-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Effect of an Exclusive Human Milk Diet on the Gut Microbiome in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Embleton, ND, Sproat, T, Uthaya, S, Young, GR, Garg, S, Vasu, V, Masi, AC, Beck, L, Modi, N, Stewart, CJ, et al
JAMA network open. 2023;6(3):e231165
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Receipt of mother’s own breast milk (MOM) is associated with lower rates of neonatal morbidities in preterm infants and improved long-term metabolic and neurocognitive outcomes. However, many experience a shortfall in MOM supply necessitating the use of either bovine formula or pasteurised human milk. The hypothesis of this study was that gut bacterial diversity and proportions of specific bacterial taxa would differ between trial groups as part of the mechanism by which exclusive human milk diets benefits preterm infants. This study was a randomised clinical trial for which preterm infants in the first 72 hours of life (born less than 30 weeks of gestation) were recruited. Infants (n=126) were randomly assigned to standard (control) or exclusive human milk diet (intervention). Results showed that the intervention group had no overall effect on gut microbiome richness or Shannon diversity. Furthermore, Bifidobacterium relative abundance was not associated with an exclusive human milk diet. Authors conclude that their findings show that pasteurized human milk (or products derived from human milk) do not exert a major impact on gut bacteria when used in addition to MOM.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The effect of using an exclusive human milk diet compared with one that uses bovine products in preterm infants is uncertain, but some studies demonstrate lower rates of key neonatal morbidities. A potential mediating pathway is the gut microbiome. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of an exclusive human milk diet on gut bacterial richness, diversity, and proportions of specific taxa in preterm infants from enrollment to 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 neonatal intensive care units in the United Kingdom from 2017 to 2020, microbiome analyses were blind to group. Infants less than 30 weeks' gestation who had only received own mother's milk were recruited before 72 hours of age. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2019 to September 2021. INTERVENTIONS Exclusive human milk diet using pasteurized human milk for any shortfall in mother's own milk supply and human milk-derived fortifiers (intervention) compared with bovine formula and bovine-derived fortifier (control) until 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. Fortifier commenced less than 48 hours of tolerating 150 mL/kg per day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Gut microbiome profile including alpha and beta diversity, and presence of specific bacterial taxa. RESULTS Of 126 preterm infants enrolled in the study, 63 were randomized to control (median [IQR] gestation: 27.0 weeks [26.0-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 910 g [704-1054 g]; 32 [51%] male) and 63 were randomized to intervention (median [IQR] gestation: 27.1 weeks [25.7-28.1 weeks]; median [IQR] birthweight: 930 g [733-1095 g]; 38 [60%] male); 472 stool samples from 116 infants were analyzed. There were no differences in bacterial richness or Shannon diversity over time, or at 34 weeks between trial groups. The exclusive human milk diet group had reduced relative abundance of Lactobacillus after adjustment for confounders (coefficient estimate, 0.056; P = .03), but not after false discovery rate adjustment. There were no differences in time to full feeds, necrotizing enterocolitis, or other key neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial in preterm infants using human milk-derived formula and/or fortifier to enable an exclusive human milk diet, there were no effects on overall measures of gut bacterial diversity but there were effects on specific bacterial taxa previously associated with human milk receipt. These findings suggest that the clinical impact of human milk-derived products is not modulated via microbiomic mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN trial registry identifier: ISRCTN16799022.
-
3.
The Effects of Black Tea Consumption on Intestinal Microflora-A Randomized Single-Blind Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Tomioka, R, Tanaka, Y, Suzuki, M, Ebihara, S
Journal of nutritional science and vitaminology. 2023;69(5):326-339
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Tea from the leaves of the tea plant (Camelia sinensis) is consumed around the world. Tea has many health benefits, and in part, this is due to its rich content in compounds classed as polyphenols. Through the fermentation process, black tea is particularly high in polyphenols. Previous studies around respiratory infections indicated that regular consumption of black tea appeared to improve immune defence mechanisms that protect mucous membranes, called mucosal immunity. As this mucosal immunity is closely influenced by gut bacteria, the authors speculated whether the previously seen impact of improved mucosal immunity is related to the ability of black tea to also modulate bacteria in the gut. A previously run randomised single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 72 Japanese participants who consumed three cups of black tea (2g) or a placebo of barley tea for 12 weeks provided the data for this study. Data gathered included gut flora analysis, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) levels - fats that play a role in maintaining gut health, and saliva IgA (SIgA) concentrations - which are antibodies made in the lymph tissue of the gut. The results showed that black tea consumption led to a significant increase in the abundance of Prevotella bacteria, which mediate SCFA production and are involved in normalising immune function. Furthermore, tea increased butyrate-producing bacteria. Butyrate is associated with improved barrier function of the gut walls but also helps to manage pathogens and immune responses. Black tea consumption also increased salivary SIgA concentration - a type of antibody on the mucous membranes that prevents pathogens from entering the body -, and a decrease in stool acetic acid concentration, which may be due to the increase in butyrate-producing bacteria which use acetic acid to make butyrate. Notably, participants with low salivary SIgA levels at the start had a more pronounced positive change in total bacteria, after consuming black tea compared to the placebo group. The authors concluded that regular consumption of black tea may help to improve mucosal immunity by increasing the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut.
Abstract
We previously reported that black tea consumption for 12 wk reduced the risk of acute upper respiratory tract inflammation, and improved secretory capacity in individuals with low salivary SIgA levels (Tanaka Y et al. 2021. Jpn Pharmacol Ther 49: 273-288). These results suggested that habitual black tea consumption improves mucosal immunity. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the effect of black tea intake on gut microbiota, which is known to be involved in mucosal immunity, by analyzing the bacterial flora and the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentration of feces collected during the above clinical study. The clinical design was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study with 72 healthy Japanese adult males and females, who consumed three cups of black tea (Black Tea Polymerized Polyphenols 76.2 mg per day) or placebo per day for 12 wk. In all subjects intake of black tea significantly increased abundance of Prevotella and decreased fecal acetic acid concentration. Particularly in the subjects with low salivary SIgA levels, the change over time of total bacteria, Prevotella, and butyrate-producing bacteria, which are involved in normalizing immune function, were higher in the black tea group than in the placebo group. In subjects with low abundance of Flavonifractor plautii a butyrate-producing bacteria, black tea consumption significantly increased salivary SIgA concentration and the absolute number of Flavonifractor plautii. In conclusion, our results suggest that improvement of mucosal immunity via an increase in butyrate-producing bacteria in the gut may partly contribute to the suppressive effect of black tea consumption on acute upper respiratory tract inflammation observed in our previous report.
-
4.
Modulating the Gut Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis Management: A Systematic Review of Current Interventions.
Tsogka, A, Kitsos, DK, Stavrogianni, K, Giannopapas, V, Chasiotis, A, Christouli, N, Tsivgoulis, G, Tzartos, JS, Giannopoulos, S
Journal of clinical medicine. 2023;12(24)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease caused by the altered immune system mistakenly attacking the central nervous system. While genetics play a leading causative role in the manifestation of this disease, other contributing environmental factors can also exist, such as a disruption in the intestinal microbial composition. Previous research has shown that the bidirectional communication between the brain's and gut's health, also known as the gut-brain axis, may contribute to the prognosis of MS. Modulating gut microbial composition can be a therapeutic strategy in MS patients to manage symptoms and prevent disease progression. This systematic review assessed different protocols for modulating gut microbial composition, including dietary modifications, probiotic use, intermittent fasting, and faecal microbial transplantation. The review included thirteen studies that compared the effects of the above gut microbial modulation intervention protocols in MS patients with healthy participants. While different dietary modification strategies improved MS symptoms, probiotic supplementations and intermittent fasting reduced inflammation, and faecal microbial transplantation showed promising positive effects in a few reports. Due to the methodological limitations of the included studies, further robust studies are required to evaluate the beneficial effects of gut microbial modulation strategies in reducing the symptoms of MS patients. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of gut microbial modulation in MS patients.
Abstract
This review attempted to explore all recent clinical studies that have investigated the clinical and autoimmune impact of gut microbiota interventions in multiple sclerosis (MS), including dietary protocols, probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and intermittent fasting (IF). Methods: Thirteen studies were held between 2011 and 2023 this demonstrated interventions in gut microbiome among patients with MS and their impact the clinical parameters of the disease. These included specialized dietary interventions, the supply of probiotic mixtures, FMT, and IF. Results: Dietary interventions positively affected various aspects of MS, including relapse rates, EDSS disability scores, MS-related fatigue, and metabolic features. Probiotic mixtures showed promising results on MS-related fatigue, EDSS parameters, inflammation; meanwhile, FMT-though a limited number of studies was included-indicated some clinical improvement in similar variables. IF showed reductions in EDSS scores and significant improvement in patients' emotional statuses. Conclusions: In dietary protocols, clinical MS parameters, including relapse rate, EDSS, MFIS, FSS, and MSQoL54 scales, were significantly improved through the application of a specific diet each time. Probiotic nutritional mixtures promote a shift in inflammation towards an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with MS. The administration of such mixtures affected disability, mood levels, and quality of life among patients with MS. FMT protocols possibly demonstrate a therapeutic effect in some case reports. IF protocols were found to ameliorate EDSS and FAMS scores. All interventional means of gut microbiome modulation provided significant conclusions on several clinical aspects of MS and highlight the complexity in the relationship between MS and the gut microbiome.
