0
selected
-
1.
Are probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics beneficial in primary thyroid diseases? A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Zawadzka, K, Kałuzińska, K, Świerz, MJ, Sawiec, Z, Antonowicz, E, Leończyk-Spórna, M, Abadi, AK, Trofimiuk-Müldner, M, Bała, MM
Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM. 2023;30(2):217-223
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irregularities in intestinal microbial composition are thought to be correlated with thyroid dysfunction. Supplementation of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics are gaining momentum in recent times in improving health in general. This systematic review of randomised controlled trials was conducted to summarise the up-to-date evidence on the therapeutic potential of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in the treatment of thyroid disease. The meta-analysis did not show beneficial effects on thyroid hormone balance, BMI or levothyroxine dosage reduction. Supplementation with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium resulted in improvement in constipation and a statistically non-significant reduction in thyroid-stimulating hormone in adult participants with hypothyroidism. Further robust long-term studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics in thyroid disease treatment as the availability of the number of studies included in this systematic review was limited. However, healthcare professionals can use the review to understand the current evidence in this area and the correlation between gut microbial alterations and thyroid disease.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE A number of studies indicate the presence of a thyroid-gut axis and the important influence of the gut microbiota on thyroid function. As prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics show therapeutic potential in the treatment of intestinal dysbiosis, the aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of their supplementation in primary thyroid diseases. REVIEW METHODS Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL), registers of clinical trials, and grey literature up to 6 October 2022 were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021235054). BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE OF KNOWLEDGE After screening 1,721 references, two RCTs were identified, which included 136 hypothyroid participants in total. Meta-analysis of the results after eight weeks of supplementation with predominantly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains indicated a clinically and statistically nonsignificant decrease in TSH (MD -0.19 mIU/L; 95% CI -0.43 to 0.06; I2= 0%), and no effect on fT3 levels (MD 0.01 pg/mL; 95% CI-0.16 to 0.18; I2= 0%). Data from single studies indicated no significant change in the levels of fT4, thyroid auto-antibodies, BMI, levothyroxine doses, and severity of symptoms measured with validated scales. Only constipation scores showed significant improvement (MD -8.71 points in the Faecal Incontinence Questionnaire; 95% CI -15.85 to -1.57; I2= 0%). SUMMARY Low-certainty evidence from two randomised trials, suggests that routine administration of probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics may result in little to no benefit in patients with primary hypothyroidism.
-
2.
Advancements in Nutritional Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence.
Sánchez-García, JC, Saraceno López-Palop, I, Piqueras-Sola, B, Cortés-Martín, J, Mellado-García, E, Muñóz Sánchez, I, Rodríguez-Blanque, R
Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;13(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) causes hyperglycaemia due to the deficit of insulin during pregnancy. Dietary and lifestyle management plays a vital role in maintaining glycaemic control in women with GDM to avoid health risks to the mother and baby. Therefore, this systematic review of fourteen randomised controlled trials evaluated the latest research advancements to identify effective nutritional strategies for managing hyperglycaemia in women with GDM. Among all the dietary strategies implemented in the included randomised controlled trials, probiotic supplementation and supplementation of probiotics and vitamin D were most effective in GDM. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the potential effectiveness of different nutritional strategies for managing GDM. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this systematic review to understand the latest evidence supporting nutritional strategy for women with GDM and the need for personalised support for managing hyperglycaemia in GDM.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as hyperglycaemia first detected at any time during pregnancy with values lower than those determined by the WHO for diabetes diagnosis in adults. This pathology, with a worldwide prevalence of 13.4%, causes significant maternal and foetal risks. The first line of treatment consists of maintaining normo-glycaemia through an adequate diet and lifestyle changes. The aim is to synthesize the scientific evidence updating the nutritional recommendations for the effective management of GDM. A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized clinical trials published within the last five years and providing information on nutritional recommendations to achieve an effective management of gestational diabetes were selected. The databases searched were PubMed, the WOS Core Collection, SCOPUS, and CINAHL, using the MeSH terms: "Diabetes, Gestational"; "Nutrition Assessment (nutrition*)"; "Diet"; "Eating"; and "Food"; with the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR". The PEDro scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) was used to assess the scientific quality of the studies, with a mean score of 8.9, indicating an average good scientific quality. Results: A total of 809 papers were collected, of which, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 randomized clinical trials were selected. Probiotic supplementation and co-supplementation with vitamin D have been found to be the most beneficial options for both mothers with GDM and neonates, but the most effective regimens are not known. Diets enriched with extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) and oat bran, as well as some recommendations focused on carbohydrates also seem effective, as well as diets designed for this group of women with GDM such as "CHOICE". Conclusions: Although there are numerous proposals that have been published in recent years focused on the diet of women with GDM in order to improve their results and those of their children, it is the supplementation with probiotics and the co-supplementation with vitamin D that is most agreed upon as beneficial; however, more research is needed into which protocols are most effective. Other proposals that could also be beneficial should be further studied.
-
3.
The role of gut microbiome in inflammatory skin disorders: A systematic review.
