-
1.
Exploring choices of early nutritional support for patients with sepsis based on changes in intestinal microecology.
Yang, XJ, Wang, XH, Yang, MY, Ren, HY, Chen, H, Zhang, XY, Liu, QF, Yang, G, Yang, Y, Yang, XJ
World journal of gastroenterology. 2023;29(13):2034-2049
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sepsis is a condition brought about by infection and results in organ dysfunction and gut microbiota imbalance. Nutrition plays a large part in recovery from sepsis, however it is unclear as to the optimal diet for gut microbial balance in individuals with sepsis. This randomised control trial of 30 individuals with sepsis aimed to determine the optimal delivery of nutrition for gut microbial health either through a gastric tube (TEN), through the jugular vein (TPN), or a mixture of the two modes (SPN). The results showed differences in gut microbiota composition between the different modes of nutrition. Enterococcus increased in TEN, Campylobacter decreased in TPN, and Dialister decreased in SPN groups. Fermentation products produced by gut microbiota also changed depending on the mode of nutrition, with the TEN group showing improvements amongst the most fermentation products. Individuals in the TEN group also showed improved immune system function alongside those in the SPN group. It was concluded that based upon improvements to the immune system and gut microbiota, TEN is the most suitable mode for nutrition in individuals with sepsis. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that nutrition methods for individuals with sepsis aren’t equally effective and recovery may be faster if individuals receive nutrition through a gastric tube.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis exacerbates intestinal microecological disorders leading to poor prognosis. Proper modalities of nutritional support can improve nutrition, immunity, and intestinal microecology. AIM: To identify the optimal modality of early nutritional support for patients with sepsis from the perspective of intestinal microecology. METHODS Thirty patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, China, between 2019 and 2021 with indications for nutritional support, were randomly assigned to one of three different modalities of nutritional support for a total of 5 d: Total enteral nutrition (TEN group), total parenteral nutrition (TPN group), and supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN group). Blood and stool specimens were collected before and after nutritional support, and changes in gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and immune and nutritional indicators were detected and compared among the three groups. RESULTS In comparison with before nutritional support, the three groups after nutritional support presented: (1) Differences in the gut bacteria (Enterococcus increased in the TEN group, Campylobacter decreased in the TPN group, and Dialister decreased in the SPN group; all P < 0.05); (2) different trends in SCFAs (the TEN group showed improvement except for Caproic acid, the TPN group showed improvement only for acetic and propionic acid, and the SPN group showed a decreasing trend); (3) significant improvement of the nutritional and immunological indicators in the TEN and SPN groups, while only immunoglobulin G improved in the TPN group (all P < 0.05); and (4) a significant correlation was found between the gut bacteria, SCFAs, and nutritional and immunological indicators (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION TEN is recommended as the preferred mode of early nutritional support in sepsis based on clinical nutritional and immunological indicators, as well as changes in intestinal microecology.
-
2.
Effect of Continuous Ingestion of Bifidobacteria and Dietary Fiber on Improvement in Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Azuma, N, Mawatari, T, Saito, Y, Tsukamoto, M, Sampei, M, Iwama, Y
Nutrients. 2023;15(19)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dementia is now the seventh leading cause of death and one of the leading causes of disability and dependency among the elderly. Alzheimer’s disease, a disease of progressive cognitive decline, is the most common form of dementia, with a prevalence of more than 60%. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of consuming a dairy beverage containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis GCL2505 (GCL2505) [a probiotic strain] and inulin on cognitive function in healthy adults. This study was a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (1:1) - the test drink intake group and the control food intake group. Results showed that elderly participants with early memory loss who consumed GCL2505 and inulin for 12 weeks showed significant improvements in scores in the neurocognitive index domain. Additionally, the number of bifidobacteria in faeces increased significantly. Authors concluded that their findings suggest that continuous intake of GCL2505 and inulin may be an effective approach to protect memory function in the elderly.