-
5.
Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Children: A State-Of-The-Art Review.
Avelar Rodriguez, D, Ryan, PM, Toro Monjaraz, EM, Ramirez Mayans, JA, Quigley, EM
Frontiers in pediatrics. 2019;7:363
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) occurs when microorganisms overpopulate the small intestine and is characterised by gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and flatulence. This review focuses on paediatric SIBO, known to be increasing, with emphasis on the impact on gut microbiota. The gut microbiota is influenced by several factors including genetics, vaginal delivery, exercise and diet. SIBO in children has been studied in the context of stunting, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), obesity, and related to use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This review analysed 149 studies published since 2000 through till May 2019 with the aim of presenting the most up-to-date information. Risk factors included gastric acids and medications which suppress this activity, intestinal motility disturbances leading to bacterial overgrowth, anatomical anomalies where there is an absence of one or more intestinal valves, and poor socioeconomic status and diet. The review concluded that the recommended diagnosis is by methane and hydrogen breath testing and that Gold Standard treatment is antibiotic ‘rifaximin’ at 1,200 mg/d, reduced to 600 mg/d for 1 week in children. Alternative treatments discussed include FODMAP diets and probiotic protocols with best results coming from combining antibiotic and probiotic protocols. It concludes that SIBO in children is heterogenous and poorly understood and that a better diagnostic criteria is necessary in paediatrics.
Abstract
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a heterogenous and poorly understood entity characterised by an excessive growth of select microorganisms within the small intestine. This excessive bacterial biomass, in turn, disrupts host physiology in a myriad of ways, leading to gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms and complications. SIBO is a common cause of non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms in children, such as chronic abdominal pain, abdominal distention, diarrhoea, and flatulence, amongst others. In addition, it has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of stunting, a disease that affects millions of children worldwide. Risk factors such as acid-suppressive therapies, alterations in gastrointestinal motility and anatomy, as well as impoverished conditions, have been shown to predispose children to SIBO. SIBO can be diagnosed via culture-dependant or culture-independent approaches. SIBO's epidemiology is limited due to the lack of uniformity and consensus of its diagnostic criteria, as well as the paucity of literature available. Antibiotics remain the first-line treatment option for SIBO, although emerging modalities such as probiotics and diet manipulation could also have a role. Herein, we present a state-of-the-art-review which aims to comprehensively outline the most current information on SIBO in children, with particular emphasis on the gut microbiota.
-
6.
Functional variants in the sucrase-isomaltase gene associate with increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome.
Henström, M, Diekmann, L, Bonfiglio, F, Hadizadeh, F, Kuech, EM, von Köckritz-Blickwede, M, Thingholm, LB, Zheng, T, Assadi, G, Dierks, C, et al
Gut. 2018;67(2):263-270
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (CSID) is a genetic disorder which results in a lower ability to digest certain sugars, resulting in diarrhoea, abdominal pain and bloating, which are also common symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). The objective of this study was to test sucrase-isomaltase (SI) gene variants for their potential relevance in IBS. The researchers looked at genetics in several populations with and without IBS. The researchers found that genetic mutations are associated with a 35% reduction in the activity of the SI enzymes. CSID mutations were almost twice as common in IBS patients than healthy controls. The genetic variant 15Phe was associated with diarrhoea, stool frequency and changes in the gut bacteria. The authors concluded that people with SI gene variants associated with reduced enzyme activity are more at risk of IBS. Genetic screening could help to identify individuals at increased risk of IBS, and may lead to more targeted treatment for some people with IBS.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE IBS is a common gut disorder of uncertain pathogenesis. Among other factors, genetics and certain foods are proposed to contribute. Congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency (CSID) is a rare genetic form of disaccharide malabsorption characterised by diarrhoea, abdominal pain and bloating, which are features common to IBS. We tested sucrase-isomaltase (SI) gene variants for their potential relevance in IBS. DESIGN We sequenced SI exons in seven familial cases, and screened four CSID mutations (p.Val557Gly, p.Gly1073Asp, p.Arg1124Ter and p.Phe1745Cys) and a common SI coding polymorphism (p.Val15Phe) in a multicentre cohort of 1887 cases and controls. We studied the effect of the 15Val to 15Phe substitution on SI function in vitro. We analysed p.Val15Phe genotype in relation to IBS status, stool frequency and faecal microbiota composition in 250 individuals from the general population. RESULTS CSID mutations were more common in patients than asymptomatic controls (p=0.074; OR=1.84) and Exome Aggregation Consortium reference sequenced individuals (p=0.020; OR=1.57). 15Phe was detected in 6/7 sequenced familial cases, and increased IBS risk in case-control and population-based cohorts, with best evidence for diarrhoea phenotypes (combined p=0.00012; OR=1.36). In the population-based sample, 15Phe allele dosage correlated with stool frequency (p=0.026) and Parabacteroides faecal microbiota abundance (p=0.0024). The SI protein with 15Phe exhibited 35% reduced enzymatic activity in vitro compared with 15Val (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS SI gene variants coding for disaccharidases with defective or reduced enzymatic activity predispose to IBS. This may help the identification of individuals at risk, and contribute to personalising treatment options in a subset of patients.
