1.
Effects of mental contrasting on sleep and associations with stress: A randomized controlled trial.
Schmidt, LI, Neubauer, AB, Stoffel, M, Ditzen, B, Schirmaier, J, Farrenkopf, C, Sieverding, M
Journal of health psychology. 2023;28(11):1057-1071
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Insufficient sleep is a widespread problem. For adults between 18 and 64 years, the National Sleep Foundation generally recommends a range of nightly sleep duration from 7 to 9 hours. The aim of this study was to test a self-regulatory intervention based on mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) against the effects of sleep hygiene information only. This study was a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial with daily/nightly assessments in a baseline-week and analog daily/nightly assessments in a post-intervention week. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Results indicated an increase in sleep quality and subjective (but not objective) sleep duration from baseline to post-intervention period. Additionally, regarding subjective stress, associations with daily sleep parameters were largely confirmed. Authors conclude that future research should include booster sessions and evaluate MCII effects in the longer run. Furthermore, a better understanding of the causes regarding insufficient sleep among specific target groups and their degree of controllability is required to develop individually targeted interventions.
Abstract
Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) has been successfully applied to improve health-related behaviors (e.g. exercise). We explored its effectiveness to improve sleep outcomes beyond effects of sleep hygiene (SH) information, and investigated associations with stress. Eighty university employees (mean age: 29.6, SD = 4.5) were randomized to either a MCII + SH or a SH-only condition. During a baseline-week and a post-intervention week, sleep duration (Fitbit Alta and self-report), sleep quality, and stress were assessed daily and saliva was collected to assess the cortisol awakening response (CAR). In total, self-reported sleep quality and duration increased, but there was no meaningful condition*week interaction for sleep parameters or CAR. Higher average stress was associated with shorter sleep duration and lower sleep quality. Within-person, days with higher stress were followed by nights with lower sleep quality. Despite overall improvements, effects of MCII were not confirmed. MCII might be less effective to improve behaviors which are less controllable.
2.
A Large Randomized Trial: Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) for Breast Cancer (BC) Survivors on Salivary Cortisol and IL-6.
Lengacher, CA, Reich, RR, Paterson, CL, Shelton, M, Shivers, S, Ramesar, S, Pleasant, ML, Budhrani-Shani, P, Groer, M, Post-White, J, et al
Biological research for nursing. 2019;21(1):39-49
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience physiological and psychological stressors related to their diagnosis and treatment, and a disruption of cortisol function can affect cancer risk and progression. Increased levels of the stress hormone cortisol and interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory immune mediator, have been associated with acute and chronic stress levels. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a clinical stress-reducing program, which has been found to decrease psychological and physical symptoms associated with stress. The purpose of this randomised study, involving 299 BCS, was to evaluate the efficacy of MBSR in reducing cortisol and IL-6 levels, compared to a usual-care control treatment. Statistically significant reductions in cortisol levels were seen after the delivery of the MBSR program at both time points (week 1 and 6), and at week 6 only for IL-6. There was no significant difference in change in cortisol or IL6 levels over time between the MBSR and the usual-care groups. An association was observed between levels of IL-6 and psychological and physical symptoms and quality of life, but not for cortisol. The authors conclude that MBSR can alleviate the stress response in the short term for breast cancer survivors.
Abstract
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience psychological and physiological symptoms after cancer treatment. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), a complementary and alternative therapy, has reduced subjective measures of stress, anxiety, and fatigue among BCS. Little is known, however, about how MBSR affects objective markers of stress, specifically the stress hormone cortisol and the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6). In the present study, BCS ( N = 322) were randomly assigned to a 6-week MBSR program for BC or usual-care control. Measurements of cortisol, IL-6, symptoms, and quality of life were obtained at orientation and 6 weeks. Cortisol and IL-6 were also measured prior to and after the MBSR(BC) class Weeks 1 and 6. The mean age of participants was 56.6 years and 69.4% were White non-Hispanic. Most had Stage I (33.8%) or II (35.7%) BC, and 35.7% had received chemotherapy and radiation. Cortisol levels were reduced immediately following MBSR(BC) class compared to before the class Weeks 1 and 6 (Wilcoxon-signed rank test; p < .01, d = .52-.56). IL-6 was significantly reduced from pre- to postclass at Week 6 (Wilcoxon-signed rank test; p < .01, d = .21). No differences were observed between the MBSR(BC) and control groups from baseline to Week 6 using linear mixed models. Significant relationships with small effect sizes were observed between IL-6 and both symptoms and quality of life in both groups. Results support the use of MBSR(BC) to reduce salivary cortisol and IL-6 levels in the short term in BCS.
3.
Impact of Experimentally Induced Cognitive Dietary Restraint on Eating Behavior Traits, Appetite Sensations, and Markers of Stress during Energy Restriction in Overweight/Obese Women.
Morin, I, Bégin, C, Maltais-Giguère, J, Bédard, A, Tchernof, A, Lemieux, S
Journal of obesity. 2018;2018:4259389
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The treatment of obesity has become a public health priority given the negative impact of this condition on physical and mental health. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of energy restriction alone or in combination with induced cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) on eating behaviour traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in overweight and obese premenopausal women. The study is a single-blinded randomised clinical study which recruited premenopausal women aged between 26 and 50 years. The participants were randomised to either an energy-restriction-plus-induced CDR condition (CDR+group) or an energy-restriction-without induced CDR condition (CDR−group). Results indicate that inducing CDR in a context of energy restriction had no further effects on eating behaviour traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in the short term as well as in the longer term than energy restriction alone. Authors conclude that increasing CDR has no negative impact on factors regulating energy balance in the context of energy restriction.
Abstract
Weight loss has been associated with changes in eating behaviors and appetite sensations that favor a regain in body weight. Since traditional weight loss approaches emphasize the importance of increasing cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) to achieve negative energy imbalance, it is difficult to untangle the respective contributions of energy restriction and increases in CDR on factors that can eventually lead to body weight regain. The present study aimed at comparing the effects of energy restriction alone or in combination with experimentally induced CDR on eating behavior traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in overweight and obese women. We hypothesized that the combination of energy restriction and induced CDR would lead to more prevalent food cravings, increased appetite sensations, and higher cortisol concentrations than when energy restriction is not coupled with induced CDR. A total of 60 premenopausal women (mean BMI: 32.0 kg/m2; mean age: 39.4 y) were provided with a low energy density diet corresponding to 85% of their energy needs during a 4-week fully controlled period. At the same time, women were randomized to either a condition inducing an increase in CDR (CDR+ group) or a condition in which CDR was not induced (CRD- group). Eating behavior traits (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire and Food Craving Questionnaire), appetite sensations (after standardized breakfast), and markers of stress (Perceived Stress Scale; postawakening salivary cortisol) were measured before (T = 0 week) and after (T = 4 weeks) the 4-week energy restriction, as well as 3 months later. There was an increase in CDR in the CDR+ group while no such change was observed in the CDR- group (p=0.0037). No between-group differences were observed for disinhibition, hunger, cravings, appetite sensations, perceived stress, and cortisol concentrations. These results suggest that a slight increase in CDR has no negative impact on factors regulating energy balance in the context of energy restriction.