Abstract
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis GCL2505 has been shown to have some positive effects on health, including improved defecation frequency and reduced visceral fat. These effects are thought to be due to GCL2505's unique ability to reach the intestine in a viable form and proliferate after a single intake. This leads to an increased number of intestinal bifidobacteria. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to confirm that intake of GCL2505 and inulin (a prebiotic) improve cognitive function (n = 80). Participants consumed test drinks containing 1 × 1010 colony-forming units of GCL2505 per 100 g and 2.0 g of inulin per 100 g for 12 weeks. The change in cognitive function assessment scores was set as the primary endpoint. There were significant improvements in scores in the neurocognitive index domain, which is an assessment of overall cognitive function, in addition to overall attention, cognitive flexibility, and executive function domains. The intervention significantly increased the number of fecal bifidobacteria and affected the levels of several inflammatory markers. These results suggest that intake of GCL2505 and inulin improves cognitive function by improving the intestinal environment and alleviating inflammation.
-
3.
Effects of Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 on Overweight and the Gut Microbiota in Humans: Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
Mo, SJ, Lee, K, Hong, HJ, Hong, DK, Jung, SH, Park, SD, Shim, JJ, Lee, JL
Nutrients. 2022;14(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Probiotics are defined by the WHO as live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. Recent studies suggest that probiotics play a role as natural therapeutic supplements with the potential to improve lipid metabolism, and improve weight control through interventions that affect gut microbiome diversity. The aim of this study was to explore how Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 (HY7601) and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 (KY1032) supplementation alleviate obesity by modulating the human gut microbiome. This study was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on overweight and obese Koreans. Subjects (n =72) were randomly assigned to receive either probiotics or placebo. Results showed that probiotic supplementation with HY7601 and KY1032 decreased body weight, visceral fat mass, waist circumference, and increased adiponectin. Furthermore, these probiotics changed the bacterial gut microbiota characteristics associated with each obesity indicator. HY7601 and KY1032 exerted anti-obesity effects by regulating the gut microbiota composition. Authors conclude that HY7601 and KY1032 intake can alter the composition and diversity of the human gut microbiome, and thereby help prevent obesity and its associated metabolic syndrome.
Abstract
Obesity and overweight are closely related to diet, and the gut microbiota play an important role in body weight and human health. The aim of this study was to explore how Lactobacillus curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 supplementation alleviate obesity by modulating the human gut microbiome. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 72 individuals with overweight. Over a 12-week period, probiotic groups consumed 1 × 1010 colony-forming units of HY7601 and KY1032, whereas the placebo group consumed the same product without probiotics. After treatment, the probiotic group displayed a reduction in body weight (p < 0.001), visceral fat mass (p < 0.025), and waist circumference (p < 0.007), and an increase in adiponectin (p < 0.046), compared with the placebo group. Additionally, HY7601 and KY1032 supplementation modulated bacterial gut microbiota characteristics and beta diversity by increasing Bifidobacteriaceae and Akkermansiaceae and decreasing Prevotellaceae and Selenomonadaceae. In summary, HY7601 and KY1032 probiotics exert anti-obesity effects by regulating the gut microbiota; hence, they have therapeutic potential for preventing or alleviating obesity and living with overweight.
-
4.
Consumption of 85% cocoa dark chocolate improves mood in association with gut microbial changes in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Shin, JH, Kim, CS, Cha, L, Kim, S, Lee, S, Chae, S, Chun, WY, Shin, DM
The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2022;99:108854
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances in a person’s mood interrupts their personal well-being and the ability to participate in social interactions, leading to physical health problems such as chronic diseases. The role of diet as a mood regulator has received a great deal of interest. Certain dietary components have been shown to reduce anxiety and depression and improve quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. This study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants who met the criteria for eligibility were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) control group (CON, n=14); 2) 85% cocoa chocolate group (DC85, n=18); and 3) 70% cocoa chocolate group (DC70, n=16). Results show that daily intake of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in the DC85, but not in the DC70. Furthermore, gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than the CON. Authors conclude that dark chocolate has prebiotic effects by restructuring the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome, which may in turn improve mood via the gut-brain axis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- To highlight the potential benefits of high cocoa content dark chocolate in relation to mental states
- To promote more awareness of how dietary habits may impact emotional wellbeing
- To emphasise the importance of microbiota and the gut-brain axis regarding dietary habits.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
The authors highlight that dark chocolate has been continually identified for its effects on mood. However, there is a dearth of evidence concerning the emotional impact of daily consumption of dark chocolate. Hence, the impact of dark chocolate consumption on daily mood, focusing on the gut-brain axis, is being investigated in this study.
Objectives
- To evaluate the correlation between the effect on emotional state after consuming dark chocolate and the gut microbiota in healthy adults
- To identify alterations in the composition and diversity of the microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract on account of dark chocolate intake.