Widhiati, S, Purnomosari, D, Wibawa, T, Soebono, H
Dermatology reports. 2022;14(1):9188
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gut-skin axis refers to the complex cross-talk between gut bacteria and skin. Although the exact mechanism underlying chronic inflammatory skin conditions is unknown, imbalances in the composition of gut microbes are believed to play a role. Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review to assess whether gut microbial imbalance may contribute to inflammatory skin conditions such as Psoriasis, Acne Vulgaris, Atopic Dermatitis, and Urticaria. According to this systematic review, immune stimulation, inflammation, and disruption of bacterial composition are common mechanisms in all these skin disorders. A western diet and environmental exposures are found to be contributing to the disruption of bacteria and the pathology of these skin disorders. It has been observed that friendly gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium are reduced in people with inflammatory skin conditions, whereas elevated levels of pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli and Proteobacteria are present in the gut of patients with inflammatory skin conditions. The abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Clostridium leptum, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium may protect against inflammatory skin conditions. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the pathogenesis behind inflammatory skin conditions as well as the involvement of gut bacteria in the development and progression of the disease. Healthcare professionals can gain a deeper understanding of gut bacteria that contribute to the pathology of inflammatory diseases as well as how clinically using anti-inflammatory bacterial species may improve the condition of individuals suffering from inflammatory skin conditions.
Abstract
The close relationship between the intestine and the skin has been widely stated, seen from gastrointestinal (GI) disorders often accompanied by skin manifestations. Exactly how the gut microbiome is related to skin inflammation and influences the pathophysiology mechanism of skin disorders are still unclear. Many studies have shown a two-way relationship between gut and skin associated with GI health and skin homeostasis and allostasis. This systematic review aimed to explore the associations between the gut microbiome with inflammatory skin disorders, such as acne, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria, and to discover the advanced concept of this relationship. The literature search was limited to any articles published up to December 2020 using PubMed and EBSCOHost. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines for conducting a systematic review. Of the 319 articles screened based on title and abstract, 111 articles underwent full-text screening. Of these, 23 articles met our inclusion criteria, comprising 13 atopic dermatitis (AD), three psoriasis, four acne vulgaris, and four chronic urticaria articles. Acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and chronic urticaria are inflammation skin disorders that were studied recently to ascertain the relationship of these disorders with dysbiosis of the GI microbiome. All acne vulgaris, psoriasis, and chronic urticaria studies stated the association of gut microbiome with skin manifestations. However, the results in atopic dermatitis are still conflicting. Most of the articles agree that Bifidobacterium plays an essential role as anti-inflammation bacteria, and Proteobacteria and Enterobacteria impact inflammation in inflammatory skin disorders.
-
4.
Effects of the Administration of Probiotics on Fecal Microbiota Diversity and Composition in Healthy Individuals.
Noh, CK, Kim, BS, Hong, G, Cheong, JY, Lee, KJ
Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility. 2018;24(3):452-459
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Probiotics are popular health supplements taken by the general population. The influence of probiotics on the composition of gut microbiota has not been fully evaluated, and the duration of the effects of probiotics administration is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the changes in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota by the administration of probiotics in healthy individuals. The study was carried out in Korea. 12 healthy volunteers aged between 30 and 42 years were given probiotic capsules containing five billion colony forming units of a mixture Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus for four weeks. Stool samples were collected at the beginning of the study, after four weeks of probiotics, and again two weeks after stopping the probiotics. The overall diversity of faecal microbiota was not significantly altered by the probiotics, but significantly decreased two weeks after stopping them. The composition of faecal microbiota was not significantly changed by the probiotics at the phylum level, but the proportions of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria significantly changed 2 weeks after stopping the probiotics. The proportions of Lactobacillus and Enterococcus were significantly increased by the probiotics, but the proportions of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus decreased two weeks after stopping the probiotics. There was no difference in the levels of calprotectin between the start and end of the study. The authors concluded that the proportion of faecal microbiota at the genus level, but not diversity, is significantly altered by the administration of probiotics in healthy people. This effect does not seem to last long, probably because of homeostasis or dietary influence.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Probiotics are expected to modify the composition of gut microbiota. We aimed to investigate the changes in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota by the administration of probiotics in healthy individuals. METHODS Twelve healthy volunteers with age range of 30-42 years provided baseline fecal samples. Subsequently, they took commercially available probiotic capsules (a mixture for Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus) for 4 weeks. Fecal samples were collected at 4 weeks of administration and 2 weeks after the stop of administration. Fecal microbiota was analyzed via 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. RESULTS The mean Shannon index was not significantly altered by the 4-week administration of probiotics (4.365 vs 4.556, P > 0.05). The proportion of Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes , and Proteobacteria was not significantly changed by the 4-week administration of probiotics. At the genus level, the proportions of Lactobacillus (2.138% vs 2.773%, P = 0.028) and Enterococcus (0.022% vs 2.758%, P = 0.004) significantly increased 4 weeks after the administration of probiotics, but reduced 2 weeks after the stop of administration (2.773% vs 3.292%, P = 0.064 and 2.758% vs 0.001%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The diversity of fecal microbiota is not significantly affected by 4 weeks of probiotics administration. The proportion of fecal microbiota at the genus level is significantly altered by the administration of probiotics. However, this effect does not seem to last long, probably because of homeostasis or dietary influence.