-
7.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
-
8.
A Walnut-Enriched Diet Affects Gut Microbiome in Healthy Caucasian Subjects: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Bamberger, C, Rossmeier, A, Lechner, K, Wu, L, Waldmann, E, Fischer, S, Stark, RG, Altenhofer, J, Henze, K, Parhofer, KG
Nutrients. 2018;10(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is a clear link between health, disease and the diversity of the human gut microbiome. Diet is one of the main factors that influences microbial composition in the gut. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of walnut consumption on the gut microbiome composition and microbial diversity. 194 healthy adults, of average age 63 years, were included in this study. Participants were allocated to two diet phases of eight weeks each. 96 subjects first followed a walnut-enriched diet (43g walnuts/day) and then switched to a nut-free diet, while 98 subjects followed the diets in reverse order. While consuming the walnut-enriched diet, participants were advised to either reduce fat or carbohydrates or both to account for the additional calories. Faecal samples were collected at the end of the walnut-diet and the control-diet period for microbiome analyses. Walnut consumption significantly affected microbiome composition and diversity. The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteria increased significantly while Clostridium species decreased significantly after walnut consumption. The effect of walnut consumption on the microbiome only marginally depended on whether subjects replaced fat, carbohydrates or both while on walnuts. The authors concluded that daily intake of 43 g walnuts over eight weeks significantly affects the gut microbiome by enhancing probiotic- and butyric acid-producing species in healthy individuals.
Abstract
Regular walnut consumption is associated with better health. We have previously shown that eight weeks of walnut consumption (43 g/day) significantly improves lipids in healthy subjects. In the same study, gut microbiome was evaluated. We included 194 healthy subjects (134 females, 63 ± 7 years, BMI 25.1 ± 4.0 kg/m²) in a randomized, controlled, prospective, cross-over study. Following a nut-free run-in period, subjects were randomized to two diet phases (eight weeks each); 96 subjects first followed a walnut-enriched diet (43 g/day) and then switched to a nut-free diet, while 98 subjects followed the diets in reverse order. While consuming the walnut-enriched diet, subjects were advised to either reduce fat or carbohydrates or both to account for the additional calories. Fecal samples were collected from 135 subjects at the end of the walnut-diet and the control-diet period for microbiome analyses. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing data was clustered with a 97% similarity into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). UniFrac distances were used to determine diversity between groups. Differential abundance was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. All analyses were performed using Rhea. Generalized UniFrac distance shows that walnut consumption significantly affects microbiome composition and diversity. Multidimensional scaling (metric and non-metric) indicates dissimilarities of approximately 5% between walnut and control (p = 0.02). The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteria increased significantly (p < 0.02) while Clostridium sp. cluster XIVa species (Blautia; Anaerostipes) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) during walnut consumption. The effect of walnut consumption on the microbiome only marginally depended on whether subjects replaced fat, carbohydrates or both while on walnuts. Daily intake of 43 g walnuts over eight weeks significantly affects the gut microbiome by enhancing probiotic- and butyric acid-producing species in healthy individuals. Further evaluation is required to establish whether these changes are preserved during longer walnut consumption and how these are linked to the observed changes in lipid metabolism.
-
9.
Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure influences the gut microbiota of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units.
Zou, ZH, Liu, D, Li, HD, Zhu, DP, He, Y, Hou, T, Yu, JL
Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2018;17(1):9
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances in gut bacteria could have long-term effects on a baby’s health. The development of healthy gut bacteria is influenced by factors such as the surrounding environment, gestational age, delivery mode, feeding method and exposure to antibiotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of antibiotic exposure on the development of gut bacteria in premature babies. This study was carried out in a hospital in China. 28 premature babies who had been admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were included in the study. Stool samples were collected when the babies were 7 and 14 days old. The researchers found that the characteristics of the gut bacteria in babies exposed to antibiotics was different to those who were not. The numbers of beneficial Bifidobacterium were significantly lower in those babies who had received antibiotics compared to those who had not. Exposure to antibiotics for more than 7 days led to increases in the presence of some strains of drug-resistant bacteria. The authors concluded that antibiotic exposure may affect the composition of early gut bacteria in premature babies which could potentially increase the risk of contracting harmful infections.