Study Design
A randomised controlled trial was performed at Seoul National University from July to December 2017, This involved. consumption of two types of dark chocolate (70% and 85% cocoa content). Subjects in the treatment groups were blinded although investigators and the control cohort were unblinded.
Participants
117 individuals were screened. However, 48 healthy males and females aged 20-30 years were eligible at baseline.
Interventions
- Subjects (n=16): Consumed 30g/day of 70% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=18): Consumed 30g/day of 85% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=14): The control group consumed no chocolate for 3 weeks.
Main Health Outcomes Measured
- Mood states were quantified via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in tandem with Microbiota analysis pre- and post-experiment
- Body composition analysis and dietary assessment were also conducted pre- and post-intervention
- Faecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of bacterial genomic DNA was conducted for the cohort who consumed 85% cocoa chocolate and the control arm to evaluate the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota
- Statistical tests were performed based on intention-to-treat analysis. The Chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, one-way ANOVA, unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed for inter-group analysis. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to assess the association between gut microbiota composition and mood scores and P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
- Daily intake of dark chocolate substantially diminished negative emotional states in the cohort consuming 85% cocoa content, but not in the 70% cocoa treatment arm
- Gut microbial diversity was substantially greater in the 85% cacao cohort than the control group (P<.05)
- Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were decreased in the 85% cacao cohort than the control arm (P<.05).
- Furthermore, it was observed that changes in negative affect scores were inversely correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05).
Conclusions
The observations suggest that consumption of dark chocolate with a higher cocoa content may induce prebiotic effects due to its capacity to restructure the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota. Furthermore, consuming dark chocolate with a higher cocoa might exert a positive effect on negative emotional states through the gut-brain axis.
Clinical practice applications:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of 30g/day high (85%) cocoa chocolate consumption and its potential positive impact on mood through the gut-brain axis
- To educate clients regarding the potential benefits of daily high cocoa content chocolate consumption and its possible favourable effect on emotional states associated with gut microbiota.
Considerations for future research:
- More extensive research could investigate interventions of a longer period
- Further studies could evaluate if any difference exists between cocoa and cacao consumption and emotional states via the gut-brain axis, and the strength of any associations
- Interventions could investigate which strains of bacteria that high cocoa content dark chocolate may affect.
Abstract
Dark chocolate has long been recognized for its mood-altering properties; however, the evidence regarding the emotional effects of daily dark chocolate intake is limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. Two different dark chocolates (85% and 70% cocoa content) were tested in this study. In a randomized controlled trial, healthy adults (20-30 y) consumed either 30 g/d of 85% cocoa chocolate (DC85, n=18); 70% cocoa chocolate (DC70, n=16); or no chocolate (control group, CON; n=14); for 3 weeks. Mood states were measured using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Daily consumption of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in DC85, but not in DC70. To assess the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota, we performed fecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis for the DC85 and CON groups. Gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than CON (P<.05). Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were reduced in DC85 compared to CON (P<.05). Furthermore, we found that the observed changes in negative affect scores were negatively correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05). These findings indicate that dark chocolate exerts prebiotic effects, as evidenced by its ability to restructure the diversity and abundance of intestinal bacteria; thus, it may improve negative emotional states via the gut-brain axis.
-
5.
