrives with the human host, whereas dysbiotic compositional changes are associated with development of oral diseases. Free sugars constitute the most important dietary risk factor for the development of dental caries, with a dose-response relationship. The aim of this study was to determine if consumption of probiotic lozenges containing an equal mix of L. rhamnosus PB01 DSM14870 and L. curvatus EB10 DSM32307 and xylitol could counteract oral dysbiosis in the supragingival microbiota. This study was a quadruple-blinded (participant, care provider, investigator, outcome assessor), randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. This study recruited eighty orally and systemically healthy individuals aged 19–31 years. Participants were randomly assigned to the placebo or intervention group. Results showed that probiotics partly counteract sugar-mediated loss of diversity in the supragingival microbiota, which was observed in the placebo group. Consequently, from a microbiological point of view, the probiotic supplement augmented resilience of the supragingival microbiota in the resolution period after sugar stress. Authors concluded that probiotics affect the composition of the supragingival microbiota during short-term sugar stress in healthy individuals.
Abstract
The aim was to test if probiotics counteract oral dysbiosis during 14 days of sugar stress and subsequently help restore oral homeostasis. Eighty healthy individuals received either probiotics (n = 40) or placebo lozenges (n = 40) for 28 days and rinsed with a 10% sucrose solution 6-8 times during the initial 14 days of the trial. Saliva and supragingival samples were collected at baseline, day 14, and day 28. Saliva samples were analyzed for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, albumin, and salivary enzyme activity. The supragingival microbiota was characterized according to the Human Oral Microbiome Database. After 14 days of sugar stress, the relative abundance of Porphyromonas species was significantly higher (p = 0.03) and remained significantly elevated at day 28 in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.004). At day 28, the relative abundance of Kingella species was significantly higher in the probiotic group (p = 0.03). Streptococcus gordinii and Neisseria elongata were associated with the probiotic group on day 28, while Streptococcus sobrinus was associated with the placebo group on day 14 and day 28. On day 28, the salivary albumin level was significantly lower in the probiotic group. The present study demonstrates a potential stabilizing effect on the supragingival microbiota mediated by consumption of probiotics during short-term sugar stress.
2.
Effects of probiotics on preventing caries in preschool children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meng, N, Liu, Q, Dong, Q, Gu, J, Yang, Y
The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2023;47(2):85-100
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Caries are caused by cariogenic microorganisms in plaque biofilms that ferment dietary carbohydrates to produce acids, resulting in the loss of minerals from the hard tissue of teeth and the formation of cavities. This study's aim was to evaluate the potential of probiotics in preventing caries in preschool children. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of seventeen studies with a total of 3781 preschool children (divided into an experimental group (n = 2047) and a control group (n = 1734)). Results showed that probiotics could effectively prevent dental caries, of which Lactobacillus rhamnosus was more effective than other bacteria in preventing dental caries. Probiotics reduced the high concentration of Streptococcus mutans in saliva but could not reduce the number of lactic acid bacteria in saliva and dental plaques. Authors concluded that since there is still a lack of relevant research on the dose, route of administration, and frequency of probiotic use, further randomised controlled studies are needed to standardise the use of probiotics and achieve more beneficial effects before they are generally used in clinical practice.
Abstract
This paper systematically evaluate the effects of probiotics on preventing caries in preschool children. The present systematic review was conducted following the Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and recorded in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration no: CRD42022325286). Literature were screened from PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and other databases from inception to April 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials on the clinical efficacies of probiotics in preventing dental caries in preschool children and extract relevant data. The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan5.4 software and the Stata16. Cochrane handbook was used to assess the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADEprofiler 3.6) was used to determine the evidence quality. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were eligible, of which two trials had certain levels of bias and 15 had a low risk of bias. Evidence quality assessment showed that the included trials were of medium quality. The meta-analysis results showed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus was associated with a reduced incidence (p = 0.005) and progression (p < 0.001) of caries in preschool children. Probiotics could reduce the number of high-level Streptococcus mutans in saliva (p < 0.00001) but could not reduce the number of Streptococcus mutans in dental plaque nor the amount of Lactobacillus in the saliva and dental plaque. Current evidence shows that probiotics could prevent caries in preschool children, but Lactobacillus rhamnosus was more effective in preventing caries than others. Although probiotics could reduce high levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva, they could not reduce the amount of Lactobacillus in saliva and dental plaque.
3.
Probiotic Mixture Containing Lactobacillus helveticus, Bifidobacterium longum and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Affects Brain Responses to an Arithmetic Stress Task in Healthy Subjects: A Randomised Clinical Trial and Proof-of-Concept Study.
Edebol Carlman, HMT, Rode, J, König, J, Repsilber, D, Hutchinson, AN, Thunberg, P, Persson, J, Kiselev, A, Pruessner, JC, Brummer, RJ
Nutrients. 2022;14(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Physiological and psychological stress can affect gut function and its interaction with the brain (gut-brain axis). Different types of stress and different phases of stress regulation can affect the brain in different ways. Manipulation of the gut microbiota using probiotic bacteria has been shown to improve cognition and stress response. However, probiotic interventions are likely to have different effects depending on the strains used. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a probiotic intervention on brain activity and stress response. This study is a randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled crossover study with 22 healthy subjects. Subjects were randomised to two study groups receiving the intervention in different orders (probiotics or placebo first). Results demonstrate that the probiotic intervention: - altered activity in specific brain regions known to regulate emotion and stress response. - significantly altered functional connectivity between the upper limbic and medioventral regions. - did not affect the activation of other limbic or subcortical areas. Authors conclude that their findings could further lead to possible clinical implications for improving stress resilience and potential roles in the treatment of affective and gut-brain axis disorders.
Abstract
Probiotics are suggested to impact physiological and psychological stress responses by acting on the gut-brain axis. We investigated if a probiotic product containing Bifidobacterium longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum R1012 affected stress processing in a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover proof-of-concept study (NCT03615651). Twenty-two healthy subjects (24.2 ± 3.4 years, 6 men/16 women) underwent a probiotic and placebo intervention for 4 weeks each, separated by a 4-week washout period. Subjects were examined by functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) as well as an autonomic nervous system function assessment during the Stroop task. Reduced activation in regions of the lateral orbital and ventral cingulate gyri was observed after probiotic intervention compared to placebo. Significantly increased functional connectivity was found between the upper limbic region and medioventral area. Interestingly, probiotic intervention seemed to predominantly affect the initial stress response. Salivary cortisol secretion during the task was not altered. Probiotic intervention did not affect cognitive performance and autonomic nervous system function during Stroop. The probiotic intervention was able to subtly alter brain activity and functional connectivity in regions known to regulate emotion and stress responses. These findings support the potential of probiotics as a non-pharmaceutical treatment modality for stress-related disorders.