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the influences of prenatal antibiotic exposure, the intensity of prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure on gut microbiota of preterm infants and whether gut microbiota and drug resistant strains in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over a defined period are related. METHODS Among 28 preterm infants, there were two groups, the PAT (prenatal antibiotic therapy) group (12 cases), and the PAF (prenatal antibiotic free) group (12 cases). Fecal samples from both groups were collected on days 7 and 14. According to the time of prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure, cases were divided into two groups, H (high) group (11 cases) and L (low) group (11 cases), and fecal samples on day 14 were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from the fecal samples and was subjected to high throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Bioinformatics methods were used to analyze the sequencing results. RESULTS Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure exercised influence on the early establishment of intestinal microflora of preterm infants. Bacteroidetes decreased significantly in the PAT group (p < 0.05). The number of Bifidobacterium significantly decreased in the PAT group and H group (p < 0.05). The early gut microbiota of preterm infants with prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure was similar to resistant bacteria in NICU during the same period. CONCLUSION Prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure may affect the composition of early gut microbiota in preterm infants. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in NICU may play a role in reshaping the early gut microbiota of preterm infants with prenatal and postnatal antibiotic exposure.
-
10.
Association between duration of intravenous antibiotic administration and early-life microbiota development in late-preterm infants.
Zwittink, RD, Renes, IB, van Lingen, RA, van Zoeren-Grobben, D, Konstanti, P, Norbruis, OF, Martin, R, Groot Jebbink, LJM, Knol, J, Belzer, C
European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2018;37(3):475-483
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Premature newborn babies are commonly given antibiotics in hospital to prevent or treat infections such as sepsis. This study, carried out in the Netherlands, looked at the effect of intravenous antibiotics on the development of the gut bacteria in premature babies. Stool samples were taken from 15 premature babies who had been exposed to either no antibiotic treatment, or short (less than 3 days) or long (at least 5 days) treatment with the commonly prescribed antibiotics amoxicillin or ceftazidime. At 3 weeks old, babies who had been treated with both short and long courses of antibiotics had significantly lower abundance of the beneficial bacteria Bifidobacterium than those who had received no antibiotics. In babies who received antibiotic treatment lasting 5 days or more, Bifidobacterium levels didn’t recover until they were 6 weeks old. Antibiotics were effective against Enterobacteriaceae, but allowed Enterococcus to thrive and remain dominant for up to two weeks after antibiotic treatment was stopped. The authors concluded that intravenous antibiotics during the first week of a baby’s life greatly affects the gut bacteria. However, short courses of antibiotics allow for a quicker recovery compared to longer courses. Disturbances in the development of gut bacteria caused by antibiotic treatment could influence the development of infants' immune and digestive systems.
Abstract
Antibiotic treatment is common practice in the neonatal ward for the prevention and treatment of sepsis, which is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Although the effect of antibiotic treatment on microbiota development is well recognised, little attention has been paid to treatment duration. We studied the effect of short and long intravenous antibiotic administration on intestinal microbiota development in preterm infants. Faecal samples from 15 preterm infants (35 ± 1 weeks gestation and 2871 ± 260 g birth weight) exposed to no, short (≤ 3 days) or long (≥ 5 days) treatment with amoxicillin/ceftazidime were collected during the first six postnatal weeks. Microbiota composition was determined through 16S rRNA gene sequencing and by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Short and long antibiotic treat ment significantly lowered the abundance of Bifidobacterium right after treatment (p = 0.027) till postnatal week three (p = 0.028). Long treatment caused Bifidobacterium abundance to remain decreased till postnatal week six (p = 0.009). Antibiotic treatment was effective against members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, but allowed Enterococcus to thrive and remain dominant for up to two weeks after antibiotic treatment discontinuation. Community richness and diversity were not affected by antibiotic treatment, but were positively associated with postnatal age (p < 0.023) and with abundance of Bifidobacterium (p = 0.003). Intravenous antibiotic administration during the first postnatal week greatly affects the infant's gastrointestinal microbiota. However, quick antibiotic treatment cessation allows for its recovery. Disturbances in microbiota development caused by short and, more extensively, by long antibiotic treatment could affect healthy development of the infant via interference with maturation of the immune system and gastrointestinal tract.