An Almond-Based Low Carbohydrate Diet Improves Depression and Glycometabolism in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes through Modulating Gut Microbiota and GLP-1: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ren, M, Zhang, H, Qi, J, Hu, A, Jiang, Q, Hou, Y, Feng, Q, Ojo, O, Wang, X
Nutrients. 2020;12(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Associations between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and depression may exist, with depression increasing the risk of T2D and T2D increasing risk of depression. Nutritional changes such as a low carbohydrate diet (LCD) are a large part of T2D management, however the effects on depression remain controversial. Almonds as part of a LCD may have additional benefits to individuals with T2D and those with depression, potentially through its ability to modify gut microbiota. This three-month randomised control trial of 50 individuals with T2D aimed to determine if an almond based LCD (a-LCD) would affect depression and T2D through modulation of gut microbiota and associated gut-brain signalling molecules compared to a low-fat diet (LFD). The results showed that although measures of blood glucose control improved in both groups, those on the a-LCD had better blood glucose control. Symptoms of depression were reduced in participants on the a-LCD compared to the LFD. Gut-brain signalling molecules were maintained in the a-LCD but decreased in the LFD after three months. Several species of gut bacteria were changed by a-LCD. It was concluded that an a-LCD diet may improve symptoms of depression in individuals with T2D through the modulation of gut bacteria and maintenance of gut-brain signalling molecules. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend a low carbohydrate diet rich in almonds for the improvement of symptoms of depression and blood glucose control in individuals with T2D. Low fat diets may also be of benefit to blood glucose control individuals with T2D.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alow carbohydrate diet (LCD) is more beneficial for the glycometabolism in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and may be effective in reducing depression. Almond, which is a common nut, has been shown to effectively improve hyperglycemia and depression symptoms. This study aimed to determine the effect of an almond-based LCD (a-LCD) on depression and glycometabolism, as well as gut microbiota and fasting glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) in patients with T2DM. METHODS This was a randomized controlled trial which compared an a-LCD with a low-fat diet (LFD). Forty-five participants with T2DM at a diabetes club and the Endocrine Division of the First and Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between December 2018 to December 2019 completed each dietary intervention for 3 months, including 22 in the a-LCD group and 23 in the LFD group. The indicators for depression and biochemical indicators including glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), gut microbiota, and GLP-1 concentration were assessed at the baseline and third month and compared between the two groups. RESULTS A-LCD significantly improved depression and HbA1c (p <0.01). Meanwhile, a-LCD significantly increased the short chain fatty acid (SCFAs)-producing bacteria Roseburia, Ruminococcus and Eubacterium. The GLP-1 concentration in the a-LCD group was higher than that in the LFD group (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS A-LCD could exert a beneficial effect on depression and glycometabolism in patients with T2DM. We speculate that the role of a-LCD in improving depression in patients with T2DM may be associated with it stimulating the growth of SCFAs-producing bacteria, increasing SCFAs production and GPR43 activation, and further maintaining GLP-1 secretion. In future studies, the SCFAs and GPR43 activation should be further examined.
-
6.
Gut microbiota plasticity is correlated with sustained weight loss on a low-carb or low-fat dietary intervention.
Grembi, JA, Nguyen, LH, Haggerty, TD, Gardner, CD, Holmes, SP, Parsonnet, J
Scientific reports. 2020;10(1):1405
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is responsible for a substantial number of deaths and is associated with considerable economic costs. Dietary intervention can help with weight loss; however, success varies between individuals. Gut microbiota could influence weight loss as they have been shown in previous studies to affect feelings of hunger. This cohort study taken from an RCT of 161 obese adults aimed to determine if differing gut microbiota communities could be involved in determining weight loss success when on a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet over 12 months. The results showed that specific gut microbiota did not predict weight loss success. However, having a diverse gut microbiota prior to starting a low-fat diet, predicted higher weight loss. This was only observed in those on a low-carbohydrate diet after 10 weeks of dieting. Interestingly individuals that reported better dietary adherence weren’t necessarily more successful with weight loss. It was concluded that gut microbiota diversity is important in sustained weight loss, especially if on a low-fat diet. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that microbial diversity may determine the success of a diet regime and the importance of personalising recommendations.
Abstract
While low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets can both lead to weight-loss, a substantial variability in achieved long-term outcomes exists among obese but otherwise healthy adults. We examined the hypothesis that structural differences in the gut microbiota explain a portion of variability in weight-loss using two cohorts of obese adults enrolled in the Diet Intervention Examining The Factors Interacting with Treatment Success (DIETFITS) study. A total of 161 pre-diet fecal samples were sequenced from a discovery cohort (n = 66) and 106 from a validation cohort (n = 56). An additional 157 fecal samples were sequenced from the discovery cohort after 10 weeks of dietary intervention. We found no specific bacterial signatures associated with weight loss that were consistent across both cohorts. However, the gut microbiota plasticity (i.e. variability), was correlated with long-term (12-month) weight loss in a diet-dependent manner; on the low-fat diet subjects with higher pre-diet daily plasticity had higher sustained weight loss, whereas on the low-carbohydrate diet those with higher plasticity over 10 weeks of dieting had higher 12-month weight loss. Our findings suggest the potential importance of gut microbiota plasticity for sustained weight-loss. We highlight the advantages of evaluating kinetic trends and assessing reproducibility in studies of the gut microbiota.
-
7.