-
5.
Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure influences the gut microbiota of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units.
Zou, ZH, Liu, D, Li, HD, Zhu, DP, He, Y, Hou, T, Yu, JL
Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2018;17(1):9
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances in gut bacteria could have long-term effects on a baby’s health. The development of healthy gut bacteria is influenced by factors such as the surrounding environment, gestational age, delivery mode, feeding method and exposure to antibiotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of antibiotic exposure on the development of gut bacteria in premature babies. This study was carried out in a hospital in China. 28 premature babies who had been admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were included in the study. Stool samples were collected when the babies were 7 and 14 days old. The researchers found that the characteristics of the gut bacteria in babies exposed to antibiotics was different to those who were not. The numbers of beneficial Bifidobacterium were significantly lower in those babies who had received antibiotics compared to those who had not. Exposure to antibiotics for more than 7 days led to increases in the presence of some strains of drug-resistant bacteria. The authors concluded that antibiotic exposure may affect the composition of early gut bacteria in premature babies which could potentially increase the risk of contracting harmful infections.
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the influences of prenatal antibiotic exposure, the intensity of prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure on gut microbiota of preterm infants and whether gut microbiota and drug resistant strains in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over a defined period are related. METHODS Among 28 preterm infants, there were two groups, the PAT (prenatal antibiotic therapy) group (12 cases), and the PAF (prenatal antibiotic free) group (12 cases). Fecal samples from both groups were collected on days 7 and 14. According to the time of prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure, cases were divided into two groups, H (high) group (11 cases) and L (low) group (11 cases), and fecal samples on day 14 were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from the fecal samples and was subjected to high throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Bioinformatics methods were used to analyze the sequencing results. RESULTS Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure exercised influence on the early establishment of intestinal microflora of preterm infants. Bacteroidetes decreased significantly in the PAT group (p < 0.05). The number of Bifidobacterium significantly decreased in the PAT group and H group (p < 0.05). The early gut microbiota of preterm infants with prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure was similar to resistant bacteria in NICU during the same period. CONCLUSION Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure may affect the composition of early gut microbiota in preterm infants. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in NICU may play a role in reshaping the early gut microbiota of preterm infants with prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure.
-
6.
Fecal Microbiome and Food Allergy in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.
Fieten, KB, Totté, JEE, Levin, E, Reyman, M, Meijer, Y, Knulst, A, Schuren, F, Pasmans, SGMA
International archives of allergy and immunology. 2018;175(1-2):77-84
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Atopic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma and rhinitis, are on the increase worldwide. Exposure to microbes may be important in the development of an atopic disease. Specifically, reduced early-life exposure is thought to be a contributing factor because microbial colonisation of the intestines during infancy plays a crucial role in the maturation of the immune system. AD, also called eczema, is an inflammatory skin disease often seen in small children. Food allergies are common in children with AD, the most common allergens being eggs, cow’s milk, peanuts, soy and wheat. This cross-sectional observational pilot study with 82 young children with a diagnosis of AD set out to identify distinct microbial patterns in the children’s faecal microbiomes associated with a clinical diagnosis of food allergy. Stool and blood samples were collected for a microbiome analysis and IgE antibody measurement, respectively. 20 children had a confirmed food allergy (most commonly to cow’s milk and peanuts), while almost half of the children without a diagnosed food allergy were sensitised to common food allergens after a food challenge. The study identified a faecal microbial signature in children with AD that differentiates between the presence and absence of food allergy. Children with AD and food allergy had more Escherichia coli and Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum species and less Bifidobacterium breve, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila species than children without food allergy. The authors concluded that the study supports a hypothesis that the intestinal microbiome differs in children with AD, depending on whether they have a food allergy or not. They call for future studies to confirm these findings.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exposure to microbes may be important in the development of atopic disease. Atopic diseases have been associated with specific characteristics of the intestinal microbiome. The link between intestinal microbiota and food allergy has rarely been studied, and the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy (double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge [DBPCFC]) has seldom been used. We aimed to distinguish fecal microbial signatures for food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS Pediatric patients with AD, with and without food allergy, were included in this cross-sectional observational pilot study. AD was diagnosed according to the UK Working Party criteria. Food allergy was defined as a positive DBPCFC or a convincing clinical history, in combination with sensitization to the relevant food allergen. Fecal samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA microbial analysis. Microbial signature species, discriminating between the presence and absence food allergy, were selected by elastic net regression. RESULTS Eighty-two children with AD (39 girls) with a median age of 2.5 years, and 20 of whom were diagnosed with food allergy, provided fecal samples. Food allergy to peanut and cow's milk was the most common. Six bacterial species from the fecal microbiome were identified, that, when combined, distinguished between children with and without food allergy: Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Escherichia coli, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Akkermansia muciniphila (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.80). CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, we identified a microbial signature in children with AD that discriminates between the absence and presence of food allergy. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings.