1.
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Reduces Perceived Psychological Stress in Healthy Adults: An Exploratory Clinical Trial.
Boehme, M, Rémond-Derbez, N, Lerond, C, Lavalle, L, Keddani, S, Steinmann, M, Rytz, A, Dalile, B, Verbeke, K, Van Oudenhove, L, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(14)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psychosocial stress is a common issue and one way in which nutrition may modulate the stress response is via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This 6-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress evaluated the effects of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 on psychological and physiological markers of stress and the response to an acute stress test. Outcome measures included cortisol awakening response, heart rate, heart rate variability and various questionnaires assessing stress, anxiety, depression, sleep and gastrointestinal symptoms. Compared to placebo, probiotic intake led to a significant decrease in perceived stress and an improvement in subjective sleep after 6 weeks. There was no difference in cortisol awakening response. The subjects in both groups did not experience significant gastrointestinal symptoms and scored low on anxiety and depression at baseline. In response to the acute stress test, cortisol levels were higher in the probiotic than the placebo group, whilst no clear differences were seen in heart rate and heart rate variability. Subjects in the probiotic group had a lower pain experience during the stress test whilst subjects in the placebo group had an increase in positive mood following the test. The authors conclude that these results support their hypothesis that BL NCC3001 may alleviate stress and improve sleep in adults with moderate stress levels.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- There is mounting evidence to suggest that nutritional interventions can influence our stress responses. One of the routes by which nutrition can influence physiological and psychological stress responses involves the microbiota– gut–brain-axis.
- This exploratory trial suggests that supplementation with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 leads to a beneficial effect on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind exploratory clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters and acute stress in healthy adults who typically experience mild-to-moderate-levels of stress.
Method
47 Participants between the ages of 25-65 years old with mild-to-moderate psychological stress received 1x1010 CFU of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 daily or a placebo for 6 weeks.
Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HAD-A and HADS-D), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and the Visual Analog Scales (VAS, which measures pain intensity) during the clinical study. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) questionnaire was also used to depict the progression of the participants through the study.
Faecal samples were taken at baseline and 6 weeks and awakening saliva samples were taken at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. At the endpoint, 45/49 (91%) of the subjects completed the study. One participant reported an adverse event and the other withdrew without an explanation. Two participants were excluded from the full analysis.
Results
The primary outcomes were:
- After 6-week of the probiotic intervention, there was a significant decrease in perceived stress in the probiotic group (21.4%) compared to the placebo group (-10.2%), p = 0.017.
- There was a significant improvement in subjective sleep in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.037).
- There was a significant decrease in the positive PANAS change score from the pre-stressor stage in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.01).
- There were lower pain values (VAS) scores from pre-stressor to post-stressor in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.05).
- There was no significant difference between groups in anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS_D) scores.
Conclusion
Oral supplementation with BL NCC3001 may have beneficial effects on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Clinical practice applications:
- While the mechanism underlying the correlation between the microbiota and the gut-brain-axis is not fully understood, it is thought to play a critical role in the links between the microbiota, mood, stress, and brain health.
- This exploratory trial additionally supports the potential of specific probiotics being used to reduce perceived stress and improve subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, powered clinical trials are needed to provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying the stress-relieving and sleep-improving effect of Bifidobacterium longum.
- Furthermore, the dosage and duration of the probiotics need further investigation in a larger healthy population.
- Comparative research is needed to help investigate the effect of different probiotic strains on stress relief and sleep quality.
Abstract
Emerging science shows that probiotic intake may impact stress and mental health. We investigated the effect of a 6-week intervention with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 (1 × 1010 CFU/daily) on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters in 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress using a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind design. The main results showed that supplementation with the probiotic significantly reduced the perceived stress and improved the subjective sleep quality score compared to placebo. Comparing the two groups, momentary subjective assessments concomitant to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test revealed a lower amount of pain experience in the probiotic group and a higher amount of relief at the end of the procedure in the placebo group, reflected by higher scores in the positive affect state. The awakening of the salivary cortisol response was not affected by the intervention, yet the reduction observed in the salivary cortisol stress response post-intervention was higher in the placebo group than the probiotic group. Multivariate analysis further indicated that a reduction in perceived stress correlated with a reduction in anxiety, in depression, and in the cortisol awakening response after the 6-week intervention. This exploratory trial provides promising insights into BL NCC3001 to reduce perceived stress in a healthy population and supports the potential of nutritional solutions including probiotics to improve mental health.
2.
Psychobiotic Effects on Anxiety Are Modulated by Lifestyle Behaviors: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial on Healthy Adults.
Morales-Torres, R, Carrasco-Gubernatis, C, Grasso-Cladera, A, Cosmelli, D, Parada, FJ, Palacios-García, I
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The microbiota-gut-brain axis refers to the complex communication system between the human gastrointestinal tract, the micro-organisms which inhabit it, and the peripheral and central nervous systems. In recent years, human trials have linked the microbiome with specific processes that are expected to contribute to well-being. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a psychobiotic formulation specifically on well-being, exploring the extent to which these effects might be modulated by lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, social connectedness, and others. This study was a four week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomised into one of two groups; placebo or probiotic group. Results showed that there were no significant effects of probiotics on a set of psychological measures of well-being. However, further analysis revealed that healthy lifestyle behaviours were significantly correlated with wellbeing across scales. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate the need of controlling lifestyle variables as a standard practice in human microbiome research and mental health research in general.
Abstract
Psychobiotics are modulators of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (MGBA) with promising benefits to mental health. Lifestyle behaviors are established modulators of both mental health and the MGBA. This randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04823533) on healthy adults (N = 135) tested 4 weeks of probiotic supplementation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175). We assessed effects on wellbeing, quality of life, emotional regulation, anxiety, mindfulness and interoceptive awareness. We then analyzed if lifestyle behaviors modulated probiotic effectiveness. Results showed no significant effects of probiotic intake in whole sample outcomes. Correlational analyses revealed Healthy Behaviors were significantly correlated with wellbeing across scales. Moreover, the linear mixed-effects model showed that the interaction between high scores in Healthy Behaviors and probiotic intake was the single significant predictor of positive effects on anxiety, emotional regulation, and mindfulness in post-treatment outcomes. These findings highlight the relevance of controlling for lifestyle behaviors in psychobiotic and mental health research.
3.
Mental awareness improved mild cognitive impairment and modulated gut microbiome.
Khine, WWT, Voong, ML, Ng, TKS, Feng, L, Rane, GA, Kumar, AP, Kua, EH, Mahendran, R, Mahendran, R, Lee, YK
Aging. 2020;12(23):24371-24393
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome and brain communicate through various pathways via the gut-brain axis. While this relationship is becoming more established, no current studies have demonstrated whether cognitive decline or cognitive stimulation directly impact the makeup of the gut microbiome. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of cognitive stimulation through a mindfulness practice in modulating the gut microbiome in patients experiencing mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this study, 123 elderly individuals were given cognitive function tests and classified as either Normal Aging or MCI, and their gut microbiota profiles were assessed to establish baseline data between the two groups. Half of the MCI patients were randomly assigned to participate in a weekly mindfulness program for three months, and then monthly for six months, and stool and blood samples were collected at baseline, three months, and nine months. This study found an alteration in cognitive capacity led to the changes in specific microbiota in elderly adults diagnosed with MCI. Based on these results, the authors highlight the brain to gut microbiota communication pathway and propose the gut microbiome be considered as a risk factor of MCI.
Abstract
There is ample scientific and clinical evidence of the effects of gut microbiota on the brain but no definitive evidence that the brain can affect changes in gut microbiota under the bi-directional gut-brain axis concept. As there is no pharmacotherapeutic intervention for the early stages of cognitive decline, research has focused on cognitive stimulation in reversing or slowing the impairment. Elderly patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment underwent a randomized-control trial of mindful awareness practice. Neuropsychological assessments, inflammatory markers, and gut microbiota profiles were tested. Here, we report that their cognitive impairment was improved and associated with changes in gut bacterial profile. A cognition-score-dependent-abundance was observed in Ruminococcus vs Recognition Trials (RT), Digit Span Backward (DSB), Semantic Fluency Span (SFS) and Memory Domain (MD); Coprococcus vs DSB, Color Trails Test 2 (CTT2) and Block Design (BD); Parabacteroides vs DSB and SFS; Fusobacterium vs DSB and CTT2; Enterobacteriaceae vs BD and SFS; Ruminococcaceae vs DSB; Phascolarctobacterium vs MD. The study showed for the first-time, alteration in the cognitive capacity leading to the corresponding changes in microbiota profiles. This strongly suggests that signals from the different segments of brain could dictate directly or indirectly the abundances of specific gut microbes.