Effects of Synbiotic Supplement on Human Gut Microbiota, Body Composition and Weight Loss in Obesity.
Sergeev, IN, Aljutaily, T, Walton, G, Huarte, E
Nutrients. 2020;12(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiota plays a role in the development of obesity and associated diseases. Whilst energy-restricted, low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets can facilitate substantial weight-loss, they also have been linked to ill-effects and unfavourable changes in the gut microbiota from excess protein fermentation. Pro-and prebiotics (synbiotics) have become a promising intervention in the management of obesity. This small placebo-controlled clinical trial involved 20 obese adults following an energy-restricted (approx.950 kcal/day) low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet. The study examined whether a supplementary synbiotic contributed to additional changes in body composition and metabolic biomarkers. The synbiotic contained Lactobacilli spp. and Bifidobacteria spp. and a prebiotic mixture of galactooligosaccharides. Overall, at the end of the 3-month trial, there was no remarkable difference between the groups. Both experienced a significant and decreasing trend in body mass, waist circumference, body mass index, fat mass, fat percentage, and glucose level, affirming the known benefits of the described weight-loss diet. However, the synbiotic supplementation group had a greater decrease in HbA1C and significant alterations in gut microbiota, showing an increased abundance of gut bacteria associated with positive health effects. Due to the complexity of microbial species and host interactions, the authors advocate for more research to identify their significance and shed light on contradictory findings. This study identified that synbiotics may not contribute to additional changes in body composition when combined with an energy-restricted, low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet but they can offer additional health benefits by inducing favourable changes to the gut microbiota.
Abstract
Targeting gut microbiota with synbiotics (probiotic supplements containing prebiotic components) is emerging as a promising intervention in the comprehensive nutritional approach to reducing obesity. Weight loss resulting from low-carbohydrate high-protein diets can be significant but has also been linked to potentially negative health effects due to increased bacterial fermentation of undigested protein within the colon and subsequent changes in gut microbiota composition. Correcting obesity-induced disruption of gut microbiota with synbiotics can be more effective than supplementation with probiotics alone because prebiotic components of synbiotics support the growth and survival of positive bacteria therein. The purpose of this placebo-controlled intervention clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of a synbiotic supplement on the composition, richness and diversity of gut microbiota and associations of microbial species with body composition parameters and biomarkers of obesity in human subjects participating in a weight loss program. The probiotic component of the synbiotic used in the study contained Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium bifidum and the prebiotic component was a galactooligosaccharide mixture. The results showed no statistically significant differences in body composition (body mass, BMI, body fat mass, body fat percentage, body lean mass, and bone mineral content) between the placebo and synbiotic groups at the end of the clinical trial (3-month intervention, 20 human subjects participating in weight loss intervention based on a low-carbohydrate, high-protein, reduced energy diet). Synbiotic supplementation increased the abundance of gut bacteria associated with positive health effects, especially Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, and it also appeared to increase the gut microbiota richness. A decreasing trend in the gut microbiota diversity in the placebo and synbiotic groups was observed at the end of trial, which may imply the effect of the high-protein low-carbohydrate diet used in the weight loss program. Regression analysis performed to correlate abundance of species following supplementation with body composition parameters and biomarkers of obesity found an association between a decrease over time in blood glucose and an increase in Lactobacillus abundance, particularly in the synbiotic group. However, the decrease over time in body mass, BMI, waist circumstance, and body fat mass was associated with a decrease in Bifidobacterium abundance. The results obtained support the conclusion that synbiotic supplement used in this clinical trial modulates human gut microbiota by increasing abundance of potentially beneficial microbial species.
-
8.
Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health.
Singh, RK, Chang, HW, Yan, D, Lee, KM, Ucmak, D, Wong, K, Abrouk, M, Farahnik, B, Nakamura, M, Zhu, TH, et al
Journal of translational medicine. 2017;15(1):73
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gut microbiome plays an important role in modulating the risk of many chronic diseases through its impact on host immunity and metabolic health. Diet, in turn, can alter the composition of the microbiota. This paper reviewed current understanding of the effects of common dietary components and three select diets on gut microbiota composition and host health. Dietary components included plant and animal protein, saturated and unsaturated fats, digestible and non-digestible carbohydrates, probiotics and polyphenols. The diets included Western diet, gluten-free diet and Mediterranean diet. Based on the reviewed papers, the authors concluded that diet can modify the intestinal microbiome, which in turn has a profound impact on overall health. The impact can be beneficial or detrimental, depending on the abundance and identity of microbial populations and the nature of their interactions with the host. The authors also state that further research using large, long-term clinical trials to evaluate a greater variety of food components would be helpful in making specific dietary recommendations to patients.
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that the intestinal microbiome plays an important role in modulating risk of several chronic diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. At the same time, it is now understood that diet plays a significant role in shaping the microbiome, with experiments showing that dietary alterations can induce large, temporary microbial shifts within 24 h. Given this association, there may be significant therapeutic utility in altering microbial composition through diet. This review systematically evaluates current data regarding the effects of several common dietary components on intestinal microbiota. We show that consumption of particular types of food produces predictable shifts in existing host bacterial genera. Furthermore, the identity of these bacteria affects host immune and metabolic parameters, with broad implications for human health. Familiarity with these associations will be of tremendous use to the practitioner as well as the patient.
-
9.
Reduction of dietary fat absorption by the novel gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor cetilistat in healthy volunteers.
Bryson, A, de la Motte, S, Dunk, C
British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2009;67(3):309-15
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is epidemic and many obese patients seek drug treatment. Orlistat (a lipase inhibitor) is effective, but associated with gastrointestinal side effects. This study aimed to demonstrate that Cetilistat inhibits gastrointestinal lipase and is well tolerated in comparison to Orlistat. Results from three Phase I clinical studies (all double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in healthy male volunteers (age 18-45y, BMI ≤30 kg m−2, minimum weight of 60 kg) (total n=99) resident in a clinical unit) are reported. Subjects receives placebo (n=24), one of a range of Cetilistat doses (n=66) or 120mg Orlistat x3/daily (n=9) for 5 days, whilst maintained on a strict diet. 30% of calories were derived from fat. Each dose of Cetilistat in the 3 studies increased mean faecal fat excretion relative to both baseline and placebo. Increased faecal fat excretion was significant compared with placebo at 150 mg t.i.d. (study 1). Faecal fat excretion was significantly higher in both the Cetilistat 120 and 240 mg t.i.d. groups (study 3). Overall, fecal fat excretion for Orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. was similar to Cetilistat. Gastroinetstinal side effects were most common (51%) for Cetilistat. Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the Orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any Cetilistat dose group. Most side-effects (98%) were mild or moderate. 3 subjects taking Cetilistat were withdrawn from the study after developing maculopapular rash, but no reaction was observed (pin-prick). The chemical structure of Orlistat and Cetistat are different which may affect how they interact with fat micelles in the intestines. The author speculates that Cetilistat may act more like a detergent, whereas Orlistat may promote the coalescence of micelles, leading to oils and increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Cetilistat is an effective inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, increasing faecal fat excretion in at all doses studied. Cetilistat is well tolerated across a range of doses, and comparison with Orlistat suggests improved tolerability.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of a range of doses of cetilistat, a novel inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, in healthy volunteers. METHODS Three Phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted. Enrolled subjects in the three studies (n = 99) received a controlled calorie diet (total intake 2160 calories daily, 30% from fat). Twenty-four subjects were randomized to placebo and 66 were randomized to the following cetilistat doses: 50 mg three times daily [t.i.d. (n = 7)], 60 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 100 mg t.i.d. (n = 7), 120 mg t.i.d. (n = 9), 150 mg t.i.d. (n = 16), 240 mg t.i.d. (n = 9) and 300 mg t.i.d. (n = 9). Nine subjects received the approved orlistat dose (120 mg t.i.d.). Treatment was for 5 days, with a 2-day run-in period and 1-day post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome measure was daily faecal fat excretion. Secondary outcomes included plasma lipid levels, tolerability [gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs)] and safety. RESULTS Cetilistat increased faecal fat excretion relative to baseline at all doses. Cetilistat was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal AEs the most common (51%). Steatorrhoea (oily stool) was more frequent in the orlistat group (4.11 events per subject) than in any cetilistat dose group (0.14-1.81 events per subject). Most AEs (98%) were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS Cetilistat increased dietary fat excretion in healthy volunteers receiving a controlled calorie diet. Cetilistat was well tolerated at all doses examined and tolerability appeared to be improved relative to orlistat. Faecal fat excretion in the cetilistat groups was at least comparable to the orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. group.